search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of RAD001 Versus Sunitinib in the First-line and Second-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RECORD-3)

Primary Purpose

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
everolimus
sunitinib
Sponsored by
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Renal Cell Carcinoma focused on measuring RAD001, everolimus, sunitinib, renal cell carcinoma, kidney cancer, metastatic renal cell cancer, advanced kidney cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
  2. Patients with at least one measurable lesion.
  3. Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70%.
  4. Adequate bone marrow function.
  5. Adequate liver function.
  6. Adequate renal function.
  7. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ lower limit of institutional normal (LLN)
  8. Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to the administration of the study medication. Adequate contraception must be used while on study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Less than 4 weeks post-major surgery
  2. Patients who had radiation therapy within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment (palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions allowed within 2 weeks prior to study treatment start).
  3. Patients in need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study
  4. Patients with a serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
  5. Patients with a history of seizure(s) not controlled with standard medical therapy
  6. Patients who have received prior systemic treatment for their metastatic RCC
  7. Patients who have previously received systemic mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus) or VEGF inhibitors. Note: History of adjuvant immunotherapy, vaccines or adjuvant sorafenib following localized surgical nephrectomy is acceptable.
  8. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins (sirolimus, temsirolimus) or to its excipients Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins or to its excipients
  9. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to sunitinib or its excipients
  10. History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Note: Subjects who have previously-treated CNS metastases (surgery plus or minus radiotherapy, radiosurgery, or gamma knife) and meet all 3 of the following criteria are eligible:

    • Are asymptomatic and,
    • have had no evidence of active CNS metastases for ≥ 6 months prior to enrollment and,
    • have no requirement for steroids or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAC)
  11. Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities including, but not limited to:

    • Malabsorption syndrome
    • Major resection of the stomach or small bowel that could affect the absorption of study drug
    • Active peptic ulcer disease
    • Inflammatory bowel disease
    • Ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation
    • History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment.
  12. Poorly controlled hypertension [defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≥ 95mmHg]
  13. Patients receiving chronic systemic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent
  14. Patients with a known history of HIV seropositivity.
  15. Patients with active bleeding.
  16. Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions or other conditions within the past 12 months that could affect their participation in the study such as:

    • Cardiac angioplasty or stenting, unstable angina pectoris, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, symptomatic congestive heart failure (NYHA II, III, IV), myocardial infarction ≤ 6 months prior to first study treatment, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, cerebrovascular accidents ≤ 6 months before study treatment start.
    • Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) > 500 milliseconds (msecs).
    • Severally impaired lung function as defined as spirometry and DLCO that is 50% of the normal predicted value and/or 0^2 saturation that is 88% or less at rest on room air.
    • Poorly controlled diabetes as defined by fasting serum glucose >2.0 x ULN.
    • Any active (acute or chronic) or uncontrolled infection/disorders that impair the ability to evaluate the patient or for the patient to complete the study.
    • Liver disease such as chronic active hepatitis or chronic persistent hepatitis.
  17. History of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) including transient ischemic attack (TIA).
  18. History of pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months. Note: Subjects with recent DVT who have been treated with therapeutic anti-coagulating agents for at least 6 weeks are eligible.
  19. Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy and off treatment for ≤ 3 years
  20. Female patients of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate birth control methods, or who are pregnant or breast feeding.
  21. Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs ≤ 2 weeks prior to study treatment start.
  22. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham/ Kirklin Clinic Comprehensive CancerCenter (1)
  • University of South Alabama / Mitchell Cancer Institute Dept. of Mitchell Cancer Inst.
  • Highlands Oncology Group HighlandsOncGrp-Bentonville(2)
  • University of California San Diego - Moores Cancer Center Dept of Moores Cancer Ctr (5)
  • University of California at Los Angeles Dept. of UCLA (3)
  • University of Colorado Dept. of Anschutz Cancer (2)
  • Norwalk Hospital Norwlak SC
  • Georgetown University/Lombardi Cancer Center Dept.of Lombardi Cancer Ctr (2
  • Lynn Cancer Institute
  • University of Miami SC
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center - Orlando Dept.ofMDACC-Orlando
  • University Cancer & Blood Center, LLC Dept of NE GCC (2)
  • Georgia Health Sciences University Dept. of MCG
  • Summit Cancer Care
  • NorthwesternUniv.Med.School/Robert H. Lurie Comp.Cancer Ctr Dept.ofNorthwesternMemHospital
  • Loyola University Medical Center /Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Cardinal Bernardin Cancer (3)
  • Crescent City Research Consortium, LLC SC
  • VA Maryland Health Care Dept.of GreenbaumCancerCent(7)
  • Weinberg Cancer Institute at Franklin Square Hospital
  • Billings Clinic Dept of Billings Clinic(2)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center DeptofHackensackUniv.MedCtr.
  • Cooper Cancer Center
  • Clinical Research Alliance
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Dept. of MSKCC
  • SUNY - Upstate Medical University Div. of Hematology-Oncology
  • University of North Carolina Dept. of LinbergerCancerCtr(3)
  • Levine Cancer Institute Oncology
  • Duke University Medical Center Duke
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Dept of OHSC
  • St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network St Luke's Hospital (2)
  • The West Clinic Dept. of the West Clinic
  • The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders Dept. of The Ctr for C & BD(2)
  • East Texas Medical Center Cancer Institute
  • Utah Cancer Specialists Dept.of Utah Cancer Spec. (3)
  • Aurora Advanced Healthcare SC
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

everolimus 1L/sunitinib 2L

sunitinib 1L/everolimus 2L

Arm Description

everolimus First Line: 10 mg orally, once daily, (two 5 mg tablets), continuous treatment. sunitinib Second Line: 50 mg orally, once daily, 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (4/2)

sunitinib First Line: 50 mg orally, once daily, 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (4/2) everolimus Second Line: 10 mg orally, once daily (two 5 mg tablets), continuous treatment

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival First-Line (PFS 1-L)
PFS_1L based on investigator assessment of radiology data by RECIST 1.0, was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause during or after first-line treatment with everolimus or sunitinib. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival Combined (PFS-C)
PFS-C (1L and 2L study drugs combined) was a composite endpoint which combined both lines of study treatment. It was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first of the following: date of death due to any cause, or date of the first radiologically documented progression disease during or after the second-line treatment period for patients with a radiologically documented progression disease in the first-line treatment period and who had crossed-over to second-line treatment no more than 6 weeks after progression.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. The analysis of OS included all deaths in the FAS regardless of when they were observed.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) - First -Line (1-L)
ORR was defined as the number of participants with best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and was based on investigator assessment of radiology data per RECIST. Participants with best overall response of 'Unknown' were treated as non-responders in the calculation of the ORR. Confirmed CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Confirmed PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. CR required a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Radiological assessments : every 12 weeks until disease progression, the start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason.
Duration of Response (DoR) - First-Line (1-L)
Duration of overall response (CR or PR) applies only to patients whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) during the first-line treatment period. The start date was the date of first documented response (CR or PR) during the first-line treatment and the end date was the date of the event defined as the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer during or after the same treatment line.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKSI-DRS Risk Score by at Least 3 Score Units by First-line Drug
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration was defined as a decrease by at least 3 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the 1-L of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 3 units was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the patient.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKSI-DRS Risk Score by at Least 3 Score Units by First and Second-line Drugs Combined
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration was defined as a decrease by at least 3 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the 1-L or 2-L treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 3 units was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the patient.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning (PF) Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 - by First-Line (1L) Drug
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 - by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First-Line Drug
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Fatigue Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First-Line Drug
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Fatigue Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2009
Last Updated
October 4, 2016
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00903175
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of RAD001 Versus Sunitinib in the First-line and Second-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Acronym
RECORD-3
Official Title
An Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of RAD001 as First-line Followed by Second-line Sunitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Followed by Second-line RAD001 in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of first-line RAD001 followed by second-line sunitinib versus the opposite sequence: first-line sunitinib followed by second-line RAD001 for the treatment of patients with MRCC.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Keywords
RAD001, everolimus, sunitinib, renal cell carcinoma, kidney cancer, metastatic renal cell cancer, advanced kidney cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
471 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
everolimus 1L/sunitinib 2L
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
everolimus First Line: 10 mg orally, once daily, (two 5 mg tablets), continuous treatment. sunitinib Second Line: 50 mg orally, once daily, 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (4/2)
Arm Title
sunitinib 1L/everolimus 2L
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
sunitinib First Line: 50 mg orally, once daily, 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (4/2) everolimus Second Line: 10 mg orally, once daily (two 5 mg tablets), continuous treatment
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
everolimus
Other Intervention Name(s)
RAD001
Intervention Description
Everolimus was administered orally at 10 mg/day. Everolimus is formulated as tablets of 5 mg strength, blister-packed under aluminum foil in units of 10 tablets.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
sunitinib
Intervention Description
Sunitinib was administered orally 50 mg daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on/2 weeks off. Sunitinib was supplied as hard gelatin capsules of 12.5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg strength according to local practice.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival First-Line (PFS 1-L)
Description
PFS_1L based on investigator assessment of radiology data by RECIST 1.0, was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause during or after first-line treatment with everolimus or sunitinib. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time Frame
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to 35 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival Combined (PFS-C)
Description
PFS-C (1L and 2L study drugs combined) was a composite endpoint which combined both lines of study treatment. It was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first of the following: date of death due to any cause, or date of the first radiologically documented progression disease during or after the second-line treatment period for patients with a radiologically documented progression disease in the first-line treatment period and who had crossed-over to second-line treatment no more than 6 weeks after progression.
Time Frame
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to about 56 months
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. The analysis of OS included all deaths in the FAS regardless of when they were observed.
Time Frame
Every 2 months from randomization up to 3 years after last patient randomized
Title
Overall Response Rate (ORR) - First -Line (1-L)
Description
ORR was defined as the number of participants with best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and was based on investigator assessment of radiology data per RECIST. Participants with best overall response of 'Unknown' were treated as non-responders in the calculation of the ORR. Confirmed CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Confirmed PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. CR required a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Radiological assessments : every 12 weeks until disease progression, the start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason.
Time Frame
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to 35 months
Title
Duration of Response (DoR) - First-Line (1-L)
Description
Duration of overall response (CR or PR) applies only to patients whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) during the first-line treatment period. The start date was the date of first documented response (CR or PR) during the first-line treatment and the end date was the date of the event defined as the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer during or after the same treatment line.
Time Frame
based on radiological assessments every 3 months until disease progression, start of another antineoplastic therapy or for any other reason up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKSI-DRS Risk Score by at Least 3 Score Units by First-line Drug
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration was defined as a decrease by at least 3 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the 1-L of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 3 units was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the patient.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the FKSI-DRS Risk Score by at Least 3 Score Units by First and Second-line Drugs Combined
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a set of items to assess symptoms experienced by patients with advanced kidney cancer. These symptoms include fatigue, pain, weight loss, dyspnea, cough, fever and hematuria. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration was defined as a decrease by at least 3 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the 1-L or 2-L treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 3 units was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the patient.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning (PF) Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 - by First-Line (1L) Drug
Description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 - by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
Description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First-Line Drug
Description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status/QoL Scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
Description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Fatigue Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First-Line Drug
Description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items.The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line of treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months
Title
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Fatigue Scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 by First and Second-Line Drugs Combined
Description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) contains 30 items. These include a global health status/QoL scale, five functional scales, three symptom scales, and six single items. The standardized score for the PF, fatigue subscales and global health status ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high level of symptom/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% was defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the first line or second line treatment. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% was considered definitive only if it was the last one available for the participant.
Time Frame
<=14 days prior to the first dose of study medication, on day 1, day 28 of every cycle, at the end of treatment visit, at the 28 day FUP visit and monthly thereafter for up to 3 months or until initiation of another anticancer therapy up to 35 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients with at least one measurable lesion. Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70%. Adequate bone marrow function. Adequate liver function. Adequate renal function. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ lower limit of institutional normal (LLN) Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to the administration of the study medication. Adequate contraception must be used while on study. Exclusion Criteria: Less than 4 weeks post-major surgery Patients who had radiation therapy within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment (palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions allowed within 2 weeks prior to study treatment start). Patients in need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study Patients with a serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture Patients with a history of seizure(s) not controlled with standard medical therapy Patients who have received prior systemic treatment for their metastatic RCC Patients who have previously received systemic mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, temsirolimus, everolimus) or VEGF inhibitors. Note: History of adjuvant immunotherapy, vaccines or adjuvant sorafenib following localized surgical nephrectomy is acceptable. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins (sirolimus, temsirolimus) or to its excipients Patients with a known hypersensitivity to RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins or to its excipients Patients with a known hypersensitivity to sunitinib or its excipients History or clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Note: Subjects who have previously-treated CNS metastases (surgery plus or minus radiotherapy, radiosurgery, or gamma knife) and meet all 3 of the following criteria are eligible: Are asymptomatic and, have had no evidence of active CNS metastases for ≥ 6 months prior to enrollment and, have no requirement for steroids or enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAC) Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities including, but not limited to: Malabsorption syndrome Major resection of the stomach or small bowel that could affect the absorption of study drug Active peptic ulcer disease Inflammatory bowel disease Ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to beginning study treatment. Poorly controlled hypertension [defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≥ 95mmHg] Patients receiving chronic systemic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent Patients with a known history of HIV seropositivity. Patients with active bleeding. Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions or other conditions within the past 12 months that could affect their participation in the study such as: Cardiac angioplasty or stenting, unstable angina pectoris, symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, symptomatic congestive heart failure (NYHA II, III, IV), myocardial infarction ≤ 6 months prior to first study treatment, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, cerebrovascular accidents ≤ 6 months before study treatment start. Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) > 500 milliseconds (msecs). Severally impaired lung function as defined as spirometry and DLCO that is 50% of the normal predicted value and/or 0^2 saturation that is 88% or less at rest on room air. Poorly controlled diabetes as defined by fasting serum glucose >2.0 x ULN. Any active (acute or chronic) or uncontrolled infection/disorders that impair the ability to evaluate the patient or for the patient to complete the study. Liver disease such as chronic active hepatitis or chronic persistent hepatitis. History of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) including transient ischemic attack (TIA). History of pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months. Note: Subjects with recent DVT who have been treated with therapeutic anti-coagulating agents for at least 6 weeks are eligible. Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy and off treatment for ≤ 3 years Female patients of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate birth control methods, or who are pregnant or breast feeding. Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs ≤ 2 weeks prior to study treatment start. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama at Birmingham/ Kirklin Clinic Comprehensive CancerCenter (1)
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294-0006
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of South Alabama / Mitchell Cancer Institute Dept. of Mitchell Cancer Inst.
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36688
Country
United States
Facility Name
Highlands Oncology Group HighlandsOncGrp-Bentonville(2)
City
Fayetteville
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72703
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California San Diego - Moores Cancer Center Dept of Moores Cancer Ctr (5)
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92093-0658
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California at Los Angeles Dept. of UCLA (3)
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado Dept. of Anschutz Cancer (2)
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Norwalk Hospital Norwlak SC
City
Norwalk
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06856
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgetown University/Lombardi Cancer Center Dept.of Lombardi Cancer Ctr (2
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007-2197
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lynn Cancer Institute
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami SC
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
MD Anderson Cancer Center - Orlando Dept.ofMDACC-Orlando
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Cancer & Blood Center, LLC Dept of NE GCC (2)
City
Athens
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgia Health Sciences University Dept. of MCG
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30912
Country
United States
Facility Name
Summit Cancer Care
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31405
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthwesternUniv.Med.School/Robert H. Lurie Comp.Cancer Ctr Dept.ofNorthwesternMemHospital
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loyola University Medical Center /Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Cardinal Bernardin Cancer (3)
City
Maywood
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60153
Country
United States
Facility Name
Crescent City Research Consortium, LLC SC
City
Metairie
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70006
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Maryland Health Care Dept.of GreenbaumCancerCent(7)
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Weinberg Cancer Institute at Franklin Square Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21237-3998
Country
United States
Facility Name
Billings Clinic Dept of Billings Clinic(2)
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center DeptofHackensackUniv.MedCtr.
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cooper Cancer Center
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Alliance
City
Lake Success
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Dept. of MSKCC
City
NY
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
SUNY - Upstate Medical University Div. of Hematology-Oncology
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina Dept. of LinbergerCancerCtr(3)
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599-7295
Country
United States
Facility Name
Levine Cancer Institute Oncology
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center Duke
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Dept of OHSC
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network St Luke's Hospital (2)
City
Bethlehem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18015
Country
United States
Facility Name
The West Clinic Dept. of the West Clinic
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38120
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders Dept. of The Ctr for C & BD(2)
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Texas Medical Center Cancer Institute
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Utah Cancer Specialists Dept.of Utah Cancer Spec. (3)
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aurora Advanced Healthcare SC
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Caba
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1405BCH
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
La Plata
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B1902CMK
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rosario
State/Province
Santa Fe
ZIP/Postal Code
S2002KDS
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tucuman
ZIP/Postal Code
T4000IAK
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Woodville
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rio de Janeiro
State/Province
RJ
ZIP/Postal Code
20230-130
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
RS
ZIP/Postal Code
90610-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-000
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 4N2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 1Z2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Victoria
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V8R 6V5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Greenfield Park
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J4V 2H1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2X 3J4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Saskatoon
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S7N 4H4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Herlev
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2730
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Angers cedex 02
ZIP/Postal Code
49055
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lille Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
59020
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy Cede
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Aschaffenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
63739
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10098
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Weiden
ZIP/Postal Code
92637
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Hongkong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Shatin, New Territories
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Arezzo
State/Province
AR
ZIP/Postal Code
52100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Modena
State/Province
MO
ZIP/Postal Code
41100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seoul
State/Province
Korea
ZIP/Postal Code
03080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seoul
State/Province
Korea
ZIP/Postal Code
03722
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Seoul
State/Province
Korea
ZIP/Postal Code
05505
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Daejeon
ZIP/Postal Code
301-747
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Chihuahua
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2545 CH
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Maastricht
ZIP/Postal Code
6229 HX
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Jesus Maria
State/Province
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
11
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Elche
State/Province
Alicante
ZIP/Postal Code
03203
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sevilla
State/Province
Andalucia
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sabadell
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08208
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lleida
State/Province
Cataluna
ZIP/Postal Code
25198
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Taipei
State/Province
Taiwan, ROC
ZIP/Postal Code
112
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Niaosong Township
ZIP/Postal Code
83301
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10700
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34093
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bristol
State/Province
Avon
ZIP/Postal Code
BS2 8ED
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW3 6JJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nottingham
ZIP/Postal Code
NG5 1PB
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30327302
Citation
Voss MH, Chen D, Reising A, Marker M, Shi J, Xu J, Ostrovnaya I, Seshan VE, Redzematovic A, Chen YB, Patel P, Han X, Hsieh JJ, Hakimi AA, Motzer RJ. PTEN Expression, Not Mutation Status in TSC1, TSC2, or mTOR, Correlates with the Outcome on Everolimus in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated on the Randomized RECORD-3 Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 15;25(2):506-514. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1833. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28327953
Citation
Knox JJ, Barrios CH, Kim TM, Cosgriff T, Srimuninnimit V, Pittman K, Sabbatini R, Rha SY, Flaig TW, Page RD, Beck JT, Cheung F, Yadav S, Patel P, Geoffrois L, Niolat J, Berkowitz N, Marker M, Chen D, Motzer RJ. Final overall survival analysis for the phase II RECORD-3 study of first-line everolimus followed by sunitinib versus first-line sunitinib followed by everolimus in metastatic RCC. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1339-1345. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx075. Erratum In: Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2269.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25049330
Citation
Motzer RJ, Barrios CH, Kim TM, Falcon S, Cosgriff T, Harker WG, Srimuninnimit V, Pittman K, Sabbatini R, Rha SY, Flaig TW, Page R, Bavbek S, Beck JT, Patel P, Cheung FY, Yadav S, Schiff EM, Wang X, Niolat J, Sellami D, Anak O, Knox JJ. Phase II randomized trial comparing sequential first-line everolimus and second-line sunitinib versus first-line sunitinib and second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2765-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6911. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://NovartisClinicalTrials.com
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of RAD001 Versus Sunitinib in the First-line and Second-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs