Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Right-hemisphere on Picture Naming in Chronic Aphasia
Primary Purpose
Aphasia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
tDCS stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Aphasia focused on measuring tDCS, Aphasia, naming
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- People with chronic aphasia following the stroke
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of seizure or epilepsy,
- previous adverse reactions to TMS/tDCS,
- having a pace-maker or a metal implanted in the brain
- being pregnant
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
anodal tDCS
sham tDCS
Arm Description
20 minutes of one mA anodal High-Definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) over right IFG combined with 40 minutes of naming therapy for five consecutive days in week 1
20-minutes sham HD-tDCS with 40-minutes therapy of naming therapy for five consecutive days in week 1
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Picture naming task
One hundred and sixty pictures of concrete nouns from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) picture set (colored version) were utilised to measure the percentage of object naming accuracy. In particular, these pictures were divided into Set A (training targets) and Set B (untrained generalization targets), with eighty stimuli in each set.
Secondary Outcome Measures
language task
* Overall language skills are measured through the overall aphasia scores provided by the Cantonese version of Western Aphasia Battery (short-form).
The scale is called Aphasia quotient: Minimum value = 0, maximum value = 100, with higher scores mean a better performance.
Cognitive task
The cognitive skills are measured through the subtest scores provided by Oxford Cognitive Screening-Cantonese. The test uses different sub-tests including the Picture naming, Semantics, Orientation, Visual field task, Sentence reading , Calculation, Attention, Praxis, Memory, and Executive tasks. The range of values varies across the subtests. For all subtests except the executive task, the higher scores reflect better performance. For executive tasks the lower scores reflect better performance.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05471570
First Posted
July 18, 2022
Last Updated
November 1, 2022
Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05471570
Brief Title
Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Right-hemisphere on Picture Naming in Chronic Aphasia
Official Title
The Effect of tDCS Stimulation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus on Language Recovery in Speakers With Aphasia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 20, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
There are two opposing hypotheses, namely the interference and laterality-shift hypotheses, regarding the role of the right hemisphere (RH) in language recovery following a left hemisphere damage. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has received increasing attention as a potential complement to behavioural therapy.
This preliminary study aimed to examine the effect of excitatory (anodal) stimulation of right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on naming abilities of chronic people with aphasia (PWA) to examine the compensatory versus interference role of RH in language recovery, and to confirm the application of tDCS does not induce adverse effects on other cognitive and language functions.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aphasia
Keywords
tDCS, Aphasia, naming
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
4 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
anodal tDCS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
20 minutes of one mA anodal High-Definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) over right IFG combined with 40 minutes of naming therapy for five consecutive days in week 1
Arm Title
sham tDCS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
20-minutes sham HD-tDCS with 40-minutes therapy of naming therapy for five consecutive days in week 1
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
tDCS stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
language therapy
Intervention Description
The study examines the effect of excitatory stimulation of right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on naming abilities of people with aphasia (PWA) as compared to sham stimulation to examine the compensatory versus interference role of right hemisphere in language recovery after stroke.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Picture naming task
Description
One hundred and sixty pictures of concrete nouns from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) picture set (colored version) were utilised to measure the percentage of object naming accuracy. In particular, these pictures were divided into Set A (training targets) and Set B (untrained generalization targets), with eighty stimuli in each set.
Time Frame
Immediately after the end of each treatment session and block
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
language task
Description
* Overall language skills are measured through the overall aphasia scores provided by the Cantonese version of Western Aphasia Battery (short-form).
The scale is called Aphasia quotient: Minimum value = 0, maximum value = 100, with higher scores mean a better performance.
Time Frame
Immediately after the end of each treatment block
Title
Cognitive task
Description
The cognitive skills are measured through the subtest scores provided by Oxford Cognitive Screening-Cantonese. The test uses different sub-tests including the Picture naming, Semantics, Orientation, Visual field task, Sentence reading , Calculation, Attention, Praxis, Memory, and Executive tasks. The range of values varies across the subtests. For all subtests except the executive task, the higher scores reflect better performance. For executive tasks the lower scores reflect better performance.
Time Frame
Immediately after the end of each treatment block
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
People with chronic aphasia following the stroke
Exclusion Criteria:
history of seizure or epilepsy,
previous adverse reactions to TMS/tDCS,
having a pace-maker or a metal implanted in the brain
being pregnant
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Right-hemisphere on Picture Naming in Chronic Aphasia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs