Effectiveness of Stepped Care Versus Best Available Care for Bulimia Nervosa
Primary Purpose
Eating Disorders
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Fluoxetine
Guided Self-Help
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Eating Disorders focused on measuring Bulimia Nervosa
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of bulimia nervosa
Exclusion Criteria:
- Weight less than 85% of ideal
- Current substance abuse or dependence
- Pregnant
- Currently receiving psychotherapy
Sites / Locations
- Stanford University
- University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN
- Cornell University; White Plains, NY
- University of North Dakota / Neuropsychiatric Research Institute
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Stepped Care
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Arm Description
Participants will receive guided self-help with nine clinician checkups, followed by fluoxetine if nonresponsive, followed by cognitive behavioral therapy if still nonresponsive.
Participants will receive 20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy with the addition of fluoxetine at interim points.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Eating disorders examination
Secondary Outcome Measures
Records of health care, medications, and treatments
Height, weight, and body mass index
Battery of self-report questionnaires
Questionnaire on time lost to bulimia, completed by a family member
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00733525
First Posted
August 12, 2008
Last Updated
October 30, 2019
Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00733525
Brief Title
Effectiveness of Stepped Care Versus Best Available Care for Bulimia Nervosa
Official Title
Stepped Care vs Best Available Care for Bulimia Nervosa
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2000 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2005 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2005 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will compare the medical and cost effectiveness of a stepped approach, including self-help and drug therapies, to the current best available care for bulimia nervosa.
Detailed Description
The eating disorder bulimia nervosa (BN) is estimated to exist in 1 % to 2 % of women from the ages of 15 to 30, and bulimic behaviors occur in many more who do not develop the disorder. Characteristic symptoms include binge eating and self-induced vomiting. Research indicates that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), paired with use of the antidepressant fluoxetine, is the treatment of choice for BN. However, a survey of doctoral level psychologists dealing with eating disorders found that 78% of clinicians had no training in CBT for eating disorders, with 72% also untrained in the alternative, interpersonal therapy. Self-help manuals based on CBT have been developed as a treatment option for those without access to a clinician trained in CBT for eating disorders. Studies of these manuals suggest that self-guided therapy is as effective as CBT for some individuals. Additionally, although little research has examined cost effectiveness for treatment of eating disorders, a self-help approach may be more cost effective than CBT. This study will test whether self-help therapy, in the context of a stepped treatment plan involving check-ins with a clinician and possible drug treatment, can be an effective alternative, medically and economically, to traditional CBT.
Participants at four treatment sites will be screened for diagnosis, health, and presence of other conditions through assessments in standardized questionnaires, clinical interviews, and a blood test. Participants who pass the screening will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences. In the first sequence, participants will be given twenty 50-minute sessions of individual CBT treatment over 18 weeks, focusing on altering eating behaviors. If participants do not have an adequate initial response to treatment by session six, they will be offered a trial of fluoxetine in addition to their continued CBT treatment. If they do not meet response criteria at the end of the 18 weeks of CBT treatment, they will again be given the option of taking or continuing to take fluoxetine until the termination of the study. The second sequence will begin with a specially designed self-help program aimed at teaching the same skills that will be taught in CBT sessions. Participants will have nine 30-minute checkup sessions with a therapist over 18 weeks. Participants who do not respond adequately to the treatment after 10 weeks will be given the option of taking fluoxetine. Participants without sufficient recovery at the end of 18 weeks will be given the option of undergoing the first treatment sequence.
Assessments of costs and health will be made at five points: the beginning of the study, and at the study visits on Week 10, Week 18, Week 36, and Week 62. Multiple assessments will be used to test health, including eating disorder symptoms, presence of other psychopathology and personality factors, social and interpersonal functioning, and quality of life. Eating disorder symptoms will be evaluated through clinical interview, questionnaires, and weight fluctuations. Treatment variables will also be assessed, with particular interest in the measure of patient knowledge of CBT techniques, to determine how much information from the self-help manual is used and absorbed. For the cost benefit analysis, assessments will include cost of health care visits, medications, treatments, and time lost due to illness. Data on cost will be collected at study visits, except for time lost, which will be measured through a questionnaire completed by a family member once at baseline and once after 18 weeks of treatment.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eating Disorders
Keywords
Bulimia Nervosa
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
293 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Stepped Care
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive guided self-help with nine clinician checkups, followed by fluoxetine if nonresponsive, followed by cognitive behavioral therapy if still nonresponsive.
Arm Title
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive 20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy with the addition of fluoxetine at interim points.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Intervention Description
Therapy focusing on skills needed to alter eating patterns
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fluoxetine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Prozac
Intervention Description
20 mg/day of fluoxetine, which can be incrementally increased to 80 mg/day
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Guided Self-Help
Intervention Description
Manual designed to impart teachings of cognitive behavioral therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Eating disorders examination
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and Weeks 10, 18, 36, and 62
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Records of health care, medications, and treatments
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and Weeks 10, 18, 36, and 62
Title
Height, weight, and body mass index
Time Frame
Measured at baseline, Week 8, and Week 62
Title
Battery of self-report questionnaires
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and Weeks 10, 18, 36, and 62
Title
Questionnaire on time lost to bulimia, completed by a family member
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and after 18 weeks of treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of bulimia nervosa
Exclusion Criteria:
Weight less than 85% of ideal
Current substance abuse or dependence
Pregnant
Currently receiving psychotherapy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stewart Agras, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Stanford University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford University
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cornell University; White Plains, NY
City
White Plains
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10605
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Dakota / Neuropsychiatric Research Institute
City
Fargo
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58103
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21415046
Citation
Mitchell JE, Agras S, Crow S, Halmi K, Fairburn CG, Bryson S, Kraemer H. Stepped care and cognitive-behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa: randomised trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2011 May;198(5):391-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.082172. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Effectiveness of Stepped Care Versus Best Available Care for Bulimia Nervosa
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs