Effectiveness Ankle-7 Orthosis VS HAFO Orthosis on Gait in Diplegic CPChildren
Primary Purpose
Cerebral Palsy
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Carbon Ankle Seven spring (A7 - Otto Bock, Germany)
Hinged AFO
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebral Palsy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- - Clinical indication to the use of orthoses to improve the walking function confirmed by instrumental parameters obtained from analysis of the path (dynamic electromyography, optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry analysis);
- Patients who already have AFO orthoses (or ankle-7) that need to be renewed;
- Patients with new clinical indication to the use of orthoses but not yet in possession of the same;
- Informed consent from parents / guardians of the child
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive disabilities that may affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study, in the opinion of the investigators;
- Lower limbs sensory disability that may affect any beneficial effects of the use of the orthoses, in the opinion of the investigators;
- Other diseases associated or not associated with PCI that, according to investigators, could affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study (eg: drug-resistant epilepsy);
- Administration of antispasmodic drugs in the last 6 months;
- Functional surgery of the lower limbs in the last 6 months;
- Indication for surgical treatment to be carried out within 6 months after the date of inclusion in the study.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Other
Arm Label
AFO - Ankle_7 group
Ankle-7 - AFO group
Arm Description
AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of first orthosis to right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of second orthosis
Measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of watt to kilogram)
Secondary Outcome Measures
knee joint kinematics
average extension in degrees of the right and left knees during initial contact, loading response and mid-stance measured by instrumental gait analysis
stride length
stride length right and left leg, measured by instrumental gait analysis (percentage of height)
walking speed
walking speed measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of percentage of height to seconds)
preference of use of AFO or Ankle_7
determined from a self- compiled diary
clinical evaluation of the walking function
Using video-recording of children during walking and the Visual Gait Assessment Scale (OGS). (Boyd R, Graham HK. 1999)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03333434
First Posted
October 2, 2017
Last Updated
November 2, 2017
Sponsor
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
Collaborators
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03333434
Brief Title
Effectiveness Ankle-7 Orthosis VS HAFO Orthosis on Gait in Diplegic CPChildren
Official Title
Effectiveness of Ankle-7 Orthosis vs HAFO Orthosis on Gait Performance in Diplegic Cerebral Palsied Children
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Difficulties in recruiting
Study Start Date
November 30, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 15, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 15, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
Collaborators
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Ankle foot orthoses (AFO) are frequently used to improve locomotor skills of cerebral palsied children (CP) although the level of scientific evidence to support their use is still moderate. Carbon Ankle Seven spring (A7 - Otto Bock, Germany) is specifically designed to store energy when loaded and release it at toe-off in order to improve gait performance with respect to non-energy-storing AFOs. The aim of this work is to verify the superiority of the ankle-7 orthosis compared to the more widespread AFO, to improve the functionality and walking function of children with spastic diplegia and PCI.
Detailed Description
The project is divided into the following phases:
T0 - at the beginning of the study children included will be subject to the following procedures and assessments:
demographic and anthropometric data collection;
randomization by concealed allocation to one of the following two groups:
AFO - Ankle_7 group
Ankle-7 - AFO group Both, AFO and ankle-7, will be tailored to the patient
The two groups are distinguished by the order of the assignment of the two orthoses, respectively defined as the first assignment orthosis (O_1) and second assignment orthosis (O_2). The first group will use the orthoses AFO as a first assignment and then the orthoses Ankle_7, while the second group will use the two orthoses according to the reverse order. The two will be used with the same orthotic footwear, with the exception of the cases where it will be necessary to change it due to accretion.
collection of the measures necessary for making the two orthotic devices at OttoBock of Reggio Emilia
training in the use of the orthoses according to a standardized protocol;
try on the patient's in-process first assignment orthoses (O_1) and subsequent delivery of them (see Annex A);
Subsequently, the patient will use O_1 for a period of 4-6 weeks.
T1 - patients will receive the following procedures and assessments:
try on the patient's in-process second assignment orthoses (O_2)
instrumental gait analysis and video recording of the walking while using O_1 (covered by elastic gaiters);
withdrawal of O_1
delivery of O_2 to the patient
Subsequently, the patient will use O_2 for a period of 4-6 weeks.
T2 - patients will undergo the following procedures and evaluations:
instrumental gait analysis and video recording of the walking while using O_2 (covered by elastic gaiters);
return of O_1 to the patient;
Delivery of the diaries and directions for completing and mailing back them at the end of the follow-up period;
T3 - three months follow-up to detect the preference of use of AFO or Ankle-7 (by the child/parent)
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebral Palsy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
AFO - Ankle_7 group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
Arm Title
Ankle-7 - AFO group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Carbon Ankle Seven spring (A7 - Otto Bock, Germany)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Hinged AFO
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of first orthosis to right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of second orthosis
Description
Measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of watt to kilogram)
Time Frame
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
knee joint kinematics
Description
average extension in degrees of the right and left knees during initial contact, loading response and mid-stance measured by instrumental gait analysis
Time Frame
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
Title
stride length
Description
stride length right and left leg, measured by instrumental gait analysis (percentage of height)
Time Frame
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
Title
walking speed
Description
walking speed measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of percentage of height to seconds)
Time Frame
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
Title
preference of use of AFO or Ankle_7
Description
determined from a self- compiled diary
Time Frame
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis, after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis and after 3 months after three months when the child could freely use both orthoses
Title
clinical evaluation of the walking function
Description
Using video-recording of children during walking and the Visual Gait Assessment Scale (OGS). (Boyd R, Graham HK. 1999)
Time Frame
After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical indication to the use of orthoses to improve the walking function confirmed by instrumental parameters obtained from analysis of the path (dynamic electromyography, optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry analysis);
Patients who already have AFO orthoses (or ankle-7) that need to be renewed;
Patients with new clinical indication to the use of orthoses but not yet in possession of the same;
Informed consent from parents / guardians of the child
Exclusion Criteria:
Cognitive disabilities that may affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study, in the opinion of the investigators;
Lower limbs sensory disability that may affect any beneficial effects of the use of the orthoses, in the opinion of the investigators;
Other diseases associated or not associated with PCI that, according to investigators, could affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study (eg: drug-resistant epilepsy);
Administration of antispasmodic drugs in the last 6 months;
Functional surgery of the lower limbs in the last 6 months;
Indication for surgical treatment to be carried out within 6 months after the date of inclusion in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adriano Ferrari
Organizational Affiliation
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Effectiveness Ankle-7 Orthosis VS HAFO Orthosis on Gait in Diplegic CPChildren
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs