search
Back to results

Efficacy of Dry Needling in Plantar Fasciitis

Primary Purpose

Fasciitis, Plantar

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Physical therapy modalities
Invasive Physical therapy modalities
Sponsored by
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fasciitis, Plantar focused on measuring Fasciosis plantar, physiotherapy, fascitis plantar, dry needling

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ultrasonographic study in which a proximal thickened affected plantar fascia is observed -greater than or equal to 4 mm.
  • Pain fell to the first steps in the morning.
  • Pain with palpation at the insertion of the medial calcaneal tubercle, above 5, in a 10-point VAS.
  • Pathology time evolution of greater than or equal to 4 weeks.
  • Age of patients over 18 years.
  • Acceptance by the patient to participate in the study, having signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of neoplastic disease.
  • Presence of neurological, sensory, orthopedic and / or surgical alterations.
  • The patient is already doing treatment of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
  • Be subjected to antiplatelet drug therapy.
  • Fear of needles (needle phobia).
  • Difficulty for the patient to understand the instructions to be followed during the study.

Sites / Locations

  • Clínica Universitaria de Podología de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Physical therapy modalities

Invasive Physical therapy modalities

Arm Description

Manual therapy techniques aimed to relaxed gastrocnemius and soleus muscles tone, movilizations, stretching and home exercises.

Manual therapy techniques aimed to relaxed gastrocnemius and soleus muscles tone, movilizations, stretching and home exercises. Previously, DN will be applied in gastrocnemius and soleus muscles.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values.Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extened.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.

Full Information

First Posted
May 27, 2015
Last Updated
August 25, 2020
Sponsor
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02467465
Brief Title
Efficacy of Dry Needling in Plantar Fasciitis
Official Title
Efficacy of Dry Needling in Plantar Fasciitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The plantar fasciitis (PF) is the most common cause of pain on the underside of the heel. About 10% to 20% of the population suffer once during their lifetime. PF concept began to describe at the end of XX century through the discovery of new clinical and histopathological signs of the plantar fascia. The difficulty of diagnosis, understanding and treatment of PF require us to develop new treatment avenues to improve the approach and the understanding of it. Dry needling (DN) as a treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and myofascial trigger points (MTP) of muscle associated with the pathology, it may be a good treatment strategy, as demonstrated in the treatment of MPS in other body regions such as the neck, shoulder or the lumbar spine.
Detailed Description
Hypothesis: Add dry needling to a physiotherapy intervention, increases the efficacy of treatment for plantar fasciosis. Objectives: General: Test the efficacy of DN in addition to physiotherapy treatment includes: manual therapy and home exercises; directed to normalize muscle tone and inhibit MTP of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, in a group of patients who have been diagnosed with PF. The variables to measure the efficacy are: Pain assessment in the affected heel, by visual analog scale (VAS). Ultrasonographic assessment of the thickness of the plantar fascia affected, in longitudinal view, compared with the contralateral. Goniometric assessment of joint range of ankle dorsiflexion, compared with the contralateral. Specific: Analyze the efficacy of the combination of DN treatment with manual therapy and home exercise, in patients who have been diagnosed with PF through monitoring and comparison between groups. Methodology: Type of study: clinical trial. Sample: It has been used sample size calculator GRANMO version 7.12, and accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2, 15 subjects were required in the first group and 15 in the second to detect a difference equal to or greater than 0.6 units. It is assumed that the common standard deviation is 0.57. It has been estimated loss rate of 0%. population: patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PF, who agree to participate in the study after signing the informed consent and carry out the selection criteria. Sample: It has been used sample size calculator GRANMO version 7.12, and accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2, 15 subjects were required in the first group and 15 in the second to detect a difference equal to or greater than 0.6 units. It is assumed that the common standard deviation is 0.57. It has been estimated loss rate of 0%. Selection criteria: Ultrasonographic study in which a proximal thickened affected plantar fascia is observed greater than or equal to 4 mm. Pain fell to the first steps in the morning. Pain with palpation at the insertion of the medial calcaneal tubercle, above 5, in a 10-point VAS. Pathology time evolution of greater than or equal to 4 weeks. Age of patients over 18 years. Acceptance by the patient to participate in the study, having signed the informed consent. Absence of neoplastic disease. Absence of neurological, sensory, orthopedic and / or surgical alterations. The patient is already doing treatment of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Be subjected to antiplatelet drug therapy. Fear of needles (needle phobia). Difficulty for the patient to understand the instructions to be followed during the study. Methods of collecting information: Personal data for each patient and relevant to the study, collected in a protocolized questionnaire, as well as an Excel sheet. All this in a personal history, encoded according to a table of alphanumeric equivalents, allowing subsequent statistical analysis with SPSS19.0 program. Statistical method: Initially, a descriptive statistical analysis will be conducted: qualitative variables were summarized by frequency distribution and quantitative by its average and standard deviation. Also it summarizes the information graphically using box plots, bar charts and pie charts. Furthermore an inferential analysis using parametric or non-parametric techniques, particularly for the main objective analysis of variance was used in two groups (assuming a normal distribution for the variable response) U test or Mann-Whitney will be made in the case lack of normal. To study the response variables in each test group the Student t test or unimuestral averages Wilcoxon signed ranks for related samples was used. For the analysis of qualitative variables the test of Chi-square test and the association between quantitative variables will be analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficients and Spearman. To test these significant differences in values of p <0.05 was assumed. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software SPSS v19.0

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fasciitis, Plantar
Keywords
Fasciosis plantar, physiotherapy, fascitis plantar, dry needling

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Physical therapy modalities
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Manual therapy techniques aimed to relaxed gastrocnemius and soleus muscles tone, movilizations, stretching and home exercises.
Arm Title
Invasive Physical therapy modalities
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Manual therapy techniques aimed to relaxed gastrocnemius and soleus muscles tone, movilizations, stretching and home exercises. Previously, DN will be applied in gastrocnemius and soleus muscles.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Physical therapy modalities
Intervention Description
Massage, movilization of ankle dorsiflexion and improve flexibility with stretching of calf muscles.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Invasive Physical therapy modalities
Intervention Description
Dry needling added to massage, movilization of ankle dorsiflexion and improve flexibility with stretching of calf muscles.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Description
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.
Time Frame
1 day.
Title
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Description
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Description
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.
Time Frame
3 month
Title
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View.
Description
Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken.
Time Frame
6 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
1 day.
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
3 month
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
6 month
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
3 month
Title
Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale.
Description
Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain.
Time Frame
6 month
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values.Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extened.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
3 month
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
6 month
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
3 month
Title
Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed.
Description
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees.
Time Frame
6 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ultrasonographic study in which a proximal thickened affected plantar fascia is observed -greater than or equal to 4 mm. Pain fell to the first steps in the morning. Pain with palpation at the insertion of the medial calcaneal tubercle, above 5, in a 10-point VAS. Pathology time evolution of greater than or equal to 4 weeks. Age of patients over 18 years. Acceptance by the patient to participate in the study, having signed the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of neoplastic disease. Presence of neurological, sensory, orthopedic and / or surgical alterations. The patient is already doing treatment of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Be subjected to antiplatelet drug therapy. Fear of needles (needle phobia). Difficulty for the patient to understand the instructions to be followed during the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Suárez Miguel, Physician
Organizational Affiliation
Principal Investigator
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clínica Universitaria de Podología de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Dry Needling in Plantar Fasciitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs