Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (IGNITE3)
Primary Purpose
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Eravacycline
Ertapenem
Placebo
Levofloxacin
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female participant with either:
- Pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy (approximately 50% of the total population), or
cUTI with at least one of the following conditions associated with a risk for developing cUTI:
- Indwelling urinary catheter
- Urinary retention (at least approximately 100 milliliters (mL) of residual urine after voiding)
- History of neurogenic bladder
- Partial obstructive uropathy (for example, nephrolithiasis, bladder stones, and ureteral strictures)
- Azotemia of renal origin (not congestive heart failure [CHF] or volume related) such that the serum blood urea nitrogen [BUN] is elevated (>20 milligrams [mg]/deciliters [dL]) and the serum BUN:creatinine ratio is <15
- Surgically modified or abnormal urinary tract anatomy (for example, bladder diverticula, redundant urine collection system) except urinary tract surgery within the last 30 days (placing of stents or catheters is not considered to be surgical modification)
- At least 18 years of age at time of consent
- Able to provide informed consent
At least two of the following signs or symptoms:
- Chills, rigors, or warmth associated with fever or hypothermia
- Flank pain (pyelonephritis) or pelvic pain (cUTI)
- Nausea or vomiting
- Dysuria, urinary frequency, or urinary urgency
- Costo-vertebral angle tenderness on physical examination
Urine specimen with evidence of pyuria
- Dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase (where positive result is at least "++" as indicated on the urine dipstick provided in the laboratory kit), or
- ≥10 white blood cells (WBCs) per cubic millimeter, or
- ≥10 WBCs per high power field
- If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception (for example, condom) during the study and for 14 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
- If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: must commit to either use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, spermicidal gel, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 14 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence
Exclusion Criteria:
Use of systemic antibiotics effective in cUTI within 72 hours prior to enrollment except under the following circumstances:
- Participants with suspected acute cUTI who have received a single dose of effective non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI
- Signs and symptoms of cUTI developed while on the antibiotic for another indication
- History of an ertapenem-resistant urinary tract infection within 1 year of enrollment
- Likely to require >10 days of antibiotic treatment to cure the acute cUTI or likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis prior to the Follow Up visit (21-28 days after randomization) [for example, participants with chronic vesiculo-ureteral reflux]
- Unlikely to survive at least through the duration of the study
- Hypotension, systolic blood pressure ≤90 millimeters of mercury [mmHg]
- Complicated pyelonephritis with complete obstruction or known or suspected renal or perinephric abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis, or Any condition likely to require surgery to achieve cure (this does not include procedure to place catheters or obtain diagnosis)
- Known or suspected urinary fungal infection
- Uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections
- Suspected or confirmed active prostatitis, or currently under treatment for prostatitis
- High risk for cUTI due to Pseudomonas (for example, history of prior cUTIs due to Pseudomonas, ≥20 mg once a day prednisone or equivalent steroid, and other risk factors as perceived by the Investigator)
- History of renal transplantation
- Presence of an ileal loop
- Any history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract occurring within 30 days of screening
- Indwelling urinary catheters present at screening which are not expected to be removed or replaced within 72 hours of enrollment (for example, nephrostomy tubes, stents, urethral and suprapubic catheters).
- Known concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with CD4 counts below 200 within the last six months, or an acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining diagnosis within the last six months
- Neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count <1,000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMNs]/microliters [µL])
- Participation in a study with an experimental drug or device within 30 days prior to enrollment
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to tetracyclines, carbapenems, or β-lactams
- History of seizures
- Any other unstable or clinically significant concurrent medical condition (for example, immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, class IV heart or lung disease, end stage renal disease, or requiring hemodialysis) that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, jeopardize the safety of a participant and/or their compliance with the protocol
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Eravacycline (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral)
Ertapenem (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral)
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the EOI Visit
This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of Responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate.
Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the Test-Of-Cure (TOC) Visit
This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Proportion of Participants in the ITT Population With Favorable Clinical Outcomes at TOC Visit
Clinical cure: A complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection such that no rescue/non-study antibacterial medication was required to treat the cUTI that presented at study entry.
Clinical failure: Subjects were classified as clinical failure in the event of
Death related to cUTI at any timepoint
Persistence of clinical symptoms of cUTI or new symptoms developed
Initiation of rescue/non-study antibacterial medication for cUTI Indeterminate: Study data were listed as indeterminate if the outcome was other than clinical cure or clinical failure. The reason for an indeterminate designation had to be provided Missing: Study data were listed as missing if the Investigator did not complete an assessment or if the subject did not complete the study visit.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03032510
First Posted
January 17, 2017
Last Updated
December 16, 2021
Sponsor
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03032510
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Acronym
IGNITE3
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of IV Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of cUTI.
Randomization will be stratified based on two criteria: (1) by primary site of infection (pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy vs all other diagnoses) and (2) by the receipt of a single dose of effective non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization. An enrollment cap of approximately 50% is planned for subjects with pyelonephritis with normal urinary tract anatomy. Also, an enrollment cap of approximately 20% is planned for subjects who have received a single dose of non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization.
In this study subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio: (i) eravacycline intravenously (IV) / levofloxacin (PO), or (ii) ertapenem (IV) / levofloxacin (PO).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1205 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Eravacycline (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Ertapenem (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Eravacycline
Other Intervention Name(s)
TP-434
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ertapenem
Other Intervention Name(s)
Invanz
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Levofloxacin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Levaquin
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the EOI Visit
Description
This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of Responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate.
Time Frame
End of Infusion
Title
Proportion of Participants in the Micro-ITT Population Demonstrating Clinical Cure and Microbiologic Success at the Test-Of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Description
This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate.
Time Frame
TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Participants in the ITT Population With Favorable Clinical Outcomes at TOC Visit
Description
Clinical cure: A complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection such that no rescue/non-study antibacterial medication was required to treat the cUTI that presented at study entry.
Clinical failure: Subjects were classified as clinical failure in the event of
Death related to cUTI at any timepoint
Persistence of clinical symptoms of cUTI or new symptoms developed
Initiation of rescue/non-study antibacterial medication for cUTI Indeterminate: Study data were listed as indeterminate if the outcome was other than clinical cure or clinical failure. The reason for an indeterminate designation had to be provided Missing: Study data were listed as missing if the Investigator did not complete an assessment or if the subject did not complete the study visit.
Time Frame
TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female participant with either:
Pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy (approximately 50% of the total population), or
cUTI with at least one of the following conditions associated with a risk for developing cUTI:
Indwelling urinary catheter
Urinary retention (at least approximately 100 milliliters (mL) of residual urine after voiding)
History of neurogenic bladder
Partial obstructive uropathy (for example, nephrolithiasis, bladder stones, and ureteral strictures)
Azotemia of renal origin (not congestive heart failure [CHF] or volume related) such that the serum blood urea nitrogen [BUN] is elevated (>20 milligrams [mg]/deciliters [dL]) and the serum BUN:creatinine ratio is <15
Surgically modified or abnormal urinary tract anatomy (for example, bladder diverticula, redundant urine collection system) except urinary tract surgery within the last 30 days (placing of stents or catheters is not considered to be surgical modification)
At least 18 years of age at time of consent
Able to provide informed consent
At least two of the following signs or symptoms:
Chills, rigors, or warmth associated with fever or hypothermia
Flank pain (pyelonephritis) or pelvic pain (cUTI)
Nausea or vomiting
Dysuria, urinary frequency, or urinary urgency
Costo-vertebral angle tenderness on physical examination
Urine specimen with evidence of pyuria
Dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase (where positive result is at least "++" as indicated on the urine dipstick provided in the laboratory kit), or
≥10 white blood cells (WBCs) per cubic millimeter, or
≥10 WBCs per high power field
If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception (for example, condom) during the study and for 14 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: must commit to either use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, spermicidal gel, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 14 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence
Exclusion Criteria:
Use of systemic antibiotics effective in cUTI within 72 hours prior to enrollment except under the following circumstances:
Participants with suspected acute cUTI who have received a single dose of effective non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI
Signs and symptoms of cUTI developed while on the antibiotic for another indication
History of an ertapenem-resistant urinary tract infection within 1 year of enrollment
Likely to require >10 days of antibiotic treatment to cure the acute cUTI or likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis prior to the Follow Up visit (21-28 days after randomization) [for example, participants with chronic vesiculo-ureteral reflux]
Unlikely to survive at least through the duration of the study
Hypotension, systolic blood pressure ≤90 millimeters of mercury [mmHg]
Complicated pyelonephritis with complete obstruction or known or suspected renal or perinephric abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis, or Any condition likely to require surgery to achieve cure (this does not include procedure to place catheters or obtain diagnosis)
Known or suspected urinary fungal infection
Uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections
Suspected or confirmed active prostatitis, or currently under treatment for prostatitis
High risk for cUTI due to Pseudomonas (for example, history of prior cUTIs due to Pseudomonas, ≥20 mg once a day prednisone or equivalent steroid, and other risk factors as perceived by the Investigator)
History of renal transplantation
Presence of an ileal loop
Any history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract occurring within 30 days of screening
Indwelling urinary catheters present at screening which are not expected to be removed or replaced within 72 hours of enrollment (for example, nephrostomy tubes, stents, urethral and suprapubic catheters).
Known concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with CD4 counts below 200 within the last six months, or an acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining diagnosis within the last six months
Neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count <1,000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMNs]/microliters [µL])
Participation in a study with an experimental drug or device within 30 days prior to enrollment
Known or suspected hypersensitivity to tetracyclines, carbapenems, or β-lactams
History of seizures
Any other unstable or clinically significant concurrent medical condition (for example, immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, class IV heart or lung disease, end stage renal disease, or requiring hemodialysis) that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, jeopardize the safety of a participant and/or their compliance with the protocol
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chief Medical Officer
Organizational Affiliation
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Coral Gables
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Columbus
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31820
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
Country
United States
City
Baytown
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Graz
Country
Austria
City
Linz
Country
Austria
City
Salzburg
Country
Austria
City
Pleven
Country
Bulgaria
City
Plovdiv
Country
Bulgaria
City
Razgrad
Country
Bulgaria
City
Ruse
Country
Bulgaria
City
Smyadovo
Country
Bulgaria
City
Sofia
Country
Bulgaria
City
Varna
Country
Bulgaria
City
Veliko Tarnovo
Country
Bulgaria
City
Tallinn
Country
Estonia
City
Tartu
Country
Estonia
City
Voru
Country
Estonia
City
K'ut'aisi
Country
Georgia
City
T'bilisi
Country
Georgia
City
Baja
Country
Hungary
City
Budapest
Country
Hungary
City
Miskolc
Country
Hungary
City
Nagykanizsa
Country
Hungary
City
Nyiregyhaza
Country
Hungary
City
Sopron
Country
Hungary
City
Szentes
Country
Hungary
City
Tatabanya
Country
Hungary
City
Jelgava
Country
Latvia
City
Riga
Country
Latvia
City
Valmiera
Country
Latvia
City
Chisinau
Country
Moldova, Republic of
City
Braşov
Country
Romania
City
Bucharest
Country
Romania
City
Craiova
Country
Romania
City
Oradea
Country
Romania
City
Arkhangel'sk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
City
Pyatigorsk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Rostov-on-the-Don
Country
Russian Federation
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
City
Smolensk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Vsevolozhsk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Yaroslavl'
Country
Russian Federation
City
Nitra
Country
Slovakia
City
Poprad
Country
Slovakia
City
Presov
Country
Slovakia
City
Svidnik
Country
Slovakia
City
Zilina
Country
Slovakia
City
Chernihiv
Country
Ukraine
City
Chernivtsi
Country
Ukraine
City
Dnipro
Country
Ukraine
City
Ivano-Frankivsk
Country
Ukraine
City
Kharkiv
Country
Ukraine
City
Kyiv
Country
Ukraine
City
L'viv
Country
Ukraine
City
Lviv
Country
Ukraine
City
Mykolaiv
Country
Ukraine
City
Odesa
Country
Ukraine
City
Poltava
Country
Ukraine
City
Uzhgorod
Country
Ukraine
City
Uzhorod
Country
Ukraine
City
Vinnytsya
Country
Ukraine
City
Zaporizhia
Country
Ukraine
City
Zhytomyr
Country
Ukraine
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs