Effects of Glucose Fluctuation Intervention on the Prognosis of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cerebral Infarction
Type 2 Diabetes and Cerebral Infarction
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Type 2 Diabetes and Cerebral Infarction focused on measuring Type 2 diabetes, Cerebral infarction, Glucose fluctuation targeted intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. cerebral infarction within one month, diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) according to 1995 acute cerebral infarction diagnosis standards promulgated by the Fourth National Cerebrovascular Disease Conference [1];
- 2. having type 2 diabetes mellitus (as defined by the WHO diagnostic criteria in 1999) [2];
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. coexisting acute complications of diabetes including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS), metabolic acidosis;
- 2. severe comorbid chronic complications of diabetes;
- 3. active malignancy;
- 4. subjects with mental illness and communication disorders; 5) those actively participating in other research studies.
Sites / Locations
- Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Experimental
Experimental
Control group
Glucose fluctuation targeted intervention
During hospitalization: Monitor subjects' blood glucose; One-on-one education: Education includes skills related to diabetes self-management, basic knowledge of diabetes, diet, exercise, medication, blood glucose monitoring, risks of glucose fluctuations; Teaching patients and their families to use blood glucose meters and correctly record results. The diabetes specialist nurses demonstrate correct methods for self-monitoring blood glucose. During discharge: Patients were given standard hospital discharge instructions and were asked to monitor their blood glucose 5 times daily after discharge. Follow-up: If a patient FPG was less than 7 mmol/L, 2hPG was less than 10 mmol/L, or A1c was less than 7%, no intervention would be implemented. If one of these items was above the numbers, a referral would be made to an endocrinologist for medication adjustment. Participants received telephone follow-up one week after discharge, thereafter, follow-up were conducted once a month.
We set achieving goals for this intervention group (both A1c<7% and LAGE<80mg/dl). Participants received the same usual care as the control group; though additional attention was paid to glucose fluctuation on the basis of glucose control. Even the patient's FPG, 2hPG, and A1c were all well controlled, If his or her LAGE≥80mg/dl, we would carefully assess the patient's diet and exercise and daily activities first. If it was caused by lifestyle or events, the researchers worked with patients to find a self-care behavioral solution for the glucose fluctuation, and set behavioral goals, otherwise, the researchers would refer the patient to an endocrinologist for medication adjustment. During next follow-up, we evaluated the glucose fluctuation and target completion.