search
Back to results

Efficacy of an Ergonomic Handwriting Pen - The AWP Pen Study

Primary Purpose

Muscle Fatigue

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ergonomic handwriting pen
Sponsored by
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Muscle Fatigue focused on measuring Office Work, Handwriting Performance, Pain, Discomfort

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent
  • People aged between 18 and 50 years
  • People free of acute or chronical diseases limiting their handwriting capabilities (e.g. Parkinson, hand/arm amputee)
  • Education level: at least high school diploma
  • People using a handwriting pen > once per week
  • Sufficient German language skills (min. B2 level - Questionnaire language)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with mental disorders limiting their writing performance
  • People with chronical fatigue syndrome
  • People incapable of concentrating on tasks for more than 30 minutes
  • Non-corrected visual disturbances

Sites / Locations

  • University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Intervention first arm

Control first arm

Arm Description

Due to the counter-balanced design of this study all participants will experience both an interventional and a control period. Within the "intervention first arm" participants will be asked to execute the assessment trial / test battery with the intervention pen first. After a wash-out period, the participants will execute the same assessment trial / test battery with the control pen.

Due to the counter-balanced design of this study all participants will experience both an interventional and a control period. Within the "control first arm" participants will be asked to execute the assessment trial / test battery with the control pen first. After a wash-out period, the participants will execute the same assessment trial / test battery with the intervention pen.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Subjectively perceived muscle fatigue changes as determined with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects will rate their subjectively perceived muscle fatigue prior and after the test battery by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 (strongly pronounced) points. Question: How would you describe your current muscle fatigue in your writing hand?
Subjectively perceived discomfort as determined with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects will rate their subjectively perceived discomfort in the writing hand prior and after the test battery by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 (strongly pronounced) points. Question: How would you describe your current discomfort in the writing hand?

Secondary Outcome Measures

Muscle pain estimated as determined with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects will rate their subjectively perceived discomfort in the writing hand prior and after the test battery by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 (strongly pronounced) points. Question: How would you rate the current pain in the writing hand?
Handwriting speed as determined with a maze task (accuracy based)
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used twice in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as accurately as possible without any time pressure". In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Handwriting speed as determined with a maze task (speed and accuracy based)
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used three times in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as soon as possible, but do not touch the walls"; In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Handwriting speed as determined with a dot in cycle task
One working speed test - named dot in cycle task - is part of the study procedure. Within this test, participants are asked to draw as many dots in a cluster of cycles as possible. This test has already been used for research, and it is characterized by a very easy design. The test instructions for this test are: "Fill in as many dots in the middle of the cycles as possible. Work as fast and accurate as possible. Work from the left to right, beginning in the upper left corner." Similar to the maze tasks, the dot in cycle task consist of a detailed test instruction, the test itself as well as two practice tasks. The execution of these practice tasks must be supervised by a study member to: ensure that the test subject fully understood the tasks, get the possibility to clarify some uncertainties when the test tasks exhibit some uncertainties, reduce practice effects that will occur on the regular task.
Handwriting speed as determined with a fatigue task
The fatigue task is a simple writing task implemented to induce muscle fatigue. Within this task the test subject is asked to copy a predefined text passage by using the corresponding study pen. As noticeable fatigue occurs only after a certain writing time and intensity, this copying process will last for 15 minutes. In addition, the test subjects are asked to copy as many words as possible within this time frame.
Positioning accuracy as determined with a maze task (accuracy based)
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used twice in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as accurately as possible without any time pressure". In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Positioning accuracy as determined with a maze task (speed and accuracy based)
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used three times in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as soon as possible, but do not touch the walls"; In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Handwriting performance as determined with the Handwriting Assessment Battery for Adults (HAB)
The "Handwriting Assessment Battery for Adults" is a standardized handwriting assessment exhibiting high intraclass correlations and standardized values for different cohorts. It consists of three main sections containing several items estimating: Pen Control & Manipulation Writing Speed Writing Legibility For the Handwriting Assessment Battery predefined guidelines for data analysis exist.
Usability as determined with a non-standardized questionaire
The questionnaires used in this study are non-standardized questionnaires consisting of questions with nominal (e.g. yes/no), ordinal (e.g. significantly worse, worse, identical, better, significantly better) or open answers (e.g. "Please state the pros of the product you used in this study"). They were developed to estimate the user experience and satisfaction with the product under investigation as well as its usability. Apart from the regular questions, the questionnaires include a short introduction as well as brief instructions on how to complete them.

Full Information

First Posted
September 19, 2021
Last Updated
November 22, 2021
Sponsor
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
Collaborators
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05077046
Brief Title
Efficacy of an Ergonomic Handwriting Pen - The AWP Pen Study
Official Title
Efficacy of an Ergonomic Handwriting Pen - a Monocenter Randomized Controlled Counter-balanced Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 27, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 8, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 8, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
Collaborators
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This clinical investigation is a monocenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, counter-balanced, two-arm study investigating the effect of a novel ergonomic handwriting pen.
Detailed Description
Background: Extended and prolonged handwriting activities can be exhausting for the writer and can lead to muscle cramps, irritations in the hand and lower arm as well as high pressures in the fingers and pain. As muscle pain in the upper extremities can affect hand writing quality, and as it is well known that high tendon activities and tissue pressures can lead to health issues, there is a need for ergonomic handwriting materials, especially for people with prolonged and extended handwriting activities (e.g. students). Despite the high number of ergonomic handwriting pens on the market, clinical or scientific investigations for such pens are very rare. Indeed only a few studies on such pens are available, and there is little knowledge on how ergonomics can impact physiological and performance parameters. As high forces and pressures in the hand region over a long period of time can lead to health issues, a pen design targeting the reduction of grip forces and pressures was developed. To investigate if this pen design can affect handwriting performance, perceived fatigue, pen and discomfort, the AWP pen study was developed. To follow international recommendations and to reduce potential bias as well as interpersonal variation, this study was designed as randomized controlled counter-balanced trial. The insights of this study can further help to develop novel handwriting tools and to support people with handwriting disabilities (e.g. stroke patients). Methods: The study consists of one assessment day / visit only. During this visit and after proving the study eligibility (inclusion / exclusion criteria), half of the study participants will randomly be allocated to one of two study groups. Depending on the group allocation participants will either execute the first assessment trial with an ergonomic (= intervention) or common (= control) handwriting pen. The randomization will be realized with opaque envelopes created by an external and independent person. Overall participants will execute the identical assessment trial / test battery with the control and the intervention pen. Each assessment trial consists of writing speed and accuracy tasks, followed by the "Handwriting Assessment Battery for Adults" (HAB) and a fatigue task. These assessments are followed by Visual Analogue Scales and a questionnaire. Due to the counter-balanced design and the fatigue tasks, the break between both assessment trials will take at least 20 minutes to ensure similar baseline conditions for both pens. The influence of incomplete fatigue recovery as well as practice effects will be reduced by the counter-balanced design. The overall duration of study participation ranges between 2.5 and 4 hours.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Muscle Fatigue
Keywords
Office Work, Handwriting Performance, Pain, Discomfort

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Participants will be informed that the effect of the handwriting pen design on different physiological parameters will be investigated within the study. Although participants know that they will execute the test battery twice with two different handwriting pens, they will receive no information on which of the pens will be the intervention of interest (intervention pen). To realize an efficient masking process, control pens will be exclusively created for the study. Control pens will be made of the same material and will contain cartridge. They will only differ in design.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
17 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention first arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Due to the counter-balanced design of this study all participants will experience both an interventional and a control period. Within the "intervention first arm" participants will be asked to execute the assessment trial / test battery with the intervention pen first. After a wash-out period, the participants will execute the same assessment trial / test battery with the control pen.
Arm Title
Control first arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Due to the counter-balanced design of this study all participants will experience both an interventional and a control period. Within the "control first arm" participants will be asked to execute the assessment trial / test battery with the control pen first. After a wash-out period, the participants will execute the same assessment trial / test battery with the intervention pen.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Ergonomic handwriting pen
Intervention Description
An ergonomic handwriting pen called AWP-pen designed to reduce perceived muscle fatigue, finger tip pressure and discomfort during handwriting activities.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjectively perceived muscle fatigue changes as determined with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
Subjects will rate their subjectively perceived muscle fatigue prior and after the test battery by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 (strongly pronounced) points. Question: How would you describe your current muscle fatigue in your writing hand?
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Subjectively perceived discomfort as determined with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
Subjects will rate their subjectively perceived discomfort in the writing hand prior and after the test battery by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 (strongly pronounced) points. Question: How would you describe your current discomfort in the writing hand?
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Muscle pain estimated as determined with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
Subjects will rate their subjectively perceived discomfort in the writing hand prior and after the test battery by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 (strongly pronounced) points. Question: How would you rate the current pain in the writing hand?
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Handwriting speed as determined with a maze task (accuracy based)
Description
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used twice in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as accurately as possible without any time pressure". In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Handwriting speed as determined with a maze task (speed and accuracy based)
Description
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used three times in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as soon as possible, but do not touch the walls"; In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Handwriting speed as determined with a dot in cycle task
Description
One working speed test - named dot in cycle task - is part of the study procedure. Within this test, participants are asked to draw as many dots in a cluster of cycles as possible. This test has already been used for research, and it is characterized by a very easy design. The test instructions for this test are: "Fill in as many dots in the middle of the cycles as possible. Work as fast and accurate as possible. Work from the left to right, beginning in the upper left corner." Similar to the maze tasks, the dot in cycle task consist of a detailed test instruction, the test itself as well as two practice tasks. The execution of these practice tasks must be supervised by a study member to: ensure that the test subject fully understood the tasks, get the possibility to clarify some uncertainties when the test tasks exhibit some uncertainties, reduce practice effects that will occur on the regular task.
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Handwriting speed as determined with a fatigue task
Description
The fatigue task is a simple writing task implemented to induce muscle fatigue. Within this task the test subject is asked to copy a predefined text passage by using the corresponding study pen. As noticeable fatigue occurs only after a certain writing time and intensity, this copying process will last for 15 minutes. In addition, the test subjects are asked to copy as many words as possible within this time frame.
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Positioning accuracy as determined with a maze task (accuracy based)
Description
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used twice in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as accurately as possible without any time pressure". In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Positioning accuracy as determined with a maze task (speed and accuracy based)
Description
Within this assessments, participants are asked to follow a predefined maze task. Overall, the same maze is used three times in different sizes to realize a progressive difficulty. In addition, as muscle fatigue can affect handling accuracy, the most difficult / accuracy maze task is to be put first in the study procedure. The test instruction is: "Cross the maze as soon as possible, but do not touch the walls"; In addition to a detailed test instruction, two practice mazes have to be executed by the test subjects and supervised by a study member. The handling speed (time required to pass the whole maze) as well as the number of errors (lines outside the walls) will be recorded and analyzed by a study member.
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Handwriting performance as determined with the Handwriting Assessment Battery for Adults (HAB)
Description
The "Handwriting Assessment Battery for Adults" is a standardized handwriting assessment exhibiting high intraclass correlations and standardized values for different cohorts. It consists of three main sections containing several items estimating: Pen Control & Manipulation Writing Speed Writing Legibility For the Handwriting Assessment Battery predefined guidelines for data analysis exist.
Time Frame
1 experimental day
Title
Usability as determined with a non-standardized questionaire
Description
The questionnaires used in this study are non-standardized questionnaires consisting of questions with nominal (e.g. yes/no), ordinal (e.g. significantly worse, worse, identical, better, significantly better) or open answers (e.g. "Please state the pros of the product you used in this study"). They were developed to estimate the user experience and satisfaction with the product under investigation as well as its usability. Apart from the regular questions, the questionnaires include a short introduction as well as brief instructions on how to complete them.
Time Frame
1 experimental day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent People aged between 18 and 50 years People free of acute or chronical diseases limiting their handwriting capabilities (e.g. Parkinson, hand/arm amputee) Education level: at least high school diploma People using a handwriting pen > once per week Sufficient German language skills (min. B2 level - Questionnaire language) Exclusion Criteria: People with mental disorders limiting their writing performance People with chronical fatigue syndrome People incapable of concentrating on tasks for more than 30 minutes Non-corrected visual disturbances
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bernhard Schwartz, Dr. MSc BSc
Organizational Affiliation
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
City
Linz
State/Province
Upper Austria
ZIP/Postal Code
4020
Country
Austria

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of an Ergonomic Handwriting Pen - The AWP Pen Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs