search
Back to results

Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation in Fibromyalgia

Primary Purpose

Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Spinal Manipulation
Sham Manipulation
Sponsored by
Bezmialem Vakif University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fibromyalgia focused on measuring fibromyalgia, manipulation, manual therapy, spinal

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 55 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with fibromyalgia according to the 2016 ACR Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria
  • Having been receiving pharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia for at least 2 weeks
  • VAS pain score> 4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Structural problem of the musculoskeletal system (acute spinal disc herniation, acute spondylolisthesis / lysis, fractures and dislocations, advanced degenerative changes, spinal stenosis)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inflammatory or infectious disease
  • Malignancy
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Unstable psychiatric disease
  • Previously received manual therapy or having enough information about manual therapy to distinguish between sham and real therapy (researched online, watched videos…).

Sites / Locations

  • Bezmialem Vakif University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Spinal Manipulation Group

Sham Manipulation Group

No Intervention Group

Arm Description

After the patients were evaluated in terms of somatic dysfunction, the appropriate techniques of Cervical Upglide Thrust, Cervical Downglide Thrust, Cervical Traction Thrust, Cervical Rotation Thrust, Cervico-Thoracic Distraction Manipulation, Cervico-Thoracic Lateral Glide (Spinous Push) Manipulation, Supine Screw Thoracic Thrust, Prone Thoracic Thrust, and Lumbar Spine Rotation Manipulation will be applied to patients.

A treatment will be applied which is very similar to active treatment but aimed to have minimal therapeutic effect. For this, the practitioner will primarily identify the areas where somatic dysfunction is detected and keep the application away from these areas. The patient will be positioned for treatment as in active therapy, but once in the lock position, a lower thrust will be given by releasing some back from the position. In this way, the movement will be imitated without reaching the elastic zone and a stronger similarity will be provided compared to sham treatments such as light touch or massage.

These patients will receive only their pharmacological treatments.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change from Baseline Pain Intensity at 1 and 3 months
Patients will be asked to mark their pain on the visual analog scale (VAS) during each visits.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change from Baseline Tenderness (tender point pain threshold score) at 1 and 3 months
Pressure pain threshold of 18 points specified in 1990 American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR) Fibromyalgia classification criteria will be evaluated with The Lafayette Manual Muscle Tester Model 01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA). This device is a dynamometer. It has been shown that if circumference is used instead of area as the correction coefficient hand dynamometers with wider tips than standard algometers are also valid and reliable in the pressure pain threshold measurement. The Lafayette Hand-Held Dynamometer uses a tip with a circumference of 5.65 cm. The applied force (kg) / 5.65 will be used as the pressure pain threshold unit in the study. The arithmetic mean of the data obtained from 18 points will be recorded as the tender point pain threshold score.
Change from Baseline Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) at 1 and 3 months
FIQR consists of 3 domains. The first domain contains 9 questions that can be scored between 0 and 10 and the score of the physical function is found by dividing the total score by three. Second domain contains 2 questions and the overall impact score is the sum of the scores from these two questions. Third domain consists of 10 questions and symptom score is obtained by dividing the total score by two. Total FIQR score is the sum of 3 domain points.
Change from Baseline Pain Extent at 1 and 3 months
The extent of the pain will be evaluated by widespread pain index (WPI). The WPI quantifies the extent of bodily pain on a 0-19 scale by asking patients if they have had pain or tenderness in 19 different body regions (shoulder girdle, hip, jaw, upper arm, upper leg, lower arm, and lower leg on each side of the body, as well as upper back, lower back, chest, neck, and abdomen) over the past week, with each painful or tender region scoring 1 point.
Change from Baseline Fibromyalgia Severity Score (FSS) at 1 and 3 months
FSS is the sum of the WPI and symptom severity scale (SSS) scores. SSS consists of two domains. For the first domain, the complaints of fatigue, waking unrefreshed and cognitive symptoms are scored between 0 (no problem) and 3 (life-disturbing problems ). For the second domain, headaches, pain or cramps in lower abdomen, and depression are scored between 0 (absent) and 1 (present). The total score gives the SSS score.

Full Information

First Posted
December 7, 2020
Last Updated
October 26, 2021
Sponsor
Bezmialem Vakif University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04673058
Brief Title
Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation in Fibromyalgia
Official Title
Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation in Addition to Standard Pharmacological Treatment in Fibromyalgia : A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 26, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 15, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 26, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Bezmialem Vakif University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether spinal manipulation, which is a potential treatment method for musculoskeletal pain, has an additional contribution in patients with fibromyalgia receiving standard pharmacological treatment.
Detailed Description
Although fibromyalgia (FM) is quite common, success rates in conservative treatment are unsatisfying. Combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological applications is recommended in treatment. Although the etiology of FM is not well known, characteristic findings such as hyperalgesia and allodynia suggest problems related to pain and sensorial processing in the central nervous system. It has been suggested that spinal manipulation can alter sensorimotor integration in the central nervous system and therefore can be used in the treatment of central sensitization syndromes. However, manual therapy applications, which were examined under the heading of chiropractic in the 2016 EULAR treatment recommendations, were not recommended due to the low quality (open-label, quasi-experimental) of the studies conducted so far. However, it has been suggested for future studies to investigate whether the combined use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments is more effective than single modality management. But since then unfortunately a high level of evidence also could not be obtained related to use of spinal manipulation in FM due to reasons such as lack of reporting of the manual therapy methods used in detail, conducting studies involving mostly soft tissue techniques and not following CONSORT recommendations. This study is planned as a prospective, triple-blinding, randomized controlled and 3-arm parallel group design clinical study considering the concepts that have been lacking the literature.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fibromyalgia
Keywords
fibromyalgia, manipulation, manual therapy, spinal

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Prospective, triple-blinding, randomized controlled and 3-arm parallel group design clinical study. 3 arms of the study were planned to consist of active intervention group, sham treatment group and no intervention group.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
2 staff members who will administer the treatment to active intervention and sham therapy groups will not be able to be blinded due the inherent of manual therapy. Staff members who are responsible for statistical analysis, participants and outcome assessors will be blinded.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Spinal Manipulation Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
After the patients were evaluated in terms of somatic dysfunction, the appropriate techniques of Cervical Upglide Thrust, Cervical Downglide Thrust, Cervical Traction Thrust, Cervical Rotation Thrust, Cervico-Thoracic Distraction Manipulation, Cervico-Thoracic Lateral Glide (Spinous Push) Manipulation, Supine Screw Thoracic Thrust, Prone Thoracic Thrust, and Lumbar Spine Rotation Manipulation will be applied to patients.
Arm Title
Sham Manipulation Group
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
A treatment will be applied which is very similar to active treatment but aimed to have minimal therapeutic effect. For this, the practitioner will primarily identify the areas where somatic dysfunction is detected and keep the application away from these areas. The patient will be positioned for treatment as in active therapy, but once in the lock position, a lower thrust will be given by releasing some back from the position. In this way, the movement will be imitated without reaching the elastic zone and a stronger similarity will be provided compared to sham treatments such as light touch or massage.
Arm Title
No Intervention Group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
These patients will receive only their pharmacological treatments.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Spinal Manipulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
high velocity low amplitude thrust manipulation
Intervention Description
Intervention will be administered twice a week for 3 weeks. Each treatment session will be given in 20-minute sessions consisting of 10 minutes of manual examination and 10 minutes of manual treatment.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Manipulation
Intervention Description
The practitioner will primarily identify the areas where somatic dysfunction is detected and keep the application away from these areas. The patient will be positioned for treatment as in active therapy, but once in the lock position, a lower thrust will be given by releasing some back from the position.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from Baseline Pain Intensity at 1 and 3 months
Description
Patients will be asked to mark their pain on the visual analog scale (VAS) during each visits.
Time Frame
Baseline, one week after the last treatment session (1st month) and 3rd month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from Baseline Tenderness (tender point pain threshold score) at 1 and 3 months
Description
Pressure pain threshold of 18 points specified in 1990 American Collage of Rheumatology (ACR) Fibromyalgia classification criteria will be evaluated with The Lafayette Manual Muscle Tester Model 01165 (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA). This device is a dynamometer. It has been shown that if circumference is used instead of area as the correction coefficient hand dynamometers with wider tips than standard algometers are also valid and reliable in the pressure pain threshold measurement. The Lafayette Hand-Held Dynamometer uses a tip with a circumference of 5.65 cm. The applied force (kg) / 5.65 will be used as the pressure pain threshold unit in the study. The arithmetic mean of the data obtained from 18 points will be recorded as the tender point pain threshold score.
Time Frame
Baseline, one week after the last treatment session (1st month) and 3rd month
Title
Change from Baseline Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) at 1 and 3 months
Description
FIQR consists of 3 domains. The first domain contains 9 questions that can be scored between 0 and 10 and the score of the physical function is found by dividing the total score by three. Second domain contains 2 questions and the overall impact score is the sum of the scores from these two questions. Third domain consists of 10 questions and symptom score is obtained by dividing the total score by two. Total FIQR score is the sum of 3 domain points.
Time Frame
Baseline, one week after the last treatment session (1st month) and 3rd month
Title
Change from Baseline Pain Extent at 1 and 3 months
Description
The extent of the pain will be evaluated by widespread pain index (WPI). The WPI quantifies the extent of bodily pain on a 0-19 scale by asking patients if they have had pain or tenderness in 19 different body regions (shoulder girdle, hip, jaw, upper arm, upper leg, lower arm, and lower leg on each side of the body, as well as upper back, lower back, chest, neck, and abdomen) over the past week, with each painful or tender region scoring 1 point.
Time Frame
Baseline, one week after the last treatment session (1st month) and 3rd month
Title
Change from Baseline Fibromyalgia Severity Score (FSS) at 1 and 3 months
Description
FSS is the sum of the WPI and symptom severity scale (SSS) scores. SSS consists of two domains. For the first domain, the complaints of fatigue, waking unrefreshed and cognitive symptoms are scored between 0 (no problem) and 3 (life-disturbing problems ). For the second domain, headaches, pain or cramps in lower abdomen, and depression are scored between 0 (absent) and 1 (present). The total score gives the SSS score.
Time Frame
Baseline, one week after the last treatment session (1st month) and 3rd month

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Female Patients
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Being diagnosed with fibromyalgia according to the 2016 ACR Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria Having been receiving pharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia for at least 2 weeks VAS pain score> 4 Exclusion Criteria: Structural problem of the musculoskeletal system (acute spinal disc herniation, acute spondylolisthesis / lysis, fractures and dislocations, advanced degenerative changes, spinal stenosis) Pregnancy or breastfeeding Inflammatory or infectious disease Malignancy Neuromuscular disease History of spinal surgery Unstable psychiatric disease Previously received manual therapy or having enough information about manual therapy to distinguish between sham and real therapy (researched online, watched videos…).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bugra Ince, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Bezmialem Vakif University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bezmialem Vakif University Hospital
City
Istanbul
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data sharing will be done on request.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17137836
Citation
Haavik-Taylor H, Murphy B. Cervical spine manipulation alters sensorimotor integration: a somatosensory evoked potential study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;118(2):391-402. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25782585
Citation
Moustafa IM, Diab AA. The addition of upper cervical manipulative therapy in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jul;35(7):1163-74. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3248-7. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31892357
Citation
Haller H, Lauche R, Sundberg T, Dobos G, Cramer H. Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 31;21(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3017-y.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16080794
Citation
Licciardone JC, Brimhall AK, King LN. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005 Aug 4;6:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-43.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27377815
Citation
Macfarlane GJ, Kronisch C, Dean LE, Atzeni F, Hauser W, Fluss E, Choy E, Kosek E, Amris K, Branco J, Dincer F, Leino-Arjas P, Longley K, McCarthy GM, Makri S, Perrot S, Sarzi-Puttini P, Taylor A, Jones GT. EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):318-328. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209724. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation in Fibromyalgia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs