search
Back to results

Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiomyopathy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cardiac MRI taken using contrast agent, Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA)
Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist
Sponsored by
Dipan Shah
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring CAD

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing clinically referred CMR.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are unable to give informed consent.
  2. Individuals with severe claustrophobia.
  3. Individuals unable to lie flat for 90 minutes (the anticipated amount of time to complete the MRI procedure).
  4. Individuals who are pregnant.
  5. Patients with implants or pacemakers.
  6. Patients that have hypersensitivity to components of gadolinium.
  7. Patients with renal failure.
  8. Patients who had any trauma or surgery which may have left ferromagnetic material in the body.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using Dotarem contrast agent

    3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using a Gadovist contrast agent

    Arm Description

    60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Dotarem

    60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Compare visual image quality of LGE-CMR when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
    All LGE-CMR scans scoring for visual image quality using a 5-point scale: 1 = LV myocardium not visible, 2 = severe artifact interfering with ability to visualize LV myocardial borders limiting assessment for presence of LGE (poor), 3 = LV myocardial borders are well delineated but there is moderate artifact affecting ability to identify LGE (fair), 4 = LV myocardium is well delineated with minor artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (good), 5 = LV myocardium well delineated with no artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (excellent).
    Compare quantitative signal enhancement of LGE when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
    Assessment of the intensity of hyperenhancement with Dotarem and Gadovist using a semi-automated computer software.
    Compare association of LGE and clinical cardiovascular outcomes when performed with Dotarem or Gadovistin a randomized fashion.
    Patient screened for outcomes (e.g. acute myocardial infraction, sudden cardiac death, heart failure, stroke, cardiovascular hemorrhage, other death from cardiovascular causes)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 18, 2017
    Last Updated
    January 17, 2019
    Sponsor
    Dipan Shah
    Collaborators
    Guerbet
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03057561
    Brief Title
    Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
    Official Title
    Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Relationship to Outcomes: A Pilot Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    October 1, 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 31, 2020 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    June 30, 2021 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor-Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Dipan Shah
    Collaborators
    Guerbet

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This project is designed to demonstrate equivalence of Dotarem enhanced LGE-CMR (late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI) with Gadoviost enhanced LGE-CMR from the standpoint of visual image quality, quantitative image quality, and association with clinical outcomes.
    Detailed Description
    Gadolinium-containing contrast agents (GdCAs) are intravenous agents used for contrast enhancement with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The GdCAs (gadodiamide, gadopentetic acid, gadobenic acid, gadoxetic acid, gadoteridol, gadobutrol and gadoteric acid) have been in use for few decades for different types of MR scan varying from product to product, including liver, brain, and whole body scan. Recently, there has been a great interest in employing contrast-related techniques to assess for fibrosis in the myocardium of the heart. As opposed to nuclear methods, viability assessment by MRI is a nonstress examination that provides high-resolution detail, including functional assessment of the left ventricle in approximately 30 minutes. Assessment of myocardial viability is performed using 5- to 20-minute delayed, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. On delayed MRI, there is a relatively decreased washout of the gadolinium contrast agent in areas of myocardium that have been replaced by fibrosis or scar. In normal viable myocardium, the gadolinium contrast agent washes out more rapidly than it does from the fibrosis or scar. Since the difference between normal and abnormal myocardium is based on washout kinetics, images that are delayed by 5 to 20 minutes after contrast injection will optimally depict the fibrosis or scar. The differences in gadolinium enhancement on MRI of viable myocardium and fibrosis or scar have been known for many years. Recently, however, MRI pulse sequences have been developed that greatly improve the conspicuity of the enhanced areas of myocardium that have been replaced by fibrosis or scar. The pulse sequence used is an inversion-recovery prepared gradient-echo sequence. In this method, an inversion pulse is used to null the signal from normal myocardium. Myocardium that is replaced by fibrosis or scar retains gadolinium and shows very high signal intensity compared with the suppressed, darker myocardium. Gadovist has been the standard gadolinium contrasts used in the U.S. in CMR imaging for the past few years. On the other hand, Dotarem, a widely used contrast agent in Europe, has been introduced to be used in the U.S. market.The sensitivity of Dotarem to that of Magnevist in determining the location and extent of scar in patients scanned with CMR will be Gadovist in this study. The CMR laboratory at the Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center is one of the largest dedicated CMR laboratories in the U.S. performing 3,000 clinical CMR procedures per year. The laboratory has been in existence since 2008 and is currently equipped with 2 dedicated MRI scanners: 1.5T Siemens Avanto and 3.0T Siemens Verio. Through a research agreement with Siemens Medical Solutions, the laboratory has access to numerous works-in progress sequences as they are developed. The laboratory is equipped with an MRI compatible patient monitoring system, infusion pump, and power injector and is staffed by a team of 5 dedicated CMR technologists, 2 clinical nurses, 1 CMR fellow, an MRI scientist, and 2 attending cardiologists. One hundred twenty patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease will be recruited for this study. Patients will be randomized (in a 1:1 fashion) to receive either Dotarem or Gadovist for LGE-CMR such that there will be 60 patients in the Dotarem cohort and 60 patients in the Gadovist cohort.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiomyopathy
    Keywords
    CAD

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Model Description
    Evaluating the efficacy of Dotarem enhanced MRI compared to Gadovist enhanced MRI in identifying myocardial fibrosis. Patients will be randomized (in a 1:1 fashion) to receive either Dotarem or Gadovist for LGE-CMR such that there will be 60 patients in the Dotarem cohort and 60 patients in the Gadovist cohort
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Blinded reader of scans will not know whether subject received Dotarem or Gadovist.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    120 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using Dotarem contrast agent
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Dotarem
    Arm Title
    3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using a Gadovist contrast agent
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Cardiac MRI taken using contrast agent, Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA)
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Cardiac MRI with contrast, CMR with tracer or contrast agent, Dotarem (Gd-DOTA) contrast agent
    Intervention Description
    Gadolinium based contrast agent used in cardiac MRI scanning using 3.0 Tesla MRI
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Cardiac MRI with contrast, CMR with tracer or contrast agent, Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) contast agent
    Intervention Description
    Brand of Gd-DO3A-butrol; contrast agent used in cardiac MRI scanning using 3.0 Tesla MRI
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Compare visual image quality of LGE-CMR when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
    Description
    All LGE-CMR scans scoring for visual image quality using a 5-point scale: 1 = LV myocardium not visible, 2 = severe artifact interfering with ability to visualize LV myocardial borders limiting assessment for presence of LGE (poor), 3 = LV myocardial borders are well delineated but there is moderate artifact affecting ability to identify LGE (fair), 4 = LV myocardium is well delineated with minor artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (good), 5 = LV myocardium well delineated with no artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (excellent).
    Time Frame
    Two years
    Title
    Compare quantitative signal enhancement of LGE when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
    Description
    Assessment of the intensity of hyperenhancement with Dotarem and Gadovist using a semi-automated computer software.
    Time Frame
    Two Years
    Title
    Compare association of LGE and clinical cardiovascular outcomes when performed with Dotarem or Gadovistin a randomized fashion.
    Description
    Patient screened for outcomes (e.g. acute myocardial infraction, sudden cardiac death, heart failure, stroke, cardiovascular hemorrhage, other death from cardiovascular causes)
    Time Frame
    Eight years

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing clinically referred CMR. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are unable to give informed consent. Individuals with severe claustrophobia. Individuals unable to lie flat for 90 minutes (the anticipated amount of time to complete the MRI procedure). Individuals who are pregnant. Patients with implants or pacemakers. Patients that have hypersensitivity to components of gadolinium. Patients with renal failure. Patients who had any trauma or surgery which may have left ferromagnetic material in the body.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Dipan Shah, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided

    Learn more about this trial

    Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs