search
Back to results

Efficacy And Safety Of Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparator Study (OPAL BROADEN)

Primary Purpose

Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tofacitinib 5 mg BID
Tofacitinib 10 mg BID
Adalimumab
Placebo
Placebo
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Psoriatic Arthritis focused on measuring psoriatic arthritis, radiographic changes, active comparator, tofacitinib

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females, aged >= 18 years at time of consent.
  • Have a diagnosis of Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) of >= 6 months
  • Meet the Classification Criteria of PsA (CASPAR) at time of screening
  • Must not have been adequately treated with a a traditional non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD).
  • Concurrent treatment with methotrexate, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine allowed and required
  • Must not have taken a biologic Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitor
  • Must have 3 or more swollen joints AND 3 or more tender joints
  • Must have active psoriasis skin lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have non-plaque forms of psoriasis, eg erythrodermic, guttate or pustular, with the exception of nail psoriasis which is allowed
  • Pregnant or breast feeding, females of child-bearing potential not using highly effective contraception
  • New York Heart Association Class III and IV congestive heart failure
  • History of hypersensitivity or infusion reaction to biologic agents
  • Infection with HIV, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or other chronic infection

Sites / Locations

  • Rheumatology Associates, PC
  • Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC
  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
  • Medvin Clinical Research
  • Desert Medical Advances
  • Advances In Medicine (X-Rays)
  • San Diego Arthritis Medical Clinic
  • Millennium Research
  • Arthritis Center, Inc.
  • Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
  • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
  • St. Paul Rheumatology, PA
  • Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC)
  • Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC
  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research
  • Low Country Rheumatology, PA
  • Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
  • Drug Shipment/Storage: Huntsman Cancer Hospital at the University of Utah
  • University of Utah Hospital & Clinics
  • Dynacare Laboratories (Specimen processing for shipment)
  • Investigational Drug Service Pharmacy, Swedish Medical Center.
  • Seattle Rheumatology Associates
  • Swedish Medical Center
  • Rheumatology Research Unit
  • Pacific Private Clinic
  • Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre
  • Pharmacy Clinical Trials
  • St. Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)
  • Emeritus Research Pty Ltd
  • Hopital Erasme - Clinique Universitaire de Bruxelles
  • University Hospital Leuven, Department of Rheumatology
  • UMHAT "Dr. G. Stranski" EAD
  • MHAT"Plovdiv" AD
  • MHAT "Kaspela" EOOD
  • UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD
  • MC "New rehabilitation center" EOOD, Rheumatology Cabinet
  • Rheumatology Research Associates
  • K. Papp Clinical Research
  • West Island Rheumatology Research Associates
  • Revmacentrum MUDr. Mostera, s.r.o.
  • MEDIGAP, s.r.o. (radiology only)
  • Revmatologicky Ustav - Lekarna (pharmacy only)
  • Revmatologicka ambulance
  • Lekarna Na Lidicke (Pharmacy only)
  • X-MEDICA s.r.o (radiology only)
  • Revmatologie s.r.o.
  • Stavovska s.r.o. (pharmacy only)
  • Vesalion s.r.o.
  • MEDIGAP, s.r.o
  • Revmatologicky ustav - Lekarna
  • Revmatologicky ustav
  • Medical Plus s.r.o. Lekarna Hradebni s. r.o
  • Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien - Secretariat de Rhumatologie
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
  • Klinische Forschung Berlin-Mitte GmbH
  • Rheumapraxis Steglitz
  • University Hospital of Cologne
  • Klinische Forschung Schwerin GmbH
  • Revita Reumatologiai Rendelo
  • Qualiclinic Kft.
  • Magyar Honvedseg Egeszsegugyi Kozpont,Reumatologiai osztaly
  • Csolnoky Ferenc Korhaz, Radiologiai Osztaly X-Ray Only
  • Csolnoky Ferenc Korhaz, Reumatologiai Osztaly
  • Centro Integral en Reumatologia SA de CV
  • Centro de Investigacion de Tratamientos Innovadores de Sinaloa, S.C.
  • Laboratorios de Analisis Clinicos CEMSI
  • Sanatorio CEMSI Chapultepec (For Emergencies Only)
  • Hospital General de Culiacán Dr. Bernardo J. Gastélum
  • Instituto Medico Panamericano, S.A. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
  • Unidad Reumatologica Las Americas, S.C.P.
  • Centro de Investigacion Clinica Pensiones
  • Centro Multidisciplinario para el Desarrollo Especializado de la Investigacion Clinica en Yucatan
  • Hospital Star Medica Merida (For Emergencies Only)
  • HOSPITAL STAR MEDICA S.A DE C.V- (emergencies only)
  • Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua SC
  • Cliditer, S. A. de C. V
  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Przychodnia Chirurgiczna dla Dzieci "PriamaMed" Sp.P.,"
  • ZDROWIE OSTEO-MEDIC s.c. L. i A. Racewicz, A. i J. Supronik
  • ClinicMed Badurski i wspolnicy Spolka Jawna
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy,
  • Centrum Kliniczno-Badawcze J.Brzezicki, B.Gornikiewicz-Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska
  • Centrum Radiologii for X-Ray only
  • NZOZ Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Lek. Med. Barbara Bazela
  • Przychodnia Specjalistyczna Lekarskiej Spoldzielni Pracy "Medica"
  • Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych Reumed Filia Onyksowa
  • NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED S.C.
  • Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab. Pawel Hrycaj
  • NZOZ Nasz Lekarz Praktyka Grupowa Lekarzy Rodzinnych z Przychodnia Specjalistyczna w Toruniu
  • Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. S.K.A.
  • Rheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
  • Reumatika Centrum Reumatologii
  • Klinika Ambroziak Estederm Sp. z o.o. ,S.K.A
  • Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddz. we Wroclawiu
  • Regional State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Karelia Republic
  • State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Moscow City Clinical Hospital
  • OOO City Neurological Centre "Sibneiromed"
  • Limited Liability Company Consultative Diagnostic Rheumatology Center "Healthy Joints"
  • State Institution of Healthcare "Regional Clinical Hospital"
  • State Budget Educational Institution of Highest Professional Education
  • State Healthcare Institution of Yaroslavl Region Clinical Emergency Hospital n.a. N.V. Solovyev
  • State Institution of Healthcare of Yaroslavl Region
  • ROMJAN s.r.o., Reumatologicka ambulancia
  • MEDMAN s.r.o. - reumatologicka ambulancia
  • Nestatna reumatologicka ambulancia
  • Reumex s.r.o
  • Hospital Clinico de Santiago
  • Corporació Sanitaria Parc Tauli
  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna
  • Hospital Infanta Luisa
  • Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  • Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Kaohsiung Branch
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
  • Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospital NHS Trust-King George Hospital
  • Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
  • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Bradford Royal Infirmary, BTHFT
  • Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Tofacitinib 5 mgBID x 12 months

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID x 12 months

Adalimumab 40 mg q2 weeks x 12 months

Placebo x3 months, then tofacitinib 5 mg BIDx 9 months

Placebo x 3 months, then tofacitinib 10 mg BID x 9 months

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20): Month 3
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, health assessment questionnaire - disability index (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in the Van Der Heijdel Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) for Psoriatic Arthritis
Assessment of joint damage includes a joint erosion score (range 0-320) and a joint space narrowing (JSN) score (range 0-208). The mTSS is the sum of the erosion and JSN scores (range 0-528). A higher score indicates more severe disease status. If a component score is missing, the mTSS will be missing.
Percentage of Participants With Progressed Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Month 12
Assessment of joint damage includes a joint erosion score (range 0-320) and a JSN score (range 0-208). The mTSS is the sum of the erosion and JSN scores (range 0-528). A higher score indicates more severe disease status. If a component score is missing, the mTSS will be missing. Progressor is defined as an increase in mTSS >0.5 from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
ACR50 was calculated as a ≥50% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
ACR70 was calculated as a ≥70% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. .
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components: C-reactive Protein Levels
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis
Participant answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very well) and 100 (very poorly).
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis
The blinded investigator or qualified assessor assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very good) and 100 (very poor).
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Swollen Joint Count
Swollen joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty six (66) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered swelling.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Tender/Painful Joint Count
Tender/painful joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty eight (68) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender or painful.
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
The PsARC covers 4 measures: Tender/painful joint count, swollen joint count, the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The PsARC response is defined as improvement in 2 of 4 items, 1 of which must be joint pain or swelling, without worsening in any measure. Improvement criteria: ≥20% improvement in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥20% improvement in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥30% improvement in tender joint count; and ≥30% improvement in swollen joint count.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response
The PGA-PsO is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are rated separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale, scored as 0=none; 1, 2, 3, or 4=most severe. The severity rating scores are summed and the average taken; the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine a PGA-PsO score on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
PASI determines psoriasis severity based on lesion severity & percentage body surface area (BSA) affected. Lesion severity is assessed for erythema, induration, & scaling, evaluated separately for head & neck, upper limbs, trunk, & lower limbs & rated for each body area according to a 5 point scale: 0=no involvement; 1=slight; 2=moderate; 3=marked; 4=very marked. BSA involvement is the extent (%) of body area affected by psoriasis & is assigned a score: 0=no involvement; 1=0-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100%. In each area, sum of severity rating scores is multiplied by the score representing the percentage of area involved by psoriasis, multiplied by a weighting factor (head 0.1; upper limbs 0.2; trunk 0.3; lower limbs 0.4). The sum of numbers obtained for the 4 body areas is the PASI score & can vary in increments of 0.1 & range from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in PASI.
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS)
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The DSS is a function of finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=no tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a patient is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness.
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index
The SPARCC Enthesitis Index identifies the presence or absence of tenderness at 16 enthesial sites, including the bilateral Achilles tendons, plantar fascia insertion at the calcaneus, patellar tendon insertion at the base of the patella, quadriceps insertion into the superior border of the patella, supraspinatus insertion into the greater tuberosity of the humerus, and medial and lateral epicondyles. On examination, tenderness is recorded as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, with an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis.
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
Enthesitis is inflammation in the tendon, ligament, and joint capsule fiber insertion into bone. The LEI assesses enthesitis in 6 sites. Tenderness is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 6 sites, for an total score of 0-6. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute, Physical Component Summary Score
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a standard deviation (SD) of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher PCS score represents better physical health status.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute, Mental Component Summary Score
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher MCS score represents better mental health status.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Physical Functioning Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher physical functioning domain score represents better physical functioning.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Physical Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher role-physical domain score represents better role-physical functioning.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Bodily Pain Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher bodily pain domain score represents less bodily pain.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: General Health Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher general health domain score represents better general health perceptions.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Vitality Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher vitality domain score represents better vitality.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Social Functioning Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher social functioning domain score represents better social functioning.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Emotional Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher role-emotional domain score represents better role-emotional functioning.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Mental Health Domain
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher mental health domain score represents better mental health functioning.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-care
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state) visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state; higher scores indicate a better health state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0 to 52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better fatigue status.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue experience.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue impact on daily functioning.
Change From Baseline in Scores Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Anklyosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a visual analog scale of 0-100mm (0=none and 100=very severe) participants answer 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score ranging 0-10cm, with higher scores representing more severe ankylosing spondylitis disease activity.

Full Information

First Posted
June 12, 2013
Last Updated
June 6, 2017
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01877668
Brief Title
Efficacy And Safety Of Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparator Study
Acronym
OPAL BROADEN
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) Or Adalimumab In Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 20, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 18, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 18, 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a 12-month study investigating the effectiveness and safety of tofactinib in treating the signs and symptoms of active psoriatic arthritis and improving physical function and preserving bone structure in patients with an inadequate response to a traditional, nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Adalimumab is used as a comparator.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psoriatic Arthritis
Keywords
psoriatic arthritis, radiographic changes, active comparator, tofacitinib

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
422 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tofacitinib 5 mgBID x 12 months
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Tofacitinib 10 mg BID x 12 months
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Adalimumab 40 mg q2 weeks x 12 months
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Placebo x3 months, then tofacitinib 5 mg BIDx 9 months
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
Placebo x 3 months, then tofacitinib 10 mg BID x 9 months
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib 5 mg BID
Intervention Description
Tofacitinib orally (po) 1 tablet of 5 mg and placebo po 1 tablet BID x 12 months Placebo injections subcu every 2 weeks x 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib 10 mg BID
Intervention Description
Tofacitinib po 2 tablets of 5 mg BID x 12 months Placebo injections subcu every 2 weeks x 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Intervention Description
Placebo po 2 tablets BIDx 12 months Adalimumab 40 mg subcu injections every 2 weeks x 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo po 2 tablets BIDx 3 months followed by tofacitinib po 1 tablet of 5 mg and placebo po 1 tablet BID x 9 months Placebo injections every 2 weeks x 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo po 2 tablets BIDx 3 months followed by tofacitinib po 2 tablets (5 mg) BID x 9 months Placebo injections every 2 weeks x 12 months
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20): Month 3
Description
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, health assessment questionnaire - disability index (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Time Frame
At end of Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Description
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Month 3
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in the Van Der Heijdel Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) for Psoriatic Arthritis
Description
Assessment of joint damage includes a joint erosion score (range 0-320) and a joint space narrowing (JSN) score (range 0-208). The mTSS is the sum of the erosion and JSN scores (range 0-528). A higher score indicates more severe disease status. If a component score is missing, the mTSS will be missing.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Month 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Progressed Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Month 12
Description
Assessment of joint damage includes a joint erosion score (range 0-320) and a JSN score (range 0-208). The mTSS is the sum of the erosion and JSN scores (range 0-528). A higher score indicates more severe disease status. If a component score is missing, the mTSS will be missing. Progressor is defined as an increase in mTSS >0.5 from baseline.
Time Frame
At Month 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Description
ACR50 was calculated as a ≥50% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
Time Frame
At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Description
ACR70 was calculated as a ≥70% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. .
Time Frame
At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Description
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
Time Frame
At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Description
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components: C-reactive Protein Levels
Description
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Time Frame
From Baseline to end of Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Description
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Time Frame
From Baseline to end of Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis
Description
Participant answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very well) and 100 (very poorly).
Time Frame
From Baseline to end of Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis
Description
The blinded investigator or qualified assessor assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very good) and 100 (very poor).
Time Frame
From Baseline to end of Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Swollen Joint Count
Description
Swollen joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty six (66) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered swelling.
Time Frame
From Baseline to end of Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Tender/Painful Joint Count
Description
Tender/painful joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty eight (68) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender or painful.
Time Frame
From Baseline to end of Month 3
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Description
The PsARC covers 4 measures: Tender/painful joint count, swollen joint count, the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The PsARC response is defined as improvement in 2 of 4 items, 1 of which must be joint pain or swelling, without worsening in any measure. Improvement criteria: ≥20% improvement in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥20% improvement in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥30% improvement in tender joint count; and ≥30% improvement in swollen joint count.
Time Frame
At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response
Description
The PGA-PsO is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are rated separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale, scored as 0=none; 1, 2, 3, or 4=most severe. The severity rating scores are summed and the average taken; the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine a PGA-PsO score on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Description
PASI determines psoriasis severity based on lesion severity & percentage body surface area (BSA) affected. Lesion severity is assessed for erythema, induration, & scaling, evaluated separately for head & neck, upper limbs, trunk, & lower limbs & rated for each body area according to a 5 point scale: 0=no involvement; 1=slight; 2=moderate; 3=marked; 4=very marked. BSA involvement is the extent (%) of body area affected by psoriasis & is assigned a score: 0=no involvement; 1=0-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100%. In each area, sum of severity rating scores is multiplied by the score representing the percentage of area involved by psoriasis, multiplied by a weighting factor (head 0.1; upper limbs 0.2; trunk 0.3; lower limbs 0.4). The sum of numbers obtained for the 4 body areas is the PASI score & can vary in increments of 0.1 & range from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in PASI.
Time Frame
At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS)
Description
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The DSS is a function of finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=no tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a patient is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index
Description
The SPARCC Enthesitis Index identifies the presence or absence of tenderness at 16 enthesial sites, including the bilateral Achilles tendons, plantar fascia insertion at the calcaneus, patellar tendon insertion at the base of the patella, quadriceps insertion into the superior border of the patella, supraspinatus insertion into the greater tuberosity of the humerus, and medial and lateral epicondyles. On examination, tenderness is recorded as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, with an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
Description
Enthesitis is inflammation in the tendon, ligament, and joint capsule fiber insertion into bone. The LEI assesses enthesitis in 6 sites. Tenderness is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 6 sites, for an total score of 0-6. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute, Physical Component Summary Score
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a standard deviation (SD) of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher PCS score represents better physical health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute, Mental Component Summary Score
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher MCS score represents better mental health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Physical Functioning Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher physical functioning domain score represents better physical functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Physical Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher role-physical domain score represents better role-physical functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Bodily Pain Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher bodily pain domain score represents less bodily pain.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: General Health Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher general health domain score represents better general health perceptions.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Vitality Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher vitality domain score represents better vitality.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Social Functioning Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher social functioning domain score represents better social functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Emotional Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher role-emotional domain score represents better role-emotional functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Mental Health Domain
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher mental health domain score represents better mental health functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-care
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems [1], some or moderate problems [2], or extreme problems [3]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state) visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state; higher scores indicate a better health state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0 to 52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better fatigue status.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue experience.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue impact on daily functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Scores Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Anklyosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Description
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a visual analog scale of 0-100mm (0=none and 100=very severe) participants answer 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score ranging 0-10cm, with higher scores representing more severe ankylosing spondylitis disease activity.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Males or females, aged >= 18 years at time of consent. Have a diagnosis of Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) of >= 6 months Meet the Classification Criteria of PsA (CASPAR) at time of screening Must not have been adequately treated with a a traditional non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Concurrent treatment with methotrexate, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine allowed and required Must not have taken a biologic Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Must have 3 or more swollen joints AND 3 or more tender joints Must have active psoriasis skin lesions Exclusion Criteria: Have non-plaque forms of psoriasis, eg erythrodermic, guttate or pustular, with the exception of nail psoriasis which is allowed Pregnant or breast feeding, females of child-bearing potential not using highly effective contraception New York Heart Association Class III and IV congestive heart failure History of hypersensitivity or infusion reaction to biologic agents Infection with HIV, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or other chronic infection
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates, PC
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85306
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medvin Clinical Research
City
Covina
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91723
Country
United States
Facility Name
Desert Medical Advances
City
Palm Desert
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92260
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advances In Medicine (X-Rays)
City
Rancho Mirage
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92270
Country
United States
Facility Name
San Diego Arthritis Medical Clinic
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Research
City
Ormond Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32174
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis Center, Inc.
City
Palm Harbor
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34684
Country
United States
Facility Name
Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21740
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Paul Rheumatology, PA
City
Eagan
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55121
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68516
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC)
City
Lebanon
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC
City
Middleburg Heights
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44130
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
Low Country Rheumatology, PA
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77008
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drug Shipment/Storage: Huntsman Cancer Hospital at the University of Utah
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84112
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Hospital & Clinics
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dynacare Laboratories (Specimen processing for shipment)
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Investigational Drug Service Pharmacy, Swedish Medical Center.
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Seattle Rheumatology Associates
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Research Unit
City
Maroochydore
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4558
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Pacific Private Clinic
City
Southport
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4215
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre
City
Clayton
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Pharmacy Clinical Trials
City
Clayton
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia
Facility Name
St. Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)
City
Fitzroy
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3065
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Emeritus Research Pty Ltd
City
Malvern East
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3145
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Hopital Erasme - Clinique Universitaire de Bruxelles
City
Brussels
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
University Hospital Leuven, Department of Rheumatology
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UMHAT "Dr. G. Stranski" EAD
City
Pleven
ZIP/Postal Code
5800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
MHAT"Plovdiv" AD
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
MHAT "Kaspela" EOOD
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski" EAD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1612
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
MC "New rehabilitation center" EOOD, Rheumatology Cabinet
City
Stara Zagora
ZIP/Postal Code
6003
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Rheumatology Research Associates
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T5M 0H4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
K. Papp Clinical Research
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2J 1C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
West Island Rheumatology Research Associates
City
Pointe-Claire
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H9R 3J1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Revmacentrum MUDr. Mostera, s.r.o.
City
Brno
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
615 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MEDIGAP, s.r.o. (radiology only)
City
Praha 1 - Nove Mesto
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
110 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicky Ustav - Lekarna (pharmacy only)
City
Praha 2
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicka ambulance
City
Praha 4
State/Province
Czech Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Lekarna Na Lidicke (Pharmacy only)
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
602 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
X-MEDICA s.r.o (radiology only)
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
61300
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologie s.r.o.
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
638 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Stavovska s.r.o. (pharmacy only)
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
63800
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Vesalion s.r.o.
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
70200
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
MEDIGAP, s.r.o
City
Praha 1- Nove Mesto
ZIP/Postal Code
110 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicky ustav - Lekarna
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicky ustav
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Medical Plus s.r.o. Lekarna Hradebni s. r.o
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
68601
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien - Secretariat de Rhumatologie
City
Corbeil Essonnes cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
91106
Country
France
Facility Name
Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinische Forschung Berlin-Mitte GmbH
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumapraxis Steglitz
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12161
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital of Cologne
City
Koeln
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinische Forschung Schwerin GmbH
City
Schwerin
ZIP/Postal Code
19055
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Revita Reumatologiai Rendelo
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1027
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Qualiclinic Kft.
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Magyar Honvedseg Egeszsegugyi Kozpont,Reumatologiai osztaly
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1062
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Csolnoky Ferenc Korhaz, Radiologiai Osztaly X-Ray Only
City
Veszprem
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Csolnoky Ferenc Korhaz, Reumatologiai Osztaly
City
Veszprem
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Centro Integral en Reumatologia SA de CV
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44160
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro de Investigacion de Tratamientos Innovadores de Sinaloa, S.C.
City
Culiacan
State/Province
Sinaloa
ZIP/Postal Code
80000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Laboratorios de Analisis Clinicos CEMSI
City
Culiacan
State/Province
Sinaloa
ZIP/Postal Code
80000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Sanatorio CEMSI Chapultepec (For Emergencies Only)
City
Culiacan
State/Province
Sinaloa
ZIP/Postal Code
80040
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Hospital General de Culiacán Dr. Bernardo J. Gastélum
City
Culiacan
State/Province
Sinaloa
ZIP/Postal Code
80230
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Instituto Medico Panamericano, S.A. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Unidad Reumatologica Las Americas, S.C.P.
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro de Investigacion Clinica Pensiones
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97070
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro Multidisciplinario para el Desarrollo Especializado de la Investigacion Clinica en Yucatan
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97130
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Hospital Star Medica Merida (For Emergencies Only)
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97133
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
HOSPITAL STAR MEDICA S.A DE C.V- (emergencies only)
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97133
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua SC
City
Chihuahua
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Cliditer, S. A. de C. V
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Przychodnia Chirurgiczna dla Dzieci "PriamaMed" Sp.P.,"
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-002
Country
Poland
Facility Name
ZDROWIE OSTEO-MEDIC s.c. L. i A. Racewicz, A. i J. Supronik
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
ClinicMed Badurski i wspolnicy Spolka Jawna
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-879
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy,
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-168
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Kliniczno-Badawcze J.Brzezicki, B.Gornikiewicz-Brzezicka Lekarze Spolka Partnerska
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Radiologii for X-Ray only
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Lek. Med. Barbara Bazela
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Przychodnia Specjalistyczna Lekarskiej Spoldzielni Pracy "Medica"
City
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
ZIP/Postal Code
05-825
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych Reumed Filia Onyksowa
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-582
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED S.C.
City
Nadarzyn
ZIP/Postal Code
05-830
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab. Pawel Hrycaj
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-397
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Nasz Lekarz Praktyka Grupowa Lekarzy Rodzinnych z Przychodnia Specjalistyczna w Toruniu
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. S.K.A.
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
01-868
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Rheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-118
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Reumatika Centrum Reumatologii
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-691
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Klinika Ambroziak Estederm Sp. z o.o. ,S.K.A
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-758
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddz. we Wroclawiu
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-088
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regional State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Karelia Republic
City
Petrozavodsk
State/Province
Karelia Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
185019
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Moscow City Clinical Hospital
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
119049
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
OOO City Neurological Centre "Sibneiromed"
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630091
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Limited Liability Company Consultative Diagnostic Rheumatology Center "Healthy Joints"
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630099
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Institution of Healthcare "Regional Clinical Hospital"
City
Saratov
ZIP/Postal Code
410053
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Budget Educational Institution of Highest Professional Education
City
Tomsk
ZIP/Postal Code
634050
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Healthcare Institution of Yaroslavl Region Clinical Emergency Hospital n.a. N.V. Solovyev
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Institution of Healthcare of Yaroslavl Region
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
ROMJAN s.r.o., Reumatologicka ambulancia
City
Bratislava
State/Province
Slovak Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
832 63
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
MEDMAN s.r.o. - reumatologicka ambulancia
City
Martin
State/Province
Slovak Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
036 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Nestatna reumatologicka ambulancia
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
841 04
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Reumex s.r.o
City
Rimavska Sobota
ZIP/Postal Code
979 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico de Santiago
City
Santiago De Compostela
State/Province
A Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Corporació Sanitaria Parc Tauli
City
Sabadell
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08208
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
City
Santander
State/Province
Cantabria
ZIP/Postal Code
39008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna
City
A Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Infanta Luisa
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
City
Taipei
State/Province
Taiwan Roc
ZIP/Postal Code
11217
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
City
Chia-Yi
ZIP/Postal Code
62247
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Kaohsiung Branch
City
Kaohsiung
ZIP/Postal Code
83301
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
City
Taichung
ZIP/Postal Code
40201
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospital NHS Trust-King George Hospital
City
Goodmayes
State/Province
Essex
ZIP/Postal Code
IG3 8YB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Romford
State/Province
Essex
ZIP/Postal Code
RM7 0AG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
City
Dudley
State/Province
West Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
DY1 2HQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Bradford
State/Province
West Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
BD5 0NA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Bradford Royal Infirmary, BTHFT
City
Bradford
State/Province
West Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
BD9 6RJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Upton
State/Province
Wirral
ZIP/Postal Code
CH49 5PE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
York
ZIP/Postal Code
YO31 8HE
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Information relating to our policy on data sharing and the process for requesting data can be found at the following link: http://www.pfizer.com/research/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36076054
Citation
de Vlam K, Mease PJ, Bushmakin AG, Fleischmann R, Ogdie A, Azevedo VF, Merola JF, Woolcott J, Cappelleri JC, Fallon L, Taylor PC. Identifying and Quantifying the Role of Inflammation in Pain Reduction for Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Tofacitinib: A Mediation Analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Oct;9(5):1451-1464. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00482-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
36045453
Citation
Orbai AM, Mease PJ, Helliwell PS, FitzGerald O, Fleishaker DL, Mundayat R, Young P. Effect of tofacitinib on dactylitis and patient-reported outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: post-hoc analysis of phase III studies. BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00298-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35385361
Citation
Taylor PC, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Young P, Germino R, Merola JF, Yosipovitch G. Relationships of dermatologic symptoms and quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis: analysis of two tofacitinib phase III studies. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Aug;33(5):2614-2620. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2060924. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35139908
Citation
Gladman DD, Coates LC, Wu J, Fallon L, Bacci ED, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Helliwell PS. Time to response for clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tofacitinib, adalimumab, or placebo. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Feb 9;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02721-0.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34921355
Citation
Dikranian A, Gold D, Bessette L, Nash P, Azevedo VF, Wang L, Woolcott J, Shapiro AB, Szumski A, Fleishaker D, Wollenhaupt J. Frequency and Duration of Early Non-serious Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):411-433. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00405-w. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34870800
Citation
Winthrop KL, Curtis JR, Yamaoka K, Lee EB, Hirose T, Rivas JL, Kwok K, Burmester GR. Clinical Management of Herpes Zoster in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib Treatment. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Feb;9(1):243-263. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00390-0. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34510295
Citation
Kivitz AJ, FitzGerald O, Nash P, Pang S, Azevedo VF, Wang C, Takiya L. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib by background methotrexate dose in psoriatic arthritis: post hoc exploratory analysis from two phase III trials. Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;41(2):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05894-2. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34226183
Citation
de Vlam K, Ogdie A, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Fleischmann R, Taylor PC, Azevedo V, Fallon L, Woolcott J, Mease PJ. Median time to pain improvement and the impact of baseline pain severity on pain response in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tofacitinib. RMD Open. 2021 Jul;7(2):e001609. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001609.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33766074
Citation
Coates LC, Bushmakin AG, FitzGerald O, Gladman DD, Fallon L, Cappelleri JC, Hsu MA, Helliwell PS. Relationships between psoriatic arthritis composite measures of disease activity with patient-reported outcomes in phase 3 studies of tofacitinib. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Mar 26;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02474-2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32910531
Citation
Ritchlin CT, Giles JT, Ogdie A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Helliwell P, Young P, Wang C, Wu J, Romero AB, Woolcott J, Stockert L. Tofacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Metabolic Syndrome: A Post hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;2(10):543-554. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11166. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32816215
Citation
Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Erratum In: Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Oct 10;:
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32006348
Citation
Burmester GR, Curtis JR, Yun H, FitzGerald O, Winthrop KL, Azevedo VF, Rigby WFC, Kanik KS, Wang C, Biswas P, Jones T, Palmetto N, Hendrikx T, Menon S, Rojo R. An Integrated Analysis of the Safety of Tofacitinib in Psoriatic Arthritis across Phase III and Long-Term Extension Studies with Comparison to Real-World Observational Data. Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;43(4):379-392. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00904-9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31112005
Citation
Gladman DD, Charles-Schoeman C, McInnes IB, Veale DJ, Thiers B, Nurmohamed M, Graham D, Wang C, Jones T, Wolk R, DeMasi R. Changes in Lipid Levels and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events Following Tofacitinib Treatment in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pooled Analysis Across Phase III and Long-Term Extension Studies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Oct;71(10):1387-1395. doi: 10.1002/acr.23930.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31111255
Citation
Cella D, Wilson H, Shalhoub H, Revicki DA, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Kudlacz E, Hsu MA. Content validity and psychometric evaluation of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 May 20;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0115-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30824647
Citation
van der Heijde D, Gladman DD, FitzGerald O, Kavanaugh A, Graham D, Wang C, Fallon L. Radiographic Progression According to Baseline C-reactive Protein Levels and Other Risk Factors in Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib or Adalimumab. J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1089-1096. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180971. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30713721
Citation
Strand V, de Vlam K, Covarrubias-Cobos JA, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Graham D, Wang C, Cappelleri JC, Hendrikx T, Hsu MA. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo: patient-reported outcomes from OPAL Broaden-a phase III study of active psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. RMD Open. 2019 Jan 11;5(1):e000806. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000806. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30680661
Citation
Cella D, Wilson H, Shalhoub H, Revicki DA, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Kudlacz E, Hsu MA. Content validity and psychometric evaluation of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Jan 24;3(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0094-5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30414064
Citation
Nash P, Coates LC, Fleischmann R, Papp KA, Gomez-Reino JJ, Kanik KS, Wang C, Wu J, Menon S, Hendrikx T, Ports WC. Efficacy of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):567-582. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0131-5. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30373651
Citation
Helliwell P, Coates LC, FitzGerald O, Nash P, Soriano ER, Elaine Husni M, Hsu MA, Kanik KS, Hendrikx T, Wu J, Kudlacz E. Disease-specific composite measures for psoriatic arthritis are highly responsive to a Janus kinase inhibitor treatment that targets multiple domains of disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 29;20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1739-0.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29045212
Citation
Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O, van der Heijde D, Merola JF, Avila-Zapata F, Cieslak D, Graham D, Wang C, Menon S, Hendrikx T, Kanik KS. Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo for Psoriatic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1537-1550. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615975.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A3921091&StudyName=Efficacy%20And%20Safety%20Of%20Tofacitinib%20In%20Psoriatic%20Arthritis%3A%20Comparator%20Study
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy And Safety Of Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparator Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs