search
Back to results

Effect of Intrapulmonary Percussion Ventilation on Deposition of Inhaled Aerosols in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (AEROPERC)

Primary Purpose

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
intrapulmonary percussive ventilation
delivery of 99mTc-DTPA aerosol
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Tours
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis focused on measuring aerosol, deposition, Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of IPF according to 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines
  • Affiliation to health insurance
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other chronic lung disease
  • Airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC<0.7)
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • History of IPF exacerbation
  • History of lung cancer
  • Chronic cough precluding aerosol delivery and radioprotection
  • Claustrophobia
  • 24h/24 oxygen therapy
  • Any acute lung disease
  • Any potentially transmissible lung infection
  • Current or possible pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Contra-indications to IPV : Emphysema, recent barotrauma, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum
  • History of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum
  • Patient unable to hold a mouthpiece tightly
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship)
  • Contraindication to the administration of Technescan DTPA

Sites / Locations

  • Pulmonology Department, University Hospital, ToursRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Sham Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Aerosol delivery without intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (Control condition)

Aerosol delivery with intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV condition)

Arm Description

A radiolabelled 99mTc-DTPA aerosol is generated with a jet nebuliser and is inhaled by the subject through a device (connecting tubes, filters) connecting the nebuliser with 1) a mouthpiece and 2) an intrapulmonary percussive ventilation device which is turned off. Aerosol deposition in fibrotic lung regions is characterized by SPECT imaging.

A radiolabelled 99mTc-DTPA aerosol is generated with a jet nebuliser and is inhaled by the subject through a device (connecting tubes, filters) connecting the nebuliser with 1) a mouthpiece and 2) an intrapulmonary percussive ventilation device which is turned on (frequency=1 Hz, pressure to be determined in phase 1 for each patient, in the 5-40 cm H2O range). Aerosol deposition in fibrotic lung regions is characterized by SPECT imaging.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Phase 1: Discomfort during IPV
IPV is delivered at increasing pressure (from 5 cm H2O to 40 cm H2O maximum pressure) and discomfort is assessed by a 5-level Likert scale ranging from "no discomfort" to "untolerable discomfort". IPV is stopped when discomfort is rated as "difficult to tolerate" whatever the pressure.
Phase 2: Change between Control and IPV condition in amount of 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol deposited in fibrotic lung regions, reported to loaded dose
Following aerosol delivery, chest imaging is done with a SPECT device. SPECT images are fused to high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images. Fibrotic lung regions regions of interest (ROI) are defined by analysis of HRCT images. SPECT signal in fibrotic ROI is reported to the radioactive dose that was loaded in the nebulizer Endpoint is radioactive signal in fibrotic ROI / loaded dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Phase 1: Sensations associated with IPV in patients with IPF
5-levels Likert scales ranging from "not at all" to "Very much" are used to answer the following questions : "I have trouble breathing" "This thumps to much" "This is scary"
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in dyspnea
Dyspnea-12 scale
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in cough
Leicester Cough Questionnaire
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Forced Vital Capacity
Spirometry Forced vital capacity is expressed in liters
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Carbon monoxide transfer factor (DLCO)
Single breath test DLCO is expressed in mL/min/mmHg
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in 5 Hz respiratory reactance
Impulse oscillometry 5 Hz reactance is expressed as kPa.s/L
Phase 1: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization
Phase 2 : Change between Control and IPV condition in total lung deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol
Ratio of SPECT in total lung / loaded dose
Phase 2: Ratio of deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol in fibrotic lung versus normal lung
ROI for normally-appearing lung are defined by HRCT. Endpoint is SPECT signal in fibrotic lung ROI / SPECT signal in normally-appearing lung ROI
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events one month after treatment
Telephone interview to assess for : Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization

Full Information

First Posted
March 25, 2022
Last Updated
December 7, 2022
Sponsor
University Hospital, Tours
Collaborators
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05366387
Brief Title
Effect of Intrapulmonary Percussion Ventilation on Deposition of Inhaled Aerosols in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Acronym
AEROPERC
Official Title
Effect of Intrapulmonary Percussion Ventilation on Deposition of Inhaled Aerosols in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 23, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Tours
Collaborators
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This protocol aims to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) to improve deposition of inhaled radiolabelled aerosols in fibrotic lung regions of patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). Phase 1 of the protocol aims to identify the highest IPV pressure that is tolerated by individual patients. Secondary endpoints explore safety of IPV in IPF patients. Phase 2 of the protocol is a crossover randomized trial where patients will inhale 99mTc-labelled DiethyleneTriamine PentaAcetate (DTPA) aerosols with or without IPV. Aerosol deposition in HRCT-defined fibrotic regions of interest (ROI) is described by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Keywords
aerosol, deposition, Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Phase 1 : Delivery of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) to assess for discomfort and adverse effects Phase 2 : Delivery of radiolabelled aerosols with or without IPV, in a crossover design
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Phase 1 : Open label Phase 2 : The primary endpoint is defined by quantitative analysis of SPECT images. Analysis is done by a project Partner (Inserm UMR1101), blinded to treatment arm.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Aerosol delivery without intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (Control condition)
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
A radiolabelled 99mTc-DTPA aerosol is generated with a jet nebuliser and is inhaled by the subject through a device (connecting tubes, filters) connecting the nebuliser with 1) a mouthpiece and 2) an intrapulmonary percussive ventilation device which is turned off. Aerosol deposition in fibrotic lung regions is characterized by SPECT imaging.
Arm Title
Aerosol delivery with intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV condition)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
A radiolabelled 99mTc-DTPA aerosol is generated with a jet nebuliser and is inhaled by the subject through a device (connecting tubes, filters) connecting the nebuliser with 1) a mouthpiece and 2) an intrapulmonary percussive ventilation device which is turned on (frequency=1 Hz, pressure to be determined in phase 1 for each patient, in the 5-40 cm H2O range). Aerosol deposition in fibrotic lung regions is characterized by SPECT imaging.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
intrapulmonary percussive ventilation
Intervention Description
Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation is a non invasive ventilation technique where small boli or air are delivered, at adjustable frequency and pressure, to the upper airways though a mouthpiece. IPV is currently used in the clinic to aid with airway clearance in neuromuscular and airway diseases.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
delivery of 99mTc-DTPA aerosol
Intervention Description
A 99mTc-DTPA aerosol (500 MBq+/-20%, 3 ml volume) is generated with a jet nebuliser (MMAD 4 µm). The aerosol is inhaled by the study subject and lung deposition is imaged by SPECT
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Phase 1: Discomfort during IPV
Description
IPV is delivered at increasing pressure (from 5 cm H2O to 40 cm H2O maximum pressure) and discomfort is assessed by a 5-level Likert scale ranging from "no discomfort" to "untolerable discomfort". IPV is stopped when discomfort is rated as "difficult to tolerate" whatever the pressure.
Time Frame
immediately after IPV (visit V1)
Title
Phase 2: Change between Control and IPV condition in amount of 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol deposited in fibrotic lung regions, reported to loaded dose
Description
Following aerosol delivery, chest imaging is done with a SPECT device. SPECT images are fused to high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images. Fibrotic lung regions regions of interest (ROI) are defined by analysis of HRCT images. SPECT signal in fibrotic ROI is reported to the radioactive dose that was loaded in the nebulizer Endpoint is radioactive signal in fibrotic ROI / loaded dose
Time Frame
After delivery of radiolabelled aerosol under both Control and IPV condition (Visit 4/5) i.e. up to 1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Phase 1: Sensations associated with IPV in patients with IPF
Description
5-levels Likert scales ranging from "not at all" to "Very much" are used to answer the following questions : "I have trouble breathing" "This thumps to much" "This is scary"
Time Frame
immediately after IPV (Visit 1)
Title
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in dyspnea
Description
Dyspnea-12 scale
Time Frame
Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)
Title
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in cough
Description
Leicester Cough Questionnaire
Time Frame
Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)
Title
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Forced Vital Capacity
Description
Spirometry Forced vital capacity is expressed in liters
Time Frame
Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)
Title
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Carbon monoxide transfer factor (DLCO)
Description
Single breath test DLCO is expressed in mL/min/mmHg
Time Frame
Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)
Title
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in 5 Hz respiratory reactance
Description
Impulse oscillometry 5 Hz reactance is expressed as kPa.s/L
Time Frame
Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)
Title
Phase 1: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Description
Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization
Time Frame
immediately after IPV (Visit 1) until 15 days after IPV (V2)
Title
Phase 2 : Change between Control and IPV condition in total lung deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol
Description
Ratio of SPECT in total lung / loaded dose
Time Frame
After delivery of radiolabelled aerosol under both Control and IPV condition (Visit 5)
Title
Phase 2: Ratio of deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol in fibrotic lung versus normal lung
Description
ROI for normally-appearing lung are defined by HRCT. Endpoint is SPECT signal in fibrotic lung ROI / SPECT signal in normally-appearing lung ROI
Time Frame
After aerosol delivery in the Control condition
Title
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events one month after treatment
Description
Telephone interview to assess for : Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization
Time Frame
1-month after the last aerosol delivery (V6)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Exploratory endpoint : Impact of specific lung lesions on pulmonary ventilation and deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol
Description
Additional ROI are defined on HRCT to define predominant lung lesions as either "ground glass opacities", "reticulations", or "bronchiectasis". The impact of these lesions on pulmonary ventilation and aerosol deposition is described as : pulmonary ventilation : Fusion of HRCT images with 88mKr-ventilation SPECT images. aerosol deposition : Fusion of HRCT images with 99mTc-DTPA aerosol deposition images.
Time Frame
After aerosol delivery under the Control condition (Visit 4 or 5 according to randomization) i.e. up to 1 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of IPF according to 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines Affiliation to health insurance Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Other chronic lung disease Airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC<0.7) History of congestive heart failure History of IPF exacerbation History of lung cancer Chronic cough precluding aerosol delivery and radioprotection Claustrophobia 24h/24 oxygen therapy Any acute lung disease Any potentially transmissible lung infection Current or possible pregnancy and breastfeeding Contra-indications to IPV : Emphysema, recent barotrauma, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum History of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum Patient unable to hold a mouthpiece tightly Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship) Contraindication to the administration of Technescan DTPA
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Laurent PLANTIER, MD-PhD
Phone
02 47 47 98 44
Ext
+33
Email
laurent.plantier@univ-tours.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sandrine LE GUELLEC
Email
sandrine.leguellec@univ-tours.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent PLANTIER, MD-PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Tours
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pulmonology Department, University Hospital, Tours
City
Tours
ZIP/Postal Code
37044
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent PLANTIER, MD-PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurent PLANTIER, MD-PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Intrapulmonary Percussion Ventilation on Deposition of Inhaled Aerosols in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs