search
Back to results

Effectiveness of AI Genetic Counseling Program vs In-person Genetic Counseling in Breast Cancer

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Automated program (ChatBot)
Genetics counselor
BCGCKQ Survey
Satisfaction Survey
Genetic testing
Sponsored by
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Breast Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects diagnosed with Stage 0-3 breast cancer.
  • Patients who do not satisfy current NCCN criteria for referral to a genetics counselor and genetics testing.
  • Must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document as well as complete the study questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Personal history of breast cancer

Sites / Locations

  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Artificial intelligence program

in-person genetic counseling

Arm Description

Will complete consult with the use of an artificial intelligence program Chatbot.

Will complete a traditional in-person genetic counseling. consult by meeting with a Genetics Counselor

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent of participants who took up genetic testing after not meeting NCCN guidelines for genetic testing
Up-take of testing for those who do not meet NCCN guidelines for genetic testing
Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing: survey
Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing as assessed by survey. The survey is a previously validated six-question Likert scale based survey. The scale ranges from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating more satisfaction. Satisfaction will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Published data suggest that standard deviation on the satisfaction survey is 3. A 2 point difference in average satisfaction score between groups is considered to be relevant
Overall comprehension as assessed by BCGCKQ
Comprehension as assessed by previously validated survey consisting of 27 questions, which are a blend of True or False and multiple choice questions. The scale ranges from to , with higher scores indicating more comprehension. Comprehension will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of overall cohort with mutation
Mutation rate as described by percentage of overall cohort with mutation. Groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test
Number of patients who decline genetic testing
Number of patients who decline genetic testing. Groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test
Frequencies of most common reasons for not pursuing genetic testing
Reasons for not pursuing genetic testing in those who declined will be collected as a descriptive measure and then analyzed as frequencies of the different responses, summarizing the most common answers
Time to treatment
Time to treatment will be compared between patients who had genetic testing to those who did not using t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test among all study patients.

Full Information

First Posted
March 25, 2020
Last Updated
August 16, 2023
Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04354675
Brief Title
Effectiveness of AI Genetic Counseling Program vs In-person Genetic Counseling in Breast Cancer
Official Title
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pre-test Genetic Counseling Using an Artificial Intelligence Program and Traditional In-person Genetic Counseling in Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Who do Not Currently Meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Criteria for Genetic Testing.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 29, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to help better understand the uptake and impact of genetic testing for women diagnosed with breast cancer who do not meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. By doing so, the research team will gain a better understanding of the clinical implications for offering genetic testing for all patients recently diagnosed with breast cancer versus only offering genetic testing to those meeting NCCN criteria. By offering genetic counseling and genetic testing to all women recently diagnosed with breast cancer, there will be a shortage of genetic counselors. This study will also assess the feasibility of using artificial intelligence to assist in the genetic counseling process.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized trial comparing the effectiveness of pre-test genetic counseling using an artificial intelligence program and traditional in-person genetic counseling in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer who do not currently meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic testing. The primary objectives of this study are: To determine up-take of testing for those who do not meet NCCN guidelines for genetic testing To assess overall patient satisfaction and comprehension in both groups The secondary objectives of this study are: To assess mutation rate in the overall cohort Identify reasons for not pursuing genetic testing Identify any specific areas of improvement in satisfaction and comprehension Assess the impact of genetic testing on Time to Treatment in this cohort Develop workflow for offering genetic testing, providing pre-test genetic counseling, ordering testing, and delivering results

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Artificial intelligence program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Will complete consult with the use of an artificial intelligence program Chatbot.
Arm Title
in-person genetic counseling
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Will complete a traditional in-person genetic counseling. consult by meeting with a Genetics Counselor
Intervention Type
Genetic
Intervention Name(s)
Automated program (ChatBot)
Intervention Description
Pre-test counseling and information through a pre-test automated genetic counseling program (ChatBot)
Intervention Type
Genetic
Intervention Name(s)
Genetics counselor
Intervention Description
Traditional in-person genetic counseling
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
BCGCKQ Survey
Other Intervention Name(s)
Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire (BCGCKQ)
Intervention Description
Survey assessing Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire (BCGCKQ)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Satisfaction Survey
Intervention Description
Survey assessing satisfaction with Decision-Genetic Testing
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Genetic testing
Intervention Description
Genetic testing for all participants will assess for a mutation in 47 genes commonly associated with hereditary cancer syndromes (Invitae's Common Hereditary Cancer Panel) for those who choose to complete testing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of participants who took up genetic testing after not meeting NCCN guidelines for genetic testing
Description
Up-take of testing for those who do not meet NCCN guidelines for genetic testing
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing: survey
Description
Mean overall patient satisfaction with decision about genetic testing as assessed by survey. The survey is a previously validated six-question Likert scale based survey. The scale ranges from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating more satisfaction. Satisfaction will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Published data suggest that standard deviation on the satisfaction survey is 3. A 2 point difference in average satisfaction score between groups is considered to be relevant
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Overall comprehension as assessed by BCGCKQ
Description
Comprehension as assessed by previously validated survey consisting of 27 questions, which are a blend of True or False and multiple choice questions. The scale ranges from to , with higher scores indicating more comprehension. Comprehension will be compared between groups with t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of overall cohort with mutation
Description
Mutation rate as described by percentage of overall cohort with mutation. Groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Number of patients who decline genetic testing
Description
Number of patients who decline genetic testing. Groups will be compared with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Frequencies of most common reasons for not pursuing genetic testing
Description
Reasons for not pursuing genetic testing in those who declined will be collected as a descriptive measure and then analyzed as frequencies of the different responses, summarizing the most common answers
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Time to treatment
Description
Time to treatment will be compared between patients who had genetic testing to those who did not using t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test among all study patients.
Time Frame
3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects diagnosed with Stage 0-3 breast cancer. Patients who do not satisfy current NCCN criteria for referral to a genetics counselor and genetics testing. Must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document as well as complete the study questionnaires. Exclusion Criteria: - N/A
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Zahraa Al-Hilli, MD
Phone
1-866-223-8100
Email
TaussigResearch@ccf.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zahraa Al-Hilli, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zahraa Al-Hilli, MD
Phone
866-223-8100
Email
TaussigResearch@ccf.org

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Commercially available software being used to conduct the study

Learn more about this trial

Effectiveness of AI Genetic Counseling Program vs In-person Genetic Counseling in Breast Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs