Effect of Buffered Numbing Solution on Patients With Toothaches
Primary Purpose
Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
buffered lidocaine
nonbuffered lidocaine
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (toothache) in a mandibular posterior tooth (back/bottom tooth) with moderate to severe pain
- ages 18 -65 years of age
- in good health (ASA I or II)
- able to grant informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- allergy to lidocaine (numbing solution
- significant medical problem (ASA III or IV)
- have taken CNS depressants or analgesic medications within the last 24 hours
- pregnancy or lactating
- non-English speaking
- inability to give informed consent
Sites / Locations
- The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Postle Hall
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
buffered lidocaine
nonbuffered lidocaine
Arm Description
4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine/0.18 mEq/mL sodium bicarbonate.
4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)
Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.
100 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior tooth randomly received a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) block using either 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate in a double-blind manner. For the buffered solution, each cartridge was buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate to produce a final concentration of 0.18 mEq/mL of sodium bicarbonate. Fifteen minutes after administration of the IAN block, profound lip numbness was confirmed and endodontic access was initiated. Success was determined as no or mild pain on access or instrumentation of the root canal. Higher numbers on the VAS are indicative of more pain and less success and the VAS scale ranged from 0 to 170 mm.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01868776
Brief Title
Effect of Buffered Numbing Solution on Patients With Toothaches
Official Title
Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ohio State University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of buffered lidocaine (a numbing solution) on the ability to numb patients with toothaches. Buffered anesthetic (numbing) solutions have shown promise in some medical and dental research. Patients presenting with toothaches will be given either a buffered numbing solution or a nonbuffered numbing solution. Neither the patient nor the operator will know which solution they will receive. Root canal treatment will be performed on the tooth and the ability of the buffered versus non-buffered numbing solutions will be compared.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
buffered lidocaine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine/0.18 mEq/mL sodium bicarbonate.
Arm Title
nonbuffered lidocaine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
buffered lidocaine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
nonbuffered lidocaine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of Patients With Successful Anesthesia (% of Patients Able to Have Treatment Without Additional Anesthesia)
Time Frame
pain at time of treatment (after buffered versus nonbuffered numbing solution) average of 15 minutes after injection
Title
Effect of Buffered Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.
Description
100 patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior tooth randomly received a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN) block using either 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2.8 ml of 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with sodium bicarbonate in a double-blind manner. For the buffered solution, each cartridge was buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate to produce a final concentration of 0.18 mEq/mL of sodium bicarbonate. Fifteen minutes after administration of the IAN block, profound lip numbness was confirmed and endodontic access was initiated. Success was determined as no or mild pain on access or instrumentation of the root canal. Higher numbers on the VAS are indicative of more pain and less success and the VAS scale ranged from 0 to 170 mm.
Time Frame
approximately 15 minutes after injection
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
patients with a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (toothache) in a mandibular posterior tooth (back/bottom tooth) with moderate to severe pain
ages 18 -65 years of age
in good health (ASA I or II)
able to grant informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
allergy to lidocaine (numbing solution
significant medical problem (ASA III or IV)
have taken CNS depressants or analgesic medications within the last 24 hours
pregnancy or lactating
non-English speaking
inability to give informed consent
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Postle Hall
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
3717616
Citation
DiFazio CA, Carron H, Grosslight KR, Moscicki JC, Bolding WR, Johns RA. Comparison of pH-adjusted lidocaine solutions for epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1986 Jul;65(7):760-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2008283
Citation
Zahl K, Jordan A, McGroarty J, Sorensen B, Gotta AW. Peribulbar anesthesia. Effect of bicarbonate on mixtures of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and hyaluronidase with or without epinephrine. Ophthalmology. 1991 Feb;98(2):239-42. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32311-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11020760
Citation
Sinnott CJ, Garfield JM, Thalhammer JG, Strichartz GR. Addition of sodium bicarbonate to lidocaine decreases the duration of peripheral nerve block in the rat. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1045-52. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00028.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7629414
Citation
Richtsmeier AJ, Hatcher JW. Buffered lidocaine for skin infiltration prior to hemodialysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995 Apr;10(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(94)00124-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16384767
Citation
Burns CA, Ferris G, Feng C, Cooper JZ, Brown MD. Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jan;54(1):128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.06.043.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1314142
Citation
Ackerman WE 3rd, Ware TR, Juneja M. The air-liquid interface and the pH and PCO2 of alkalinized local anaesthetic solutions. Can J Anaesth. 1992 Apr;39(4):387-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03009051.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Effect of Buffered Numbing Solution on Patients With Toothaches
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs