search
Back to results

Effectiveness Study of the Intervention "Stop Sexual Harassment" in Secondary School

Primary Purpose

Sexual Harassment, Anti-Gay Bias, Non Sexual Harassment

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Stop sexual harassment
Sponsored by
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Sexual Harassment focused on measuring Sexual harassment, Gendered harassment, Homophobic harassment, Intervention program, RCT study, Secondary school, Youth, Teachers, Pupils, LGBTQ

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 16 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pupils belonging to classes where their main teacher has agreed to participate in the intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is not able to read and write a minimum level of Norwegian

Sites / Locations

  • NORCE Norwegian Research Centre

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention group

Control group

Arm Description

"Stop sexual harassment"

No intervention

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Baseline sexual harassment
Experiences of sexual harassment in schools (AAUW, 2001; 2011)
Change from baseline sexual harassment at eight months
Experiences of sexual harassment in schools (AAUW, 2001; 2011)
Change from baseline sexual harassment at one year
Experiences of sexual harassment in schools (AAUW, 2001; 2011)
Baseline gendered harassment
Experiences of homophobic harassment, and harassment due to sexual orientation and gender non-conformity (Martin-Storey & August, 2016; Poteat, 2014)
Change from baseline gendered harassment at eight months
Experiences of homophobic harassment, and harassment due to sexual orientation and gender non-conformity (Martin-Storey & August, 2016; Poteat, 2014)
Change from baseline gendered harassment at one year
Experiences of homophobic harassment, and harassment due to sexual orientation and gender non-conformity (Martin-Storey & August, 2016; Poteat, 2014)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Baseline internalized problems
Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (Angold, 1995; Larson, Ingul, Jozefiak, Leikanger & Sund, 2016; Lundervold, Brevik, Possserud, Stormark & Hysing, 2013). Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (Birmaher, Khetarpal, Cully, Brent &McKenzie, 1996)
Change from internalized problems at eight months
Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (Angold, 1995; Larson, Ingul, Jozefiak, Leikanger & Sund, 2016; Lundervold, Brevik, Possserud, Stormark & Hysing, 2013). Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (Birmaher, Khetarpal, Cully, Brent &McKenzie, 1996)
Change from baseline internalized problems at one year
Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (Angold, 1995; Larson, Ingul, Jozefiak, Leikanger & Sund, 2016; Lundervold, Brevik, Possserud, Stormark & Hysing, 2013). Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (Birmaher, Khetarpal, Cully, Brent &McKenzie, 1996)
Baseline externalized problems
Bullying (Olweus & Endresen, 1998) and The Bergen Questionnaire on Antisocial Behaviour (Bendixen & Olweus, 1999; Bendixen, Endresen & Olweus, 2003)
Change from externalized problems at eight months
Bullying (Olweus & Endresen, 1998) and The Bergen Questionnaire on Antisocial Behaviour (Bendixen & Olweus, 1999; Bendixen, Endresen & Olweus, 2003)
Change from externalized problems at one year
Bullying (Olweus & Endresen, 1998) and The Bergen Questionnaire on Antisocial Behaviour (Bendixen & Olweus, 1999; Bendixen, Endresen & Olweus, 2003)
Baseline teachers' reactions to sexual and gendered harassment (Teacher questionnaire)
Modified versions of the primary outcome measures, including teachers' action, intentions to act and attitudes towards sexual and gendered harassment
Change from teachers' reactions to sexual and gendered harassment at eight months (Teacher questionnaire)
Modified versions of the primary outcome measures, including teachers' action, intentions to act and attitudes towards sexual and gendered harassment
Change from teachers' reactions to sexual and gendered harassment at one year (Teacher questionnaire)
Modified versions of the primary outcome measures, including teachers' action, intentions to act and attitudes towards sexual and gendered harassment

Full Information

First Posted
January 13, 2021
Last Updated
September 28, 2022
Sponsor
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
Collaborators
University of Bergen, Boston College, Norwegian Council for Mental Health, The Dam Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04716400
Brief Title
Effectiveness Study of the Intervention "Stop Sexual Harassment" in Secondary School
Official Title
A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Intervention "Stop Sexual Harassment" in Norwegian Secondary Schools
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
April 13, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 30, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
Collaborators
University of Bergen, Boston College, Norwegian Council for Mental Health, The Dam Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
"Stop sexual harassment" is a school based intervention tailored to reduce sexual- and gendered harassment among pupils in secondary school. The first aim of this study is to test to what extent "Stop sexual harassment" reduces sexual harassment and harassment based on sexual orientation and gender expression (gendered harassment) among 8th to 10th grade pupils in secondary school. The second aim of the study is to test to what extent the intervention increases teachers' responses to sexual- and gendered harassment among pupils. The intervention consists of eight lessons which address the prevention of sexual- and gendered harassment. METHOD: A minimum 32 schools with at least 3840 pupils will participate in a cluster randomized controlled trial. Participating schools will be randomly assigned to intervention schools and control schools. At the intervention schools, teachers will be introduced to "Stop sexual harassment" through a digital course which will provide them with a manual containing eight lessons to be held for the pupils. At the control schools there will not be any intervention. The effects of the intervention on pupils will be determined by assessing their experiences with sexual and gendered harassment, and internalized and externalized problems prior to the intervention (T1), shortly after the intervention (T2) and six moths after the intervention (T3). The effects of the intervention on teachers will be determined by assessing the teachers' experiences of responding to sexual and gendered harassment among pupils. HYPOTHESIS: It is expected that the intervention "Stop sexual harassment" will lead to reduced sexual and gendered harassment perpetration and victimization, and less internalized and externalized problems among the pupils in secondary school, and that teachers will more frequently take action when sexual- and gendered harassment is encountered among the pupils.
Detailed Description
AIMS AND HYPOTHESIS The first aim of this study is to test the effects of "Stop sexual harassment", a sexual- and gendered harassment prevention intervention in secondary school among 8th to 10th grade pupils. The second aim of the study is to test the effects of the intervention on teachers' responses to sexual- and gendered harassment among the pupils. "Stop sexual harassment" is targeted at both pupils and teachers with the intention of reducing sexual harassment and harassment based on sexual orientation and gender expression (gendered harassment) among the pupils. It is hypothesized that the intervention will lead to reduced sexual- and gendered harassment perpetration and victimization and less internalized and externalized problems among the pupils. It is also hypothesized that the intervention will lead to teachers more frequently taking action when sexual- and gendered harassment is encountered among pupils. DESIGN AND METHOD Recruitment: All secondary schools (8th to 10th grade) in three counties (Vestland, Nordland and former county Buskerud) in Norway will be invited to take part in the intervention. Design: A cluster randomized controlled trial will be used to test the effects of the intervention. Participating schools will be randomly assigned to intervention schools and control schools. Assessment: Questionnaires will be administered to pupils and teachers, prior to the intervention to obtain a baseline level (T1), shortly after the intervention (T2), and about six months after the intervention (T3). Previously tested instruments to assess to what extent the intervention leads to reduction in sexual harassment and harassment based on sexual orientation and gender expression among the pupils will be utilized. Teachers' responses to the pupils' sexual and gendered harassment will also be assessed. Data analytic plan and power analysis: The data will be analyzed with both simple descriptive (such as correlations, frequency tables) and advanced statistical methods. With regard to the latter, 3 level multilevel modelling will be used to assess the impact of the intervention on the outcome variables. Multilevel modelling takes into account the hierarchical design of the data due to cluster randomization by school (level 3) and school class (level 2). Cluster effects were approximated (Intra Class Correlation; ICC) influencing the main outcomes (Sexual harassment, emotional problems, attitudes towards homosexuals) by taking advantage of data from previous studies. These studies indicate that whereas relatively little (often less than 5%) of the total variance of sexual harassment victimization, bullying and emotional problems are at the school and/or school class level, a still limited amount of studies suggests that this might not be the case for instance attitudes towards homosexuals where as much as 12,5 - 30% of the total variance have been explained by school/class levels. Power calculations, by the use the Optimal Design Software, showed that with a .05 level of significance, power = .80, ICC level 2 = .25, ICC level 3=0.05, number of cluster level 2=6 (classes) with a cluster size=20 (pupils), 38 schools are needed to be able to detect effect sizes of .30 (about medium effects according to Cohen (1988). The power of the analyses can be increased by including the pre-intervention measure of the outcome variable. Assuming the average school level of the outcome variable at pre-intervention explains 50 or 30 percent of the variation of the outcome variable at post-test, decreases the number of schools to 30 and 32, respectively, given the same assumptions as above. It was therefore decided to include at least 32 schools (16 intervention schools) to guard against the possibility of type II errors. A minimum of 3840 pupils will thus take part in the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sexual Harassment, Anti-Gay Bias, Non Sexual Harassment, Gender-based Violence, Gender Bias, Bullying, Aggression, Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety, Mental Health
Keywords
Sexual harassment, Gendered harassment, Homophobic harassment, Intervention program, RCT study, Secondary school, Youth, Teachers, Pupils, LGBTQ

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Cluster randomized controlled study. The randomization is at school level.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2037 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
"Stop sexual harassment"
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Stop sexual harassment
Intervention Description
Teachers will be introduced to a digital course on the prevention of sexual- and gendered harassment. In the course they will provided with a manual containing eight lessons to be held for the pupils. Each lesson will last 45 minutes and consist of a short lecture and practical activities for the pupils.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Baseline sexual harassment
Description
Experiences of sexual harassment in schools (AAUW, 2001; 2011)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from baseline sexual harassment at eight months
Description
Experiences of sexual harassment in schools (AAUW, 2001; 2011)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from baseline sexual harassment at one year
Description
Experiences of sexual harassment in schools (AAUW, 2001; 2011)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Baseline gendered harassment
Description
Experiences of homophobic harassment, and harassment due to sexual orientation and gender non-conformity (Martin-Storey & August, 2016; Poteat, 2014)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from baseline gendered harassment at eight months
Description
Experiences of homophobic harassment, and harassment due to sexual orientation and gender non-conformity (Martin-Storey & August, 2016; Poteat, 2014)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from baseline gendered harassment at one year
Description
Experiences of homophobic harassment, and harassment due to sexual orientation and gender non-conformity (Martin-Storey & August, 2016; Poteat, 2014)
Time Frame
Two months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Baseline internalized problems
Description
Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (Angold, 1995; Larson, Ingul, Jozefiak, Leikanger & Sund, 2016; Lundervold, Brevik, Possserud, Stormark & Hysing, 2013). Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (Birmaher, Khetarpal, Cully, Brent &McKenzie, 1996)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from internalized problems at eight months
Description
Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (Angold, 1995; Larson, Ingul, Jozefiak, Leikanger & Sund, 2016; Lundervold, Brevik, Possserud, Stormark & Hysing, 2013). Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (Birmaher, Khetarpal, Cully, Brent &McKenzie, 1996)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from baseline internalized problems at one year
Description
Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (Angold, 1995; Larson, Ingul, Jozefiak, Leikanger & Sund, 2016; Lundervold, Brevik, Possserud, Stormark & Hysing, 2013). Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (Birmaher, Khetarpal, Cully, Brent &McKenzie, 1996)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Baseline externalized problems
Description
Bullying (Olweus & Endresen, 1998) and The Bergen Questionnaire on Antisocial Behaviour (Bendixen & Olweus, 1999; Bendixen, Endresen & Olweus, 2003)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from externalized problems at eight months
Description
Bullying (Olweus & Endresen, 1998) and The Bergen Questionnaire on Antisocial Behaviour (Bendixen & Olweus, 1999; Bendixen, Endresen & Olweus, 2003)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from externalized problems at one year
Description
Bullying (Olweus & Endresen, 1998) and The Bergen Questionnaire on Antisocial Behaviour (Bendixen & Olweus, 1999; Bendixen, Endresen & Olweus, 2003)
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Baseline teachers' reactions to sexual and gendered harassment (Teacher questionnaire)
Description
Modified versions of the primary outcome measures, including teachers' action, intentions to act and attitudes towards sexual and gendered harassment
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from teachers' reactions to sexual and gendered harassment at eight months (Teacher questionnaire)
Description
Modified versions of the primary outcome measures, including teachers' action, intentions to act and attitudes towards sexual and gendered harassment
Time Frame
Two months
Title
Change from teachers' reactions to sexual and gendered harassment at one year (Teacher questionnaire)
Description
Modified versions of the primary outcome measures, including teachers' action, intentions to act and attitudes towards sexual and gendered harassment
Time Frame
Two months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Pupils belonging to classes where their main teacher has agreed to participate in the intervention Exclusion Criteria: Is not able to read and write a minimum level of Norwegian
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hilde Slaatten, Ph.D
Organizational Affiliation
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre
City
Bergen
ZIP/Postal Code
5838
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Effectiveness Study of the Intervention "Stop Sexual Harassment" in Secondary School

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs