search
Back to results

Efficacy of a Robotic-assisted Gait Training in Addition to a Conventional Physical Therapy in Parkinson's Disease

Primary Purpose

Parkinson's Disease

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lokomat (Hocoma, Zurich, Switzerland)
Conventional physical treatment
Sponsored by
Habilita, Ospedale di Sarnico
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson's Disease focused on measuring Parkinson's disease, Lokomat, gait training, rehabilitation.

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parkinson's disease stage 2 to 3 (calculated in the "on phase") on the Hoehn and Yahr scale
  • independent walking
  • clinical-pharmacological stabilization until three months before the beginning of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • deficits of somatic sensation involving the legs
  • vestibular disorders or paroxysmal vertigo
  • other neurological, orthopedic or cardiovascular co-morbility
  • severe posture abnormalities
  • severe-moderate cognitive impairment (Minmental state ≤ 21)
  • severe dyskinesia or "on-off"phases

Sites / Locations

  • Casa di Cura HabilitaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Experimental group

Control group

Arm Description

Participants received 12 sessions of robotic assisted body weight-supported treadmill training on the Lokomat. Training occurred approximately 3 days/ week for 4 weeks, and each training session on the Lokomat lasted 30 minutes. All sessions were supervised by a trained research therapist. All participants started with 40% body weight-support and an initial treadmill speed of 1.5 km/h. Body weight-support was used primarily to facilitate an increase in walking speed; therefore, progression of training across subsequent sessions was standardized by preferentially increasing speed and then unloading body weight-support. Speed was increased to a range of 2.2 to 2.5 km/h before body weight-support was decreased. There was an active attempt to enhance the level of training at each session.

Participants received 20 sessions of conventional physiotherapy. Training occurred approximately 5 days/week for 4 weeks, and each training session lasted 1 hour .Patients allocated to the Control Group performed a general exercise program and a conventional gait training with a 5-minute rest between them. The general exercise program consisted in cardiovascular warm-up exercises, muscle stretching exercises, active-assisted or active isometric and isotonic exercises for the main muscles of the trunk and limbs, relaxation exercises, coordination and dual task activities and balance exercises. The conventional gait therapy was based on the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation concept (lasting 30 minutes), with rhythmic initiation, slow reversal, and agonistic reversal exercises applied to the pelvic region, each 10 minutes long.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Timed 6 meter walking test
Timed 6-meter walking test evaluate the gait speed. Individual walks without assistance 10 meters and the time is measured for the intermediate 6 meters to allow for acceleration and deceleration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Disease rating scale motor sub-scores)
a scale to assess the motor specific examination for Parkinson's Disease
Functional Independence Measure
to assess daily activities functional autonomy
Barthel Index
to assess the degree of disability
Tinetti Test
to assess balance and gait ability and the falls risk
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire -39 item
to assess quality of life

Full Information

First Posted
June 10, 2014
Last Updated
June 20, 2014
Sponsor
Habilita, Ospedale di Sarnico
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02164162
Brief Title
Efficacy of a Robotic-assisted Gait Training in Addition to a Conventional Physical Therapy in Parkinson's Disease
Official Title
Interventional Double Blinded Randomized and Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of a Robotic-assisted Gait Training in Addition to a Conventional Physical Therapy in Parkinson's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2014 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2014 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Habilita, Ospedale di Sarnico

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In Parkinson's disease, gait disturbances represent one of the most disabling motor symptoms, frequently associated with an increased risk of falls, loss of independence and a negative impact on quality of life. In recent years, the interest in automated robotic devices for gait training for Parkinson's Disease patients has grown. With their consistent, symmetrical lower-limb trajectories, robotic devices provide many of the proprioceptive inputs that may increase cortical activation and improve motor function while minimizing the intervention of a therapist. So the main aim of this study will be to analyze, through a clinical and an instrumental evaluation, the effectiveness of a Lokomat gait training in subjects affected by Parkinson's disease in comparison to a ground conventional gait training.
Detailed Description
In Parkinson's disease, gait disturbances represent one of the most disabling motor symptoms, frequently associated with an increased risk of falls, loss of independence and a negative impact on quality of life. Patients with Parkinson's Disease, display an abnormal gait pattern (reduced gait speed, shortened stride length, and a longer double-limb support phase) and they are typically unable to generate a proper stride length and to maintain a steady gait rhythm. Therefore, improving gait ability is a primary goal of physical therapy in patients with Parkinson's Disease. Conventional Physiotherapy aimed at enabling patients to maintain their maximum level of activity and independence is often prescribed, but treatments for gait give only limited benefits. Promising reports have suggested that external sensory cueing (acoustic, visual, verbal cues), through an attention mechanism, may help to increase the deficient internal cueing in Parkinson's Disease, thus improving gait pattern.Treadmill training, which induces a constant horizontal movement, generates a rhythmic input for locomotion, coordinating the upper and lower limbs, offering a useful retraining modality that complements conventional therapy. In the last decade some researchers focused on the use of partial body weight support systems on the ground or with the combination of treadmill training (Body weight support-treadmill). These systems, which improves the ability to stand in an upright position with a redistribution of forces on the trunk, thus disengaging the girdle and upper limbs, suggests a greater improvement in motor performance and walking ability compared with conventional phisiotherapy. In recent years, the interest in automated robotic devices for gait training for Parkinson's Disease patients has grown. With their consistent, symmetrical lower-limb trajectories, robotic devices provide many of the proprioceptive inputs that may increase cortical activation and improve motor function while minimizing the intervention of a therapist. Moreover, proprioceptive inputs may share mechanisms that are common to external cues, thus stimulating the cerebellar-premotor pathway to improve gait. Besides,the preprogrammed walking pattern corresponds to normal gait kinematics including: gait cycle timing, inter-limb and inter-joint coordination, appropriate limb loading, and afferent signaling. A recent randomized controlled trial that compared a comprehensive rehabilitative program vis-à-vis robot-assisted gait training has shown that the latter displays some advantages. A pilot, non-controlled study explored the effect of robot-assisted gait training on freezing of gait.Still, despite recent interest in automated locomotion training, there is still very little evidence to support the superiority of this technique over traditional gait training. A computerized gait analysis represents an useful aid to study gait disturbances. The analysis sets objectives and defines quantitative data about gait changes occurred in a patient, in relation to the progression of underlying disease or th effectiveness of treatments administered (medication, surgery or physical). So the main aim of this study will be to analyze, through a clinical and an instrumental evaluation, the effectiveness of a Lokomat gait training in subjects affected by Parkinson's disease in comparison to a ground conventional gait training

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson's Disease
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, Lokomat, gait training, rehabilitation.

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received 12 sessions of robotic assisted body weight-supported treadmill training on the Lokomat. Training occurred approximately 3 days/ week for 4 weeks, and each training session on the Lokomat lasted 30 minutes. All sessions were supervised by a trained research therapist. All participants started with 40% body weight-support and an initial treadmill speed of 1.5 km/h. Body weight-support was used primarily to facilitate an increase in walking speed; therefore, progression of training across subsequent sessions was standardized by preferentially increasing speed and then unloading body weight-support. Speed was increased to a range of 2.2 to 2.5 km/h before body weight-support was decreased. There was an active attempt to enhance the level of training at each session.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received 20 sessions of conventional physiotherapy. Training occurred approximately 5 days/week for 4 weeks, and each training session lasted 1 hour .Patients allocated to the Control Group performed a general exercise program and a conventional gait training with a 5-minute rest between them. The general exercise program consisted in cardiovascular warm-up exercises, muscle stretching exercises, active-assisted or active isometric and isotonic exercises for the main muscles of the trunk and limbs, relaxation exercises, coordination and dual task activities and balance exercises. The conventional gait therapy was based on the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation concept (lasting 30 minutes), with rhythmic initiation, slow reversal, and agonistic reversal exercises applied to the pelvic region, each 10 minutes long.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Lokomat (Hocoma, Zurich, Switzerland)
Intervention Description
Patients allocated to the Experimental group performed a Robotic Assistested Gait Training by means of the Lokomat. The Lokomat is robotic device set up as an exoskeleton on the lower limbs of the patient. The system uses a dynamic body weight-support system to support he participant above a motorized treadmill synchronized with the Lokomat.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional physical treatment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Control group
Intervention Description
Patients allocated to the Control Group performed a general exercise program and a conventional gait training. The general exercise program consisted in cardiovascular warm-up exercises, muscle stretching exercises, active-assisted or active isometric and isotonic exercises for the main muscles of the trunk and limbs, relaxation exercises, coordination and dual task activities and balance exercises. The conventional gait therapy was based on the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) concept (lasting 30 minutes), with rhythmic initiation, slow reversal, and agonistic reversal exercises applied to the pelvic region, each 10 minutes long. The same trained therapist treated all the patients in this group and standardized the duration of each part of the treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Timed 6 meter walking test
Description
Timed 6-meter walking test evaluate the gait speed. Individual walks without assistance 10 meters and the time is measured for the intermediate 6 meters to allow for acceleration and deceleration
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Disease rating scale motor sub-scores)
Description
a scale to assess the motor specific examination for Parkinson's Disease
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Functional Independence Measure
Description
to assess daily activities functional autonomy
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Barthel Index
Description
to assess the degree of disability
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Tinetti Test
Description
to assess balance and gait ability and the falls risk
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire -39 item
Description
to assess quality of life
Time Frame
4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Parkinson's disease stage 2 to 3 (calculated in the "on phase") on the Hoehn and Yahr scale independent walking clinical-pharmacological stabilization until three months before the beginning of the study. Exclusion Criteria: deficits of somatic sensation involving the legs vestibular disorders or paroxysmal vertigo other neurological, orthopedic or cardiovascular co-morbility severe posture abnormalities severe-moderate cognitive impairment (Minmental state ≤ 21) severe dyskinesia or "on-off"phases
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Casa di Cura Habilita
City
Ciserano
State/Province
Bergamo
ZIP/Postal Code
24040
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paola Sabattini, Coordinator
Phone
+390354815
Ext
507
Email
paolasabattini@habilita.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giovanni Taveggia, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anna Furnari, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anna Furnari

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of a Robotic-assisted Gait Training in Addition to a Conventional Physical Therapy in Parkinson's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs