search
Back to results

Effect of Safinamide on Parkinson's Disease Related Chronic Pain

Primary Purpose

Idiopathic Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Safinamide Methanesulfonate
Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo
Sponsored by
Zambon SpA
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Idiopathic Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson disease, Safinamide

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant must be 30 years of age or older, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  2. Diagnosed with IPD by using the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria for more than 5 years duration.
  3. Receiving treatment with a stable dose of oral L-Dopa (including controlled release [CR], immediate release [IR] or a combination of CR/IR), with and without benserazide/carbidopa, with or without addition of a catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor and may be receiving concomitant treatment with stable doses of a dopamine agonist, an anticholinergic and/or amantadine for at least 4 weeks prior to the randomisation (baseline visit).
  4. Hoehn and Yahr stage between 2-3 (inclusive) during the "ON" phase at the screening visit.
  5. Experiencing motor fluctuations following optimum titration of treatment medications and within the 4 weeks immediately prior to randomisation.
  6. Experiencing chronic pain (i.e. ongoing for ≥3 months prior to screening visit); the Investigator must consider chronic pain directly related to PD and not explained by any other health problem (e.g. peripheral neuropathy, organ disease or arthritis pain) OR consider the intensity of chronic pain specifically aggravated by PD.
  7. If taking regular analgesics, the treatment regimen should be stable in the 4 weeks prior to the randomisation visitt.
  8. Able to maintain an accurate and complete electronic diary with the help of a caregiver.
  9. Male or female

    •A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: i.Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) OR ii.A WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance

  10. Capable of giving signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any form of Parkinsonism other than IPD.
  2. Diagnosis of chronic migraine (>15 days per month) or cancer pain.
  3. History of bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder requiring treatment with neuroleptics.
  4. History of dementia or cognitive dysfunction.
  5. Severe, peak dose or biphasic dyskinesia.
  6. Unpredictable or widely swinging fluctuations.
  7. Ophthalmologic history including any of the following conditions: albinism, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal degeneration, active retinopathy, severe progressive diabetic retinopathy, inherited retinopathy or family history of hereditary retinal disease.
  8. Moderate or severe liver failure using the Child-Pugh classification score.
  9. History of drug and/or alcohol abuse within 12 months prior to screening as defined by the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
  10. Allergy/sensitivity, intolerance or contraindications to Safinamide.
  11. Treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), levodopa infusion, pethidine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine less than 4 weeks prior to the randomisation visit
  12. Use of any investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is the longest
  13. Previous treatment with Safinamide in the 9 months before the screening visit
  14. Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) total score <24 at screening.
  15. NRS score ≤ 4 points at randomization visit.
  16. Any clinically significant condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would not be compatible with study participation or represent a risk for participants while in the study

Sites / Locations

  • Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck
  • Institut für Neuroimmunologische und Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
  • Hopital Gabriel Montpied
  • CHU de GRENOBLE
  • Hopitaux de La Timone
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
  • Hopital de Hautepierre
  • Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet
  • St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden
  • Katholische Kliniken Ruhrhalbinsel GmbH
  • Neurologische Praxis
  • University Medicine Göttingen Germany
  • Klinik Haag i. OB
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster
  • NeuroPoint Akademie
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm
  • Zambon Investigative Site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
  • Centro per la Malattia di Parkinson e i Disturbi del Movimento
  • Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.l. - PPDS
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Di Perugia
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
  • Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed
  • Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata
  • Ospedale San Giovanni Battista - ACISMOM
  • IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi d'Aragona
  • Hospital del Mar
  • Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón - PPDS
  • C.A.U de Burgos - Hospital Universitario de Burgos
  • Hospital Puerta del Mar
  • Hospital Universitario de Donostia
  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz - PPDS
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
  • Hospital HM Puerta del Sur
  • Clinica Universidad Navarra
  • Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
  • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
  • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Experimental

Placebo

Arm Description

Safinamide methanesulfonate film coated tablets once daily, 50 mg and 100 mg. Safinamide methanesulfonate 50 mg and 100 mg tablets was administered orally, OD, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA. Subjects received study drug 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards). The dose of 100 mg/day (titrated from 50 mg/day after 1 week) was selected based on the results of previous studies in patients with PD and from the results of a post hoc analysis that investigated the effects of safinamide on pain.

Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo film coated tablets once daily. The matching placebo was administered orally, OD, in tablets, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Full Analysis Set
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Per Protocol Set
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Subjects With a Reduction of ≥2 Points in Pain Severity at Week 16, Compared to Baseline
Reduction in pain severity (based on the "average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days") of ≥ 2 points was assessed by an 11-point NRS (numerical rating scale), compared to baseline. Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score for Pain
CGI-C (Clinical Global Impression - Change) score for pain is a seven-point scale that indicates the patient's impression of change for relevant symptoms. It ranges from "substantial improvement" to "substantial worsening": = substantial improvement; = moderate improvement; = minimum improvement; = No change; = Minimum worsening; = moderate worsening; = substantial worsening. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
The Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score for Pain at Week 16
The CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression - Severity) score is a seven-point scale which asks the clinician one question: "considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated as follow: = normal, not at all ill; = borderline mentally ill; = mildly ill; = moderately ill; = markedly ill; = severely ill; = among the most severely ill patients. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score for Pain
The Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) scale is designed to capture the subject's perception of change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, an overall quality of life. These areas are captured using a 7- point scale, indicating: = no change (or condition has got worse); = almost the same, hardly any change at all; = a little better, but not noticeable change; = somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; = moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; = better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; = a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference. Of course, the higher the score, the better the outcome.
Number of Subjects With Concomitant Use of Pain Drugs at Different Timepoints
This outcome describes the number of subjects which had concomitant assumption of pain drugs at different timepoints.
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Count of Subjects Who Used PRN PD Pain Medication in the 7 Days Preceding Visits
Total count of patients who used PRN (meaning "when necessary") Parkinson's Disease Pain Medications was expressed both in number and in percentage. The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized: as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints; in the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints.
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Number of Days on Which PRN PD Pain Medication Was Taken at Different Timepoints
The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized: as the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints. as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients through a unique questionnaire which takes 2-5 min to be completed. The questionnaire consists of a total of 14 items: seven items for the anxiety subscale (HADS Anxiety) and seven items for the depression subscale (HADS Depression). HADS Anxiety focus mainly on symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder and HADS Depression is focused on anhedonia, the main symptom of depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for anxiety subscale and the same for depression subscale, where: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case). 11-21 = Abnormal (case) The two subscores are then summed up to obtain a total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The total scale range is 0-42. The higher the score, the worse the anxiety/depression status.
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in MDS-UPDRS
Change in the MDS-UPDRS = Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale The MDS-UPDRS is defined by 4 Parts, each composed by a different number of items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 to 4); Part I (non-motor experiences of daily living; 13 items) Part II (motor experiences of daily living;13 items) Part III (motor examination; 33 items) Part IV (motor complications; 6 items) The MDS-UPDRS has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 260. The higher the score, the more severe the impairment.

Full Information

First Posted
January 30, 2019
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Sponsor
Zambon SpA
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03841604
Brief Title
Effect of Safinamide on Parkinson's Disease Related Chronic Pain
Official Title
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide 100mg Once Daily, as add-on Therapy, in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients With Motor Fluctuations and PD Related Chronic Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 9, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 30, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 3, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Zambon SpA

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Primary objective: • To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 mg once daily (OD), compared with placebo, as add-on therapy for PD-related chronic pain Secondary objectives: Percentage of pain responders Clinical Global Impression for pain Patient Global Impression for pain Reduction in use of pain drugs Mood Motor and non-motor symptoms Safety Objectives: • Safety and tolerability
Detailed Description
This is a Phase IV, international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients, experiencing motor fluctuations and PD-related chronic pain while on stable doses of levodopa (L-Dopa), to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide 100 mg Once Daily, as Add-On Therapy. The study consisted of: A screening period of up to 1 to 2 weeks. A treatment period of 16 weeks. A telephone follow-up call at 1 week after the end of treatment. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either safinamide (50 mg or 100 mg) or matching placebo. At Day 1, eligible subjects entered the treatment period to receive safinamide 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards) orally OD. After completion of all baseline assessments, subjects received the first dose of study drug at the study center and, thereafter, study drug was to be taken at home each morning along with their first morning dose of L-DOPA and other (if any) PD medications. On Day 8, the dose of study drug was increased, at home, to 100 mg OD. Each subject received treatment for 16 weeks, with visits at Week 0/Day 1 (baseline) and at Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (or early termination). From Day 1 onwards, subjects recorded the use of as-needed (PRN) medications along with indicating the worst pain they experienced on a daily basis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Idiopathic Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Parkinson disease, Safinamide

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
94 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Safinamide methanesulfonate film coated tablets once daily, 50 mg and 100 mg. Safinamide methanesulfonate 50 mg and 100 mg tablets was administered orally, OD, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA. Subjects received study drug 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards). The dose of 100 mg/day (titrated from 50 mg/day after 1 week) was selected based on the results of previous studies in patients with PD and from the results of a post hoc analysis that investigated the effects of safinamide on pain.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo film coated tablets once daily. The matching placebo was administered orally, OD, in tablets, with or without food, at breakfast time when the subject was taking their morning dose of L-DOPA.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Safinamide Methanesulfonate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Xadago
Intervention Description
50 mg, 100 mg
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Safinamide methanesulfonate matching placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
50 mg, 100 mg
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Full Analysis Set
Description
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Per Protocol Set
Description
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of ≥2 Points in Pain Severity at Week 16, Compared to Baseline
Description
Reduction in pain severity (based on the "average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days") of ≥ 2 points was assessed by an 11-point NRS (numerical rating scale), compared to baseline. Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score for Pain
Description
CGI-C (Clinical Global Impression - Change) score for pain is a seven-point scale that indicates the patient's impression of change for relevant symptoms. It ranges from "substantial improvement" to "substantial worsening": = substantial improvement; = moderate improvement; = minimum improvement; = No change; = Minimum worsening; = moderate worsening; = substantial worsening. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
The Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score for Pain at Week 16
Description
The CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression - Severity) score is a seven-point scale which asks the clinician one question: "considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated as follow: = normal, not at all ill; = borderline mentally ill; = mildly ill; = moderately ill; = markedly ill; = severely ill; = among the most severely ill patients. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score for Pain
Description
The Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) scale is designed to capture the subject's perception of change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, an overall quality of life. These areas are captured using a 7- point scale, indicating: = no change (or condition has got worse); = almost the same, hardly any change at all; = a little better, but not noticeable change; = somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; = moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; = better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; = a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference. Of course, the higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Number of Subjects With Concomitant Use of Pain Drugs at Different Timepoints
Description
This outcome describes the number of subjects which had concomitant assumption of pain drugs at different timepoints.
Time Frame
Baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 16
Title
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Count of Subjects Who Used PRN PD Pain Medication in the 7 Days Preceding Visits
Description
Total count of patients who used PRN (meaning "when necessary") Parkinson's Disease Pain Medications was expressed both in number and in percentage. The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized: as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints; in the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints.
Time Frame
at Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Title
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Number of Days on Which PRN PD Pain Medication Was Taken at Different Timepoints
Description
The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized: as the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints. as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints.
Time Frame
At Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients through a unique questionnaire which takes 2-5 min to be completed. The questionnaire consists of a total of 14 items: seven items for the anxiety subscale (HADS Anxiety) and seven items for the depression subscale (HADS Depression). HADS Anxiety focus mainly on symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder and HADS Depression is focused on anhedonia, the main symptom of depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for anxiety subscale and the same for depression subscale, where: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case). 11-21 = Abnormal (case) The two subscores are then summed up to obtain a total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The total scale range is 0-42. The higher the score, the worse the anxiety/depression status.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in MDS-UPDRS
Description
Change in the MDS-UPDRS = Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale The MDS-UPDRS is defined by 4 Parts, each composed by a different number of items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 to 4); Part I (non-motor experiences of daily living; 13 items) Part II (motor experiences of daily living;13 items) Part III (motor examination; 33 items) Part IV (motor complications; 6 items) The MDS-UPDRS has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 260. The higher the score, the more severe the impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participant must be 30 years of age or older, at the time of signing the informed consent. Diagnosed with IPD by using the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria for more than 5 years duration. Receiving treatment with a stable dose of oral L-Dopa (including controlled release [CR], immediate release [IR] or a combination of CR/IR), with and without benserazide/carbidopa, with or without addition of a catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor and may be receiving concomitant treatment with stable doses of a dopamine agonist, an anticholinergic and/or amantadine for at least 4 weeks prior to the randomisation (baseline visit). Hoehn and Yahr stage between 2-3 (inclusive) during the "ON" phase at the screening visit. Experiencing motor fluctuations following optimum titration of treatment medications and within the 4 weeks immediately prior to randomisation. Experiencing chronic pain (i.e. ongoing for ≥3 months prior to screening visit); the Investigator must consider chronic pain directly related to PD and not explained by any other health problem (e.g. peripheral neuropathy, organ disease or arthritis pain) OR consider the intensity of chronic pain specifically aggravated by PD. If taking regular analgesics, the treatment regimen should be stable in the 4 weeks prior to the randomisation visit. Able to maintain an accurate and complete electronic diary with the help of a caregiver. Male or female •A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: i.Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) OR ii.A WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance Capable of giving signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Any form of Parkinsonism other than IPD. Diagnosis of chronic migraine (>15 days per month) or cancer pain. History of bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder requiring treatment with neuroleptics. History of dementia or cognitive dysfunction. Severe, peak dose or biphasic dyskinesia. Unpredictable or widely swinging fluctuations. Ophthalmologic history including any of the following conditions: albinism, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal degeneration, active retinopathy, severe progressive diabetic retinopathy, inherited retinopathy or family history of hereditary retinal disease. Moderate or severe liver failure using the Child-Pugh classification score. History of drug and/or alcohol abuse within 12 months prior to screening as defined by the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Allergy/sensitivity, intolerance or contraindications to Safinamide. Treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), levodopa infusion, pethidine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine less than 4 weeks prior to the randomisation visit Use of any investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is the longest Previous treatment with Safinamide in the 9 months before the screening visit Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) total score <24 at screening. NRS score ≤ 4 points at randomization visit. Any clinically significant condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would not be compatible with study participation or represent a risk for participants while in the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlotte Keywood, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Zambon SpA
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck
City
Innsbruck
ZIP/Postal Code
6020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Institut für Neuroimmunologische und Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1220
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Hopital Gabriel Montpied
City
Clermont-Ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63000
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de GRENOBLE
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38700
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopitaux de La Timone
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13385
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
City
Nîmes
ZIP/Postal Code
30900
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital de Hautepierre
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67200
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31300
Country
France
Facility Name
St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13088
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden
City
Dresde
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Katholische Kliniken Ruhrhalbinsel GmbH
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45257
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Praxis
City
Gera
ZIP/Postal Code
07551
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Medicine Göttingen Germany
City
Göttingen
ZIP/Postal Code
37075
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinik Haag i. OB
City
Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
83527
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH
City
Marburg
ZIP/Postal Code
35043
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Münster
City
Münster
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
Facility Name
NeuroPoint Akademie
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89073
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Zambon Investigative Site
City
Chieti
ZIP/Postal Code
66013
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20122
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Centro per la Malattia di Parkinson e i Disturbi del Movimento
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale San Raffaele S.r.l. - PPDS
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Di Perugia
City
Perugia
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
City
Pisa
ZIP/Postal Code
56124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed
City
Pozzilli
ZIP/Postal Code
86077
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale San Giovanni Battista - ACISMOM
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00148
Country
Italy
Facility Name
IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00163
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi d'Aragona
City
Salerno
ZIP/Postal Code
84084
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Hospital del Mar
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08003
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08025
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón - PPDS
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
C.A.U de Burgos - Hospital Universitario de Burgos
City
Burgos
ZIP/Postal Code
09006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Puerta del Mar
City
Cadiz
ZIP/Postal Code
11009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de Donostia
City
Donostia
ZIP/Postal Code
20014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario La Paz - PPDS
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28222
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital HM Puerta del Sur
City
Móstoles
ZIP/Postal Code
28938
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Clinica Universidad Navarra
City
Pamplona
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
City
Pamplona
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
City
Zaragoza
ZIP/Postal Code
50009
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Safinamide on Parkinson's Disease Related Chronic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs