Effects of Vitamin D and Omega-3 on Cerebrovascular Disease
Primary Purpose
Stroke, Vitamin D
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vitamin D
Fish oil
Vitamin D placebo
Fish oil placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, stroke outcomes, vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acid
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants eligible and willing to participate in the main VITAL trial (NCT 01169259) who experience a stroke during follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants eligible and willing to participate in the main VITAL trial (NCT 01169259) who do not experience a stroke during follow-up.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Vitamin D + fish oil
Vitamin D + fish oil placebo
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil placebo
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Poor Stroke Outcome at Hospital Discharge as Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (mR 3-6)
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge
The mRS is often seen as a measure of disability or a "global health index" due to its strong emphasis on mobility although it claims to be a measure of handicap. The mRS is a seven-point scale (0=no symptoms at all; 1=no significant disability despite symptoms; 2=slight disability; 3=moderate disability; 4=moderately severe disability; 5=severe disability; 6=death). To avoid issues with model convergence due to sparse data, I will a priori categorize the mRS into good (mRS 0-2) versus poor (mRS 3-6) outcomes. These data were collected during the parent study (NCT01169259)
Number of Participants With at Least One Functional Limitation After Stroke According to the Scale Adapted From Nagi
Functional limitations will be assessed through self-report using the physical performance scale adapted from Nagi. The adapted Nagi scale asks respondents if they experience any limitations in each of the following items: pulling or pushing large objects; stooping, crouching, or kneeling; reaching or extending arms above shoulder level; reaching or extending arms below shoulder level; writing or handling or fingering small objects; standing in one place for long periods; and sitting for an hour. Participants reporting a limitation in any of these items will be considered to have at least one functional limitation after stroke.
Number of Participants With a Physical Disability After Stroke as Measured by the Modified Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale
The modified Katz ADL scale ask participants to self-report if they need needing help with any of the following items: bathing; dressing; eating; getting in and out of a chair; and walking 50 yards. Individuals who report needing help with any of those items will be considered to have a physical disability after stroke.
Number of Participants With a Physical Disability After Stroke as Measured by the Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale
The Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale asks participants to self-report if they need help with any of the following tasks: walking 0.5 mile; walking up and down stairs to the second floor; and doing heavy work around the house. Individuals who report needing help with any of those tasks will be considered to have a physical disability after stroke.
Number of Participants With Social Disability After Stroke as Measured by FHS Social Disability Scale
Social disability was assessed through a self-administered questionnaire which asked questions about social functioning developed in the Framingham Heart Study. The scale covers five social areas (housekeeping, transportation, social interaction, food preparation, and grocery shopping). Respondents are grouped into four categories (need met, no apparent problem (best outcome); need met, potential problem; uncertain need met, potential problem; need unmet, current problem (worst outcome)) for each social area using a previously published algorithm.
We created summary indices for the total number of unmet needs across all areas and for the total number of unmet needs or uncertain needs met, potential problem. These indices range from 0 to 5, but to avoid problems with model convergence due to sparse data, we will a priori categorize them as 0 (best outcome), 1, or ≥2 (worst outcome).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04070833
First Posted
August 23, 2019
Last Updated
August 10, 2022
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04070833
Brief Title
Effects of Vitamin D and Omega-3 on Cerebrovascular Disease
Official Title
Effects of Vitamin D and Omega-3 on Cerebrovascular Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 17, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 17, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL; NCT 01169259) is a completed randomized clinical trial in 25,875 U.S. men and women which investigated whether taking daily dietary supplements of vitamin D3 (2000 IU) or omega-3 fatty acids (Omacor® fish oil, 1 gram) reduced the risk of developing cancer, heart disease, and stroke in people who do not have a prior history of these illnesses. Observational follow-up of participants is currently ongoing. The current study is being conducted among participants in VITAL who experience a stroke event during follow-up and will examine whether vitamin D or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation impact post-stroke outcomes.
Detailed Description
Stroke is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide and is expected to become an even more prevalent cause of disability in the future as the population ages. Understanding risk factors which may prospectively influence stroke outcomes may help to reduce the morbidity burden of stroke.
The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) examined the impact of vitamin D3 (2,000 IU/day cholecalciferol) and omega-3 fatty acids (840 mg eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] + docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) on stroke incidence. However, the parent trial did not examine the impact of these supplements on stroke outcomes. Even if they do not significantly reduce stroke incidence, these supplements may still reduce stroke severity and improve outcomes post-stroke. Given the high morbidity burden of stroke, the impact of these supplements on stroke outcomes is of substantial scientific and public health importance.
The first aim of this study is to test whether vitamin D3 or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduces the risk of poor functional outcomes as measured at hospital discharge and 6- and 12-months post-stroke. The second aim is to determine whether chronic cerebrovascular changes (white matter hyperintensity volume and cerebral microbleeds) mediate the effect of vitamin D3 or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on stroke outcomes.
Individuals enrolled in VITAL who experience a non-fatal stroke event will be mailed additional questionnaires assessing functional limitations, physical disability, and social disability. Responses from these questionnaires will be used to determine the effect of vitamin D3 or omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on post-stroke outcomes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Vitamin D
Keywords
stroke, stroke outcomes, vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acid
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
290 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Vitamin D + fish oil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Vitamin D + fish oil placebo
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Vitamin D placebo + fish oil placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin D
Intervention Description
Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D-3 (cholecalciferol), 2000 IU Other Name: cholecalciferol
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fish oil
Intervention Description
Drug: Omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) Omacor, 1 capsule per day. Each capsule of Omacor contains 840 milligrams of marine omega-3 fatty acids (465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid [DHA])
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin D placebo
Intervention Description
Vitamin D placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fish oil placebo
Intervention Description
Fish oil placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Poor Stroke Outcome at Hospital Discharge as Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (mR 3-6)
Description
modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge
The mRS is often seen as a measure of disability or a "global health index" due to its strong emphasis on mobility although it claims to be a measure of handicap. The mRS is a seven-point scale (0=no symptoms at all; 1=no significant disability despite symptoms; 2=slight disability; 3=moderate disability; 4=moderately severe disability; 5=severe disability; 6=death). To avoid issues with model convergence due to sparse data, I will a priori categorize the mRS into good (mRS 0-2) versus poor (mRS 3-6) outcomes. These data were collected during the parent study (NCT01169259)
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Number of Participants With at Least One Functional Limitation After Stroke According to the Scale Adapted From Nagi
Description
Functional limitations will be assessed through self-report using the physical performance scale adapted from Nagi. The adapted Nagi scale asks respondents if they experience any limitations in each of the following items: pulling or pushing large objects; stooping, crouching, or kneeling; reaching or extending arms above shoulder level; reaching or extending arms below shoulder level; writing or handling or fingering small objects; standing in one place for long periods; and sitting for an hour. Participants reporting a limitation in any of these items will be considered to have at least one functional limitation after stroke.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Number of Participants With a Physical Disability After Stroke as Measured by the Modified Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale
Description
The modified Katz ADL scale ask participants to self-report if they need needing help with any of the following items: bathing; dressing; eating; getting in and out of a chair; and walking 50 yards. Individuals who report needing help with any of those items will be considered to have a physical disability after stroke.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Number of Participants With a Physical Disability After Stroke as Measured by the Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale
Description
The Rosow-Breslau Functional Health Scale asks participants to self-report if they need help with any of the following tasks: walking 0.5 mile; walking up and down stairs to the second floor; and doing heavy work around the house. Individuals who report needing help with any of those tasks will be considered to have a physical disability after stroke.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Number of Participants With Social Disability After Stroke as Measured by FHS Social Disability Scale
Description
Social disability was assessed through a self-administered questionnaire which asked questions about social functioning developed in the Framingham Heart Study. The scale covers five social areas (housekeeping, transportation, social interaction, food preparation, and grocery shopping). Respondents are grouped into four categories (need met, no apparent problem (best outcome); need met, potential problem; uncertain need met, potential problem; need unmet, current problem (worst outcome)) for each social area using a previously published algorithm.
We created summary indices for the total number of unmet needs across all areas and for the total number of unmet needs or uncertain needs met, potential problem. These indices range from 0 to 5, but to avoid problems with model convergence due to sparse data, we will a priori categorize them as 0 (best outcome), 1, or ≥2 (worst outcome).
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants eligible and willing to participate in the main VITAL trial (NCT 01169259) who experience a stroke during follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants eligible and willing to participate in the main VITAL trial (NCT 01169259) who do not experience a stroke during follow-up.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Investigators interested in using data from the parent study (VITAL) will be directed to contact the principal investigators of that study.
Links:
URL
http://vitalstudy.org
Description
Welcome to the VITAL Study Website
Learn more about this trial
Effects of Vitamin D and Omega-3 on Cerebrovascular Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs