search
Back to results

Efficacy of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure (ILEOMESH)

Primary Purpose

Incisional Hernia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Control CT
Clinical Follow Up
Reinforcement with Light Polypropylene Mesh
Sponsored by
Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Incisional Hernia focused on measuring Ileostomy closure, Polypropylene Mesh, Incisional hernia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients operated on in hospitals in Catalunya for loop ileostomy closure after a prior rectal resection for rectal cancer.
  • elective surgery for loop ileostomy closure
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)<4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy or intolerance to polypropilene
  • patients with a prior mesh on the abdominal wall
  • ASA ≥IV
  • patients with a life expectancy of <12 months
  • chronic renal failure in haemodialysis
  • patients on steroid therapy

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Control

    Reinforcement with Mesh

    Arm Description

    Abdominal wall closure will be done by continuous polydioxanone (PDS) suture following a SL:WL ratio of 4:1, and the skin will be closed using a subcutaneous purse-string closure

    Abdominal wall closure will be done by continous polydioxanone (PDS) suture following a SL:WL ratio of 4:1. The incision is reinforced with onlay placement of a light polypropylene mesh (3 cm wide and the length corresponding to the incision), fixed to the aponeurosis with interrupted polyglactin (Vycril) suture. The skin will be closed using a subcutaneous purse-string closure

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Incidence of incisional hernia
    The primary endpoint is the incidence of incisional hernia, either symptomatic or asymptomatic in the mesh and suture-only groups. Because appearance of an incisional hernia occurs within the first months after laparotomy, assessment of efficacy was carried out during scheduled clinical visits over a period of 12 months. The presence of incisional hernia was evaluated by physical examination at scheduled clinical visits and radiologically by an abdominal CT scan performed at the end of follow-up (6 months after operation).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Perioperative complications
    Secondary endpoints are perioperative complications, including wound infection, hematoma, pain and reoperation.
    Quality of life of the patients
    The quality of life was evaluated by the SF-36 Quality of life test, during scheduled clinical visits over a period of 12 months.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 16, 2016
    Last Updated
    September 9, 2016
    Sponsor
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02896686
    Brief Title
    Efficacy of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure
    Acronym
    ILEOMESH
    Official Title
    Multicentric, Prospective, Randomized and Simple Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy of the Placement of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure in Patients With a Prior Rectal Resection for Cancer
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2016
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    October 2016 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    October 2017 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    October 2018 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The aim of the present study is to determine the efficacy of the placement of an onlay mesh to prevent incisional hernia after loop ileostomy closure in patients with a prior rectal resection for cancer
    Detailed Description
    The primary aim of the study is to determine the efficacy of the placement of an onlay mesh for prevention of incisional hernia after loop ileostomy closure in patients with a prior rectal resection for cancer. The efficacy will be evaluated by physical examination 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery and by abdominal CT scan one year after stoma closure. Secondary aims are to evaluate the tolerability and safety of the prothesis; complications, quality of life and the need for further treatments will be compared between the groups. This is a multicentric study that will include patients operated on in hospitals in Catalunya for loop ileostomy closure after a prior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Elective surgery for loop ileostomy closure with ASA<4. Exclusion criteria include patients with allergy or intolerance to polypropilene, with a prior mesh on the abdominal wall, ASA ≥IV, patients with a life expectancy of <12 months, chronic renal failure in haemodialysis and patients on steroid therapy. Patients that agree to participate in the study will be randomized using an electronic formula (Excel) of a uniformly distributed variable assigning case/control randomly until the total number of patients are included. In the control group, after the digestive tract is reconstructed, the closure of the abdominal wall will be performed with a continuous suture of PDS loop 1/0 following Jenkins 4:1 rule and the skin will be closed using a subcutaneous purse-string closure. Patients in the study group will have the same procedure performed, and after the aponeurosis closure with PDS loop, an onlay light polypropilene mesh will be placed. Each participant will have an assigned code depending on the participating Centre that will maintain anonymity at all times. All of the information will be registered in a database specifically designed for the study. Statistical analysis will be performed by a descriptive study of the demographic variables and the incidence of incisional hernia after loop ileostomy closure. A comparative study between the groups will be performed using X2 test for categorical variables and t Student test or U-Mann for continuous variables. A binary logistic regression will also be performed to analyse the influence of each variable and to predict if the interventions produce incisional hernia.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Incisional Hernia
    Keywords
    Ileostomy closure, Polypropylene Mesh, Incisional hernia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Phase 4
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    157 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Control
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Abdominal wall closure will be done by continuous polydioxanone (PDS) suture following a SL:WL ratio of 4:1, and the skin will be closed using a subcutaneous purse-string closure
    Arm Title
    Reinforcement with Mesh
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Abdominal wall closure will be done by continous polydioxanone (PDS) suture following a SL:WL ratio of 4:1. The incision is reinforced with onlay placement of a light polypropylene mesh (3 cm wide and the length corresponding to the incision), fixed to the aponeurosis with interrupted polyglactin (Vycril) suture. The skin will be closed using a subcutaneous purse-string closure
    Intervention Type
    Radiation
    Intervention Name(s)
    Control CT
    Intervention Description
    At the end of the follow up (12 Months) a CT scan will be done. Radiologically the incisional hernia is defined as a solution of continuity of the abdominal wall seen on the abdominal CT scan with the patient at rest. The radiologist is blinded to the patient's history and the technique used for fascial closure.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Clinical Follow Up
    Intervention Description
    The presence of incisional hernia was evaluated by physical examination at scheduled clinical visits (3 and 6 months after surgery) Clinically, an incisional hernia is defined as the presence of a reducible bulge or protrusion at the laparotomy incision scar, palpable during the Valsalva maneuver.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Reinforcement with Light Polypropylene Mesh
    Intervention Description
    Reinforcement with Light Polypropylene Mesh
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Incidence of incisional hernia
    Description
    The primary endpoint is the incidence of incisional hernia, either symptomatic or asymptomatic in the mesh and suture-only groups. Because appearance of an incisional hernia occurs within the first months after laparotomy, assessment of efficacy was carried out during scheduled clinical visits over a period of 12 months. The presence of incisional hernia was evaluated by physical examination at scheduled clinical visits and radiologically by an abdominal CT scan performed at the end of follow-up (6 months after operation).
    Time Frame
    12 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Perioperative complications
    Description
    Secondary endpoints are perioperative complications, including wound infection, hematoma, pain and reoperation.
    Time Frame
    30 days
    Title
    Quality of life of the patients
    Description
    The quality of life was evaluated by the SF-36 Quality of life test, during scheduled clinical visits over a period of 12 months.
    Time Frame
    3, 6 and 12 months after surgery

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: patients operated on in hospitals in Catalunya for loop ileostomy closure after a prior rectal resection for rectal cancer. elective surgery for loop ileostomy closure ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)<4 Exclusion Criteria: allergy or intolerance to polypropilene patients with a prior mesh on the abdominal wall ASA ≥IV patients with a life expectancy of <12 months chronic renal failure in haemodialysis patients on steroid therapy

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Available IPD and Supporting Information:
    Available IPD/Information Type
    Study Protocol
    Available IPD/Information URL
    https://cirurgiahj23.wordpress.com

    Learn more about this trial

    Efficacy of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs