search
Back to results

Effects of Individualized Cognitive Training on Cognition in Heart Failure (SYNAPSE)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive training
Usual Care
Sponsored by
Louis Bherer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart failure, Cognition, Individualized cognitive training, Home-based intervention, Remote monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult aged 50 or older
  • Have access to Internet
  • Have access to a computer or a tablet;
  • Have the ability to perform cognitive training;
  • Have the ability to read, understand and consent to the informed consent form;
  • Have chronic heart failure on tolerated therapy for at least two months;
  • Without limitation of physical activity to severe limitation of physical activity (i.e. NYHA class I, class II, class III OR class IV).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute cardiovascular event 1 month before randomization;
  • Cardiovascular procedure scheduled within 3 months;
  • Uncontrolled diabetes or untreated thyroid dysfunction;
  • Current or recent malignancy with a life expectancy of less than 1 year;
  • Neurological disease;
  • Chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.

Sites / Locations

  • Preventive medicine and physical activity center (centre EPIC), Montreal heart Institute
  • Centre de recherche du centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Cognitive training followed by usual care

Usual care followed by cognitive training

Arm Description

Usual care and cognitive training for 6 weeks, followed by usual care (only) for 6 weeks.

Usual care (only) for 6 weeks, followed by cognitive training and usual care for 6 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in general cognitive functioning
Remote version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. (0-28 score, with a higher score indicating a better cognitive functioning.)
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Memory capacity -Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (z-score change)
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Processing speed -Trail making test Part A (z-score change)
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Executive functions Trail making test Part B Verbal fluency test Digit span test (z-score change)
Change in quality of life
36-Items Short form health Survey (SF-36) (Score ranges from 0-100, with a higher score indicating more favorable health status.)
Change in self-care behavior
European Heart-Failure Self-care Behavior Scale-9 (EHFsB-9) (The minimal score is 9 while the maximal score is 45. The higher the score, the less the patient performs self-care behaviors.)

Full Information

First Posted
September 29, 2021
Last Updated
January 31, 2022
Sponsor
Louis Bherer
Collaborators
The Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center (MHICC)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05223426
Brief Title
Effects of Individualized Cognitive Training on Cognition in Heart Failure
Acronym
SYNAPSE
Official Title
A Multicenter Randomized Single-blinded Clinical Trial to Investigate the Effects of a Home-based Cognitive Training for individualS Affected bY chroNic heArt Failure: an Individualized Program to increaSE Cognitive Functions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
February 21, 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
April 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Louis Bherer
Collaborators
The Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center (MHICC)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The SYNAPSE trial is designed to study the effects of an individualized home-based cognitive training program on cognitive functions in heart-failure patients.
Detailed Description
The purpose of the SYNAPSE study is to evaluate the effects of an individualized home-based training program aimed to improve cognitive functions and well-being in heart failure patients. Heart failure is characterized by the inability of the heart to pump blood efficiently through the body. Nearly half of patients with heart failure present with cognitive deficits. Memory and executive functions that allow us to perform complex tasks are mainly affected. These cognitive deficits are linked to an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality, in addition to decreasing patients' well-being and ability to care for themselves. Although rehabilitation programs that include physical activity and counseling help reduce heart and brain health risks, these programs are unpopular. Among the few who enroll, between 24% and 50% drop out before the completion of the program. Offering alternative options such as cognitive training would help to reach this proportion of patients. The literature has shown that cognitive training is effective in preventing or reducing cognitive deficits in older adults with or without cognitive loss. Although still understudied in patients with heart failure, a better understanding of the association between heart failure and changes in cognition would allow better adaptation of patient care to their situations and needs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure
Keywords
Heart failure, Cognition, Individualized cognitive training, Home-based intervention, Remote monitoring

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Single blind masking: the research personnel performing the outcome assessments at baseline, between the intervention (two months) and after the intervention (four months) will be blinded to groups' intervention order. Participants will be aware of the order in which they receive the intervention.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
54 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cognitive training followed by usual care
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Usual care and cognitive training for 6 weeks, followed by usual care (only) for 6 weeks.
Arm Title
Usual care followed by cognitive training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Usual care (only) for 6 weeks, followed by cognitive training and usual care for 6 weeks.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive training
Intervention Description
A cognitive training program will be individually developed for each participant based on baseline neuropsychological tests. It will include: Computerized cognitive training: this training include: the Dual-Task, the Stroop and the N-Back task. The tasks are accompanied by feedback based on the participant's responses (e.g., progress graph, feedback, etc.). In order to promote participants' learning, the level of difficulty of the tasks increased as training sessions progressed. Two sets of stimuli will be used to maximize the generalization of learning. Memory training: This training is adapted from the MEMO+ training program (Belleville et al., 2018). These sessions, also home-based, will be done through online video and are covering a variety of topics: memory (normal aging, mnemonic strategies), attention, aging, etc. Each week, participants will be asked to complete the equivalent of 6 training sessions of 15 minutes each, for a total of 1h30 per week.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Usual Care
Intervention Description
Participants will be asked to continue the care and follow-up as usually planned with the attending cardiologist. Apart from weekly follow-ups with the research team member, no changes will be made to the participant's medical care.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Description
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Changes in performance on trained computerized cognitive tasks
Description
Trained version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Description
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Reaction time (ms)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Changes in performance on transfer computerized cognitive tasks
Description
Transfer version of computerized dual-task, modified stroop and n-back tasks Accuracy (%)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in general cognitive functioning
Description
Remote version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. (0-28 score, with a higher score indicating a better cognitive functioning.)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Description
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Memory capacity -Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (z-score change)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Description
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Processing speed -Trail making test Part A (z-score change)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Changes in performance on neuropsychological tests
Description
Remote version of validated neuropsychological test Executive functions Trail making test Part B Verbal fluency test Digit span test (z-score change)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in quality of life
Description
36-Items Short form health Survey (SF-36) (Score ranges from 0-100, with a higher score indicating more favorable health status.)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in self-care behavior
Description
European Heart-Failure Self-care Behavior Scale-9 (EHFsB-9) (The minimal score is 9 while the maximal score is 45. The higher the score, the less the patient performs self-care behaviors.)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in depressive symptomatology
Description
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Score ranges from 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating a more severe depression state.)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in anxiety
Description
General Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7) (Total score ranges from 0 to 21, with an increasing score on the scale is indicating a worse anxiety state.)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in perceived stress
Description
Perceived Stress Scale questionnaire (PSS-10) (Score ranges from 0-40, with a higher score indicating a worse sleep quality)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in quality of sleep
Description
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire (PSQI) (19 self-assessment questions are grouped into seven components. The scores for the seven components are summed to give an overall score that ranges from 0 to 21 points, with "0" indicating no difficulty and "21" indicating severe difficulty in all components. A score higher than 5 indicates problematic sleep in one or more components)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in Risk of sleep apnea
Description
Berlin Questionnaire (Participants are classified into a high or a low risk of sleep apnea based their responses to the individual items and their overall scores in the symptom categories. A High Risk represent 2 or more categories where the score is positive. A low risk represents 1 or no category where the score is positive.)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in self-reported physical activity
Description
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly Questionnaire (PASE) (The overall score ranges from 0 to 400, with a higher score indicating a better level of physical activity)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in Walking test speed
Description
4-meter walking test (m/s)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in functional mobility
Description
Timed up and Go test (s)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in balance performance
Description
Timed one-leg standing test (s)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Change in lower limb muscles strength
Description
Timed Sit-to-Stand test (s)
Time Frame
Before and after the 6 weeks of interventions
Title
Cognitive Reserve
Description
Rami and colleagues' cognitive reserve questionnaire (Scale ranges from 0-26, with a higher score indicating a greater cognitive reserve)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Self-reported masculinity and femininity traits
Description
Short Form BEM Sex-Role Inventory questionnaire (30 items questionnaire with 10 items assessing the femininity traits, 10 items assessing the masculinity traits and 10 items neutral, not scored. Two scores, rage from 10-70, are calculated for femininity and masculinity, respectively. A higher score is indicating a higher trait.)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Dietary patterns
Description
Short Diet Questionnaire (Score ranges from 15-45 points, with a score between 15-29 categorized as unhealthy, 30-37 as somewhat unhealthy and 38 or more as a healthy diet.)
Time Frame
Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult aged 50 or older Have access to Internet Have access to a computer or a tablet; Have the ability to perform cognitive training; Have the ability to read, understand and consent to the informed consent form; Have chronic heart failure on tolerated therapy for at least two months; Without limitation of physical activity to severe limitation of physical activity (i.e. NYHA class I, class II, class III OR class IV). Exclusion Criteria: Acute cardiovascular event 1 month before randomization; Cardiovascular procedure scheduled within 3 months; Uncontrolled diabetes or untreated thyroid dysfunction; Current or recent malignancy with a life expectancy of less than 1 year; Neurological disease; Chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Louis Bherer, PhD
Phone
514-376-3330
Ext
2059
Email
louis.bherer@umontreal.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Caroll-Ann Blanchette, MSc
Phone
514-374-1480
Ext
4340
Email
caroll-ann.blanchette-bisson@umontreal.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Louis Bherer, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Montreal Heart Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Preventive medicine and physical activity center (centre EPIC), Montreal heart Institute
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T1N6
Country
Canada
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Louis Bherer, PhD
Phone
514-376-3330
Ext
2059
Email
louis.bherer@umontreal.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caroll-Ann Blanchette, MSc
Phone
514-374-1480
Ext
4340
Email
caroll-ann.blanchette-bisson@umontreal.ca
Facility Name
Centre de recherche du centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM)
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Loyda Jean-Charles, MSc
Phone
514-890-8000
Ext
17166
Email
loyda.jean-charles.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
François Tournoux, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24145743
Citation
Turk-Adawi KI, Oldridge NB, Tarima SS, Stason WB, Shepard DS. Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: what keeps patients in programs? J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Oct 21;2(5):e000418. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000418.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29909641
Citation
Resurreccion DM, Moreno-Peral P, Gomez-Herranz M, Rubio-Valera M, Pastor L, Caldas de Almeida JM, Motrico E. Factors associated with non-participation in and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Jan;18(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/1474515118783157. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29538528
Citation
Rego MLM, Cabral DAR, Fontes EB. Cognitive Deficit in Heart Failure and the Benefits of Aerobic Physical Activity. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Jan;110(1):91-94. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25593581
Citation
Leto L, Feola M. Cognitive impairment in heart failure patients. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014 Dec;11(4):316-28. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.04.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25510559
Citation
Hawkins MA, Schaefer JT, Gunstad J, Dolansky MA, Redle JD, Josephson R, Moore SM, Hughes JW. What is your patient's cognitive profile? Three distinct subgroups of cognitive function in persons with heart failure. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 May;28(2):186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31885510
Citation
Doehner W. Dementia and the heart failure patient. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Dec;21(Suppl L):L28-L31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz242. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23997843
Citation
Dodson JA, Chaudhry SI. Geriatric conditions in heart failure. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2012 Oct;6(5):404-410. doi: 10.1007/s12170-012-0259-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17719284
Citation
Dickson VV, Tkacs N, Riegel B. Cognitive influences on self-care decision making in persons with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.058.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22068879
Citation
de Tournay-Jette E, Dupuis G, Denault A, Cartier R, Bherer L. The benefits of cognitive training after a coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Behav Med. 2012 Oct;35(5):557-68. doi: 10.1007/s10865-011-9384-y. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28433667
Citation
Cannon JA, Moffitt P, Perez-Moreno AC, Walters MR, Broomfield NM, McMurray JJV, Quinn TJ. Cognitive Impairment and Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Card Fail. 2017 Jun;23(6):464-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29313875
Citation
Belleville S, Hudon C, Bier N, Brodeur C, Gilbert B, Grenier S, Ouellet MC, Viscogliosi C, Gauthier S. MEMO+: Efficacy, Durability and Effect of Cognitive Training and Psychosocial Intervention in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):655-663. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15192. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30585868
Citation
Kua ZJ, Valenzuela M, Dong Y. Can Computerized Cognitive Training Improve Cognition in Patients With Heart Failure?: A Review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;34(2):E19-E27. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000558.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25773610
Citation
Bherer L. Cognitive plasticity in older adults: effects of cognitive training and physical exercise. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1337:1-6. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12682.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25405755
Citation
Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22629239
Citation
Lussier M, Gagnon C, Bherer L. An investigation of response and stimulus modality transfer effects after dual-task training in younger and older. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 18;6:129. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00129. eCollection 2012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23138443
Citation
Pendlebury ST, Welch SJ, Cuthbertson FC, Mariz J, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Telephone assessment of cognition after transient ischemic attack and stroke: modified telephone interview of cognitive status and telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment versus face-to-face Montreal Cognitive Assessment and neuropsychological battery. Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):227-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673384. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Individualized Cognitive Training on Cognition in Heart Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs