search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of Several Doses of Viaskin Peanut in Adults and Children With Peanut Allergy (VIPES)

Primary Purpose

Peanut Allergy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg
Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg
Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg
Viaskin Placebo
Sponsored by
DBV Technologies
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peanut Allergy focused on measuring Food allergy, Immediate hypersensitivity, Whole peanut extract, Allergenic product, Specific Immunotherapy, Epicutaneous Immunotherapy (EPIT)

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 55 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Peanut-allergic subjects between 6 and 55 years of age, with a well-documented medical history of systemic reactions after ingestion of peanut and currently following a strict peanut-free diet.
  • Peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) level (Phadia CAP-system) > 0.7 kU/L and a positive skin prick test to peanut with a largest wheal diameter ≥ 8 mm
  • Positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at ≤ 300 mg of peanut proteins: the eliciting dose of peanut proteins during the DBPCFC is capped at 300 mg, i.e. subjects must react to peanut before reaching or at the dose of 300 mg peanut proteins.
  • Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing age must use effective methods of contraception to prevent pregnancy and agree to continue to practice an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of participation in the study. Sexual abstinence will be accepted as an effective method of contraception for girls below 15 years of age.
  • Ability to perform spirometry maneuvers in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines (2005) for subjects 9 years of age and above Subjects below 9 years of age can perform peak expiratory flow (PEF) instead.
  • Willing to comply with all study requirements during their participation in the study.
  • Provide signed informed consent and assent as appropriate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a history of severe anaphylaxis to peanut with the following symptoms: hypotension, hypoxia, neurological compromise (collapse, loss of consciousness or incontinence).
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • FEV1 <80% of the predicted value at screening for subjects 9 years of age and above. PEF < 80% of predicted for subjects below 9 years of age.
  • Subjects who did not react at or below the dose of 300 mg of peanut proteins during the DBPCFC at screening.
  • Known allergy or known hypersensitivity to placebo excipients either of the Viaskin patches or of the food challenge formulas.
  • Subjects reacting objectively to the placebo formula at screening.
  • Severe reaction during the screening food challenge, defined as need for intubation, hypotension persisting after epinephrine administration, or the need for more than two doses of epinephrine.
  • Inability to discontinue short-acting antihistamines for three days or long-acting antihistamines for five to seven days (depending on half-life) prior to skin prick testing or food challenges.
  • Subjects treated with systemic long-acting corticosteroids (depot corticosteroids) within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit and/or systemic short-acting corticosteroid within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit or any systemic corticosteroid at screening.
  • Subjects with asthma defined as follows:

    1. uncontrolled persistent asthma by National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Asthma guidelines (2007) or by Global Initiative for Asthma (2011) or being treated with combination therapy of medium dose inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled β2-agonists;
    2. at least two systemic corticosteroid courses for asthma in the past year or one oral corticosteroid course for asthma in the past three months;
    3. prior intubation for asthma in the past two years.
  • Subjects on β-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or tricyclic antidepressant therapy.
  • Subjects undergoing any type of immunotherapy to any food within one year prior to the screening visit.
  • Subjects presently on aeroallergen immunotherapy and unwilling or unable to discontinue.
  • Subjects currently treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs or anti-IgE drugs (such as omalizumab) or any biologic immunomodulatory therapy within one year prior to the screening visit.
  • Allergy or known history of reaction to Tegaderm®.
  • Subjects suffering from generalized dermatologic diseases (e.g. severe atopic dermatitis, uncontrolled generalized eczema, keratosis pilaris, ichthyosis vulgaris) with no intact skin zones to apply the patches.
  • Any disorder in which epinephrine is contraindicated such as coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or serious ventricular arrhythmias.
  • Participation in another clinical intervention study in the three months prior to the screening visit.
  • Subjects on any experimental drugs or treatments.

Other inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Sites / Locations

  • University of California, Rady Childrens Hospital
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Children's Memorial Hospital
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Boston Childrens' Hospital
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas
  • ASTHMA, Inc.
  • Cheema Research Inc.
  • Ottawa Allergy Asthma Research Institute
  • Gordon Sussman Clinical Research
  • Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Asthme et Allergie de Québec
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin
  • Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul
  • GCS des hôpitaux pédiatriques
  • Hôpital Necker
  • Nouvel Hôpital Civil
  • Hôpitaux De Brabois
  • Erasmus MC
  • UMC Utrecht
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr2
  • Szpital Kliniczny UM

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg

Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg

Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg

Viaskin Placebo

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at the screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Mean Cumulative Reactive Dose of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
The peanut protein cumulative reactive dose was defined as the sum of all peanut protein doses up to and including the eliciting dose ingested during the peanut challenge. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Change From Baseline in Severity of Symptoms Based on the Oral Food Challenge (OFC) Symptom Score Sheet at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
The symptoms of erythematous rash, pruritus, urticaria/angioedema, rash, sneezing/itching, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, laryngeal symptoms (example, throat clearing, occasional cough, hoarseness, frequent dry cough, inspiratory stridor), wheezing, subjective complaints, objective complaints and cardiovascular symptoms (example, color change, weakness, dizziness, mental status change, tachycardia, decreased blood pressure, etc) were observed. The OFC score ranges from 0 to 3 for each symptom (0=Absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe). The total symptom score for each participant was calculated. Higher scores indicate worst outcome. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Number of Participants With an Average Wheal Diameter Ratio ≤0.5 and >0.5 at Each Skin Prick Test Dilution at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
The mean wheal diameter of skin prick test (sum of the orthogonal diameters divided by 2) at each time point is calculated for the 5 skin prick tests at baseline and at each time point, i.e., Months 3, 6 and 12: undiluted, diluted 1:10 millimeter (mm), diluted 1:100 (mm), diluted 1:1,000 (mm), diluted 1:10,000 (mm). The ratio of the mean wheal diameter at each time point for a specific dilution versus the baseline value for that specific dilution was calculated and classified as <=0.5 or >0.5, allowing to assess the number of participants of those mean wheal diameters that have been at least halved from the baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgE at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgE at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgE at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific Immunoglobulin G Subtype 4 (IgG4) at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgG4 at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgG4 at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgG4 at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.

Full Information

First Posted
August 17, 2012
Last Updated
September 28, 2021
Sponsor
DBV Technologies
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01675882
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Several Doses of Viaskin Peanut in Adults and Children With Peanut Allergy
Acronym
VIPES
Official Title
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial to Study the Viaskin Peanut's Efficacy and Safety for Treating Peanut Allergy in Children and Adults.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
DBV Technologies

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objectives of this dose-finding study for the treatment of peanut allergy are: To determine the efficacy of 3 doses of Viaskin Peanut (50 mcg ,100 mcg and 250 mcg peanut protein per patch) to significantly desensitize peanut-allergic subjects to peanut after 12 months of treatment. To evaluate the safety of a long-term treatment with Viaskin Peanut.
Detailed Description
Peanut allergy is a common allergy in the United States, with a prevalence in the general population as high as 1%. Peanut allergy management is based on strict peanut avoidance and injectable epinephrine after the allergic systemic reactions have started. Specific Immunotherapy methods currently available have shown some limitations in their use because of safety issues. Hence, there is an important unmet medical need for efficient and safe treatment of peanut allergy. DBV Technologies has developed an epicutaneous delivery system, called Viaskin, a method based on delivering precise quantity of the allergen on the upper layers of the skin. Avoiding contact between the allergen and the bloodstream should confer to epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) a higher level of safety as systemic reactions should be circumvented The VIPES study is a 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled,randomized trial to study the efficacy and safety of Viaskin Peanut in subjects from 6 to 55 years old with a history of immediate hypersensitive reaction to peanut protein. The trial will be conducted at sites with investigators and staff trained and experienced in the diagnosis and the management of peanut allergy and anaphylaxis, and who are capable of performing a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) in adult and/or pediatric subjects. Three doses of peanut proteins, i.e. 50 mcg, 100 mcg and 250 mcg will be evaluated for the study. Following the confirmation of peanut allergy at screening, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio into four different treatment groups, including 50 mcg, 100 mcg and 250 mcg peanut protein or placebo. Treatment will be comprised of daily applications of Viaskin Peanut or placebo patch for 12 months. Each subject will undergo two DBPCFCs: one at screening and one at Month 12. A follow up visit will be performed 2 weeks after completion of treatment and the last DBPCFC.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peanut Allergy
Keywords
Food allergy, Immediate hypersensitivity, Whole peanut extract, Allergenic product, Specific Immunotherapy, Epicutaneous Immunotherapy (EPIT)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
221 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Viaskin Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg
Intervention Description
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 50 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Viaskin Peanut 100 mcg
Intervention Description
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 100 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Viaskin Peanut 250 mcg
Intervention Description
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 250 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Viaskin Placebo
Intervention Description
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing a matching placebo formulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Description
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
Description
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
Description
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
Description
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Description
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at the screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
Description
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
Description
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Mean Eliciting Doses of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
Description
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Mean Cumulative Reactive Dose of Peanut Proteins at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Description
The peanut protein cumulative reactive dose was defined as the sum of all peanut protein doses up to and including the eliciting dose ingested during the peanut challenge. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Severity of Symptoms Based on the Oral Food Challenge (OFC) Symptom Score Sheet at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Description
The symptoms of erythematous rash, pruritus, urticaria/angioedema, rash, sneezing/itching, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, laryngeal symptoms (example, throat clearing, occasional cough, hoarseness, frequent dry cough, inspiratory stridor), wheezing, subjective complaints, objective complaints and cardiovascular symptoms (example, color change, weakness, dizziness, mental status change, tachycardia, decreased blood pressure, etc) were observed. The OFC score ranges from 0 to 3 for each symptom (0=Absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe). The total symptom score for each participant was calculated. Higher scores indicate worst outcome. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Title
Number of Participants With an Average Wheal Diameter Ratio ≤0.5 and >0.5 at Each Skin Prick Test Dilution at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Description
The mean wheal diameter of skin prick test (sum of the orthogonal diameters divided by 2) at each time point is calculated for the 5 skin prick tests at baseline and at each time point, i.e., Months 3, 6 and 12: undiluted, diluted 1:10 millimeter (mm), diluted 1:100 (mm), diluted 1:1,000 (mm), diluted 1:10,000 (mm). The ratio of the mean wheal diameter at each time point for a specific dilution versus the baseline value for that specific dilution was calculated and classified as <=0.5 or >0.5, allowing to assess the number of participants of those mean wheal diameters that have been at least halved from the baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgE at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgE at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgE at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific Immunoglobulin G Subtype 4 (IgG4) at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgG4 at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Children (6-11 Years of Age)
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgG4 at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adolescents (12-17 Years of Age)
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Peanut-Specific IgG4 at Months 3, 6 and 12; Analyzed in Adults (18-55 Years of Age)
Description
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Peanut-allergic subjects between 6 and 55 years of age, with a well-documented medical history of systemic reactions after ingestion of peanut and currently following a strict peanut-free diet. Peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) level (Phadia CAP-system) > 0.7 kU/L and a positive skin prick test to peanut with a largest wheal diameter ≥ 8 mm Positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at ≤ 300 mg of peanut proteins: the eliciting dose of peanut proteins during the DBPCFC is capped at 300 mg, i.e. subjects must react to peanut before reaching or at the dose of 300 mg peanut proteins. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing age must use effective methods of contraception to prevent pregnancy and agree to continue to practice an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of participation in the study. Sexual abstinence will be accepted as an effective method of contraception for girls below 15 years of age. Ability to perform spirometry maneuvers in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines (2005) for subjects 9 years of age and above Subjects below 9 years of age can perform peak expiratory flow (PEF) instead. Willing to comply with all study requirements during their participation in the study. Provide signed informed consent and assent as appropriate. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects with a history of severe anaphylaxis to peanut with the following symptoms: hypotension, hypoxia, neurological compromise (collapse, loss of consciousness or incontinence). Pregnancy or lactation. FEV1 <80% of the predicted value at screening for subjects 9 years of age and above. PEF < 80% of predicted for subjects below 9 years of age. Subjects who did not react at or below the dose of 300 mg of peanut proteins during the DBPCFC at screening. Known allergy or known hypersensitivity to placebo excipients either of the Viaskin patches or of the food challenge formulas. Subjects reacting objectively to the placebo formula at screening. Severe reaction during the screening food challenge, defined as need for intubation, hypotension persisting after epinephrine administration, or the need for more than two doses of epinephrine. Inability to discontinue short-acting antihistamines for three days or long-acting antihistamines for five to seven days (depending on half-life) prior to skin prick testing or food challenges. Subjects treated with systemic long-acting corticosteroids (depot corticosteroids) within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit and/or systemic short-acting corticosteroid within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit or any systemic corticosteroid at screening. Subjects with asthma defined as follows: uncontrolled persistent asthma by National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Asthma guidelines (2007) or by Global Initiative for Asthma (2011) or being treated with combination therapy of medium dose inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled β2-agonists; at least two systemic corticosteroid courses for asthma in the past year or one oral corticosteroid course for asthma in the past three months; prior intubation for asthma in the past two years. Subjects on β-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or tricyclic antidepressant therapy. Subjects undergoing any type of immunotherapy to any food within one year prior to the screening visit. Subjects presently on aeroallergen immunotherapy and unwilling or unable to discontinue. Subjects currently treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs or anti-IgE drugs (such as omalizumab) or any biologic immunomodulatory therapy within one year prior to the screening visit. Allergy or known history of reaction to Tegaderm®. Subjects suffering from generalized dermatologic diseases (e.g. severe atopic dermatitis, uncontrolled generalized eczema, keratosis pilaris, ichthyosis vulgaris) with no intact skin zones to apply the patches. Any disorder in which epinephrine is contraindicated such as coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or serious ventricular arrhythmias. Participation in another clinical intervention study in the three months prior to the screening visit. Subjects on any experimental drugs or treatments. Other inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California, Rady Childrens Hospital
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford University School of Medicine
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Memorial Hospital
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Childrens' Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Medical Center Dallas
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75235
Country
United States
Facility Name
ASTHMA, Inc.
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cheema Research Inc.
City
Mississauga
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L5A 3V4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Ottawa Allergy Asthma Research Institute
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1Y 4G2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Gordon Sussman Clinical Research
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4V 1R2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Asthme et Allergie de Québec
City
Sainte-Foy
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1V 4M6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33076
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59020
Country
France
Facility Name
GCS des hôpitaux pédiatriques
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06200
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Necker
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75743
Country
France
Facility Name
Nouvel Hôpital Civil
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67091
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpitaux De Brabois
City
Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France
Facility Name
Erasmus MC
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 GD
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
UMC Utrecht
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584 CX
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr2
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85168
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Szpital Kliniczny UM
City
Łódź
ZIP/Postal Code
92213
Country
Poland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30978404
Citation
Lewis MO, Brown-Whitehorn TF, Cianferoni A, Rooney C, Spergel JM. Peanut-allergic patient experiences after epicutaneous immunotherapy: peanut consumption and impact on QoL. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Jul;123(1):101-103. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 10. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29136445
Citation
Sampson HA, Shreffler WG, Yang WH, Sussman GL, Brown-Whitehorn TF, Nadeau KC, Cheema AS, Leonard SA, Pongracic JA, Sauvage-Delebarre C, Assa'ad AH, de Blay F, Bird JA, Tilles SA, Boralevi F, Bourrier T, Hebert J, Green TD, Gerth van Wijk R, Knulst AC, Kanny G, Schneider LC, Kowalski ML, Dupont C. Effect of Varying Doses of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Exposure Among Patients With Peanut Sensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Nov 14;318(18):1798-1809. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16591.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of Several Doses of Viaskin Peanut in Adults and Children With Peanut Allergy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs