search
Back to results

Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Resistant Hypertension and Cardiovascular Hemodynamic in Comparison to Intensive Medical Therapy Utilizing Impedance Cardiography (OsloRDN)

Primary Purpose

Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
The SymplicityTM Renal Denervation System
The HOTMAN® System
Sponsored by
Oslo University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy focused on measuring Renal sympathetic denervation, Impedance cardiography

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Average SBP >140mmHg, measured per guidelines
  • 24 hour average ABPM daytime SBP >135mm/Hg
  • On stable medication regimen of full tolerated doses of 3 or more antihypertensive meds, with one being a diuretic
  • No changes for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to screening
  • No planned medication changes for 6 months
  • Age 18-80 years
  • At minimum, 3 antihypertensive medications must meet one or more of the following full dose criteria:
  • Highest labeled dose according to medication's labeling
  • Highest usual dose per clinical guidelines-JNC-7
  • Highest tolerated dose
  • Highest appropriate dose for the patient per the PI's clinical judgment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamically or anatomically significant renal artery abnormalities or stenosis >50% or prior renal artery intervention
  • eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2 (MDRD formula)
  • Albumin/creatinine ratio > 50 mg/mmol
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Known alcohol or drug abuse
  • Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension in past year
  • Stenotic valvular heart disease for which BP reduction would be hazardous
  • MI, unstable angina, or CVA in the prior 6 months
  • Known primary pulmonary HTN
  • Known pheochromocytoma, Cushing's disease, coarctation of the aorta, hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism
  • Known primary hyperaldosteronism not adequately treated.

Sites / Locations

  • Oslo University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

group Co

group RDN

Arm Description

group Co receives intensive medical therapy utilizing integrated hemodynamic management calculated by impedance cardiography of "The HOTMAN® System"

For patients who will be randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation by "The SymplicityTM Renal Denervation System", the femoral artery will be accessed with the standard endovascular technique and the catheter will be advanced into the renal artery and connected to a radiofrequency generator. As in Symplicity HTN 1 and 2 trials, four-to-six discrete, low-power radiofrequency ablations lasting up to 2 min each and of 8 watts or less to obtain up to four-six ablations separated both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery. During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Absolute change in office systolic blood pressure(SBP)
is the absolute change in office SBP, after a 6 months follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Short and long term safety of RDN as an interventional procedure
Safety of RDN will be assessed at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years by clinical, laboratory and radiology examinations.
Percentage of normalization of blood pressure(BP) at office, home and ABPM
This will include the percentage of normalization of daytime SBP at office, home and ABPM.
The normalization of hemodynamics.
The normalization of hemodynamics: Cardiac Index (CI), Heart rate, Stroke systemic vascular resistance index (SSVRI), pulse wave velocity(PWV) and central BP.
Cost effectiveness
It will be assessed the Cost effectiveness of Renal denervation as treatment of resistant hypertension compared to control group.

Full Information

First Posted
August 17, 2012
Last Updated
October 29, 2015
Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01673516
Brief Title
Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Resistant Hypertension and Cardiovascular Hemodynamic in Comparison to Intensive Medical Therapy Utilizing Impedance Cardiography
Acronym
OsloRDN
Official Title
Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Resistant Hypertension and Cardiovascular Hemodynamic in Comparison to Intensive Medical Therapy Utilizing Impedance Cardiography
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Renal Sympathetic Denervation (RDN) improves the control of blood pressure (BP) in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, as compared to intensive medical therapy (IMT) using hemodynamic parameters and then applying a predefined algorithm of drug selection (i.e. integrated hemodynamic management - IHM) during 6 months intensive treatment program (receiving antihypertensive care according to the 2007 ESH Guidelines). Working hypothesis: When it is possible to disrupt the sympatho-renal axis by RDN - BP reduction occurs to a greater extent and more rapidly than applying intensive medical therapy using IHM.
Detailed Description
Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease, affecting approximately 1 billion1 people worldwide. Hypertension is a major public health concern, because of its complications (coronary artery disease, heart failure, renal disease, stroke). Early blood pressure control in hypertensive patients guarantees the best prevention of cardiovascular events on the long term (2007 ESH-ESC Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension; VALUE study). However, in spite of education efforts and antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure control rates remain low. The most common cause of uncontrolled BP is inadequate pharmacological treatment, because the selection of antihypertensive agents is often done independently of the hemodynamic status of the patient (volemic status, peripheral resistance, cardiac inotropy). The sympatho-renal axis describes the dual role of the kidney as originator of some central nervous system afferent signals and recipient of efferent sympathetic signals. Both the contribution of the kidney to central sympathetic drive and the consequences of sympathetic efferent drive to the kidney contribute to the development and sustenance of hypertension. Poly-pharmacy strategies for the treatment of elevated blood pressure have identified populations of patients with treatment resistant hypertension. Treatment Resistant Hypertension(TRH) is a blood pressure that remains above goal in spite of the concomitant use of antihypertensive medications from more than 3 drug classes. Patients who require more than 4 drug classes to have their blood pressure controlled are also considered to have resistant hypertension. Preferably, the regimen should include a diuretic and all doses should be optimal2 .The true prevalence of treatment resistant hypertension is unknown. In clinical trials from 20 to 40% of randomized patients did not reach blood pressure targets3. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in USA (2003-2008), non-pregnant adults with hypertension were classified as resistant if their blood pressure was 140/90 mmHg or higher and if they reported using antihypertensive medications from 3 different drug classes or drugs from 4 antihypertensive drug classes regardless of blood pressure. The prevalence was 12.8% of the drug-treated hypertensive population. Risk factors for treatment-resistant hypertension include older age and obesity . Treatment-resistant patients are more likely to have albuminuria, reduced renal function, and a history of diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, stroke or heart failure. They are at increased risk of cardiovascular complications although the true incidence of death and morbidity remains currently unknown. In the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry5, 8295 of 68045 treated patients (12.2%) had treatment resistant hypertension, defined as an office blood pressure equal to or exceeding 140 mm Hg systolic and/or 90 mm Hg diastolic. RDN is a novel procedure which has been approved safe and gives a remarkable reduction of BP in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients. The HOTMAN® System is a novel impedance cardiographic device, measuring and calculating hemodynamic parameters. The HOTMAN® System may help the physician to control blood pressure in patients with resistance hypertension. * Our pilot study(Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension after witnessed intake of medication before qualifying ambulatory blood pressure.Fadl Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Fossum E, Brekke M, Gjønnæss E, Hjørnholm U, Kjær VN, Rostrup M, Kjeldsen SE, Os I, Stenehjem AE, Høieggen A.Hypertension. 2013 Sep;62(3):526-32)has showed that The mean office and ambulatory BPs remained unchanged at 1, 3, and 6 months in the 6 patients, whereas there was no known change in antihypertensive medication. Two patients, however, had a fall in both office and ambulatory BPs. Our findings question whether BP falls in response to RDN in patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension.That is why we intended to do an intrim analysis after inclusion of around 30% of the total number planned to be included in the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy
Keywords
Renal sympathetic denervation, Impedance cardiography

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
group Co
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
group Co receives intensive medical therapy utilizing integrated hemodynamic management calculated by impedance cardiography of "The HOTMAN® System"
Arm Title
group RDN
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
For patients who will be randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation by "The SymplicityTM Renal Denervation System", the femoral artery will be accessed with the standard endovascular technique and the catheter will be advanced into the renal artery and connected to a radiofrequency generator. As in Symplicity HTN 1 and 2 trials, four-to-six discrete, low-power radiofrequency ablations lasting up to 2 min each and of 8 watts or less to obtain up to four-six ablations separated both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery. During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
The SymplicityTM Renal Denervation System
Intervention Description
For patients who will be randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation (group RDN), the femoral artery will be accessed with the standard endovascular technique and the catheter will be advanced into the renal artery and connected to a radiofrequency generator. As in Simplicity HTN 1 and 2 trials, four-to-six discrete, low-power radiofrequency ablations lasting up to 2 min each and of 8 watts or less to obtain up to four-six ablations separated both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery. During ablation, the catheter system monitored tip temperature and impedance, altering radiofrequency energy delivery in response to a predetermined algorithm.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
The HOTMAN® System
Intervention Description
Impedance Cardiography by HOTMAN system will evaluates non-invasively hemodynamic parameters in patients randomized to "group Co"
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Absolute change in office systolic blood pressure(SBP)
Description
is the absolute change in office SBP, after a 6 months follow-up.
Time Frame
at 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Short and long term safety of RDN as an interventional procedure
Description
Safety of RDN will be assessed at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years by clinical, laboratory and radiology examinations.
Time Frame
up to10 years
Title
Percentage of normalization of blood pressure(BP) at office, home and ABPM
Description
This will include the percentage of normalization of daytime SBP at office, home and ABPM.
Time Frame
at 6 months and later
Title
The normalization of hemodynamics.
Description
The normalization of hemodynamics: Cardiac Index (CI), Heart rate, Stroke systemic vascular resistance index (SSVRI), pulse wave velocity(PWV) and central BP.
Time Frame
at 6 month and later
Title
Cost effectiveness
Description
It will be assessed the Cost effectiveness of Renal denervation as treatment of resistant hypertension compared to control group.
Time Frame
At 6 month and later
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
The quality of life and side effects related to antihypertensive agents
Description
The quality of life and side effects related to antihypertensive agents
Time Frame
at 6 months and later

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Average SBP >140mmHg, measured per guidelines 24 hour average ABPM daytime SBP >135mm/Hg On stable medication regimen of full tolerated doses of 3 or more antihypertensive meds, with one being a diuretic No changes for a minimum of 2 weeks prior to screening No planned medication changes for 6 months Age 18-80 years At minimum, 3 antihypertensive medications must meet one or more of the following full dose criteria: Highest labeled dose according to medication's labeling Highest usual dose per clinical guidelines-JNC-7 Highest tolerated dose Highest appropriate dose for the patient per the PI's clinical judgment Exclusion Criteria: Hemodynamically or anatomically significant renal artery abnormalities or stenosis >50% or prior renal artery intervention eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2 (MDRD formula) Albumin/creatinine ratio > 50 mg/mmol Type 1 diabetes mellitus Known alcohol or drug abuse Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension in past year Stenotic valvular heart disease for which BP reduction would be hazardous MI, unstable angina, or CVA in the prior 6 months Known primary pulmonary HTN Known pheochromocytoma, Cushing's disease, coarctation of the aorta, hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism Known primary hyperaldosteronism not adequately treated.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aud Høieggen, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Oslo University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oslo University Hospital
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0424
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36073648
Citation
Halvorsen LV, Bergland OU, Soraas CL, Larstorp ACK, Hjornholm U, Kjaer VN, Kringen MK, Clasen PE, Haldsrud R, Kjeldsen SE, Rostrup M, Fadl Elmula FEM, Opdal MS, Hoieggen A. Nonadherence by Serum Drug Analyses in Resistant Hypertension: 7-Year Follow-Up of Patients Considered Adherent by Directly Observed Therapy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 20;11(18):e025879. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025879. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33399016
Citation
Undrum Bergland O, Larstorp ACK, Lund Soraas C, Hoieggen A, Rostrup M, Norheim Kjaer V, Godang K, Sevre K, Fadl Elmula FEM. Changes in sympathetic nervous system activity after renal denervation: results from the randomised Oslo RDN study. Blood Press. 2021 Jun;30(3):154-164. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2020.1868286. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24591332
Citation
Fadl Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Larstorp AC, Fossum E, Brekke M, Kjeldsen SE, Gjonnaess E, Hjornholm U, Kjaer VN, Rostrup M, Os I, Stenehjem A, Hoieggen A. Adjusted drug treatment is superior to renal sympathetic denervation in patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):991-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03246. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24059787
Citation
Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Oparil S, Hedner T. Blood pressure lowering effect of renal sympathetic denervation or placebo? - building expectations for Symplicity-HTN 3. Blood Press. 2013 Oct;22(5):279-81. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2013.840445. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23836798
Citation
Fadl Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Fossum E, Brekke M, Gjonnaess E, Hjornholm U, Kjaer VN, Rostrup M, Kjeldsen SE, Os I, Stenehjem AE, Hoieggen A. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension after witnessed intake of medication before qualifying ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension. 2013 Sep;62(3):526-32. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01452. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Resistant Hypertension and Cardiovascular Hemodynamic in Comparison to Intensive Medical Therapy Utilizing Impedance Cardiography

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs