Effects of Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Assistance
Primary Purpose
Arm Weakness as a Consequence of Stroke
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Compliant Passive Arm Support
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Arm Weakness as a Consequence of Stroke
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- greater than 6 months post-stroke
- passive abduction to 90 degrees at shoulder
- reduced active (retro)flexion/extension at shoulder when abducted at 90 degrees
- reduced active flexion/extension at elbow
Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to give informed consent
- unable to comprehend and follow instructions
- have a condition (other than stroke) affecting sensorimotor function
- show evidence of unilateral spatial neglect
- unable to sit in a chair without armrests for 2 hours
Sites / Locations
- Stanford University CHARM Lab
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Stroke Survivors
Arm Description
Stroke survivors with upper extremity motor impairments
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Wolf Motor Function Test - Change in Functional Score by Task (WMFT)
Change reported as number of tasks where participants on average had increased functionality, no change, or decreased functionality. Lower functional scores are indicative of lower functional levels. The WMFT consists of 17 tasks: Forearm to table (side), Forearm to box (side), Extend elbow (to the side), Extend elbow (to the side) - with weight, Hand to table (front), Hand to box (front), Weight to box, Reach and retrieve, Lift can, Lift pencil, Lift paper clip, Stack checkers, Flip cards, Grip Strength, Turning key In lock, Fold towel, and Lift basket. Fifteen tasks were assessed for this outcome: task 7 (Weight to box) is reported in a separate analysis; task 14 (Grip strength) was excluded due to an inability to acquire the necessary equipment.
Wolf Motor Function Test - Change in Completion Time by Task
Change reported as number of tasks which participants on average performed with increased time, no change, or decreased time. If a participant was unable to complete the task, a time score of 120+ seconds was assigned and converted to 121 for calculation purposes. The WMFT consists of 17 tasks: Forearm to table (side), Forearm to box (side), Extend elbow (to the side), Extend elbow (to the side) - with weight, Hand to table (front), Hand to box (front), Weight to box, Reach and retrieve, Lift can, Lift pencil, Lift paper clip, Stack checkers, Flip cards, Grip Strength, Turning key In lock, Fold towel, and Lift basket. Fifteen tasks were assessed for this outcome: task 7 (Weight to box) is reported in a separate analysis; task 14 (Grip strength) was excluded due to an inability to acquire the necessary equipment.
Wolf Motor Function Test - Weight Lifted
Weight lifted (carried) in task 7 of the WMFT: Weight to box. In this assessment, the participant is seated and lifts weight to a box centered on a table in front of them, while keeping his/her back against the chair.
Percentage of Successful Motions
Participants are instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. The participant was asked to perform 6 motions (3 clockwise and 3 counterclockwise in randomized order). This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. Successful motion is defined as motion where any part of the arm is within 20cm of shoulder level. The percentage of motion in which successful motion occurred over the total motion was reported.
Reachable Workspace - Mean Distance From Trunk, Successful Motions
Participants are instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. Successful motion is defined as motion where any part of the arm is within 20cm of shoulder level. The distance from the wrist to the trunk was reported for successful motion. Distance closer to the trunk indicates greater ability to correctly perform the task. Negative numbers would indicate the arm was below the trunk; positive numbers would indicate the arm was above the trunk.
Reachable Workspace - Area, Successful Motions
Participants will be instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. A larger workspace area indicates fewer upper extremity motor impairments.
Reachable Workspace - Mean Distance From Trunk, All Motions
Participants are instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. The distance from the wrist to the trunk was reported for all motion. Distance closer to the trunk indicates greater ability to correctly perform the task. Negative numbers would indicate the arm was below the trunk; positive numbers would indicate the arm was above the trunk.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Participant Satisfaction Survey
Closing survey of participants satisfaction with the device (impact, comfort, and responsiveness). Participants rated the experience as very positive, positive, neutral, negative, or very negative.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05036642
Brief Title
Effects of Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Assistance
Official Title
Effects of Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Assistance
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 26, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 7, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 7, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Stanford University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to quantify the improvement of post- stroke individuals' ability to move their arms during and after robot assisted therapy.
While researchers know that robot assisted therapies improve motor performance over the course of weeks, they do not know how motor performance is affected over the course of minutes or hours. A better understanding of how robot assisted therapies affect motor performance on short time scales may help us to prescribe more effective therapy doses to maximize motor recovery after neurological injury.
The study will allow us to obtain a detailed understanding of the performance of the device as described above.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arm Weakness as a Consequence of Stroke
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
12 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Stroke Survivors
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Stroke survivors with upper extremity motor impairments
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Compliant Passive Arm Support
Intervention Description
The device is a mechanical device that consists of two linkages, elastic bands, a commercial posture brace, and a hook-and-loop fastener. The design of the device, with several compliant elements, ensures that one device fits many without joint alignment concerns. No motors or other actuators add energy into the system, meaning that it is stable.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Wolf Motor Function Test - Change in Functional Score by Task (WMFT)
Description
Change reported as number of tasks where participants on average had increased functionality, no change, or decreased functionality. Lower functional scores are indicative of lower functional levels. The WMFT consists of 17 tasks: Forearm to table (side), Forearm to box (side), Extend elbow (to the side), Extend elbow (to the side) - with weight, Hand to table (front), Hand to box (front), Weight to box, Reach and retrieve, Lift can, Lift pencil, Lift paper clip, Stack checkers, Flip cards, Grip Strength, Turning key In lock, Fold towel, and Lift basket. Fifteen tasks were assessed for this outcome: task 7 (Weight to box) is reported in a separate analysis; task 14 (Grip strength) was excluded due to an inability to acquire the necessary equipment.
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline (without the device) and after approximately 30 minutes of use with the device.
Title
Wolf Motor Function Test - Change in Completion Time by Task
Description
Change reported as number of tasks which participants on average performed with increased time, no change, or decreased time. If a participant was unable to complete the task, a time score of 120+ seconds was assigned and converted to 121 for calculation purposes. The WMFT consists of 17 tasks: Forearm to table (side), Forearm to box (side), Extend elbow (to the side), Extend elbow (to the side) - with weight, Hand to table (front), Hand to box (front), Weight to box, Reach and retrieve, Lift can, Lift pencil, Lift paper clip, Stack checkers, Flip cards, Grip Strength, Turning key In lock, Fold towel, and Lift basket. Fifteen tasks were assessed for this outcome: task 7 (Weight to box) is reported in a separate analysis; task 14 (Grip strength) was excluded due to an inability to acquire the necessary equipment.
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline (without the device) and after approximately 30 minutes of use with the device.
Title
Wolf Motor Function Test - Weight Lifted
Description
Weight lifted (carried) in task 7 of the WMFT: Weight to box. In this assessment, the participant is seated and lifts weight to a box centered on a table in front of them, while keeping his/her back against the chair.
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline (without the device) and after approximately 5 minutes of use with the device.
Title
Percentage of Successful Motions
Description
Participants are instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. The participant was asked to perform 6 motions (3 clockwise and 3 counterclockwise in randomized order). This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. Successful motion is defined as motion where any part of the arm is within 20cm of shoulder level. The percentage of motion in which successful motion occurred over the total motion was reported.
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline (without the device) and after approximately 30 minutes of use with the device.
Title
Reachable Workspace - Mean Distance From Trunk, Successful Motions
Description
Participants are instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. Successful motion is defined as motion where any part of the arm is within 20cm of shoulder level. The distance from the wrist to the trunk was reported for successful motion. Distance closer to the trunk indicates greater ability to correctly perform the task. Negative numbers would indicate the arm was below the trunk; positive numbers would indicate the arm was above the trunk.
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline (without the device) and after approximately 30 minutes of use with the device.
Title
Reachable Workspace - Area, Successful Motions
Description
Participants will be instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. A larger workspace area indicates fewer upper extremity motor impairments.
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline (without the device) and after approximately 30 minutes of use with the device.
Title
Reachable Workspace - Mean Distance From Trunk, All Motions
Description
Participants are instructed to individually flex and extend the elbow and shoulder to trace the largest possible circle that they can reach while keeping the hand and elbow raised to the height of the shoulder while the motion of the arm is tracked with motion capture. This protocol was originally developed by Sukal et al (2007); to asses post-stroke motor abilities. The distance from the wrist to the trunk was reported for all motion. Distance closer to the trunk indicates greater ability to correctly perform the task. Negative numbers would indicate the arm was below the trunk; positive numbers would indicate the arm was above the trunk.
Time Frame
Assessed at baseline (without the device) and after approximately 60 minutes of use with the device.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Participant Satisfaction Survey
Description
Closing survey of participants satisfaction with the device (impact, comfort, and responsiveness). Participants rated the experience as very positive, positive, neutral, negative, or very negative.
Time Frame
After study procedures have been performed, on day 2 (up to 5 minutes to complete survey)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
greater than 6 months post-stroke
passive abduction to 90 degrees at shoulder
reduced active (retro)flexion/extension at shoulder when abducted at 90 degrees
reduced active flexion/extension at elbow
Exclusion Criteria:
unable to give informed consent
unable to comprehend and follow instructions
have a condition (other than stroke) affecting sensorimotor function
show evidence of unilateral spatial neglect
unable to sit in a chair without armrests for 2 hours
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allison Okamura
Organizational Affiliation
Stanford University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford University CHARM Lab
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17634933
Citation
Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Nov;183(2):215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1029-6. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Effects of Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Assistance
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs