search
Back to results

Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program

Primary Purpose

Compassion Fatigue

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program (CFRP)
Sponsored by
Koc University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Compassion Fatigue focused on measuring Oncology-hematology nurses, compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction, perceived stress, resilience

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Nurses working in inpatient oncology-hematology, outpatient chemotherapy, or BMT unit Exclusion criteria
  • Providing care for pediatric oncology patients
  • Being a nurse manager
  • Not providing direct patient care

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Short-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program

    Long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program

    Control

    Arm Description

    Experimental I received a short-term program (five hours per day for two days, ten hours in total).

    Experimental II received a long-term program (five weeks, two hours per week, ten hours in total).

    No intervention was applied to the control group.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL), "change" is being assessed.
    Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL): It is a self-reporting instrument consisting of thirty items and three subscales: Compassion Fatigue (CF), Sompassion Satisfaction (CS), and burnout. The scale has no total score. Each subscale is evaluated separately. Scores above 17 indicate high CF levels while scores below 8 indicate low, Scores below 18 indicate low burnout levels while scores above 27 indicate high Scores above 42 indicate high CS levels while those below 33 indicate low
    Perceived Stress Scale, "change" is being assessed.
    Perceived Stress Scale: The lowest possible score is 0 and the highest is 40. A high total score is considered a high level of perceived stress.
    Resilience Scale for Adults, "change" is being assessed.
    Resilience Scale for Adults: a lowest possible score of 33 and a highest of 165. A high total score is considered a high level of resilience.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 23, 2020
    Last Updated
    April 29, 2020
    Sponsor
    Koc University Hospital
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04372303
    Brief Title
    Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
    Official Title
    Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program on Nurses' Professional Quality of Life, Perceived Stress, Resilience: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 8, 2017 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 8, 2019 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    January 8, 2019 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Koc University Hospital

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study aimed to conduct a short- and long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program and compare its impact on nurses' professional quality of life, perceived stress and resilience. The research was conducted between January 2017 and January 2019 as a randomized controlled trial. The sample comprised 125 oncology-hematology nurses randomly assigned to a Experimental I (short-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program), Experimental II (long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program) or control group. Data was collected using Personal Information Form, Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQOL-IV), Perceived Stress Scale, and Resilience Scale for Adults. Measurements were obtained during pre- and post-test and at three-, six- and twelve-month follow-ups. Research hypotheses were analyzed using multilevel models.
    Detailed Description
    The research was conducted with nurses from the oncology-hematology inpatient services, outpatient chemotherapy units and bone marrow transplant (BMT) units of three private hospitals in Istanbul between January 2017 and January 2019. No sample selection models were applied, and out of 153 nurses working in these services, 125 nurses meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Nurses were randomly assigned to the Experimental I, Experimental II, or control group in order to prevent interaction between the subjects working in the same hospital. Of the nurses, 34 completed the short-term program (Experimental I), 49 completed the long-term (Experimental II), and 42 were assigned to the control group. Data collection: Data was collected using Personal Information Form, Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQOL-IV), Perceived Stress Scale, and Resilience Scale for Adults Study procedure This study's principal investigator had participated online in a CFRP, developed by Eric Gentry (Licensed Mental Health Counselor) (2002), and received the certificate, and then conducted the program with the nurses. Meetings were held with each institution's directorate of nursing services to determine the training schedules and content. The schedules were planned in accordance with the hospital administration's preferences and by taking nurses' busy schedules into consideration. Preliminary tests were applied to Experimental I, Experiment II, and the control group before the training. Experimental I received a short-term program (five hours per day for two days, ten hours in total) while Experimental II received a long-term one (five weeks, two hours per week, ten hours in total). No intervention was applied to the control group. After the training, a post-test, and three-, six-, and twelve-month follow-up assessments were conducted for all groups. Program Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program The purpose of the program: The purpose of the program is to provide oncology-hematology nurses with knowledge and skills that will increase their level of resilience by helping them recognize compassion fatigue, cope with its consequences and work effectively. The objectives of the training program Nurses, who successfully complete the program will be able to: Explain the historical development of compassion fatigue among caregivers, Define the developmental process of compassion fatigue, Specify the risk factors for compassion fatigue, Explain the symptoms of compassion fatigue, Raise awareness about their personal history, Explain the concept of stress and its impact on the body, Apply compassion fatigue resilience skills acquired in the program, Professionally create a self-directed resilience plan. Validity and reliability/Rigour The included scales have been tested for validity and reliability for various settings and countries. The investigators chose three private hospitals in Istanbul, which are considered to be close to each other, such as institution (etc. working conditions) and the sociodemographic and professional characteristics of nurses (etc. age, educational status, clinical experience, willingness to work in oncology, voluntarily career choice) that are known to affect dependent variables. Then, the investigators randomly assigned each hospital to the Experimental I, Experimental II, or control group in order to prevent interaction between the nurses working in the same hospital. Finally, the program was conducted by the principal investigator who had participated online in a CFRP, and received the certificate. Data analysis: SPSS 25.0 software package was used to analyze data. A chi-square test and one-way ANOVA determined whether the scales and information on demographic characteristics and work environment differed among pre-initiative groups; in other words, to measure homogeneity. Variables found to be statistically significant were included in the model as a correction factor for primary hypotheses. Primary research hypotheses were analyzed using multilevel models (MLM). This analysis method has some advantages over others, such as repeated measures ANOVA.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Compassion Fatigue
    Keywords
    Oncology-hematology nurses, compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction, perceived stress, resilience

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    125 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Short-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Experimental I received a short-term program (five hours per day for two days, ten hours in total).
    Arm Title
    Long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Experimental II received a long-term program (five weeks, two hours per week, ten hours in total).
    Arm Title
    Control
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    No intervention was applied to the control group.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program (CFRP)
    Intervention Description
    The purpose of Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program (CFRP) is to provide oncology-hematology nurses with knowledge and skills that will increase their level of resilience by helping them recognize compassion fatigue, cope with its consequences and work effectively.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL), "change" is being assessed.
    Description
    Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL): It is a self-reporting instrument consisting of thirty items and three subscales: Compassion Fatigue (CF), Sompassion Satisfaction (CS), and burnout. The scale has no total score. Each subscale is evaluated separately. Scores above 17 indicate high CF levels while scores below 8 indicate low, Scores below 18 indicate low burnout levels while scores above 27 indicate high Scores above 42 indicate high CS levels while those below 33 indicate low
    Time Frame
    Change from Baseline up to 1 year
    Title
    Perceived Stress Scale, "change" is being assessed.
    Description
    Perceived Stress Scale: The lowest possible score is 0 and the highest is 40. A high total score is considered a high level of perceived stress.
    Time Frame
    Change from Baseline up to 1 year
    Title
    Resilience Scale for Adults, "change" is being assessed.
    Description
    Resilience Scale for Adults: a lowest possible score of 33 and a highest of 165. A high total score is considered a high level of resilience.
    Time Frame
    Change from Baseline up to 1 year

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion criteria Nurses working in inpatient oncology-hematology, outpatient chemotherapy, or BMT unit Exclusion criteria Providing care for pediatric oncology patients Being a nurse manager Not providing direct patient care

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    No, because hospitals told us, the investigators have to keep secret their nurses individual data.
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    23803277
    Citation
    Traeger L, Park ER, Sporn N, Repper-DeLisi J, Convery MS, Jacobo M, Pirl WF. Development and evaluation of targeted psychological skills training for oncology nurses in managing stressful patient and family encounters. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Jul;40(4):E327-36. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.E327-E336.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23294820
    Citation
    Tarantino B, Earley M, Audia D, D'Adamo C, Berman B. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a pilot integrative coping and resiliency program for healthcare professionals. Explore (NY). 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2012.10.002.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25694849
    Citation
    Deible S, Fioravanti M, Tarantino B, Cohen S. Implementation of an integrative coping and resiliency program for nurses. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):28-33. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.057.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26330434
    Citation
    Rushton CH, Batcheller J, Schroeder K, Donohue P. Burnout and Resilience Among Nurses Practicing in High-Intensity Settings. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Sep;24(5):412-20. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015291.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    6668417
    Citation
    Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16097398
    Citation
    Friborg O, Barlaug D, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge JH, Hjemdal O. Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/mpr.15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33009840
    Citation
    Pehlivan T, Guner P. Effect of a compassion fatigue resiliency program on nurses' professional quality of life, perceived stress, resilience: A randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3584-3596. doi: 10.1111/jan.14568. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
    Results Reference
    derived
    PubMed Identifier
    32627860
    Citation
    Kunzler AM, Helmreich I, Chmitorz A, Konig J, Binder H, Wessa M, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 5;7(7):CD012527. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs