search
Back to results

Efficacy of Injection Therapy for Lateral Epicondylosis

Primary Purpose

Tennis Elbow

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dextrose prolotherapy
PrT-DMS
Platelet Rich Plasma injection
Sponsored by
University of Wisconsin, Madison
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tennis Elbow focused on measuring prolotherapy, Platelet rich plasma, tennis elbow, lateral epicondylosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age 18-65 years
  2. diagnosis of CLE, confirmed by the PI using clinical symptoms and exam findings of tenderness over the lateral epicondyle and/or extensor tendon, and pain on 2 extensor muscle provocation tests
  3. self-reported CLE-related pain for at least 6 months
  4. self-reported failure of at least 2 of the 3 most common treatments for CLE (a course of NSAIDS, physical therapy or corticosteroid injections).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. current bilateral CLE
  2. a corticosteroid injection in the prior 3 months or prior PrT or PRP for CLE
  3. current carpal tunnel syndrome, other elbow pathology, or acute trauma of the CLE-affected upper extremity
  4. self-reported history of bleeding disorders, other hematologic conditions, inflammatory arthritis, systemic nervous system disease, upper extremity surgeries or neuropathy
  5. current use of opioids for pain
  6. anticoagulation or immunosuppressive therapy in the prior month
  7. intent to use NSAIDs or steroids
  8. known allergy to dextrose, acetaminophen or lidocaine
  9. MRI contraindications: non-compatible metal in the CLE-affected upper extremity or severe claustrophobia
  10. unresolved litigation
  11. self-reported pregnancy. Pregnant women are excluded from the study because pregnancy changes the characteristics of connective tissue including ligaments and tendons associated with CLE and, so, is an unacceptable confounder in this pilot level study. There is no report however, about dextrose, morrhuate sodium or PrT being harmful to pregnant women. Therefore we will not draw confirmatory labs to ensure that women of childbearing age are not pregnant. Rather we will accept self-report on pregnancy status at the time of consent. If a woman becomes pregnant during the study she will be dropped from the study.

Sites / Locations

  • Northeast Family Medical Center
  • University of Wisconsin General Clinical Research Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

PrT-DMS

PrT-D

Waitlist

Platelet rich plasma

Arm Description

1.0 mL 5% morrhuate sodium + 1.5 mL 50% dextrose, 1 mL 2% lidocaine and 3.5 mL normal saline.

PrT-D solution is 4 mL 50% dextrose, 3 mL normal saline, and 2 mL 2% lidocaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE)
Validated disease specific quality of life questionnaire conducted at 0, 16 (all subjects) and 32 weeks (PrT only).The PRTEE will assess elbow related quality of life at each of the specified time points. Change in quality of life score in the study groups over time will be compared.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Biomedical (grip strength), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Pain-free- and maximum-grip strengths will be using a hand dynamometer, a simple squeeze device with which the force of the subject's grip strength is recorded.US and MRI will be obtained at baseline and 16 weeks.

Full Information

First Posted
October 25, 2011
Last Updated
February 14, 2019
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01476605
Brief Title
Efficacy of Injection Therapy for Lateral Epicondylosis
Official Title
The Efficacy of Prolotherapy and Platelet Rich Plasma Injections for Lateral Epicondylosis: a Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
While evidence does not identify any conventional therapy as definitive for chronic lateral epicondylosis (CLE, tennis elbow), basic science and limited pilot level trials support rigorous assessment of prolotherapy (PrT) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as therapy for CLE. The proposed study will conduct a pilot RCT assessing 2 PrT solutions and PRP injections commonly used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe tennis elbow using clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes. Data from this study will support a future confirmatory study to find an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe tennis elbow. In support of this goal, the investigators propose the following research questions. Does PrT or PRP, compared to waitlist control: improve pain- and function-dependent, CLE-specific quality of life among adults with CLE, as assessed by a validated questionnaire, the elbow-specific Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation? improve upper extremity performance among adults with CLE as assessed by a blinded assessor using elbow-specific, effort-dependent biomechanical measures of grip strength (pain-free and maximal), stiffness, effective mass and damping improve the radiologic appearance of several pathologic features of CLE as evaluated using imaging studies of lateral elbow structures: ultrasound to assess a) neovascularity (color Doppler), b) hypoechogenicity (grayscale US), and c) tendon stiffness ("acousto-elastic strain gauge" technique) using standardized, 0-3 severity scales, and d) MRI to assess the overall common extensor tensor tendon disease severity using a standardized 0-3 scale? provide satisfying treatment to subjects as assessed by a treatment satisfaction survey and a qualitative exit interview?
Detailed Description
CLE is a prevalent, disabling condition with significant individual and societal costs. The incidence of CLE is increasing. CLE is often refractory to care. There is limited scientific evidence to support specific therapies. PrT and PRP show promise as effective therapy for CLE that can be performed in the primary care setting. Pilot-level RCTs of PrT and PRP for CLE have reported large absolute effect sizes. Findings from invitro and animal studies are consistent with the results of clinical trials and suggest that both therapies can improve clinical outcomes and modify disease in CLE. However, prior research is limited by lack of methodological rigor, non-validated outcome measures and lack of integrated multidisciplinary outcome measures. Positive trends in the proposed study would suggest the effect size of PrT and PRP for CLE, and allow the calculation of a robust sample size to power an R01 study, and pilot test the use of an integrated set of outcome measures. Statistically significant positive results on clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes would demonstrate that PrT and PRP can treat, modify the disease of and may be a cure for CLE. Such findings would provide enormous benefits to patients through improved quality of life, reduced pain and disability, and to industry and society at large through reduced workers' injury claims and absenteeism.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tennis Elbow
Keywords
prolotherapy, Platelet rich plasma, tennis elbow, lateral epicondylosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
31 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PrT-DMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
1.0 mL 5% morrhuate sodium + 1.5 mL 50% dextrose, 1 mL 2% lidocaine and 3.5 mL normal saline.
Arm Title
PrT-D
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PrT-D solution is 4 mL 50% dextrose, 3 mL normal saline, and 2 mL 2% lidocaine
Arm Title
Waitlist
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Title
Platelet rich plasma
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Dextrose prolotherapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
dextrose
Intervention Description
PrT-D solution is 4 mL 50% dextrose, 3 mL normal saline, and 2 mL 2% lidocaine
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
PrT-DMS
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dextrose and Morrhuate sodium PrT
Intervention Description
PrT-DMS. 1.0 mL 5% morrhuate sodium + 1.5 mL 50% dextrose, 1 mL 2% lidocaine and 3.5 mL normal saline.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Platelet Rich Plasma injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Platelet rich plasma
Intervention Description
Platelet rich plasma injection therapy (PRP) uses components of autologous blood to promote healing in chronically diseased joint tissues.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE)
Description
Validated disease specific quality of life questionnaire conducted at 0, 16 (all subjects) and 32 weeks (PrT only).The PRTEE will assess elbow related quality of life at each of the specified time points. Change in quality of life score in the study groups over time will be compared.
Time Frame
0, 16 and 32 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Biomedical (grip strength), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Description
Pain-free- and maximum-grip strengths will be using a hand dynamometer, a simple squeeze device with which the force of the subject's grip strength is recorded.US and MRI will be obtained at baseline and 16 weeks.
Time Frame
0 and 16 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: age 18-65 years diagnosis of CLE, confirmed by the PI using clinical symptoms and exam findings of tenderness over the lateral epicondyle and/or extensor tendon, and pain on 2 extensor muscle provocation tests self-reported CLE-related pain for at least 6 months self-reported failure of at least 2 of the 3 most common treatments for CLE (a course of NSAIDS, physical therapy or corticosteroid injections). Exclusion Criteria: current bilateral CLE a corticosteroid injection in the prior 3 months or prior PrT or PRP for CLE current carpal tunnel syndrome, other elbow pathology, or acute trauma of the CLE-affected upper extremity self-reported history of bleeding disorders, other hematologic conditions, inflammatory arthritis, systemic nervous system disease, upper extremity surgeries or neuropathy current use of opioids for pain anticoagulation or immunosuppressive therapy in the prior month intent to use NSAIDs or steroids known allergy to dextrose, acetaminophen or lidocaine MRI contraindications: non-compatible metal in the CLE-affected upper extremity or severe claustrophobia unresolved litigation self-reported pregnancy. Pregnant women are excluded from the study because pregnancy changes the characteristics of connective tissue including ligaments and tendons associated with CLE and, so, is an unacceptable confounder in this pilot level study. There is no report however, about dextrose, morrhuate sodium or PrT being harmful to pregnant women. Therefore we will not draw confirmatory labs to ensure that women of childbearing age are not pregnant. Rather we will accept self-report on pregnancy status at the time of consent. If a woman becomes pregnant during the study she will be dropped from the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David P Rabago, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Wisconsin, Department of Family Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Wilson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
UW Dept of Family Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Northeast Family Medical Center
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53704
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin General Clinical Research Center
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53792
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.fammed.wisc.edu
Description
University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Injection Therapy for Lateral Epicondylosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs