Effectiveness of the GumChucks® Flossing System Compared to String Floss for Interdental Plaque Removal in Children
Primary Purpose
Gingivitis, Plaque
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GumChucks
String floss
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Gingivitis focused on measuring Interdental plaque, Flossing aid, Children, Gingival inflammation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- healthy children aged 4-15 years, who were not on any type of medication
- presence of at least 4 posterior interdental contacts
- ability to follow verbal and/or written instruction
- availability for a 4-week study period
- one parent or legal guardian of each included child participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
- had antibiotics within the last 6 months
- are pregnant.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
String floss
Gumchucks floss
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Interdental plaque score - after first use
Interdental plaque scores were recorded after the teeth were stained with plaque disclosing solutions (GUM® Red-Cote®) for 30 seconds followed by a water rinse. Interdental plaque was scored either presence or absence at 4 sites of each tooth (mesio-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, and disto-lingual).
Score of 0 = If disclosing solution shows no visible plaque at the site Score of 1 = if disclosing solution shows the presence of any plaque between interproximal contact and the respective line angle of that site.
The total interdental plaque score for each participant is the sum of all sites stained positive with disclosing solution.
Interdental plaque score - after 4 weeks of usage
Interdental plaque scores were recorded after the teeth were stained with plaque disclosing solutions (GUM® Red-Cote®) for 30 seconds followed by a water rinse. Interdental plaque was scored either presence or absence at 4 sites of each tooth (mesio-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, and disto-lingual).
Score of 0 = If disclosing solution shows no visible plaque at the site Score of 1 = if disclosing solution shows the presence of any plaque between interproximal contact and the respective line angle of that site.
Gingival index - after 4 weeks of usage
Gingival inflammation was assessed using the gingival index where the scores were taken of the buccal and lingual margins of the interdental papillae adjacent to interdental contacts with the following scoring system:
0 = absence of inflammation
= mild inflammation: slight change in color, little change in texture
= moderate inflammation: moderate erythema/edema, bleeding on pressure
= severe inflammation: severe erythema/edema, tendency to spontaneous bleeding, ulceration The gingival index score of each participant is the sum of all scores divided by the total numbers of buccal and lingual interdental papillae sites
Flossing speed
The total time for a participant to floss all interdental contacts was measured in seconds.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Floss preferences by children, parents and dentists
Preferences of child participants, their parents and dentists toward the use of GumChucks® in comparison to string floss was measured by a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. Child participants and their parents completed questionnaires after using both flossing products, while dentists completed questionnaires after viewing the video and/or live demonstration of GumChucks® usage on a model of the oral cavity.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04057430
First Posted
August 12, 2019
Last Updated
August 13, 2019
Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04057430
Brief Title
Effectiveness of the GumChucks® Flossing System Compared to String Floss for Interdental Plaque Removal in Children
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 10, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 26, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 26, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the interdental plaque removal efficacy, flossing speed, and reduction in gingival inflammation of a new flossing system (GumChucks®) compared to string floss, and to assess preference between the two flossing products in children, parents, and dentists.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gingivitis, Plaque
Keywords
Interdental plaque, Flossing aid, Children, Gingival inflammation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
String floss
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Gumchucks floss
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
GumChucks
Intervention Description
GumChucks® is an innovative flossing system resembling mini nunchucks. The two-handle design eliminates the need to wrap the floss around fingers, and a proper flossing technique is facilitated by the nature of its curved shaped.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
String floss
Intervention Description
Traditional string floss used in this study was Oral-B Glide® Pro-Health Original Floss
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Interdental plaque score - after first use
Description
Interdental plaque scores were recorded after the teeth were stained with plaque disclosing solutions (GUM® Red-Cote®) for 30 seconds followed by a water rinse. Interdental plaque was scored either presence or absence at 4 sites of each tooth (mesio-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, and disto-lingual).
Score of 0 = If disclosing solution shows no visible plaque at the site Score of 1 = if disclosing solution shows the presence of any plaque between interproximal contact and the respective line angle of that site.
The total interdental plaque score for each participant is the sum of all sites stained positive with disclosing solution.
Time Frame
Baseline and Day 1
Title
Interdental plaque score - after 4 weeks of usage
Description
Interdental plaque scores were recorded after the teeth were stained with plaque disclosing solutions (GUM® Red-Cote®) for 30 seconds followed by a water rinse. Interdental plaque was scored either presence or absence at 4 sites of each tooth (mesio-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, and disto-lingual).
Score of 0 = If disclosing solution shows no visible plaque at the site Score of 1 = if disclosing solution shows the presence of any plaque between interproximal contact and the respective line angle of that site.
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks
Title
Gingival index - after 4 weeks of usage
Description
Gingival inflammation was assessed using the gingival index where the scores were taken of the buccal and lingual margins of the interdental papillae adjacent to interdental contacts with the following scoring system:
0 = absence of inflammation
= mild inflammation: slight change in color, little change in texture
= moderate inflammation: moderate erythema/edema, bleeding on pressure
= severe inflammation: severe erythema/edema, tendency to spontaneous bleeding, ulceration The gingival index score of each participant is the sum of all scores divided by the total numbers of buccal and lingual interdental papillae sites
Time Frame
Baseline and 4 weeks
Title
Flossing speed
Description
The total time for a participant to floss all interdental contacts was measured in seconds.
Time Frame
Day 1
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Floss preferences by children, parents and dentists
Description
Preferences of child participants, their parents and dentists toward the use of GumChucks® in comparison to string floss was measured by a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. Child participants and their parents completed questionnaires after using both flossing products, while dentists completed questionnaires after viewing the video and/or live demonstration of GumChucks® usage on a model of the oral cavity.
Time Frame
Day 1
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
4 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
healthy children aged 4-15 years, who were not on any type of medication
presence of at least 4 posterior interdental contacts
ability to follow verbal and/or written instruction
availability for a 4-week study period
one parent or legal guardian of each included child participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
had antibiotics within the last 6 months
are pregnant.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Effectiveness of the GumChucks® Flossing System Compared to String Floss for Interdental Plaque Removal in Children
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs