search
Back to results

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Aerobic Exercise Training for Patients With Fibromyalgia

Primary Purpose

Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
tDCS
active intervention of aerobic exercise
placebo tDCS
placebo AE
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fibromyalgia focused on measuring Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Exercise, Fibromyalgia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia according to the American College of Rheumatology
  2. Have completed high school
  3. Age between 18 and 65 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Were on medication for pain control for less than two months
  2. In treatment of depression for less than two months
  3. Patients with epilepsy, psychiatric disorders or who have any recent episode of neurologic disorders such as idiopathic syncope
  4. Pregnant women and infants
  5. Possessing metallic implant in the brain
  6. In use of illicit drugs
  7. That were in some kind of physical treatment for less than two months

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Group A

    Group B

    Group C

    Arm Description

    tDCS (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany) / AE Group in which will receive active intervention of aerobic exercise training and active tDCS intervention

    AE group which will receive active intervention of aerobic exercise and placebo tDCS (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany)

    tDCS group which will receive placebo AE and active intervention for tDCS (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany)

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in Visual Numeric Scale (VNS)
    Pain intensity is measured using a scale from 0 to 10. A straight 10 cm line is displayed for the subject enumerated from zero to 10, where zero represents no pain and 10 the worst pain possible. Subjects should mark the number that most represents the symptom of pain at the moment. Outcome will be measured 24 hours after each intervention session, after 1 month of the end of protocol and 2 months after the end of protocol for evaluation of long term effects.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in Visual Numeric Scale for Anxiety
    This scale has a straight 10 cm enumerated from zero to 10, where zero represents not anxious and 10 the most anxious possible. Subjects should mark the number that most represents the anxiety level at the moment. Outcome will be measured 24 hours after each intervention session, after 1 month of the end of protocol and 2 months after the end of protocol for evaluation of long term effects.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 19, 2014
    Last Updated
    February 3, 2015
    Sponsor
    University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
    Collaborators
    University of Nove de Julho
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02358902
    Brief Title
    Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Aerobic Exercise Training for Patients With Fibromyalgia
    Official Title
    Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Aerobic Exercise Training for Patients With Fibromyalgia
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    December 2014
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    March 2013 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 2014 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    November 2014 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
    Collaborators
    University of Nove de Julho

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study consists of a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial with two months' duration of follow-up. The variable used was the VAS for pain, considering the values of any difference between the data before and after stimulation.
    Detailed Description
    The average between the analyzed values was 1.20, with a standard deviation of 0.84, taking into account a type I error of 5%, a type II error of 10% and a power of 80%. From the sample calculation was found an n = 10 for each group. The sample is amplified in order to avoid possible effects of dropout ending with a n = 15 in each group with a total N = 45. Randomization was performed by a blinded therapist using sealed envelopes for each individual. The subjects will be divided into three intervention groups: tDCS (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany) / AE Group, in which will receive active intervention of aerobic exercise training and active tDCS intervention. AE group, which will receive active intervention of aerobic exercise and placebo tDCS. And tDCS group, which will receive placebo AE and active intervention for tDCS. Participants will be blinded to the intervention groups as well as therapists involved in the evaluation process. The evaluation methods were carried out one week before the beginning of the intervention (baseline) for all variables. After the first week of intervention (neuromodulatory period) was performed ratings for level of cortical excitability (T1), and after the end of the one month period of intervention for all variables (T2). Follow-up evaluations were conducted one month (T3) and two months (T4) after the end of the intervention period."

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Fibromyalgia
    Keywords
    Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Exercise, Fibromyalgia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 2, Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    45 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Group A
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    tDCS (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany) / AE Group in which will receive active intervention of aerobic exercise training and active tDCS intervention
    Arm Title
    Group B
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    AE group which will receive active intervention of aerobic exercise and placebo tDCS (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany)
    Arm Title
    Group C
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    tDCS group which will receive placebo AE and active intervention for tDCS (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany)
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    tDCS
    Intervention Description
    tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    active intervention of aerobic exercise
    Intervention Description
    different types of aerobic exercise
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    placebo tDCS
    Intervention Description
    only 30 seconds of cortical stimulaion , with the power turned off for the remaining time (tDCS - DC stimulator, Neurocom, Germany)
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    placebo AE
    Intervention Description
    the procedure was a training on the treadmill, but heart rate was maintained within 5% of the resting heart rate at the minimum speed on the treadmill
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Visual Numeric Scale (VNS)
    Description
    Pain intensity is measured using a scale from 0 to 10. A straight 10 cm line is displayed for the subject enumerated from zero to 10, where zero represents no pain and 10 the worst pain possible. Subjects should mark the number that most represents the symptom of pain at the moment. Outcome will be measured 24 hours after each intervention session, after 1 month of the end of protocol and 2 months after the end of protocol for evaluation of long term effects.
    Time Frame
    Up to 2 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Visual Numeric Scale for Anxiety
    Description
    This scale has a straight 10 cm enumerated from zero to 10, where zero represents not anxious and 10 the most anxious possible. Subjects should mark the number that most represents the anxiety level at the moment. Outcome will be measured 24 hours after each intervention session, after 1 month of the end of protocol and 2 months after the end of protocol for evaluation of long term effects.
    Time Frame
    Up to 2 months
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
    Description
    Using a pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments, USA), pressure is measured in the thenar region of the hand and at the uppermost portion of the anterior tibialis muscle. Pressure is held until the individual report onset of pain. At this time the amount of compression performed in kg/force is measured. Outcome will be measured after one week of intervention, after four weeks of intervention, after 1 month of the end of protocol and 2 months after the end of protocol, for evaluation of long term effects.
    Time Frame
    Up to 2 months
    Title
    Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC-like effects)
    Description
    This parameter assesses through intense heterotopic stimulation, the response of endogenous pain modulation. Subjects emerge the hand in a container with ice-water (10-12˚C) for a period of one minute. During the last 30 seconds of immersion, the pressure pain threshold is measured in the other hand. The same procedure is performed for the other side. Temperature is measured by an immersion thermometer (ALLA BRAZIL 910.0150L). Outcome will be measured after four weeks of intervention, after 1 month of the end of protocol and 2 months after the end of protocol, for evaluation of long term effects.
    Time Frame
    Up to 2 months
    Title
    Change in SF-36 questionnaire of quality of life
    Description
    This questionnaire evaluates different aspects in individual life such as: Vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. Through different questions a score is generated for each subscale where zero represents the worst quality of life and 100 the best quality of life. Outcome will be measured after four weeks of intervention, after 1 month of the end of protocol and 2 months after the end of protocol, for evaluation of long term effects.
    Time Frame
    Up to 2 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients diagnosed with Fibromyalgia according to the American College of Rheumatology Have completed high school Age between 18 and 65 years old Exclusion Criteria: Were on medication for pain control for less than two months In treatment of depression for less than two months Patients with epilepsy, psychiatric disorders or who have any recent episode of neurologic disorders such as idiopathic syncope Pregnant women and infants Possessing metallic implant in the brain In use of illicit drugs That were in some kind of physical treatment for less than two months
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Marcel Simis, MD PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinicas Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo
    Official's Role
    Study Chair

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    17133529
    Citation
    Fregni F, Gimenes R, Valle AC, Ferreira MJ, Rocha RR, Natalle L, Bravo R, Rigonatti SP, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Boggio PS. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec;54(12):3988-98. doi: 10.1002/art.22195.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Aerobic Exercise Training for Patients With Fibromyalgia

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs