search
Back to results

Efficacy of a Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality Intervention (REACT01)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Hemiparesis, Chronic Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
REACt system
Physical therapy
Sponsored by
Hospitales Nisa
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Virtual Reality, Rehabilitation, Physical therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronicity > six months
  • severe paresis of the upper limb defined by the Brunnstrom Approach as stages I or II and by the Upper Extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment as scores below 19
  • ability to maintain a sitting position for at least 60 minutes
  • fairly good cognitive condition defined by scores in the Mini-Mental State Examination above 23.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pacemakers
  • brain implants or other metallic objects (valves, coils, etc.)
  • impaired comprehension that hinder sufficient understanding of the instructions defined by Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test scores below 45
  • severe visual impairments
  • emotional or behavioral circumstances that impede adequate collaboration

Sites / Locations

  • Servicio de Neurorrehabilitación y Daño Cerebral de los Hospitales NISA

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Experimental

Arm Label

Control

Experimental

Arm Description

Conventional physical therapy

Combined tDCS and VR-based intervention

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the Upper Extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke evaluates and measures recovery in post-stroke hemiplegic patients in both clinical and research settings. Score range: 0-66

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in the Time subscale of the Wolf Motor Function Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end to one-month after the intervention
The Wolf Motor Function Test is a quantitative measure of upper extremity motor ability through timed and functional tasks. Score range: 0-1200
Change in the Functional ability subscale of the Wolf Motor Function Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end to one-month after the intervention.
The Wolf Motor Function Test is a quantitative measure of upper extremity motor ability through timed and functional tasks. Score range: 0-75
Change in the Nottingham Sensory Assessment from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end to one-month after the intervention.
The Nottingham Sensory Assessment is a multi-modal sensory examination that includes tests of tactile sensation (Score range: 0-2) (light, touch, touch localization, temperature discrimination, pinprick sensation, bilateral simultaneous stimulation), kinesthesia (Score range:0-3), and stereognosis (Score range: 0-2)
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
The Intrinsic Motivation Inventory is a multidimensional questionnaire structured into various subscales. In this study, this questionnaire was used to assess participant interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, pressure/tension, and value/usefulness measures. Score range for each subscale: 1-7
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale is a simple ten-item scale that serves as a global assessment of subjective usability. Score range: 0-100

Full Information

First Posted
April 24, 2018
Last Updated
May 16, 2018
Sponsor
Hospitales Nisa
Collaborators
Universitat Politècnica de València
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03528018
Brief Title
Efficacy of a Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality Intervention
Acronym
REACT01
Official Title
Efficacy of a Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality-based Paradigm for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Individuals With Severe Hemiparesia. A Randomized Control Trial Survivor With Severe Hemiparesis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 30, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 17, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospitales Nisa
Collaborators
Universitat Politècnica de València

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Rehabilitation options for stroke survivors who present severe hemiparesis in chronic stages are limited and may end in compensation techniques that involve the use of the less affected arm to achieve some degree of functional independence. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that has been used after stroke to promote excitability of the surviving neural architecture in order to support functional recovery. Interestingly, cortical excitability has been reported to increase when tDCS is combined with virtual reality. This synergetic effect could explain the promising results achieved by preliminary experimental interventions that combined both approaches on upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. The objective of this study is to explore the use of these interventions in subjects with severe hemiparesis and to determine its efficacy in comparison to conventional physical therapy

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Hemiparesis, Chronic Stroke, Upper Limb Injury
Keywords
Virtual Reality, Rehabilitation, Physical therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
14 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Conventional physical therapy
Arm Title
Experimental
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Combined tDCS and VR-based intervention
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
REACt system
Intervention Description
The REACt system is a virtual reality-based paradigm for upper limb rehabilitation that allows for interaction of individuals with restricted movements from active responses triggered when they attempt to perform a movement. The experimental system also provides multisensory stimulation in the visual, auditory, and tactile channels, and transcranial direct current stimulation coherent to the observed movements
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Physical therapy
Intervention Description
Physical therapy included passive and active mobilization of the paretic upper limb. Passive range of motion exercises were provided in those segments where no active movement was detected to meticulously reproduce a range of articular movements and muscle and soft tissue elongation. In case of residual active movement capability, participants were encouraged to perform the movements with the assistance of the therapists
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Upper Extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Description
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke evaluates and measures recovery in post-stroke hemiplegic patients in both clinical and research settings. Score range: 0-66
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (within 5 days prior intervention), post-intervention (within 5 days after intervention), one-month follow-up (within 30 to 35 days after the intervention)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Time subscale of the Wolf Motor Function Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end to one-month after the intervention
Description
The Wolf Motor Function Test is a quantitative measure of upper extremity motor ability through timed and functional tasks. Score range: 0-1200
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (within 5 days prior intervention), post-intervention (within 5 days after intervention), one-month follow-up (within 30 to 35 days after the intervention)
Title
Change in the Functional ability subscale of the Wolf Motor Function Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end to one-month after the intervention.
Description
The Wolf Motor Function Test is a quantitative measure of upper extremity motor ability through timed and functional tasks. Score range: 0-75
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (within 5 days prior intervention), post-intervention (within 5 days after intervention), one-month follow-up (within 30 to 35 days after the intervention)
Title
Change in the Nottingham Sensory Assessment from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end to one-month after the intervention.
Description
The Nottingham Sensory Assessment is a multi-modal sensory examination that includes tests of tactile sensation (Score range: 0-2) (light, touch, touch localization, temperature discrimination, pinprick sensation, bilateral simultaneous stimulation), kinesthesia (Score range:0-3), and stereognosis (Score range: 0-2)
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (within 5 days prior intervention), post-intervention (within 5 days after intervention), one-month follow-up (within 30 to 35 days after the intervention)
Title
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Description
The Intrinsic Motivation Inventory is a multidimensional questionnaire structured into various subscales. In this study, this questionnaire was used to assess participant interest/enjoyment, perceived competence, pressure/tension, and value/usefulness measures. Score range for each subscale: 1-7
Time Frame
Post-intervention (within 5 days after intervention)
Title
System Usability Scale
Description
The System Usability Scale is a simple ten-item scale that serves as a global assessment of subjective usability. Score range: 0-100
Time Frame
Post-intervention (within 5 days after intervention)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: chronicity > six months severe paresis of the upper limb defined by the Brunnstrom Approach as stages I or II and by the Upper Extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment as scores below 19 ability to maintain a sitting position for at least 60 minutes fairly good cognitive condition defined by scores in the Mini-Mental State Examination above 23. Exclusion Criteria: pacemakers brain implants or other metallic objects (valves, coils, etc.) impaired comprehension that hinder sufficient understanding of the instructions defined by Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test scores below 45 severe visual impairments emotional or behavioral circumstances that impede adequate collaboration
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roberto Llorens, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universitat Politècnica de València
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Servicio de Neurorrehabilitación y Daño Cerebral de los Hospitales NISA
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46011
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of a Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality Intervention

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs