search
Back to results

Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies on Migraine: a Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled Study. (HOMEOMIG)

Primary Purpose

Migraine

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Argentina
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Individualized Homeopathic Remedy
Placebo
Sponsored by
Hospital General de Agudos Bernardino Rivadavia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Migraine focused on measuring Migraine, Homeopathy, Individualized, Triple blind, Randomized, Clinical trial, headache

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with certified diagnosis of migraine with or with out aura of at least one year of evolution according to the Subcommittee of Headaches Classification of the International Headache Association 3rd edition (ICHD-III)
  • Patients receiving acute or preventive standardized pharmacological treatment for migraine for at least one year prior to study inclusion
  • Patients do not have chronic migraine defined as Headache occurring on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months, which has the features of migraine headache on at least 8 days per month (ICHD-III)
  • Patients meeting ICHD-III criteria of probable medication overuse headache (MOH)
  • Female patients in reproductive age that are correctly using a standardized contraceptive method
  • Participants who are able to maintain a prospectively collected simple headache diary

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under standardized pharmacological treatment who have significantly (>50%) added or modified migraine preventive drugs doses within 3 months prior to study baseline
  • Patients who have initiated or significantly (>50%) modified doses of any drug for any chronic treatment with any agent with proven analgesic action or psychiatric action (antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, etc) or neurological action (anticonvulsivants, antiparkinsonians, etc) within 3 months prior to study baseline
  • Patients suffering any cause of secondary headache like trauma, metabolic or vascular disorders, non vascular intracranial lesions, abuse of alcohol or other psychoactive substances.
  • Pregnant or probably pregnant patients according to date of last menstruation referred by the patient of more than 35 days in women with regular cycles or plasma beta sub-unit of human chorionic gonadotrophin in women with irregular menstrual cycles
  • Patients with history of anaphylaxis, non controlled diabetes, severe disorders being neurological, cardiac, pulmonary and/or hepatic as well as psychosis or suicide ideation and/or attempts.
  • Patients with other acute or chronic pain disorders, history of hemiplegic migraine or migraine with brain stem aura, history of cerebral-vascular accident, convulsions, severe coronary disease, non controlled hypertension or cognitive dysfunctions.
  • Patients not meeting homeopathic clinical criteria of High Pathological Similitude defined as an homeopathic previous success probability for the selected homeopathic remedy of of 5 to 7 points in a probability scale of 1 to 7

    • NOTE: Please contact the investigator for additional information about Homeopathic criteria

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Bernardino RivadaviaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Individualized Homeopathic Remedy plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment

Placebo plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment

Arm Description

Each subject receives an individually selected homeopathic remedy (individualized homeopathic remedy) as an add on to the conventional standardized pharmacological treatment he/she is receiving prior and during study. Standardized pharmacological treatment will be monitored and approved at first hospital neurological visit and as a requirement needs to be unchanged within 3 months prior inclusion and throughout the study.

Subjects receive an indistinguishable placebo plus the conventional standardized pharmacological treatment he/she is receiving prior and during study. Standardized pharmacological treatment will be monitored and approved at first hospital neurological visit and as a requirement needs to be unchanged within 3 months prior inclusion and throughout the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of migraine attacks
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measuring the change in the number of weekly migraine attacks comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Number of migraine days
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measuring the change in the number of monthly migraine days comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Responder in frequency of migraine attacks
Number of subjects achieving diminution in more than 50% of migraine attacks per month comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo
Responder in quantity of migraine days
Number of subjects achieving diminution in more than 50% of migraine days per month comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo

Secondary Outcome Measures

Migraine acute medication usage doses
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measured by the change of the required doses of standard pharmacological acute migraine drugs comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Assess the change in MSQ Questionnaire scores from baseline to end of treatment period versus placebo.

Full Information

First Posted
July 10, 2022
Last Updated
July 18, 2022
Sponsor
Hospital General de Agudos Bernardino Rivadavia
Collaborators
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05468801
Brief Title
Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies on Migraine: a Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled Study.
Acronym
HOMEOMIG
Official Title
Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies With High Grade of Pathological Similarity vs Conventional Standardized Pharmacological Treatment in Patients With Migraine.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 1, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital General de Agudos Bernardino Rivadavia
Collaborators
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Migraine, a chronic and often lifelong neurological disorder, is the second leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. To reduce this global burden, concerted efforts are needed to implement and improve migraine health-care policies. Several observational studies showed significant improvement of different headaches types with homeopathy. The purpose of this study is the assessment of the efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies (specific remedies for each patient) versus Conventional pharmacological treatment in patients with migraine.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in adult subjects with diagnosis of migraine with or without aura. All patients will be assessed in a screening visit at the Study Hospital Dept. of Neurology in order to confirm and certify migraine diagnosis and evaluate correctness and stability of usual acute and preventive standardized pharmacological treatment. Patients will fulfill a 30 day baseline period to monitor headache activity, migraine related symptoms, and medication usage. Subjects agreeing to participate in the study and meeting clinical-neurological eligibility criteria will then assist to a first homeopathic consultation to assess viability of homeopathic treatment and selection of the individualized homeopathic remedy. Patients who meet both neurological and homeopathic inclusion criteria will begin a three month treatment phase. An estimated of 72 patients, calculated according to the Open-Epi program ((c) 2003, 2008 Andrew G. Dean and Kevin M. Sullivan, Atlanta, GA, USA) , will be randomized according to statistics Epidat Program (4.2 version, july 2016 Panamerican Health Organization (PHO-WHO); to receive Individualized homeopathic treatment + standard pharmacological treatment OR unidentified placebo + standard pharmacological treatment. Study homeopathic remedy or placebo will be administered for a minimum period of 12 weeks with control visits every 4 weeks to assess neurological and homeopathic evolution, adherence and possible adverse events. During the study period patients will continue filling the migraine diary collecting frequency, length and type of headaches, acute medication usage and migraine associated symptoms. At the end of treatment, a final clinical homeopathic visit will take place as well as a final Neurological visit at study Hospital. Hospital visits are independent of clinical visits and performed by different study physicians. After conclusion of treatment phase patients will have three more follow up visits for the assessment of clinical and homeopathic evolution, possible adverse events and general satisfaction with the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Migraine
Keywords
Migraine, Homeopathy, Individualized, Triple blind, Randomized, Clinical trial, headache

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Remedy vials will be filled according randomized allocation in 2 number sets; one for the experimental group and two for the control group. Randomization information will be kept by the Study pharmaceutical responsible who will be the only person in possession of the sequence from the beginning of the study. Only the pharmaceutical responsible will have access to the randomization codes during the study and only in case of clinical emergency can break the code of an individual patient. The pharmaceutical responsible will never have any direct nor indirect contact with the study subjects. The The study statistician/s will be masked.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Individualized Homeopathic Remedy plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Each subject receives an individually selected homeopathic remedy (individualized homeopathic remedy) as an add on to the conventional standardized pharmacological treatment he/she is receiving prior and during study. Standardized pharmacological treatment will be monitored and approved at first hospital neurological visit and as a requirement needs to be unchanged within 3 months prior inclusion and throughout the study.
Arm Title
Placebo plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects receive an indistinguishable placebo plus the conventional standardized pharmacological treatment he/she is receiving prior and during study. Standardized pharmacological treatment will be monitored and approved at first hospital neurological visit and as a requirement needs to be unchanged within 3 months prior inclusion and throughout the study.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Individualized Homeopathic Remedy
Intervention Description
An individualized homeopathic remedy selected for each subject according clinical homeopathic parameters will be administered daily in the form of oral globules as an add on to conventional treatment.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo plus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of migraine attacks
Description
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measuring the change in the number of weekly migraine attacks comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Time Frame
Baseline - Month 3
Title
Number of migraine days
Description
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measuring the change in the number of monthly migraine days comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Time Frame
Baseline - Month 3
Title
Responder in frequency of migraine attacks
Description
Number of subjects achieving diminution in more than 50% of migraine attacks per month comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo
Time Frame
Baseline - Month 3
Title
Responder in quantity of migraine days
Description
Number of subjects achieving diminution in more than 50% of migraine days per month comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo
Time Frame
Baseline - Month 3
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Migraine acute medication usage doses
Description
Assess the efficacy of chosen individualized homeopathic remedy in the preventive treatment of migraine, measured by the change of the required doses of standard pharmacological acute migraine drugs comparing baseline to the final month of the 3-month treatment period versus placebo.
Time Frame
Baseline - Month 3
Title
Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ)
Description
Assess the change in MSQ Questionnaire scores from baseline to end of treatment period versus placebo.
Time Frame
Baseline - Month 3

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with certified diagnosis of migraine with or with out aura of at least one year of evolution according to the Subcommittee of Headaches Classification of the International Headache Association 3rd edition (ICHD-III) Patients receiving acute or preventive standardized pharmacological treatment for migraine for at least one year prior to study inclusion Patients do not have chronic migraine defined as Headache occurring on 15 or more days per month for more than 3 months, which has the features of migraine headache on at least 8 days per month (ICHD-III) Patients meeting ICHD-III criteria of probable medication overuse headache (MOH) Female patients in reproductive age that are correctly using a standardized contraceptive method Participants who are able to maintain a prospectively collected simple headache diary Exclusion Criteria: Patients under standardized pharmacological treatment who have significantly (>50%) added or modified migraine preventive drugs doses within 3 months prior to study baseline Patients who have initiated or significantly (>50%) modified doses of any drug for any chronic treatment with any agent with proven analgesic action or psychiatric action (antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, etc) or neurological action (anticonvulsivants, antiparkinsonians, etc) within 3 months prior to study baseline Patients suffering any cause of secondary headache like trauma, metabolic or vascular disorders, non vascular intracranial lesions, abuse of alcohol or other psychoactive substances. Pregnant or probably pregnant patients according to date of last menstruation referred by the patient of more than 35 days in women with regular cycles or plasma beta sub-unit of human chorionic gonadotrophin in women with irregular menstrual cycles Patients with history of anaphylaxis, non controlled diabetes, severe disorders being neurological, cardiac, pulmonary and/or hepatic as well as psychosis or suicide ideation and/or attempts. Patients with other acute or chronic pain disorders, history of hemiplegic migraine or migraine with brain stem aura, history of cerebral-vascular accident, convulsions, severe coronary disease, non controlled hypertension or cognitive dysfunctions. Patients not meeting homeopathic clinical criteria of High Pathological Similitude defined as an homeopathic previous success probability for the selected homeopathic remedy of of 5 to 7 points in a probability scale of 1 to 7 NOTE: Please contact the investigator for additional information about Homeopathic criteria
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Samuel M Arrues, MD
Phone
+5411 5805 4524
Email
samuelarrues@yahoo.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Daniel Gutierrez, MD
Phone
+54 11 4416-7477
Email
danielgutierrezbue@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samuel M Arrues, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Researcher
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Bernardino Rivadavia
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
1425
Country
Argentina
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samuel M Arrues, MD
Phone
+54 115 805 4524
Email
samuelarrues@yahoo.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel A Gutierrez, MD
Phone
+54 9 11 4416-7477
Email
Danielgutierrezbue@gmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After study conclusion individual participant data will be shared, specifically 1- clinical and neurological evolution previous to entering the study; 2- previous treatments; 3- bio psycho social and homeopathic relevant data pre and post treatment period to help understand homeopathic remedy action.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available 6 months after study termination, for a 12 months period.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data will be shared via e-mail.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29504482
Citation
Tassorelli C, Diener HC, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M, Becker WJ, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang SJ; International Headache Society Clinical Trials Standing Committee. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 2018 Apr;38(5):815-832. doi: 10.1177/0333102418758283. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23771276
Citation
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8418405
Citation
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):246-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280406.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15751329
Citation
Steinsbekk A, Ludtke R. Patients' assessments of the effectiveness of homeopathic care in Norway: a prospective observational multicentre outcome study. Homeopathy. 2005 Jan;94(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.11.016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25480654
Citation
Mathie RT, Lloyd SM, Legg LA, Clausen J, Moss S, Davidson JR, Ford I. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 6;3:142. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-142.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26678738
Citation
Mathie RT. Controlled clinical studies of homeopathy. Homeopathy. 2015 Oct;104(4):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2015.05.003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23596996
Citation
Kristoffersen ES, Aaseth K, Grande RB, Lundqvist C, Russell MB. Self-reported efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine: the Akershus study of chronic headache. J Headache Pain. 2013 Apr 18;14(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-36.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22978244
Citation
Danno K, Colas A, Masson JL, Bordet MF. Homeopathic treatment of migraine in children: results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Feb;19(2):119-23. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0821. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19674623
Citation
Owen JM, Green BN. Homeopathic treatment of headaches: a systematic review of the literature. J Chiropr Med. 2004 Spring;3(2):45-52. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60085-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22510227
Citation
Mathie RT, Roniger H, Van Wassenhoven M, Frye J, Jacobs J, Oberbaum M, Bordet MF, Nayak C, Chaufferin G, Ives JA, Dantas F, Fisher P. Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Apr 17;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-49.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14734789
Citation
Bell IR, Lewis DA 2nd, Brooks AJ, Schwartz GE, Lewis SE, Walsh BT, Baldwin CM. Improved clinical status in fibromyalgia patients treated with individualized homeopathic remedies versus placebo. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 May;43(5):577-82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh111. Epub 2004 Jan 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12371444
Citation
Aghadiuno M. A study of the inter-observer reliability of paper case analysis. Homeopathy. 2002 Jan;91(1):10-7. doi: 10.1054/homp.2001.0016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15287431
Citation
Brien S, Prescott P, Owen D, Lewith G. How do homeopaths make decisions? An exploratory study of inter-rater reliability and intuition in the decision making process. Homeopathy. 2004 Jul;93(3):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2004.04.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17015195
Citation
Souter K. Heuristics and bias in homeopathy. Homeopathy. 2006 Oct;95(4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2006.07.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23245607
Citation
Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basanez MG, Baxter A, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bernabe E, Bhalla K, Bhandari B, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Black JA, Blencowe H, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Bonaventure A, Boufous S, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Braithwaite T, Brayne C, Bridgett L, Brooker S, Brooks P, Brugha TS, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, Buchbinder R, Buckle G, Budke CM, Burch M, Burney P, Burstein R, Calabria B, Campbell B, Canter CE, Carabin H, Carapetis J, Carmona L, Cella C, Charlson F, Chen H, Cheng AT, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahiya M, Dahodwala N, Damsere-Derry J, Danaei G, Davis A, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Dellavalle R, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Derrett S, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dherani M, Diaz-Torne C, Dolk H, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Edmond K, Elbaz A, Ali SE, Erskine H, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ewoigbokhan SE, Farzadfar F, Feigin V, Felson DT, Ferrari A, Ferri CP, Fevre EM, Finucane MM, Flaxman S, Flood L, Foreman K, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Franklin R, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabbe BJ, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Ganatra HA, Garcia B, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gmel G, Gosselin R, Grainger R, Groeger J, Guillemin F, Gunnell D, Gupta R, Haagsma J, Hagan H, Halasa YA, Hall W, Haring D, Haro JM, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Higashi H, Hill C, Hoen B, Hoffman H, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Huang JJ, Ibeanusi SE, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jarvis D, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Jonas JB, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Kawakami N, Keren A, Khoo JP, King CH, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Lalloo R, Laslett LL, Lathlean T, Leasher JL, Lee YY, Leigh J, Lim SS, Limb E, Lin JK, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Liu W, Loane M, Ohno SL, Lyons R, Ma J, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Malekzadeh R, Mallinger L, Manivannan S, Marcenes W, March L, Margolis DJ, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGill N, McGrath J, Medina-Mora ME, Meltzer M, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Meyer AC, Miglioli V, Miller M, Miller TR, Mitchell PB, Mocumbi AO, Moffitt TE, Mokdad AA, Monasta L, Montico M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Moran A, Morawska L, Mori R, Murdoch ME, Mwaniki MK, Naidoo K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nelson PK, Nelson RG, Nevitt MC, Newton CR, Nolte S, Norman P, Norman R, O'Donnell M, O'Hanlon S, Olives C, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Page A, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Patten SB, Pearce N, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Pesudovs K, Phillips D, Phillips MR, Pierce K, Pion S, Polanczyk GV, Polinder S, Pope CA 3rd, Popova S, Porrini E, Pourmalek F, Prince M, Pullan RL, Ramaiah KD, Ranganathan D, Razavi H, Regan M, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Richardson K, Rivara FP, Roberts T, Robinson C, De Leon FR, Ronfani L, Room R, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Saha S, Sampson U, Sanchez-Riera L, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Scott JG, Segui-Gomez M, Shahraz S, Shepard DS, Shin H, Shivakoti R, Singh D, Singh GM, Singh JA, Singleton J, Sleet DA, Sliwa K, Smith E, Smith JL, Stapelberg NJ, Steer A, Steiner T, Stolk WA, Stovner LJ, Sudfeld C, Syed S, Tamburlini G, Tavakkoli M, Taylor HR, Taylor JA, Taylor WJ, Thomas B, Thomson WM, Thurston GD, Tleyjeh IM, Tonelli M, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Tsilimbaris MK, Ubeda C, Undurraga EA, van der Werf MJ, van Os J, Vavilala MS, Venketasubramanian N, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weatherall DJ, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Weisskopf MG, Weissman MM, White RA, Whiteford H, Wiersma ST, Wilkinson JD, Williams HC, Williams SR, Witt E, Wolfe F, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Zaidi AK, Zheng ZJ, Zonies D, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2163-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2. Erratum In: Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):628. AlMazroa, Mohammad A [added]; Memish, Ziad A [added].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24372457
Citation
Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Jan;20(1):22-33. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27261996
Citation
Stub T, Musial F, Kristoffersen AA, Alraek T, Liu J. Adverse effects of homeopathy, what do we know? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2016 Jun;26:146-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33773613
Citation
Ashina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, Buse DC, Pozo-Rosich P, Ozge A, Krymchantowski AV, Lebedeva ER, Ravishankar K, Yu S, Sacco S, Ashina S, Younis S, Steiner TJ, Lipton RB. Migraine: epidemiology and systems of care. Lancet. 2021 Apr 17;397(10283):1485-1495. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32160-7. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Remedies on Migraine: a Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled Study.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs