Proportion of participants achieving Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) total score less than or equal to (<=)10 [CDAI Low disease activity (LDA)] at Week 12
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20 at Week 12: non-inferiority comparison with tofacitinib
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant hsCRP or ESR. Proportion of participants achieving ACR20 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 52
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=10 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 52
CDAI: a composite score to determine disease severity using only clinical data: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis. Proportion of participants achieving CDAI total score <=2.8 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 12
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 52
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, pain VAS, HAQ-DI and an acute-phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR). Proportion of participants achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving Disease Activity Score using 28 joint count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/liter [L]) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (millimeters[mm]/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (millimeter [mm]/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 52
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 52
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <=3.2 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 52
DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 52
DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (28 joint count), ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (transformed to a 0-10 scale). Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease. Proportion of participants achieving DAS28-ESR <2.6 at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate (European league against rheumatism) EULAR response at Week 12
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 52
Proportion of participants achieving a good/moderate EULAR response at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 52
Proportion of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at Week 52 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 12
Van der Heijde modified total sharp scores (mTSS) is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 12 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 24
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified total sharp score (mTSS) score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 24 will be summarized.
Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 52
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. No radiographic progression defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde modified total sharp score (mTSS) score of <=0.5. Proportion of participants achieving no radiographic progression at Week 52 will be summarized.
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease
Change from Baseline in CDAI total score at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis determines disease severity using only clinical data. It is calculated by the simple sum of the 4 following parameters: Tender joint count (28), Swollen joint count (28), Patient's global assessment of arthritis and Physician's global assessment of arthritis both transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-76, higher score indicating more severe disease
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measures of RA disease activity calculated using tender joint count and swollen joint count (28 joint count), hsCRP (mg/L) / ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, higher score indicating more severe disease.
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Change from Baseline in Van der Heijde mTSS at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Van der Heijde mTSS is a scoring method which utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes, in each hand, 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing, and in each foot, 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas joint space narrowing.
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
HAQ-DI: 20-questions which assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Change from Baseline in Arthritis pain VAS at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
Participants' assessment of the severity of their arthritis pain over the past week, using a 100 unit VAS, with anchors "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain).
Change from Baseline in Short form (SF)-36 physical component scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 physical component scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 mental component scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in SF-36 domain scores at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
SF-36 is a generic health survey that contains 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue and general health perceptions. SF-36 scores each item on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively.
Change from Baseline in Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12 (Scores on a scale)
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 (Scores on a scale)
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Change from Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 52 (Scores on a scale)
FACIT-fatigue is a validated participant-reported measure developed originally to assess fatigue in individuals with cancer and has subsequently been used and validated in numerous chronic conditions, including RA.
Incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, cause life threatening events which requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity and birth defect or congenital anomaly. Protocol defined AESIs will be included.
Change from Baseline in white blood cell (WBC) count at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Change from Baseline in WBC count at Week 24 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Change from Baseline in WBC count at Week 52 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of WBC count.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 12 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 24 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes at Week 52 (Giga cells per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 12 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 24 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in hematology parameter of hemoglobin at Week 52 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of hematology parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) at Week 12 (International units per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 (International units per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 52 (International units per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 12 (Micromoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 24 (Micromoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of total bilirubin at Week 52 (Micromoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 12 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 24 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in clinical chemistry parameter of albumin at Week 52 (Grams per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of total cholesterol at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 4 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 16 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Change from Baseline in lipid profile parameter of triglycerides at Week 52 (Millimoles per liter)
Blood samples will be collected for the assessment of lipid profile parameters.
Proportion of participants with National Cancer Institute-Common terminology criteria for adverse events) (NCI-CTCAE)>=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities
Proportion of participants with NCI-CTCAE >=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities will be summarized.
Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) autoantibody
Concentrations of GM-CSF autoantibodies will be determined
Number of participants with anti-GSK3196165 antibodies
Presence of anti-GSK3196165 antibodies will be determined.