Effectiveness Study of Mirtazapine Combined With Paroxetine in Major Depressive Patients Without Early Improvement
Primary Purpose
Major Depression
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
mirtazapine
paroxetine 20mg QD
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Major Depression focused on measuring mirtazapine, paroxetine, major depression, early improvement
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Has given written informed consent.
- Male or female outpatients aged at least 18 years and not more than 60 years.
- Has a diagnosis of major depressive disorder by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria.
- HAMD-17 ≥ 20 and HAMD-17 Item 1(depressed mood) score ≥2 at enrolment in open-label preliminary phase.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently enrolled in, or discontinued within the last 30 days from, a clinical trial involving an off-label use of an investigational drug.
- Current Axis I primary psychiatric diagnosis other than major depressive disorder.
- Organic mental disease, including mental retardation.
- History of clinically significant disease, including any cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, hematologic, endocrinologic, or neurologic disease, or clinically significant laboratory abnormality that is not stabilized or is anticipated to require treatment during the study.
- Subjects receiving an investigational agent (including different formulation and generic agents of investigational drug) in the previous 3 months prior to screening.
- Women in pregnancy or lactation, or female of child bearing potential without appropriate birth control measures.
- Use of antipsychotics or mood stabilizers within 5 days prior to screening.
- Has received depot antipsychotic medication within one cycle prior to screening.
- Known allergy or lack of response to mirtazapine.
- Has received ECT or MECT within 3 months prior to screening.
- Significant risk of suicidal and/or self-harm behaviors.
Sites / Locations
- Beijing Anding Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Add-on therapy
mirtazapine monotherapy
paroxetine monotherapy
Arm Description
mirtazapine 30mg QD and paroxetine 20mg QD
mirtazapine 30mg QD
paroxetine 20mg QD
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Symptoms Improvement by HAMD-17
Change of 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) total score
Secondary Outcome Measures
Self-reported improvement by QIDS-SR
Change of Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-self report (QIDS-SR) total score
Remission rate by HAMD-17
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with HAMD-17 total score ≤7
Remission rate by QIDS-SR
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with QIDS-SR total score ≤5
Response rate HAMD-17
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with the reduction of HAMD-17 total score >=50%
Response rate by QIDS-SR
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with the reduction of QIDS-SR total score >=50%
Clinical Global Impression-improvement
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with CGI-I as "much improved" or "very much improved"
Clinical Global Impression- severity
Change of CGI-S total score
Safety outcome 1
The incidence and nature of overall adverse events
Safety outcome 2
The incidence and nature of drug-related adverse events
Drop-off rate due to adverse events
The number of subject withdrawal due to adverse events during double-blind phase
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01458626
First Posted
August 9, 2011
Last Updated
August 30, 2017
Sponsor
Capital Medical University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01458626
Brief Title
Effectiveness Study of Mirtazapine Combined With Paroxetine in Major Depressive Patients Without Early Improvement
Official Title
A Double-blind, Active-controlled, Randomized Study Comparing Mirtazapine Combined With Paroxetine or Paroxetine Monotherapy in Patients With Major Depressive Patients Without Early Improvement in the First 2 Weeks
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 14, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 24, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 24, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Capital Medical University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Although treatment guidelines manifest that antidepressant response usually appear with a delay of several weeks and suggest that treatment should be changed if a partial response has not occurred after 4~6 week, these beliefs are no longer held by experts, and a new concept is raised that the first 2 weeks of treatment may be a useful strategy for improving the management of depression. New evidence indicates that early treatment response can be predicted with high sensitivity after 2 weeks of treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
Early improvement not only predicted response or remission, but also that lack of improvement was associated with little chance of response if the treatment strategy remained unchanged. The criterion of a 20% score reduction has been chosen as an early indicator of improvement because it can be reliably measured in clinical trials and translates into a clinically relevant change in the severity of depressive symptoms.
Antidepressants that enhance both serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission may be more effective than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for acute-phase therapy of major depressive disorder. As a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant, the antidepressive mechanism of mirtazapine is quite superior to SSRI and in particular has been suggested to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs in MDD patients.
The aim of this study is to provide physicians with further information regarding early improvement and the effectiveness of mirtazapine combined with a SSRI antidepressant therapy in nonresponders.
Detailed Description
Mirtazapine has significant advantages in response and remission rates compared with various SSRIs in double-blind treatment. Mirtazapine combined with SSRIs or venlafaxine was also found to be one of the more effective and successful strategy for nonresponders in MDD. The investigators hypothesized that mirtazapine as adjunctive treatment to paroxetine can boost the onset time and also can improve the antidepression action of SSRIs in patients without early improvement.
The aim of this study is to provide physicians with further information regarding early improvement and mirtazapine combined with a SSRI antidepressant therapy in nonresponders, by providing a comparison of depressive symptoms outcomes associated with adjunctive mirtazapine or mono- paroxetine in MDD patients who have previously been treated with paroxetine for 2 weeks and who have not attained improvement. Paroxetine has been chosen as a comparator because it is a widely-used and relatively well-tolerated SSRI antidepressant.
The study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial in subjects with MDD.
Patients will be male or female, 18 to 60 years of age, inclusive, outpatient or inpatient status, with diagnosis of major depressive episode (single or recurrent) by DSM-IV. The patients should also have HAMD-17 total score ≥ 20,a HAMD-17 Item 1(depressed mood) score ≥ 2 at enrollment in open-label preliminary phase.
It will consist of 2 phases. An open-label preliminary phase lasts for 2 weeks, during which paroxetine is titrated up to 20mg/day (Day 5). At Week 2, patients will be evaluated by HAMD-17. The patients who have achieved early improvement (the decrease of HAMD-17 total score ≥ 20%) will be discontinued. The patients who have not achieved early improvement (the decrease of HAMD-17 total score < 20%), will be randomized into three treatment arms [1.Mirtazapine (30mg/d); 2.Paroxetine (20mg/d); 3.Mirtazapine (30mg/d) +Paroxetine(20mg/d)]. In double-blind treatment phase (consist of 6 weeks), patients will be evaluated at Week 3, 4, 6 and 8.
Primary efficacy measure will be assessed based on the decrease of HAMD-17 from randomization (Week 2) to endpoint (Week 8). CGI-I and CGI-S will be used as secondary efficacy measures throughout this phase.
The safety in this study will be assessed by adverse event reporting, clinical laboratory measurements and physical examinations.
Up to 540 patients will enter into Open-label Phase in order to yield approximately 200 evaluable patients in Randomization Phase.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Major Depression
Keywords
mirtazapine, paroxetine, major depression, early improvement
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
525 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Add-on therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
mirtazapine 30mg QD and paroxetine 20mg QD
Arm Title
mirtazapine monotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
mirtazapine 30mg QD
Arm Title
paroxetine monotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
paroxetine 20mg QD
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
mirtazapine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Remeron
Intervention Description
mirtazapine 30mg QD
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
paroxetine 20mg QD
Other Intervention Name(s)
Seroxat
Intervention Description
paroxetine 20mg QD
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Symptoms Improvement by HAMD-17
Description
Change of 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) total score
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self-reported improvement by QIDS-SR
Description
Change of Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-self report (QIDS-SR) total score
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
Title
Remission rate by HAMD-17
Description
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with HAMD-17 total score ≤7
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
Title
Remission rate by QIDS-SR
Description
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with QIDS-SR total score ≤5
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
Title
Response rate HAMD-17
Description
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with the reduction of HAMD-17 total score >=50%
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
Title
Response rate by QIDS-SR
Description
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with the reduction of QIDS-SR total score >=50%
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
Title
Clinical Global Impression-improvement
Description
The proportion of subjects at endpoint with CGI-I as "much improved" or "very much improved"
Time Frame
Endpoint(Week 8)
Title
Clinical Global Impression- severity
Description
Change of CGI-S total score
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
Title
Safety outcome 1
Description
The incidence and nature of overall adverse events
Time Frame
From enrollment to endpoint (Week 8)
Title
Safety outcome 2
Description
The incidence and nature of drug-related adverse events
Time Frame
From enrollment to endpoint (Week 8)
Title
Drop-off rate due to adverse events
Description
The number of subject withdrawal due to adverse events during double-blind phase
Time Frame
From randomization (Week 2) to endpoint(Week 8)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Has given written informed consent.
Male or female outpatients aged at least 18 years and not more than 60 years.
Has a diagnosis of major depressive disorder by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria.
HAMD-17 ≥ 20 and HAMD-17 Item 1(depressed mood) score ≥2 at enrolment in open-label preliminary phase.
Exclusion Criteria:
Currently enrolled in, or discontinued within the last 30 days from, a clinical trial involving an off-label use of an investigational drug.
Current Axis I primary psychiatric diagnosis other than major depressive disorder.
Organic mental disease, including mental retardation.
History of clinically significant disease, including any cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, hematologic, endocrinologic, or neurologic disease, or clinically significant laboratory abnormality that is not stabilized or is anticipated to require treatment during the study.
Subjects receiving an investigational agent (including different formulation and generic agents of investigational drug) in the previous 3 months prior to screening.
Women in pregnancy or lactation, or female of child bearing potential without appropriate birth control measures.
Use of antipsychotics or mood stabilizers within 5 days prior to screening.
Has received depot antipsychotic medication within one cycle prior to screening.
Known allergy or lack of response to mirtazapine.
Has received ECT or MECT within 3 months prior to screening.
Significant risk of suicidal and/or self-harm behaviors.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gang Wang, M.D., Ph.D
Organizational Affiliation
Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beijing Anding Hospital
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100088
Country
China
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34838606
Citation
Zhou J, Liu S, Mayes TL, Feng Y, Fang M, Xiao L, Wang G. The network analysis of depressive symptoms before and after two weeks of antidepressant treatment. J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 15;299:126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.059. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Effectiveness Study of Mirtazapine Combined With Paroxetine in Major Depressive Patients Without Early Improvement
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs