search
Back to results

Effect of Granisetron on Morphine Induced Pruritus in Cesarean Section

Primary Purpose

Pruritus

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Morphine Sulfate
Placebo
Granisetron
Sponsored by
Assiut University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Pruritus focused on measuring Granisetron, Serum Serotonin, Morphine

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 40 Years (Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II physical status.
  • Age: 20-40 years.
  • At term gestation (≥ 37 weeks) with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy.
  • Elective cesarean delivery under intrathecal anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parturient refusal.
  • Significant organ dysfunctions (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, renal, or liver disorders).
  • Morbid obesity (BMI >35).
  • Parturients with known hypersensitivity to granisetron, morphine or amide local anesthetics.
  • Parturients with pruritogenic systemic disease.
  • A coexisting skin disorder or preexisting pregnancy induced pruritus.
  • Parturients with any contraindication for intrathecal anesthesia, e.g. coagulopathy.
  • Emergency cesarean section.
  • Psychiatric disorders.
  • Fetal abnormalities.
  • Failed or unsatisfactory intrathecal block.

Sites / Locations

  • Assiut University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Morphine sulphate & Placebo

Morphine sulphate & Granisetron

Arm Description

20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of normal saline 0.9% (placebo) IV injection preoperative.

20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection preoperative.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.
The effect of prophylactic intravenous (IV) administration of granisetron on incidence and severity of pruritus that occurs after intrathecal morphine in parturients undergoing cesarean section (CS).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Onset time of pruritus
Recording the time when itching began
The pruritus grading system (PGS)
The pruritus grading system (PGS) score (Firas et al, 2012) for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep. Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as: Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3 Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5 Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5 Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6 Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5. Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11. Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19.
Postoperative pain assessment
Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain. Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4.
Perioperative adverse events
Nausea, vomiting, intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR < 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively.
Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery
1) not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated.

Full Information

First Posted
March 22, 2018
Last Updated
September 1, 2021
Sponsor
Assiut University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03483870
Brief Title
Effect of Granisetron on Morphine Induced Pruritus in Cesarean Section
Official Title
Effect of Intravenous Granisetron on Incidence and Severity of Intrathecal Morphine Induced Pruritus in Elective Cesarean Section
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Assiut University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Neuraxial anesthesia, which includes epidural anesthesia and intrathecal anesthesia, is a frequent anesthetic approach for caesarean delivery and other lower abdominal and lower limb anesthetic procedures. The addition of neuraxial morphine to local anesthetics provides an effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia. Neuraxial administration of morphine which is considered as a gold standard for analgesia has been associated with a frequent incidence of pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting. The incidence of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus varies widely from 30% - 60% after orthopedic surgery with intrathecal morphine injection and from 60% - 100% in pregnant women after neuraxial opioid administration. Parturients appear to be the most susceptible to neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus which probably might be due to the interaction of estrogens with opioid receptors. Although the exact mechanism of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus is unclear, the postulated mechanisms include the presence of an "itch center" in the central nervous system (CNS), medullary dorsal horn activation, antagonism of inhibitory transmitters, modulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 (5-HT3) or serotonergic pathways and the involvement of prostaglandins. There is dense concentration of opioid receptors and 5-HT3 receptors in the dorsal part of the spinal cord and the nucleus of the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve in the medulla. Activation of these receptors by neuraxial opioid administration or by circulating estrogen in parturients results in neuraxial opioid induced pruritus which is usually localized to the face, neck, or upper thorax. Nalbuphine, propofol and ondansetron have been used effectively in the treatment of pruritus associated with neuraxial morphine in surgical patients. Granisetron is a potent and highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that has little or no affinity for other 5-HT receptors, or dopaminergic, adrenergic, benzodiazepine, histaminic, or opioid receptors. Its onset of action is 1-3 min, peak plasma level 30 min, plasma half-life is 4-6 h and duration of action up to 24 h. Its longer duration of action than that of ondansetron may coincide with the peak incidence of pruritus after intrathecal morphine (6-9 h). In contrast, other 5-HT3-receptor antagonists have affinities for various receptor-binding sites. For example, ondansetron has detectable binding to 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C, α1-adrenergic, and μ-opioid receptor sites. Although not proven, the binding of these agents to additional receptor subtypes other than their target receptor may underlie the inferior adverse event profile seen with ondansetron compared with granisetron.
Detailed Description
The study will be carried on 40 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section (CS) under intrathecal anesthesia. They will be randomly allocated into two equal groups of 20 parturients each: Group A: (placebo group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally & 2 mL of normal saline 0.9%. Group B: (treatment group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally & 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection. Preoperative assessment: The day prior to surgery, all patients will undergo preanesthetic checkup including detailed history, thorough general, physical, systemic examination and weight of the patient. They will be kept NOP (nil per mouth) 6-8 hours for solids and 2 hours for water and clear fluids. Preparation of the patients: Written consent, coagulation profile, emergency resuscitation equipments including airway devices, advanced cardiac life support drugs. Parturients will be educated regarding the visual analogue scale (VAS). Parturients in the holding area: The patients will be positioned in the supine position, with uterine displacement to the left lateral side. Baseline monitoring readings of the maternal vital signs including Heart rate (HR), noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate (RR). Then IV cannula 18 G will be inserted into forearm vein and normal saline 0.9% solution 15 ml/kg will be infused for all women participating in the study over 20-30 minutes as a preload. The study drugs will be given 30 min before administration of intrathecal anesthesia. All patients will be premedicated with ranitidine 50 mg IV and then they will be transferred to the operating room. Parturient in the operating room: The previous monitoring data will be recorded again for the second time. Then subarachnoid block will be carried out under complete aseptic condition in the sitting position with the table in the horizontal level using 25 G pencil point spinal needle. Intrathecal block will be performed at the level of L 3-4 or L 4-5 vertebral interspaces; 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally at a rate of 1 ml/15 second after obtaining free flow of CSF. Immediately after end of injection of the drugs intrathecally, the parturient will be placed in the supine position with left lateral uterine displacement by putting a wedge under right hip (15ﹾ left-tilted supine position). All patients will receive supplemental oxygen 4 L/min via facemask until delivery of the baby. Sensory block will be assessed using loss of sensation in response to cold sensation (using ice cube). Surgery will start when the maximum height of sensory block reaches T6 or higher. Motor blockade will be assessed by modified Bromage scale (1 = unable to move feet or knees; 2 = able to move feet only; 3 = just able to move knees; 4 = full flexion of knees; 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; 6 = able to perform partial knee bend). A third monitoring reading of the vital data will be taken immediately, 5 min and 10 min after spinal block and before the surgical operation (CS) starts. Intraoperative assessment: After subarachnoid block parturients will be monitored for HR, NIBP, SpO2 and RR every 5 min till the end of the surgery. All parturients will be continuously monitored intraoperatively for any episodes of hypotension or bradycardia. Hypotension: defined as more than 20% decrease in maternal systolic blood pressure from the baseline. It will be treated with IV crystalloid fluid bolus and/or 3 mg IV ephedrine boluses when needed. Bradycardia defined as maternal heart rate < 60 beats/min. If occurred, it will be treated with IV atropine sulphate 0.5mg. After delivery of the baby, IV oxytocin 5 U will be administered slowly followed by an oxytocin infusion 0.03 U/mL at a rate of 200 mL/hr. Study outcomes: Primary outcome: Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours. Secondary outcomes: Onset time of pruritus Duration, location of pruritus and severity of pruritus according to the pruritus grading score The pruritus grading system (PGS) score for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep. Pruritus Grading System Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as: Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3 Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5 Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5 Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6 Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5. Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11. Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19. The onset of pruritus will be assessed and recorded every 15 min for 4 hours along with the complaint by the patient. Pruritus scores will then be evaluated at 4, 8 and 24 hours post-surgery. For patients with pruritus who request treatment, antihistamines such as pheniramine maleate and μ-opioid receptor antagonists such as naloxone will be used depending upon the severity assessed by the clinician, if required. Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale (Fig. 1) is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain. Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4. Perioperative adverse events will be recorded, including nausea, vomiting (treated with 10 mg IV metoclopramide), intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR < 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery: 1) not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated. Serum serotonin measurment: Two blood samples (2 mL each) will be withdrawn from each parturient. One sample will be withdrawn in the holding area before preload infusion and granisetron injection (basal reading for serum serotonin) and the other one will be withdrawn 6 hours after intrathecal morphine injection in both groups. Repeated freezing and thawing of the samples should be avoided. Hemolytic and especially lipemic serum samples should not be used with this assay. Storage: up to 6 hours at 2 - 8ºC; for longer periods (up to 6 months) at - 20 ºC. Intended use and principle of the test: Enzyme Immunoassay for the quantitative determination of serotonin in serum. In the first step, serotonin is quantitatively acylated. The subsequent competitive ELISA kit uses the microtiter plate format. The antigen is bound to the solid phase of the microtiter plate. The acylated standards, controls and samples and the solid phase bound analyte compete for a fixed number of antiserum binding sites. After the system is in equilibrium, free antigen and free antigen-antiserum complexes are removed by washing. The antibody bound to the solid phase is detected by an anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase conjugate using TMB as a substrate. The reaction is monitored at 450 nm. Quantification of unknown samples is achieved by comparing their absorbance with a reference curve prepared with known standard concentrations. Expected reference values in serum: Males: 80 - 450 ng/ml and females: 40 - 400 ng/ml

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pruritus
Keywords
Granisetron, Serum Serotonin, Morphine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
comparison of the effect of intravenous granisetron with the effect of using placebo on morphine induced pruritus in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) The trial will be planned that neither the doctors (investigator) nor the parturients will be aware of the group allocation. The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the intrathecal anesthesia, patient care or in data collection.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Morphine sulphate & Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of normal saline 0.9% (placebo) IV injection preoperative.
Arm Title
Morphine sulphate & Granisetron
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection preoperative.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Morphine Sulfate
Intervention Description
200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Normal saline 0.9%
Intervention Description
2 mL of normal saline 0.9% IV injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Granisetron
Other Intervention Name(s)
Kytril, Sancuso
Intervention Description
2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.
Description
The effect of prophylactic intravenous (IV) administration of granisetron on incidence and severity of pruritus that occurs after intrathecal morphine in parturients undergoing cesarean section (CS).
Time Frame
24 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Onset time of pruritus
Description
Recording the time when itching began
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
The pruritus grading system (PGS)
Description
The pruritus grading system (PGS) score (Firas et al, 2012) for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep. Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as: Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3 Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5 Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5 Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6 Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5. Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11. Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Postoperative pain assessment
Description
Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain. Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Perioperative adverse events
Description
Nausea, vomiting, intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR < 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively.
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery
Description
1) not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated.
Time Frame
24 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II physical status. Age: 20-40 years. At term gestation (≥ 37 weeks) with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy. Elective cesarean delivery under intrathecal anesthesia. Exclusion Criteria: Parturient refusal. Significant organ dysfunctions (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, renal, or liver disorders). Morbid obesity (BMI >35). Parturients with known hypersensitivity to granisetron, morphine or amide local anesthetics. Parturients with pruritogenic systemic disease. A coexisting skin disorder or preexisting pregnancy induced pruritus. Parturients with any contraindication for intrathecal anesthesia, e.g. coagulopathy. Emergency cesarean section. Psychiatric disorders. Fetal abnormalities. Failed or unsatisfactory intrathecal block.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Assiut University Hospital
City
Assiut
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24106351
Citation
Kumar K, Singh SI. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: An update. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;29(3):303-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.117045.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10690153
Citation
Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS. Opioid-induced pruritus: repeated vs single dose ondansetron administration in preventing pruritus after intrathecal morphine. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;83(5):822-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.5.822. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25971957
Citation
Koju RB, Gurung BS, Dongol Y. Prophylactic administration of ondansetron in prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing caesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Feb 17;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-15-18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12770663
Citation
Szarvas S, Harmon D, Murphy D. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2003 May;15(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00501-9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
7570052
Citation
Blower P. A pharmacologic profile of oral granisetron (Kytril tablets). Semin Oncol. 1995 Aug;22(4 Suppl 10):3-5. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
8214727
Citation
Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, Foster-Payne D, Oriol NE. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg. 1993 Nov;77(5):919-24. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00008.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19663845
Citation
Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Opioid-induced pruritus: an update. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Jan;35(1):2-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03463.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12761013
Citation
Charuluxananan S, Kyokong O, Somboonviboon W, Narasethakamol A, Promlok P. Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1789-1793. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000066015.21364.7D.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15471273
Citation
Wood S. Factors influencing the selection of appropriate pain assessment tools. Nurs Times. 2004 Aug 31-Sep 6;100(35):42-7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
2164935
Citation
van Wijngaarden I, Tulp MT, Soudijn W. The concept of selectivity in 5-HT receptor research. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990 Jun 12;188(6):301-12. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(90)90190-9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9469367
Citation
Perez EA, Hesketh P, Sandbach J, Reeves J, Chawla S, Markman M, Hainsworth J, Bushnell W, Friedman C. Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):754-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.754.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11050519
Citation
Slappendel R, Weber EW, Benraad B, van Limbeek J, Dirksen R. Itching after intrathecal morphine. Incidence and treatment. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000 Oct;17(10):616-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00727.x.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
http://journals.ju.edu.jo/JMJ/article/view/3023/5700
Description
Using Pruritus Grading System for Measurement of Pruritus in Patients with Diseases Associated with Itch

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Granisetron on Morphine Induced Pruritus in Cesarean Section

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs