search
Back to results

Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on Modulation of Mirror Illusion-induced Rhythm Suppression in Stroke

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Hemiplegia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Hong Kong
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intermittent theta burst stimulation
Mirror Therapy
Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation
Sham mirror Therapy
Sponsored by
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Stroke, upper extremity, intermittent theta burst stimulation, mirror visual feedback, event-related desynchronization

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. type and location of stroke - ischemic or hemorrhagic, cortical or subcortical, confirmed by medical diagnoses compatible with a unilateral lesion involvement;
  2. Acute stroke patients: stroke with onset of neurological condition ≤3 months, recruited from a local hospital; Chronic stroke patients: stroke with onset of neurological condition from 6 months to 3 years, recruited from self-help organization in the community. The randomization will be pre-stratified into 2 - subacute and chronic stages, and recruit from 2 centers - acute hospital and self-help organizations in the community.
  3. normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity better than 20/60 (6/18) in the better eye;
  4. right-handed, verified by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory;
  5. mild to moderately impaired hemiplegic upper extremity functions, with functional levels 5-7 as rated by the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity - Hong Kong version (FTHUE-HK);
  6. the ability to understand and follow simple verbal instructions;
  7. the ability to participate in a therapy session lasting at least 60 minutes; and
  8. consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. prior neurological or psychiatric disorders;
  2. severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >3) over hemiplegic upper extremity;
  3. a history of recent Botox injections or acupuncture to the hemiplegic upper extremity within the past three months;
  4. use of central nervous system-active medicine;
  5. any contraindication to TMS, according to the guideline of the Safety of TMS Consensus group, such as the risk of epilepsy, metal implants, and pregnancy;
  6. the presence of unilateral neglect as screened by the Behavioural Inattention Test (CBIT-HK); and
  7. participation in another clinical study elsewhere during recruitment. Informed written consent will be obtained from all patients prior to data collection.

Sites / Locations

  • Kenneth FONG

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

iTBS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus mirror therapy

Sham iTBS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus mirror therapy

iTBS to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus sham mirror therapy

Arm Description

iTBS: iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. After the iTBS therapy, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.

iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere, but with a sham coil (i.e., sham iTBS). After the sham stimulation, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.

iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. After the iTBS therapy, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time, but with a covered mirror (e.g., sham mirror therapy). In the sham mirror therapy condition, the mirror is covered by a cloth and the participant is instructed to move both arms while looking at a cross mark on the covered mirror and imaging the analogous movements of the affected arm. The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks (same as mirror therapy) and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery

Secondary Outcome Measures

EEG rhythm power
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
EEG rhythm power
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
EEG rhythm power
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
EEG rhythm power
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex
Cortical silent period
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Cortical silent period
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Cortical silent period
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Cortical silent period
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Ipsilateral silent period
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Ipsilateral silent period
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Ipsilateral silent period
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Ipsilateral silent period
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.

Full Information

First Posted
November 30, 2020
Last Updated
January 31, 2023
Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Collaborators
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04658745
Brief Title
Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on Modulation of Mirror Illusion-induced Rhythm Suppression in Stroke
Official Title
Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on Modulation of Mirror Illusion-induced Rhythm Suppression in Stroke
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 23, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Collaborators
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study aims to test the hypothesis that rTMS in the form of theta burst stimulation (TBS) over the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortices can modulate mirror illusion-induced rhythm suppression while observing unilateral arm movement in stroke individuals. The investigators further hypothesize that this intervention will lead to the revision of interhemispheric asymmetry. Finally, this study will also explore the longitudinal relationship between rhythm suppression and motor recovery as indicated by motor excitability in the form of MEP. The results of this study will provide significant new information regarding neurophysiological motor relearning mechanisms which could inform the development and evaluation of innovative treatments for individuals with stroke
Detailed Description
Stroke is the leading cause of physical disability. Facilitating the process of motor relearning would greatly accelerate the rehabilitation of motor functions and elicit positive neuroplasticity of the damaged brain area. Previous research has already explored the feasibility of motor priming techniques embedded in stroke rehabilitation programs using strategies such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and mirror therapy (MT). These treatments are usually implemented along with the standardized rehabilitation, sequentially or simultaneously, and have been demonstrated to be more effective than the standardized rehabilitation programs alone. Mirror neuron, as indicated traditionally by the decrease in the amplitude of Mu rhythm, i.e. a suppression over central electrodes of electroencephalography (EEG), reflects the "seeing" of movement after "perception". Such oscillations are based on neural substrates that are discharged during the observation and execution of a motor act, which is also associated with other human functions, such as imitation, language, etc. The core mirror neuron system (MNS) is thought to be located in the premotor and the primary sensorimotor cortices, indicating that motor learning could be enhanced during action observation and overt movement. Preliminary research has shown that repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) can enhance the corticomotor excitability in mirror neurons during both observation of movement (by others) or imagined movement in healthy subjects; in particular, as measured by enhanced motor evoked potentials (MEP). Increases in MEP has also been induced by short-term action observation and mirror visual feedback in stroke survivors. However, it is not yet known if MNS can be activated by TMS in MT following a stroke, and the relationship between mirror neuron activation and clinical improvements in stroke remains unclear. The investigators have already published preliminary findings in patients with hemiplegic upper extremity, rTMS, and MT. Here, the investigators propose to test the hypothesis that rTMS in the form of theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortices can modulate mirror illusion-induced rhythm suppression while observing unilateral arm movement in stroke individuals. The investigators further hypothesize that this intervention will lead to the revision of interhemispheric asymmetry. Finally, this study will also explore the longitudinal relationship between rhythm suppression and motor recovery as indicated by motor excitability in the form of MEP. The results of this study will provide significant new information regarding neurophysiological motor relearning mechanisms which could inform the development and evaluation of innovative treatments for individuals with stroke

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Hemiplegia
Keywords
Stroke, upper extremity, intermittent theta burst stimulation, mirror visual feedback, event-related desynchronization

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
iTBS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus mirror therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
iTBS: iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. After the iTBS therapy, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.
Arm Title
Sham iTBS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus mirror therapy
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere, but with a sham coil (i.e., sham iTBS). After the sham stimulation, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.
Arm Title
iTBS to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus sham mirror therapy
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. After the iTBS therapy, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time, but with a covered mirror (e.g., sham mirror therapy). In the sham mirror therapy condition, the mirror is covered by a cloth and the participant is instructed to move both arms while looking at a cross mark on the covered mirror and imaging the analogous movements of the affected arm. The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks (same as mirror therapy) and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Intermittent theta burst stimulation
Intervention Description
iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients, by using a butterfly shape coil.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Mirror Therapy
Intervention Description
Participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation
Intervention Description
iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. However, a sham coil will be used, which is not associated with any stimulation effect on the brain.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sham mirror Therapy
Intervention Description
In sham mirror therapy, the mirror will be covered. Participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to move the non-affected hand. The participants cannot receive mirror visual feedback of the paretic upper extremity movement during the therapy. Same as mirror therapy, the movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
Description
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
Description
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
Description
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA)
Description
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time Frame
1-month after the completion of the intervention
Title
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Description
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time Frame
Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Title
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Description
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Description
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Description
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time Frame
1-month after the completion of the intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EEG rhythm power
Description
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time Frame
Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Title
EEG rhythm power
Description
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time Frame
1 day
Title
EEG rhythm power
Description
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
EEG rhythm power
Description
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time Frame
1-month after the completion of the intervention
Title
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Description
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Title
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Description
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Description
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Motor-evoked Potential (MEP)
Description
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex
Time Frame
1-month after the completion of the intervention
Title
Cortical silent period
Description
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Title
Cortical silent period
Description
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Cortical silent period
Description
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Cortical silent period
Description
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
1-month after the completion of the intervention
Title
Ipsilateral silent period
Description
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Title
Ipsilateral silent period
Description
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Ipsilateral silent period
Description
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Ipsilateral silent period
Description
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Time Frame
1-month after the completion of the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: type and location of stroke - ischemic or hemorrhagic, cortical or subcortical, confirmed by medical diagnoses compatible with a unilateral lesion involvement; Acute stroke patients: stroke with onset of neurological condition ≤3 months, recruited from a local hospital; Chronic stroke patients: stroke with onset of neurological condition from 6 months to 3 years, recruited from self-help organization in the community. The randomization will be pre-stratified into 2 - subacute and chronic stages, and recruit from 2 centers - acute hospital and self-help organizations in the community. normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity better than 20/60 (6/18) in the better eye; right-handed, verified by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory; mild to moderately impaired hemiplegic upper extremity functions, with functional levels 5-7 as rated by the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity - Hong Kong version (FTHUE-HK); the ability to understand and follow simple verbal instructions; the ability to participate in a therapy session lasting at least 60 minutes; and consent to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: prior neurological or psychiatric disorders; severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >3) over hemiplegic upper extremity; a history of recent Botox injections or acupuncture to the hemiplegic upper extremity within the past three months; use of central nervous system-active medicine; any contraindication to TMS, according to the guideline of the Safety of TMS Consensus group, such as the risk of epilepsy, metal implants, and pregnancy; the presence of unilateral neglect as screened by the Behavioural Inattention Test (CBIT-HK); and participation in another clinical study elsewhere during recruitment. Informed written consent will be obtained from all patients prior to data collection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kenneth Nai Kuen FONG, PHD
Organizational Affiliation
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kenneth FONG
City
Hong Kong
ZIP/Postal Code
000000
Country
Hong Kong

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on Modulation of Mirror Illusion-induced Rhythm Suppression in Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs