search
Back to results

Effectiveness Ankle-7 Orthosis VS HAFO Orthosis on Gait in Diplegic CPChildren

Primary Purpose

Cerebral Palsy

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Carbon Ankle Seven spring (A7 - Otto Bock, Germany)
Hinged AFO
Sponsored by
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebral Palsy

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Clinical indication to the use of orthoses to improve the walking function confirmed by instrumental parameters obtained from analysis of the path (dynamic electromyography, optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry analysis);
  • Patients who already have AFO orthoses (or ankle-7) that need to be renewed;
  • Patients with new clinical indication to the use of orthoses but not yet in possession of the same;
  • Informed consent from parents / guardians of the child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive disabilities that may affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study, in the opinion of the investigators;
  • Lower limbs sensory disability that may affect any beneficial effects of the use of the orthoses, in the opinion of the investigators;
  • Other diseases associated or not associated with PCI that, according to investigators, could affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study (eg: drug-resistant epilepsy);
  • Administration of antispasmodic drugs in the last 6 months;
  • Functional surgery of the lower limbs in the last 6 months;
  • Indication for surgical treatment to be carried out within 6 months after the date of inclusion in the study.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Other

    Other

    Arm Label

    AFO - Ankle_7 group

    Ankle-7 - AFO group

    Arm Description

    AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment

    AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change from right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of first orthosis to right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of second orthosis
    Measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of watt to kilogram)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    knee joint kinematics
    average extension in degrees of the right and left knees during initial contact, loading response and mid-stance measured by instrumental gait analysis
    stride length
    stride length right and left leg, measured by instrumental gait analysis (percentage of height)
    walking speed
    walking speed measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of percentage of height to seconds)
    preference of use of AFO or Ankle_7
    determined from a self- compiled diary
    clinical evaluation of the walking function
    Using video-recording of children during walking and the Visual Gait Assessment Scale (OGS). (Boyd R, Graham HK. 1999)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 2, 2017
    Last Updated
    November 2, 2017
    Sponsor
    Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
    Collaborators
    Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03333434
    Brief Title
    Effectiveness Ankle-7 Orthosis VS HAFO Orthosis on Gait in Diplegic CPChildren
    Official Title
    Effectiveness of Ankle-7 Orthosis vs HAFO Orthosis on Gait Performance in Diplegic Cerebral Palsied Children
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Terminated
    Why Stopped
    Difficulties in recruiting
    Study Start Date
    November 30, 2012 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 15, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    August 15, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
    Collaborators
    Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH

    4. Oversight

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Ankle foot orthoses (AFO) are frequently used to improve locomotor skills of cerebral palsied children (CP) although the level of scientific evidence to support their use is still moderate. Carbon Ankle Seven spring (A7 - Otto Bock, Germany) is specifically designed to store energy when loaded and release it at toe-off in order to improve gait performance with respect to non-energy-storing AFOs. The aim of this work is to verify the superiority of the ankle-7 orthosis compared to the more widespread AFO, to improve the functionality and walking function of children with spastic diplegia and PCI.
    Detailed Description
    The project is divided into the following phases: T0 - at the beginning of the study children included will be subject to the following procedures and assessments: demographic and anthropometric data collection; randomization by concealed allocation to one of the following two groups: AFO - Ankle_7 group Ankle-7 - AFO group Both, AFO and ankle-7, will be tailored to the patient The two groups are distinguished by the order of the assignment of the two orthoses, respectively defined as the first assignment orthosis (O_1) and second assignment orthosis (O_2). The first group will use the orthoses AFO as a first assignment and then the orthoses Ankle_7, while the second group will use the two orthoses according to the reverse order. The two will be used with the same orthotic footwear, with the exception of the cases where it will be necessary to change it due to accretion. collection of the measures necessary for making the two orthotic devices at OttoBock of Reggio Emilia training in the use of the orthoses according to a standardized protocol; try on the patient's in-process first assignment orthoses (O_1) and subsequent delivery of them (see Annex A); Subsequently, the patient will use O_1 for a period of 4-6 weeks. T1 - patients will receive the following procedures and assessments: try on the patient's in-process second assignment orthoses (O_2) instrumental gait analysis and video recording of the walking while using O_1 (covered by elastic gaiters); withdrawal of O_1 delivery of O_2 to the patient Subsequently, the patient will use O_2 for a period of 4-6 weeks. T2 - patients will undergo the following procedures and evaluations: instrumental gait analysis and video recording of the walking while using O_2 (covered by elastic gaiters); return of O_1 to the patient; Delivery of the diaries and directions for completing and mailing back them at the end of the follow-up period; T3 - three months follow-up to detect the preference of use of AFO or Ankle-7 (by the child/parent)

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cerebral Palsy

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    10 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    AFO - Ankle_7 group
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
    Arm Title
    Ankle-7 - AFO group
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    AFO is active comparator, ANKLE7 is the experimental treatment
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Carbon Ankle Seven spring (A7 - Otto Bock, Germany)
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Hinged AFO
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change from right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of first orthosis to right and left ankle joints power generation in stance phase after the use of second orthosis
    Description
    Measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of watt to kilogram)
    Time Frame
    After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    knee joint kinematics
    Description
    average extension in degrees of the right and left knees during initial contact, loading response and mid-stance measured by instrumental gait analysis
    Time Frame
    After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
    Title
    stride length
    Description
    stride length right and left leg, measured by instrumental gait analysis (percentage of height)
    Time Frame
    After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
    Title
    walking speed
    Description
    walking speed measured by instrumental gait analysis (ratio of percentage of height to seconds)
    Time Frame
    After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis
    Title
    preference of use of AFO or Ankle_7
    Description
    determined from a self- compiled diary
    Time Frame
    After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis, after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis and after 3 months after three months when the child could freely use both orthoses
    Title
    clinical evaluation of the walking function
    Description
    Using video-recording of children during walking and the Visual Gait Assessment Scale (OGS). (Boyd R, Graham HK. 1999)
    Time Frame
    After a 4-6 week period of use of first orthosis and after a 4-6 week period of use of second orthosis

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    6 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: - Clinical indication to the use of orthoses to improve the walking function confirmed by instrumental parameters obtained from analysis of the path (dynamic electromyography, optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry analysis); Patients who already have AFO orthoses (or ankle-7) that need to be renewed; Patients with new clinical indication to the use of orthoses but not yet in possession of the same; Informed consent from parents / guardians of the child Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive disabilities that may affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study, in the opinion of the investigators; Lower limbs sensory disability that may affect any beneficial effects of the use of the orthoses, in the opinion of the investigators; Other diseases associated or not associated with PCI that, according to investigators, could affect the child's participation in the activities related to this study (eg: drug-resistant epilepsy); Administration of antispasmodic drugs in the last 6 months; Functional surgery of the lower limbs in the last 6 months; Indication for surgical treatment to be carried out within 6 months after the date of inclusion in the study.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Adriano Ferrari
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Effectiveness Ankle-7 Orthosis VS HAFO Orthosis on Gait in Diplegic CPChildren

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs