search
Back to results

Effects of a Supervised Training Program on Functional Capacity in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence (Training-HR)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Chronotropic Incompetence

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Supervised aerobic training
Supervised aerobic plus low to moderate-intensity strength training
Supervised aerobic plus moderate to high-intensity strength training
Sponsored by
Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction focused on measuring Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction, Chronotropic incompetence, Functional capacity, Elderly

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to 2021 ESC guidelines for Heart Failure. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >125 pg/mL in the last month Stable symptomatic heart failure patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-III/IV) during the last month Age ≥ 60 years old. Blunted heart rate (HR) response during a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), defined as a chronotropic index <0.62 if previous treatment with Beta-blockers or chronotropic index <0.80 in patients without beta-blockers. Chronotropic index= [HRpeak exercise - HRrest] / [220 - age - HRrest] Exclusion Criteria: Inability to perform a valid baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test Cardiac pacemaker Significant primary moderate-to-severe valve disease Effort angina or signs of ischemia during CPET Primary cardiomyopathies Cardiac transplantation Any other comorbidity with a life expectancy of less than one year

Sites / Locations

  • INCLIVARecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Usual care

Supervised aerobic training

Supervised aerobic plus low to moderate-intensity strenght training

Supervised aerobic plus moderate to high-intensity strenght training

Arm Description

Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care

Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic training

Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic and low to moderate-intensity strength training

Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic and moderate to high-intensity strength training.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Peak oxygen consumption
Maximal functional capacity will be evaluated using incremental and symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer, beginning with a workload of 10 W and increasing gradually in a ramp protocol at 10-W increments every 1 minute. We define maximal functional capacity as when the patient stops pedalling because of symptoms and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was >1.05. During exercise, patients will be monitored with 12-lead electrocardiogram and blood pressure measurements every 2 minutes. Gas exchange data and cardiopulmonary variables were averages of values taken every 10 seconds. Peak oxygen consumption (PeakVO2) was defined as the highest value of VO2 during the last 20 seconds of exercise. Primary outcome: changes in peak oxygen consumption between and within groups at 12-week Unit of measure of peak oxygen consumption: mL/kg/min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Chronotropic response
Heart rate (HR) response during the maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing will be evaluated following the chronotropic index (CIx) formula. The chronotropic index is evaluated by the following formula, including heart rate at peak effort, heart rate at rest and age. Chronotropic index: (peak heart rate-rest heart rate)/ [220-age-rest heart rate)]. Secondary outcome: changes in chronotropic response in between and within groups at 12-week Heart rate unit: beats per minute Age unit: years The chronotropic index has no units of measure.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Scales
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life, and self-efficacy (the patient's understanding of how to manage their heart failure). All Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire domains are scaled from 0 to 100, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24, very poor to poor; 25 to 49, poor to fair; 50 to 74, fair to good; and 75 to 100, good to excellent. A change of 5 points is considered to be a small but clinically important change, whereas changes of 10 and 20 points are considered moderate-to-large and large-to-very-large clinical changes.

Full Information

First Posted
November 22, 2022
Last Updated
September 12, 2023
Sponsor
Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05649787
Brief Title
Effects of a Supervised Training Program on Functional Capacity in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence
Acronym
Training-HR
Official Title
Effects of a Supervised Training Program on Functional Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Function and Chronotropic Incompetence
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 18, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective study, blinded for the evaluator, randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive standard management alone or combined with a program of training (aerobic alone or combined with strength exercises) that will be carried out in a single centre. After randomization, patients will be clinically evaluated. The primary endpoint (peakVO2) will be assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, functional class NYHA II-III, and chronotropic incompetence criteria will be enrolled. A sample size estimation [alfa: 0.05, power: 80%, a 15% loss rate, and at least a delta change of mean peakVO2: +2,4 mL/kg/min (SD±2)] of 80 patients (20 per arm) would be necessary to test our hypothesis.
Detailed Description
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a highly prevalent clinical entity that predominantly affects women >60 years old, whose incidence has increased in the last decade and has a complex and multifactorial pathophysiology. Chronotropic incompetence (CrI) has emerged as a crucial mechanism, particularly in patients older than 60 years, and is associated with more significant functional impairment. Supervised training programs in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and CrI have improved functional capacity and chronotropic response. However, we do not have evidence about the effects of a supervised training program on patients with HFpEF and CrI. This work aims to evaluate the effect of a supervised exercise program for 12 weeks in patients with HFpEF and CrI on peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2) and chronotropic response. This is a prospective study, blinded for the evaluator, randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive standard management alone or combined with a program of training (aerobic alone or combined with strength exercises) that will be carried out in a single centre. After randomization, patients will be clinically evaluated. The primary endpoint (peakVO2) will be assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at 12 weeks. Patients with HFpEF, functional class NYHA II-III, and CrI criteria will be enrolled. A sample size estimation [alfa: 0.05, power: 80%, a 15% loss rate, and at least a delta change of mean peakVO2: +2,4 mL/kg/min (SD±2)] of 80 patients (20 per arm) would be necessary to test our hypothesis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Chronotropic Incompetence
Keywords
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction, Chronotropic incompetence, Functional capacity, Elderly

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a prospective study, blinded for the evaluator, randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive standard management alone or combined with a program of training (aerobic alone or combined with strength exercises) that will be carried out in a single centre.
Masking
Investigator
Masking Description
Blinded only for the evaluator of primary and secondary endpoints
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Usual care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care
Arm Title
Supervised aerobic training
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic training
Arm Title
Supervised aerobic plus low to moderate-intensity strenght training
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic and low to moderate-intensity strength training
Arm Title
Supervised aerobic plus moderate to high-intensity strenght training
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients allocated to this arm will receive the usual care plus supervised aerobic and moderate to high-intensity strength training.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Supervised aerobic training
Intervention Description
Supervised moderate to high-intensity interval aerobic training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Supervised aerobic plus low to moderate-intensity strength training
Intervention Description
Supervised moderate to high-intensity interval aerobic training plus low to moderate-intensity strength training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Supervised aerobic plus moderate to high-intensity strength training
Intervention Description
Supervised moderate to high-intensity interval aerobic training plus moderate to high-intensity strength training
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Peak oxygen consumption
Description
Maximal functional capacity will be evaluated using incremental and symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer, beginning with a workload of 10 W and increasing gradually in a ramp protocol at 10-W increments every 1 minute. We define maximal functional capacity as when the patient stops pedalling because of symptoms and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was >1.05. During exercise, patients will be monitored with 12-lead electrocardiogram and blood pressure measurements every 2 minutes. Gas exchange data and cardiopulmonary variables were averages of values taken every 10 seconds. Peak oxygen consumption (PeakVO2) was defined as the highest value of VO2 during the last 20 seconds of exercise. Primary outcome: changes in peak oxygen consumption between and within groups at 12-week Unit of measure of peak oxygen consumption: mL/kg/min
Time Frame
Peak oxygen consumption will be evaluated at first visit and after 3 months. We will evaluate peak oxygen consumption change from baseline.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Chronotropic response
Description
Heart rate (HR) response during the maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing will be evaluated following the chronotropic index (CIx) formula. The chronotropic index is evaluated by the following formula, including heart rate at peak effort, heart rate at rest and age. Chronotropic index: (peak heart rate-rest heart rate)/ [220-age-rest heart rate)]. Secondary outcome: changes in chronotropic response in between and within groups at 12-week Heart rate unit: beats per minute Age unit: years The chronotropic index has no units of measure.
Time Frame
Chronotropic index will be evaluated at first visit and after 3 months. We will evaluate chronotropic index change from baseline.
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Scales
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life, and self-efficacy (the patient's understanding of how to manage their heart failure). All Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire domains are scaled from 0 to 100, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24, very poor to poor; 25 to 49, poor to fair; 50 to 74, fair to good; and 75 to 100, good to excellent. A change of 5 points is considered to be a small but clinically important change, whereas changes of 10 and 20 points are considered moderate-to-large and large-to-very-large clinical changes.
Time Frame
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire will be evaluated at first visit and after 3 months. We will evaluate the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire change from baseline.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to 2021 ESC guidelines for Heart Failure. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >125 pg/mL in the last month Stable symptomatic heart failure patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-III/IV) during the last month Age ≥ 60 years old. Blunted heart rate (HR) response during a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), defined as a chronotropic index <0.62 if previous treatment with Beta-blockers or chronotropic index <0.80 in patients without beta-blockers. Chronotropic index= [HRpeak exercise - HRrest] / [220 - age - HRrest] Exclusion Criteria: Inability to perform a valid baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test Cardiac pacemaker Significant primary moderate-to-severe valve disease Effort angina or signs of ischemia during CPET Primary cardiomyopathies Cardiac transplantation Any other comorbidity with a life expectancy of less than one year
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marta Peiró, PhD
Phone
+0034 961973536
Email
mpeiro@incliva.es
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patricia Palau, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
INCLIVA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
INCLIVA
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46010
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marta Peiró, PhD
Phone
*34961973536
Email
mpeiro@incliva.es

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Effects of a Supervised Training Program on Functional Capacity in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs