Effect of Erenumab-aooe on Disability and Work Productivity in Employed Subjects With Episodic Migraine
Primary Purpose
Migraine
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
Erenumab
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Migraine focused on measuring Episodic migraine, Disability, Migraine-related disability, Work productivity, Erenumab, AIMOVIG
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Greater than or equal to 18 years of age upon entry into screening.
- Documented history of migraine with or without aura according to the IHS ICHD-III for greater than or equal to 12 months
- Has EM defined as history of greater than or equal to 4 and less than 15 migraine days and less than 15 headache days per month on average during the 3 months prior to initial screening
- Employed greater than or equal to 20 hours/week upon entry into initial screening, stable for at least 3 months in the same job and has not specified willful termination of employment throughout the duration of the study. Employment is defined by work outside the home, self-employed, or works from home
- Has greater than or equal to 4 hours of lost productive time due to headache/migraine and/or related symptoms in the past month prior to initial screening as determined by subject
- Has total disability score of greater than 10 as assessed by MIDAS (3-month recall) at initial screening
- History of treatment failure with at least 1 preventive treatment category for migraine
Exclusion Criteria:
- Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset
- History of cluster headache, hemiplegic migraine, or other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia.
- Taken an opioid and/or opioid-containing analgesic greater than or equal to 4 days during the 1 month prior to screening for any indication
- Taken a butalbital and/or butalbital-containing analgesic greater than or equal to 4 days during the 1 month prior to screening for any indication
- Change in the regimen of current migraine preventive treatment or a concomitant medication that may have migraine prevention effects during baseline
- Taken an opioid and/or opioid-containing analgesic ≥ 4 days during baseline for any indication.
- Taken a butalbital and/or butalbital-containing analgesic ≥ 4 days during baseline for any indication.
- Previously treated with any agent (monoclonal antibody or small molecule) targeting the CGRP pathway (ligand or receptor) in preventive settings
Other inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.
Sites / Locations
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Placebo
Erenumab
Arm Description
After subjects complete baseline and are found eligible, they will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either erenumab or placebo.
After subjects complete baseline and are found eligible, they will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either erenumab or placebo.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Sum of Monthly Changes From Baseline in Modified MIDAS Total Score Over the 6-month DBTP
The modified MIDAS Questionnaire is a 5-item questionnaire that measures headache-related disability as lost time from paid work or school, housework, and non-work (family, social, and leisure) activities. Participants provided the number of productive days lost or productivity reduced by half or more over the past month due to headache (item score range from 0 to 31). Productive days lost counted in items 1 and 3 were not included for items 2 and 4, respectively. The 5 item scores were summed to calculate the MIDAS total score (range from 0 to 93). The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline total score from the total score calculated each month. The change from baseline values for Months 1 to 6 were then summed to calculate the sum of monthly changes from baseline (range from -558 to 558). A negative sum of changes from baseline indicated a better outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Mean MMD Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache) or received migraine-specific medication during aura. A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine (≥30 minutes) with or without aura.
The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the average number of migraine days per month during the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase subtract the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Percent Work Impairment Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
Percent work impairment was calculated based on questions 2, 4 and 5 of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Migraine-Questionnaire and could range from 0% to 100%. The questionnaire was collected weekly. The monthly percent work impairment was equal to the arithmetic mean of the observed weekly percent work impairment over the monthly interval. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Change from baseline in mean monthly percent work impairment was calculated as the average of monthly percent work impairment over the last 3 months (month 4, 5, and 6) of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase minus the baseline score. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Mean MFIQ Physical Functioning Domain Score Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
The MFIQ is a self-administered 26-item instrument measuring the impact of migraine on broader functioning. Participants responded to 5 items on the impact on physical functioning domain using a 5-point scale assigned scores from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the greatest burden. The scores were calculated as the sum of the item responses rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing greater impact of migraine, i.e., higher burden.
The MFIQ physical functioning domain score was calculated per month for months 4, 5, and 6 and the mean over this period was calculated. The MFIQ physical functioning domain score during the 4-week baseline period was then subtracted to calculate the change from baseline in mean MFIQ physical functioning domain score over months 4, 5,and 6 of the 6-month DBTP. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Mean MFIQ Usual Activities Domain Score Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
The MFIQ is a self-administered 26-item instrument measuring the impact of migraine on broader functioning. Participants responded to 10 items on the impact on usual activities domain using a 5-point scale assigned scores from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the greatest burden. The scores were calculated as the sum of the item responses rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing greater impact of migraine, i.e., higher burden.
The MFIQ usual activities domain score was calculated per month for months 4, 5, and 6 and the mean over this period was calculated. The MFIQ usual activities domain score during the 4-week baseline period was then subtracted to calculate the change from baseline in mean MFIQ usual activities domain score over months 4, 5,and 6 of the 6-month DBTP. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Mean MFIQ Social Functioning Domain Score Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
The MFIQ is a self-administered 26-item instrument measuring the impact of migraine on broader functioning. Participants responded to 5 items on the impact on social functioning domain using a 5-point scale assigned scores from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the greatest burden. The scores were calculated as the sum of the item responses rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing greater impact of migraine, i.e., higher burden.
The MFIQ social functioning domain score was calculated per month for months 4, 5, and 6 and the mean over this period was calculated. The MFIQ social functioning domain score during the 4-week baseline period was then subtracted to calculate the change from baseline in mean MFIQ social functioning domain score over months 4, 5,and 6 of the 6-month DBTP. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03912337
First Posted
April 10, 2019
Last Updated
July 18, 2022
Sponsor
Amgen
Collaborators
Novartis
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03912337
Brief Title
Effect of Erenumab-aooe on Disability and Work Productivity in Employed Subjects With Episodic Migraine
Official Title
Effect of Erenumab-aooe on Disability and Work Productivity in Employed Subjects With Episodic Migraine Who Have Previously Failed 1 or More Migraine Preventive Treatments.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Terminated [Study would not complete enrollment target until 2026 with results available in 2027. The information will not be useful at that time.]
Study Start Date
December 4, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 28, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 28, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Amgen
Collaborators
Novartis
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to placebo on disability in employed subjects with episodic migraine (EM) who have previously failed 1 or more migraine preventive treatments.
Detailed Description
Migraine prevention continues to be an area of large, unmet medical need, with existing therapies often having modest efficacy and poor tolerability. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has an important role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Erenumab-aooe is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the CGRP receptor, and interrupts its downstream effects. Erenumab has been approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. The present study is a Phase IV trial that will assess the effect of erenumab on disability and work productivity in employed subjects with episodic migraine (EM) who have previously failed 1 or more migraine preventive treatments.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Migraine
Keywords
Episodic migraine, Disability, Migraine-related disability, Work productivity, Erenumab, AIMOVIG
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
29 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
After subjects complete baseline and are found eligible, they will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either erenumab or placebo.
Arm Title
Erenumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
After subjects complete baseline and are found eligible, they will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either erenumab or placebo.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo once every 4 weeks. SC injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Erenumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aimovig
Intervention Description
Erenumab once every 4 weeks. SC injection.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sum of Monthly Changes From Baseline in Modified MIDAS Total Score Over the 6-month DBTP
Description
The modified MIDAS Questionnaire is a 5-item questionnaire that measures headache-related disability as lost time from paid work or school, housework, and non-work (family, social, and leisure) activities. Participants provided the number of productive days lost or productivity reduced by half or more over the past month due to headache (item score range from 0 to 31). Productive days lost counted in items 1 and 3 were not included for items 2 and 4, respectively. The 5 item scores were summed to calculate the MIDAS total score (range from 0 to 93). The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline total score from the total score calculated each month. The change from baseline values for Months 1 to 6 were then summed to calculate the sum of monthly changes from baseline (range from -558 to 558). A negative sum of changes from baseline indicated a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1 to 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean MMD Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
Description
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache) or received migraine-specific medication during aura. A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine (≥30 minutes) with or without aura.
The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the average number of migraine days per month during the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase subtract the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the 6-month DBTP
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Monthly Percent Work Impairment Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
Description
Percent work impairment was calculated based on questions 2, 4 and 5 of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Migraine-Questionnaire and could range from 0% to 100%. The questionnaire was collected weekly. The monthly percent work impairment was equal to the arithmetic mean of the observed weekly percent work impairment over the monthly interval. Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Change from baseline in mean monthly percent work impairment was calculated as the average of monthly percent work impairment over the last 3 months (month 4, 5, and 6) of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase minus the baseline score. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the 6-month DBTP
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean MFIQ Physical Functioning Domain Score Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
Description
The MFIQ is a self-administered 26-item instrument measuring the impact of migraine on broader functioning. Participants responded to 5 items on the impact on physical functioning domain using a 5-point scale assigned scores from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the greatest burden. The scores were calculated as the sum of the item responses rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing greater impact of migraine, i.e., higher burden.
The MFIQ physical functioning domain score was calculated per month for months 4, 5, and 6 and the mean over this period was calculated. The MFIQ physical functioning domain score during the 4-week baseline period was then subtracted to calculate the change from baseline in mean MFIQ physical functioning domain score over months 4, 5,and 6 of the 6-month DBTP. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the 6-month DBTP
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean MFIQ Usual Activities Domain Score Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
Description
The MFIQ is a self-administered 26-item instrument measuring the impact of migraine on broader functioning. Participants responded to 10 items on the impact on usual activities domain using a 5-point scale assigned scores from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the greatest burden. The scores were calculated as the sum of the item responses rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing greater impact of migraine, i.e., higher burden.
The MFIQ usual activities domain score was calculated per month for months 4, 5, and 6 and the mean over this period was calculated. The MFIQ usual activities domain score during the 4-week baseline period was then subtracted to calculate the change from baseline in mean MFIQ usual activities domain score over months 4, 5,and 6 of the 6-month DBTP. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the 6-month DBTP
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean MFIQ Social Functioning Domain Score Over Months 4, 5, and 6 of the 6-month DBTP
Description
The MFIQ is a self-administered 26-item instrument measuring the impact of migraine on broader functioning. Participants responded to 5 items on the impact on social functioning domain using a 5-point scale assigned scores from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the greatest burden. The scores were calculated as the sum of the item responses rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing greater impact of migraine, i.e., higher burden.
The MFIQ social functioning domain score was calculated per month for months 4, 5, and 6 and the mean over this period was calculated. The MFIQ social functioning domain score during the 4-week baseline period was then subtracted to calculate the change from baseline in mean MFIQ social functioning domain score over months 4, 5,and 6 of the 6-month DBTP. A negative change from baseline indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the 6-month DBTP
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Greater than or equal to 18 years of age upon entry into screening.
Documented history of migraine with or without aura according to the IHS ICHD-III for greater than or equal to 12 months
Has EM defined as history of greater than or equal to 4 and less than 15 migraine days and less than 15 headache days per month on average during the 3 months prior to initial screening
Employed greater than or equal to 20 hours/week upon entry into initial screening, stable for at least 3 months in the same job and has not specified willful termination of employment throughout the duration of the study. Employment is defined by work outside the home, self-employed, or works from home
Has greater than or equal to 4 hours of lost productive time due to headache/migraine and/or related symptoms in the past month prior to initial screening as determined by subject
Has total disability score of greater than 10 as assessed by MIDAS (3-month recall) at initial screening
History of treatment failure with at least 1 preventive treatment category for migraine
Exclusion Criteria:
Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset
History of cluster headache, hemiplegic migraine, or other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia.
Taken an opioid and/or opioid-containing analgesic greater than or equal to 4 days during the 1 month prior to screening for any indication
Taken a butalbital and/or butalbital-containing analgesic greater than or equal to 4 days during the 1 month prior to screening for any indication
Change in the regimen of current migraine preventive treatment or a concomitant medication that may have migraine prevention effects during baseline
Taken an opioid and/or opioid-containing analgesic ≥ 4 days during baseline for any indication.
Taken a butalbital and/or butalbital-containing analgesic ≥ 4 days during baseline for any indication.
Previously treated with any agent (monoclonal antibody or small molecule) targeting the CGRP pathway (ligand or receptor) in preventive settings
Other inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
MD
Organizational Affiliation
Amgen
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35805
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90094
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pasadena
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Basalt
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
81621
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
East Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
New London
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06320
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Stamford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chalmette
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21742
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55402
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bolivar
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saint Peters
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Springfield
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65810
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toms River
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08755
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Centerville
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45459
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78731
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Frisco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84109
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.amgen.com/datasharing
Links:
URL
http://www.amgentrials.com
Description
AmgenTrials clinical trials website
Learn more about this trial
Effect of Erenumab-aooe on Disability and Work Productivity in Employed Subjects With Episodic Migraine
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs