search
Back to results

Effectiveness of Three Different Oral Moisturizers in Palliative Care Patients.

Primary Purpose

Xerostomia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Glycerol 17%
Aequasyal (OGT)
Salient (new product)
Sponsored by
University of Bergen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Xerostomia focused on measuring Palliative, Moisturisers, Dry mouth, Xerostomia

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patients have xerostomia (subjective feeling of dry mouth). 2
  2. The patients are palliative and in institutionalized care.
  3. Curative treatment of existing diseases has been completed.
  4. WHOs functional status 3/Karnofsky functional status 30 - 40 % (only capable of limited self-care, tied to bed or chair more than 50% of wake time).
  5. Participants are cognitively functioning, capable of and willing to consent, capable of giving responses to a limited questionnaire and are expected to remain at the care centre for a minimum of 3 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients treated with radiotherapy in head and neck region.

-

Sites / Locations

  • University of BergenRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Glycerol 17 %

Aequasyal (OGT)

Salient (new product)

Arm Description

Oral moisturizer

Oral moisturizer

Oral moisturizer

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Subjective xerostomia
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Subjective feeling of dry mouth: Not dry Insignificantly dry Fairly dry Almost completely dry Completely dry

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain/discomfort
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Subjective feeling pain/discomfort: No pain Insignificant pain/discomfort Some pain/discomfort Much pain/discomfort Strong pain/discomfort
Speech
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Xerostomia regarding impact on ability to speak: Not difficulties Insignificant difficulties Some difficulties Significant difficulties Major difficulties
Diurnal variation
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: At what times are xerostomia most pronounced: At night In the morning In the afternoon In the evening No diurnal difference
Situational dry mouth
Measured on a 3-point Likert-scale: By intake of medication By worsening of the disease In Connection with thirst

Full Information

First Posted
December 14, 2017
Last Updated
October 26, 2018
Sponsor
University of Bergen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03400969
Brief Title
Effectiveness of Three Different Oral Moisturizers in Palliative Care Patients.
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Three Different Oral Moisturizers in Palliative Care Patients.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 15, 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 15, 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Bergen

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study compares the effectiveness of 3 different oral moisturizers; 17% watery solution of glycerol, OGT oral spray, Aequasyal, and a newly developed Product, Salient.
Detailed Description
Background: A majority of patients in palliative care have problems with dry mouth caused by medication or as a direct result of the mortal condition. Dry mouth will cause a variety of problems that commonly affect the disease negatively and contribute to reduced quality of life in the patient's last stage of life. A Cochrane review from 2011 concludes that "there are several moisturising agents available, but no strong evidence that any topical therapy is effective for relieving the symptom of dry mouth." It also concludes that "Oxygenated glycerol triester (OGT) oral spray is more effective than an aqueous electrolyte spray."1 Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of 3 different oral moisturisers, ; 17 % watery solution of glycerol, OGT oral spray, Aequasyal® and a newly developed product, Salient®. Methods/design: 30 patients will be recruited from a Norwegian palliative care unit. Eligibility criteria for participants are: The patients have xerostomia (subjective feeling of dry mouth). 2 The patients are palliative and in institutionalized care. Curative treatment of existing diseases has been completed. WHOs functional status 3/Karnofsky functional status 30 - 40 % (only capable of limited self-care, tied to bed or chair more than 50% of wake time).3, 4 Participants are cognitively functioning, capable of and willing to consent, capable of giving responses to a limited questionnaire and are expected to remain at the care centre for a minimum of 3 days. Patients treated with radiotherapy in head and neck region, are excluded from this trial. The different moisturizers will be compared in a double blind, cross-over design. All patients will be randomized to all three treatments in the cross-over trial, with a minimum of 24 hours wash-out period between the treatments. Patient responses will be collected at baseline, immediately after exposure and after 2 hours. Medical history and medication will be recorded. Primary outcome variables are the subjective feeling of xerostomia, pain/discomfort and speech disturbance. Ethical considerations: An application for approval of this study will be sent to the Regional Ethical Committee (REC). There are no known side effects of the agents or methods that will be applied. Discussion: To the investigators knowledge, the proposed randomized controlled trial of the effect of three different oral moisturizers will be the first study of this kind to be performed in patients in palliative institutionalized ward. There are no known adverse effects of the products used in this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Xerostomia
Keywords
Palliative, Moisturisers, Dry mouth, Xerostomia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
The different moisturizers will be compared in a double blind, cross-over design. Patient responses will be collected at baseline, immediately after exposure and after 2 hours.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
A Block randomisation is made by a person, other than the one who applies the product. Neither the patient nor the person who records the product or the person who registers data knows which product is used for the intervention. The product is not labeled with name
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Glycerol 17 %
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral moisturizer
Arm Title
Aequasyal (OGT)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral moisturizer
Arm Title
Salient (new product)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral moisturizer
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Glycerol 17%
Intervention Description
Glycerol will be applied, using gauze on a lockable tweezer, at the end of the oral care procedure performed by a dentist.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Aequasyal (OGT)
Intervention Description
Aequasyl (OGT) will be sprayed on the mucosa, at the end of the oral care procedure, preformed by a dentist.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Salient (new product)
Intervention Description
Salient (new Product) will be applied/given on a spoon, at the end of the oral care procedure, preformed by a dentist.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjective xerostomia
Description
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Subjective feeling of dry mouth: Not dry Insignificantly dry Fairly dry Almost completely dry Completely dry
Time Frame
3 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain/discomfort
Description
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Subjective feeling pain/discomfort: No pain Insignificant pain/discomfort Some pain/discomfort Much pain/discomfort Strong pain/discomfort
Time Frame
3 days
Title
Speech
Description
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Xerostomia regarding impact on ability to speak: Not difficulties Insignificant difficulties Some difficulties Significant difficulties Major difficulties
Time Frame
3 days
Title
Diurnal variation
Description
Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: At what times are xerostomia most pronounced: At night In the morning In the afternoon In the evening No diurnal difference
Time Frame
3 days
Title
Situational dry mouth
Description
Measured on a 3-point Likert-scale: By intake of medication By worsening of the disease In Connection with thirst
Time Frame
3 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patients have xerostomia (subjective feeling of dry mouth). 2 The patients are palliative and in institutionalized care. Curative treatment of existing diseases has been completed. WHOs functional status 3/Karnofsky functional status 30 - 40 % (only capable of limited self-care, tied to bed or chair more than 50% of wake time). Participants are cognitively functioning, capable of and willing to consent, capable of giving responses to a limited questionnaire and are expected to remain at the care centre for a minimum of 3 days. Exclusion Criteria: Patients treated with radiotherapy in head and neck region. -
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Siri F. Kvalheim, DDS
Phone
0047 55586488
Email
Siri.Kvalheim@uib.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Stein-Atle Lie, PhD
Phone
0047 55586477
Email
Stein.Lie@uib.no
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gunhild V Strand, DDS, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Bergen, Norway
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Bergen
City
Bergen
State/Province
Hordaland
ZIP/Postal Code
5099
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Signe Solberg
Phone
+47 55 58 66 88
Email
signe.solberg@uib.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Åstrøm, PhD
Phone
+47 55 58 64 83
Email
anne.astrom@uib.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stein A Lie, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gunhild V Strand, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Siri F Kvalheim, MDS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Einar Berg, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Anonymous data will be available by request after publication of effect article.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available after publication of article.

Learn more about this trial

Effectiveness of Three Different Oral Moisturizers in Palliative Care Patients.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs