Effect of Remimazolam on Motor Evoked Potential
Primary Purpose
Spine Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Propofol
Remimazolam Besylate
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Spine Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 20-70
- Scheduled for elective spine surgery requiring monitoring of evoked potential
- ASA physical status 1-3
Exclusion Criteria:
- BMI ≥ 40
- Uncontrolled DM (HbA1c ≥ 9%)
- Contraindications to the study drug: known allergy or hypersensitivity
- Use of rate responsive cardiac pacemaker with bioelectrical impedence
- Diagnosed neuromuscular disorder
- Pre-existing motor weakness
Sites / Locations
- Seok Kyeong Oh
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Propofol-Remimazolam
Remimazolam-Propofol
Arm Description
General anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, then switched to remimazolam after 60 minutes from incision.
General anesthesia was induced and maintained with remimazolam, then changed to propofol after 60 minutes from incision.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Motor evoked potential (MEP), before cross-over
Amplitude and latency of MEP before cross-over
MEP, after cross-over
Amplitude and latency of MEP after cross-over
Secondary Outcome Measures
Bispectral index
Bispectral index during MEP data collection
Blood pressure
Blood pressure during MEP data collection
Heart rate
Heart rate during MEP data collection
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05453955
First Posted
July 8, 2022
Last Updated
March 13, 2023
Sponsor
Korea University Guro Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05453955
Brief Title
Effect of Remimazolam on Motor Evoked Potential
Official Title
Influence of Propofol and Remimazolam on Intraoperative Responses of Motor Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 2, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 7, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Korea University Guro Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study was planned to investigate the degree of effect of remimazolam on MEP compared to propofol when monitoring the motion-inducing potential (MEP).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spine Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Propofol-Remimazolam
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
General anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, then switched to remimazolam after 60 minutes from incision.
Arm Title
Remimazolam-Propofol
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
General anesthesia was induced and maintained with remimazolam, then changed to propofol after 60 minutes from incision.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Propofol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Remimazolam Besylate
Intervention Description
Anesthesia induction and maintenance with propofol 60 minutes later, change the maintenance drug to remimazolam
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Remimazolam Besylate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Propofol
Intervention Description
Anesthesia induction and maintenance with remimazolam 60 minutes later, change the maintenance drug to propofol
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Motor evoked potential (MEP), before cross-over
Description
Amplitude and latency of MEP before cross-over
Time Frame
Intraoperative, just after confirmation of neuromuscular recovery, for 30 minutes
Title
MEP, after cross-over
Description
Amplitude and latency of MEP after cross-over
Time Frame
Intraoperative, 30 minutes after alteration of the maintenance drug, for 30 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bispectral index
Description
Bispectral index during MEP data collection
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Blood pressure
Description
Blood pressure during MEP data collection
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Heart rate
Description
Heart rate during MEP data collection
Time Frame
Intraoperative
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Aged 20-70
Scheduled for elective spine surgery requiring monitoring of evoked potential
ASA physical status 1-3
Exclusion Criteria:
BMI ≥ 40
Uncontrolled DM (HbA1c ≥ 9%)
Contraindications to the study drug: known allergy or hypersensitivity
Use of rate responsive cardiac pacemaker with bioelectrical impedence
Diagnosed neuromuscular disorder
Pre-existing motor weakness
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sang Sik Choi, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Korea University Guro Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Seok Kyeong Oh
City
Seoul
State/Province
Gangnam-gu
ZIP/Postal Code
06294
Country
Korea, Republic of
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Effect of Remimazolam on Motor Evoked Potential
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs