search
Back to results

Efficacy in iNPH Shunting (PENS) Trial (PENS)

Primary Purpose

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
programmable CSF shunt valve
Sponsored by
Johns Hopkins University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 60 years; and
  2. Diagnosis of iNPH and recommendation for shunt surgery based on the Investigator's clinical judgement based on criteria and testing as described in the iNPH Guidelines;
  3. Evans Ratio ≥ 0.30; and
  4. One positive supplementary test to include either large volume Lumbar Puncture or extended CSF drainage per institutional standards; and
  5. History or evidence of gait impairment (such as decreased step height or length, decreased speed, retropulsion as described in the iNPH Guidelines) duration ≥ 6 months; and
  6. Participant has the sensory motor skills, communication skills and understanding to comply with the testing and reporting required in the PENS trial; and
  7. Participant is able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to walk 10 meters with or without an assistive device; or
  2. Baseline fastest gait velocity (out of three gait trials) >1 m/sec prior to drainage trial and fastest gait velocity improvement is < 30% with or without an assistive device; or
  3. Unable to return to the study center for follow up evaluation and shunt programming; or
  4. Participant is not medically cleared for shunt surgery per local standards; or
  5. Secondary NPH. (Prior encephalitis, meningitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury (including concussion) within two years or with brain injury or skull fracture on baseline imaging, brain abscess, brain tumor, obstructive hydrocephalus (including acquired aqueductal stenosis and carcinomatous meningitis); or
  6. Prior or existing shunts, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or any previous surgical intervention for hydrocephalus; or
  7. Previous intracranial neurosurgical procedure; or
  8. Symptomatic cerebral or cerebellar infarction occurring within 6 months from screening (asymptomatic lacunar infarctions are permitted); or
  9. Diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndrome that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation; or
  10. Diagnosis of schizophrenia or any psychiatric diagnosis (including depression) that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation (such as neuroleptic treatment for schizophrenia); or
  11. Diagnosis of dementia disorder where the investigator considers cognition deficit limits participation in the study; or
  12. Conditions impairing gait that are considered to be unrelated to hydrocephalus, such as hemiparesis, spasticity, cerebellar ataxia or musculoskeletal and joint disease, which will interfere with gait assessment or the potential for gait improvement.
  13. Individuals with contraindication to MRI (e.g., implanted electric and electronic devices, aneurysm clip(s), any metallic fragment or foreign body, coronary and peripheral artery stents, cardiac pacemaker, known claustrophobia, or known/possible pregnancy or breast-feeding) will be excluded according to institutional guidelines.

Sites / Locations

  • University of California, DavisRecruiting
  • University of Southern California
  • Pacific Neuroscience Institute
  • University of South FloridaRecruiting
  • Emory UniversityRecruiting
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Indiana UniversityRecruiting
  • Johns Hopkins UniversityRecruiting
  • Henry Ford Health SystemRecruiting
  • Mayo ClinicRecruiting
  • University of New Mexico Hospital
  • New York University Langone HealthRecruiting
  • Mount Sinai Health SystemRecruiting
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Cleveland ClinicRecruiting
  • Oregon Health & Science UniversityRecruiting
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRecruiting
  • University of WashingtonRecruiting
  • University of CalgaryRecruiting
  • University of British ColumbiaRecruiting
  • Umeå University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Open Shunt Group

Closed Shunt Group

Arm Description

FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation

FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation followed by setting to active (setting 4) (110 mm H2O) three months after the procedure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Gait velocity
Evaluation of CSF shunting in iNPH patients through a group comparison of change from baseline at three months between active and placebo-controlled groups, using the primary endpoint of gait velocity (in meters per second).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Gait velocity
Evaluate the change in gait velocity among all study participants between baseline and 9 months of active shunting, using the primary outcome of gait velocity (in meters per second).
Cognition as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at three months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from 0 to 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
Cognition as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at nine months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from zero to 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
Bladder Control as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at three months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. The OAB-q sf consists of three QOL domains: coping, sleep, and emotional/social interaction. All scale scores are transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale, with lower scores indicating greater effect, i.e., worse QOL.
Bladder Control as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at nine months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. All scale scores are transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale, with lower scores indicating greater effect, i.e., worse QOL.

Full Information

First Posted
October 5, 2021
Last Updated
October 17, 2023
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05081128
Brief Title
Efficacy in iNPH Shunting (PENS) Trial
Acronym
PENS
Official Title
A Placebo-Controlled Efficacy in iNPH Shunting (PENS) Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 18, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Placebo-Controlled Efficacy in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) Shunting (PENS) trial is a multi-center blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled design investigation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery to study the shunt efficacy in iNPH patients.
Detailed Description
The primary intervention will be setting the FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) or placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O)in a 1:1 ratio. By the time of the primary objective evaluation at three months, the closed shunt group will have zero months of active treatment, and the open shunt group will have three months of active treatment. At three months, shunts for subjects in the closed shunt group will be adjusted to setting 4. To maintain blinding, all patients will be adjusted / mock adjusted to the active setting in a similar fashion. Patients from both groups will not be adjusted before three months of active treatment, unless judged medically necessary by the treating team. Following the three month visit, all subjects in each group will have shunt adjustments according to clinical standards at each center.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The primary intervention will be the initiation of the randomized initial shunt valve opening pressure setting to create a delayed treatment group in half of the study patients. Randomization will be to active or placebo (closed) shunt settings. At the time of the standard three-month evaluation, all subjects will be similarly non-invasively adjusted to bring all subjects in both groups to the active setting while maintaining blinding of the subjects. All settings will be verified by the adjusting neurosurgeon.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Open Shunt Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation
Arm Title
Closed Shunt Group
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation followed by setting to active (setting 4) (110 mm H2O) three months after the procedure.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
programmable CSF shunt valve
Other Intervention Name(s)
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard
Intervention Description
Brain shunt surgery using a programmable CSF shunt valve
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Gait velocity
Description
Evaluation of CSF shunting in iNPH patients through a group comparison of change from baseline at three months between active and placebo-controlled groups, using the primary endpoint of gait velocity (in meters per second).
Time Frame
Baseline and 3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Gait velocity
Description
Evaluate the change in gait velocity among all study participants between baseline and 9 months of active shunting, using the primary outcome of gait velocity (in meters per second).
Time Frame
Baseline and 9 months
Title
Cognition as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at three months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from 0 to 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Cognition as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at nine months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from zero to 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
Time Frame
9 months
Title
Bladder Control as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at three months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. The OAB-q sf consists of three QOL domains: coping, sleep, and emotional/social interaction. All scale scores are transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale, with lower scores indicating greater effect, i.e., worse QOL.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Bladder Control as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form
Description
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at nine months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. All scale scores are transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale, with lower scores indicating greater effect, i.e., worse QOL.
Time Frame
9 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 60 years; and Diagnosis of iNPH and recommendation for shunt surgery based on the Investigator's clinical judgement based on criteria and testing as described in the iNPH Guidelines; Evans Ratio ≥ 0.30; and One positive supplementary test to include either large volume Lumbar Puncture or extended CSF drainage per institutional standards; and History or evidence of gait impairment (such as decreased step height or length, decreased speed, retropulsion as described in the iNPH Guidelines) duration ≥ 6 months; and Participant has the sensory motor skills, communication skills and understanding to comply with the testing and reporting required in the PENS trial; and Participant is able to give written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Unable to walk 10 meters with or without an assistive device; or Baseline fastest gait velocity (out of three gait trials) >1 m/sec prior to drainage trial and fastest gait velocity improvement is < 30% with or without an assistive device; or Unable to return to the study center for follow up evaluation and shunt programming; or Participant is not medically cleared for shunt surgery per local standards; or Secondary NPH. (Prior encephalitis, meningitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury (including concussion) within two years or with brain injury or skull fracture on baseline imaging, brain abscess, brain tumor, obstructive hydrocephalus (including acquired aqueductal stenosis and carcinomatous meningitis); or Prior or existing shunts, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or any previous surgical intervention for hydrocephalus; or Previous intracranial neurosurgical procedure; or Symptomatic cerebral or cerebellar infarction occurring within 6 months from screening (asymptomatic lacunar infarctions are permitted); or Diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndrome that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation; or Diagnosis of schizophrenia or any psychiatric diagnosis (including depression) that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation (such as neuroleptic treatment for schizophrenia); or Diagnosis of dementia disorder where the investigator considers cognition deficit limits participation in the study; or Conditions impairing gait that are considered to be unrelated to hydrocephalus, such as hemiparesis, spasticity, cerebellar ataxia or musculoskeletal and joint disease, which will interfere with gait assessment or the potential for gait improvement. Individuals with contraindication to MRI (e.g., implanted electric and electronic devices, aneurysm clip(s), any metallic fragment or foreign body, coronary and peripheral artery stents, cardiac pacemaker, known claustrophobia, or known/possible pregnancy or breast-feeding) will be excluded according to institutional guidelines.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jessica Wollett
Phone
667-306-8141
Email
penstrial@jh.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Cristina Camayd-Munoz
Email
cmunoz@jhu.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Luciano, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Holubkov, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Utah
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California, Davis
City
Davis
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95616
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janice Wang-Polagruto, PhD, CCRP
Phone
916-551-3244
Email
jfwang@ucdavis.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gurprit Garcha
Phone
916-551-3243
Email
gkgarcha@ucdavis.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kiarash Shahlaie, MD, PhD, FAANS
Facility Name
University of Southern California
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90089
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Darrin Lee, MD
Facility Name
Pacific Neuroscience Institute
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Garni Barkhoudarian, MD
Phone
310-582-7450
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Garni Barkhoudarian, MD
Facility Name
University of South Florida
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel Karlnoski, PhD
Phone
813-974-8558
Email
karlnosk@usf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Naomi Abel, MD
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Barrow, MD
Phone
404-778-4471
Email
daniel.barrow@emory.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yvan Bamps, PhD
Phone
404-778-7673
Email
ybamps@emory.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Barrow, MD
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Withdrawn
Facility Name
Indiana University
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carolyn O'Neil
Phone
317-963-7293
Email
caoneil@iu.edu,
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lauren Snyder
Phone
317-963-1300
Email
lmillar@iu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jesse Savage, MD
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kallan Dirmeyer
Email
kdirmey1@jhu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Luciano
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Abhay Moghekar
Facility Name
Henry Ford Health System
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rehnuma Newaz
Phone
313-704-5250
Email
rnewaz1@hfhs.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jason Schwalb, MD
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Blake Schleusner
Phone
507-284-5775
Email
Schleusner.blake@mayo.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin Elder, MD
Facility Name
University of New Mexico Hospital
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87106
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Withdrawn
Facility Name
New York University Langone Health
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cathryn Lapierre
Phone
646-501-2762
Email
Cathryn.lapierre@nyulangone.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey Wisoff, MD
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Health System
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Morgenstern, MD
Phone
212-241-0954
Email
Peter.morgenstern@mountsinai.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Morgenstern, MD
Facility Name
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157-1029
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wendy Jenkins, BSN RN, CCRC
Phone
336-716-3842
Email
wejenkin@wakehealth.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Hawley
Phone
336.716.4031
Email
khawley@wakehealth.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Couture, MD
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jerrod Cook
Phone
216-636-1561
Email
cookj6@ccf.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julia Kosco
Phone
216-444-6626
Email
koscoj@ccf.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sean Nagel, MD
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael McGehee
Phone
503-494-4988
Email
mcgehee@ohsu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian Lothrop
Phone
503.494.4988
Email
lothrop@ohsu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ahmed Raslan, MD
Facility Name
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390-8855
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan A. White, MD
Phone
214-648-7912
Email
jonathan.white@utsouthwestern.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan A. White, MD
Facility Name
University of Washington
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elisa McGee
Phone
206-598-9260
Email
emcgee@uw.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael A. Williams, MD
Facility Name
University of Calgary
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
AB T2N 1N4
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jarred Dronyk
Phone
4039441626
Email
jdronyk@ucalgary.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Hamilton, MD
Phone
4039441626
Email
mhamilto@ucalgary.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Hamilton, MD
Facility Name
University of British Columbia
City
Vancouver
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Zwimpfer
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Zwimpfer, MD
Facility Name
Umeå University
City
Umeå
ZIP/Postal Code
901 87
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Suspended

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy in iNPH Shunting (PENS) Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs