search
Back to results

Efficacy and Tolerability of Riluzole in Treatment Resistant Depression

Primary Purpose

Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Riluzole
placebo
Sponsored by
Yale University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depression focused on measuring MDD, Depression, Treatment refractory, Glutamate, Riluzole, Major depressive disorder, psychopharmacology, rilutek

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Group A inclusion/exclusion

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-65
  2. Written informed consent
  3. Meets DSM-IV criteria (by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - SCID-I/P) for MDD, current
  4. Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated (IDS-SR30) score of > 20 at screening, baseline and start of double-blind phase (Phase 2)
  5. May have a history of failure to respond to up to two FDA-approved antidepressants at adequate doses during the current episode for at least 8 weeks, and for inclusion into the Phase 2 subjects must have failed the 8-week prospective citalopram treatment.
  6. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 18 or higher at baseline and start of Phase 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy)
  2. Patients who no longer meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD during the baseline visit
  3. Patients who demonstrate > 50% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the IDS-SR total score from screen to baseline
  4. Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician A serious suicide risk will be considered an inability to control suicide attempts, imminent risk of suicide in the investigator's judgment, or a history of serious suicidal behavior, which is defined using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as either (1) one or more actual suicide attempts in the 3 years before study entry with the lethality rated at 3 or higher, or (2) one or more interrupted suicide attempts with a potential lethality judged to result in serious injury or death.
  5. Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease
  6. The following DSM-IV diagnoses: substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past)
  7. History of a seizure disorder or clinical evidence of untreated hypothyroidism
  8. Patients requiring excluded medications (see Table 3 for details)
  9. Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features, as assessed by SCID
  10. Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months
  11. Have failed 3 or more adequate antidepressant trials during the current Major Depressive Episode by MGH-ATRQ criteria.
  12. Patients with a history of antidepressant-induced hypomania.
  13. Patients with any evidence of clinically significant liver abnormalities, or any liver transaminase level >1.5 X ULN at initial screening, or >5 x ULN during Phase 2 treatment.
  14. Axis II personality disorders that are the primary purpose of treatment, or would interfere with a patient's safety or compliance.
  15. Patients currently being treated for a respiratory disorder (including asthma or COPD)
  16. Any subject who scores a 5 or higher on item #10 of the MADRS

Group B inclusion/exclusion

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age 18-65
  2. Written informed consent
  3. Meets DSM-IV criteria (by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - SCID-I/P) for MDD, current
  4. Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated (IDS-SR30) score of > 20 at screening and baseline visits, that is at the start of Phase 2
  5. Has a history of failure to respond to 1, 2, or 3 FDA-approved antidepressants at adequate doses during the current episode for at least 8 weeks, as defined by the MGH Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ), and must be currently on the failed SSRI for at least 8 weeks and on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks.
  6. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 18 or higher at baseline and start of Phase 2.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy)
  2. Patients who no longer meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD during the baseline visit
  3. Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician A serious suicide risk will be considered an inability to control suicide attempts, imminent risk of suicide in the investigator's judgment, or a history of serious suicidal behavior, which is defined using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as either (1) one or more actual suicide attempts in the 3 years before study entry with the lethality rated at 3 or higher, or (2) one or more interrupted suicide attempts with a potential lethality judged to result in serious injury or death.
  4. Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease
  5. The following DSM-IV diagnoses: substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past)
  6. History of a seizure disorder or clinical evidence of untreated hypothyroidism;
  7. Patients requiring excluded medications (see Table 3 for details)
  8. Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features, as assessed by SCID
  9. Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months
  10. Have failed 3 or more adequate antidepressant trials during the current Major Depressive Episode by MGH-ATRQ criteria.
  11. Patients with a history of antidepressant-induced hypomania.
  12. Patients with any evidence of clinically significant liver abnormalities, or any liver transaminase level >2 X ULN at initial screening, or >5 x ULN during Phase 2 treatment.
  13. Axis II personality disorders that are the primary purpose of treatment, or would interfere with a patients safety or compliance.
  14. Patients currently being treated for a respiratory disorder (including asthma or COPD)
  15. Any subject who scores a 5 or higher on item #10 of the MADRS

Sites / Locations

  • Yale University, Yale Depression Research Program
  • Massachussettes General Hospital, Depression Clinical and Research Center
  • Baylor College of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Riluzole addition to SSRI antidepressant

Placebo addition to standard SSRI antidepressant

Riluzole/Placebo addition to SSRI antidepressant

Arm Description

Riluzole 100mg added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant for 8 weeks

Placebo will be added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks

Riluzole 100mg added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant for 4 weeks and placebo will added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant treatment for 4 weeks

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression
Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression

Secondary Outcome Measures

Responders Having at Least a 50% Improvement in MADRS Compared to the Baseline
Responders having at least a 50% improvement in MADRS compared to the baseline in the sequential parallel design
Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE-SI)
A commonly used instrument originally developed by NIMH and adapted into a self-report instrument. The version of the scale that we plan to use examines in a systematic fashion all possible treatment-emergent side effects and probes specific adverse symptoms, including suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and self-injurious behavior. Presented below are counts of people that had experienced the event by 8 weeks.

Full Information

First Posted
September 16, 2010
Last Updated
March 4, 2020
Sponsor
Yale University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01204918
Brief Title
Efficacy and Tolerability of Riluzole in Treatment Resistant Depression
Official Title
Efficacy and Tolerability of Riluzole in Treatment Resistant Depression
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Yale University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the antidepressant efficacy of riluzole, employing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adjunctive trial in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD).
Detailed Description
This study aims to examine the antidepressant efficacy of riluzole, employing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8 week trial of adjunctive trial in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). Preclinical studies have shown riluzole to modulate Glu release and clearance, and to have potent neuroprotective properties, promoting neuro-resiliency. Other preclinical data now also show the drug to have antidepressant-like effects in rodent models used to screen for antidepressant activity. In addition, several small open-label clinical studies further suggest riluzole has antidepressant and anxiolytic properties, even in patients who do not respond to standard monoaminergic antidepressant and anxiolytic medications.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depression
Keywords
MDD, Depression, Treatment refractory, Glutamate, Riluzole, Major depressive disorder, psychopharmacology, rilutek

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
104 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Riluzole addition to SSRI antidepressant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Riluzole 100mg added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant for 8 weeks
Arm Title
Placebo addition to standard SSRI antidepressant
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo will be added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant treatment for 8 weeks
Arm Title
Riluzole/Placebo addition to SSRI antidepressant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Riluzole 100mg added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant for 4 weeks and placebo will added to ongoing SSRI or SNRI antidepressant treatment for 4 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Riluzole
Other Intervention Name(s)
Rilutek
Intervention Description
Riluzole 100mg PO
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Description
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression
Time Frame
4 weeks of therapy (baseline to week 4)
Title
Change in Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Description
This 10 item instrument is completed by the clinician by using a structured interview and defined anchor points, and aims to quantify the degree of depression over the past 7 days. The MADRS is a widely studied instrument for depression, and its reliability and validity are high. This instrument is administered at every study visit during the double-blind RCT, and at the screening, and baseline. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression
Time Frame
4 weeks of therapy (week 4 to week 8)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Responders Having at Least a 50% Improvement in MADRS Compared to the Baseline
Description
Responders having at least a 50% improvement in MADRS compared to the baseline in the sequential parallel design
Time Frame
8 weeks therapy
Title
Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE-SI)
Description
A commonly used instrument originally developed by NIMH and adapted into a self-report instrument. The version of the scale that we plan to use examines in a systematic fashion all possible treatment-emergent side effects and probes specific adverse symptoms, including suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and self-injurious behavior. Presented below are counts of people that had experienced the event by 8 weeks.
Time Frame
8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Group A inclusion/exclusion Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-65 Written informed consent Meets DSM-IV criteria (by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - SCID-I/P) for MDD, current Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated (IDS-SR30) score of > 20 at screening, baseline and start of double-blind phase (Phase 2) May have a history of failure to respond to up to two FDA-approved antidepressants at adequate doses during the current episode for at least 8 weeks, and for inclusion into the Phase 2 subjects must have failed the 8-week prospective citalopram treatment. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 18 or higher at baseline and start of Phase 2. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy) Patients who no longer meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD during the baseline visit Patients who demonstrate > 50% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the IDS-SR total score from screen to baseline Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician A serious suicide risk will be considered an inability to control suicide attempts, imminent risk of suicide in the investigator's judgment, or a history of serious suicidal behavior, which is defined using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as either (1) one or more actual suicide attempts in the 3 years before study entry with the lethality rated at 3 or higher, or (2) one or more interrupted suicide attempts with a potential lethality judged to result in serious injury or death. Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease The following DSM-IV diagnoses: substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past) History of a seizure disorder or clinical evidence of untreated hypothyroidism Patients requiring excluded medications (see Table 3 for details) Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features, as assessed by SCID Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months Have failed 3 or more adequate antidepressant trials during the current Major Depressive Episode by MGH-ATRQ criteria. Patients with a history of antidepressant-induced hypomania. Patients with any evidence of clinically significant liver abnormalities, or any liver transaminase level >1.5 X ULN at initial screening, or >5 x ULN during Phase 2 treatment. Axis II personality disorders that are the primary purpose of treatment, or would interfere with a patient's safety or compliance. Patients currently being treated for a respiratory disorder (including asthma or COPD) Any subject who scores a 5 or higher on item #10 of the MADRS Group B inclusion/exclusion Inclusion criteria: Age 18-65 Written informed consent Meets DSM-IV criteria (by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - SCID-I/P) for MDD, current Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated (IDS-SR30) score of > 20 at screening and baseline visits, that is at the start of Phase 2 Has a history of failure to respond to 1, 2, or 3 FDA-approved antidepressants at adequate doses during the current episode for at least 8 weeks, as defined by the MGH Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (MGH-ATRQ), and must be currently on the failed SSRI for at least 8 weeks and on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 18 or higher at baseline and start of Phase 2. Exclusion Criteria Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy) Patients who no longer meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD during the baseline visit Serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician A serious suicide risk will be considered an inability to control suicide attempts, imminent risk of suicide in the investigator's judgment, or a history of serious suicidal behavior, which is defined using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as either (1) one or more actual suicide attempts in the 3 years before study entry with the lethality rated at 3 or higher, or (2) one or more interrupted suicide attempts with a potential lethality judged to result in serious injury or death. Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease The following DSM-IV diagnoses: substance use disorders active within the last six months, any bipolar disorder (current or past), any psychotic disorder (current or past) History of a seizure disorder or clinical evidence of untreated hypothyroidism; Patients requiring excluded medications (see Table 3 for details) Psychotic features in the current episode or a history of psychotic features, as assessed by SCID Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months Have failed 3 or more adequate antidepressant trials during the current Major Depressive Episode by MGH-ATRQ criteria. Patients with a history of antidepressant-induced hypomania. Patients with any evidence of clinically significant liver abnormalities, or any liver transaminase level >2 X ULN at initial screening, or >5 x ULN during Phase 2 treatment. Axis II personality disorders that are the primary purpose of treatment, or would interfere with a patients safety or compliance. Patients currently being treated for a respiratory disorder (including asthma or COPD) Any subject who scores a 5 or higher on item #10 of the MADRS
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerard Sanacora, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Yale University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maurizio Fava, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusettes General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sanjay Matthew, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Baylor College of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlos Zarate, MD
Organizational Affiliation
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Yale University, Yale Depression Research Program
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachussettes General Hospital, Depression Clinical and Research Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17141740
Citation
Sanacora G, Kendell SF, Levin Y, Simen AA, Fenton LR, Coric V, Krystal JH. Preliminary evidence of riluzole efficacy in antidepressant-treated patients with residual depressive symptoms. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar 15;61(6):822-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.037. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14702270
Citation
Zarate CA Jr, Payne JL, Quiroz J, Sporn J, Denicoff KK, Luckenbaugh D, Charney DS, Manji HK. An open-label trial of riluzole in patients with treatment-resistant major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;161(1):171-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.1.171.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35092868
Citation
Hejazi NS, Farmer CA, Oppenheimer M, Falodun TB, Park LT, Duncan WC Jr, Zarate CA Jr. The relationship between the HDRS insomnia items and polysomnographic (PSG) measures in individuals with treatment-resistant depression. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Apr;148:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.022. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Tolerability of Riluzole in Treatment Resistant Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs