search
Back to results

Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Autologous BM-MSC in Subjects With Chronic LBP Due to Multilevel Lumbar IDD (DREAM)

Primary Purpose

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Chronic Low-back Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Autologous BM-MSC
Sham
Sponsored by
Campus Bio-Medico University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration focused on measuring Low Back Pain, Spine, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bone Marrow

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent.
  • Symptomatic chronic LBP due to moderate IDD (modified Pfirrmann score 3-4, Griffith score 3-7) at max.3 levels of the lumbar spine unresponsive to conservative treatment, physical and medical for at least 6 months. Physical treatment includes physiotherapy. Medical treatments includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), paracetamol, opioids and myorelaxant.
  • Annulus fibrosus intact, demonstrated by MRI.
  • Pain baseline > 40 mm on VAS (0- 100).
  • NSAID washout of at least 2 days before screening.
  • Painkillers washout of at least 24 hours before screening.
  • For females of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test must be documented at Screening.
  • Men and women should use effective contraception during treatment and for at least 24 months after BM-MSC discontinuation. As a precautionary measure, breast-feeding should be discontinued during treatment with BM-MSC and should not be restarted after discontinuation of BM-MSC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital or acquired diseases leading to spine deformations that may upset cell application (scoliosis, isthmus lesion, sacralization and hemisacralization, degenerative spondylolisthesis).
  • Spinal segmental instability assessed by dynamic X-Ray.
  • Symptomatic facet joints syndrome on MRI (facet joints hyperintensity and hypertrophy evaluated at coronal T2 weighted MRI).
  • Prior to the screening visit, has received:
  • Oral corticosteroid therapy within the previous 3 months, OR
  • Intramuscular, intravenous or epidural corticosteroid therapy within the previous 3 months
  • Presence of a 4th level with symptomatic IDD (modified Pfirrmann score 3-4, Griffith score 3-7) in the lumbar spine.
  • Spinal canal stenosis (Schizas score > B).
  • History of spinal infection.
  • Lumbar disc herniation and sciatica.
  • Endplate abnormality such as Schmorl's Nodes.
  • Previous discal puncture or previous spine surgery.
  • IDD with Modic II and III changes on MRI images.
  • Patients not eligible to the intravertebral disc surgery.
  • Patients who have the risk to undergo a surgery in the next 6 months.
  • Patients with local infusion device/devices for corticosteroids.
  • Obesity with body mass index (BMI in Kg/size in m^2) greater than 35 (obesity grade II).
  • Participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Abnormal blood tests: hepatic (alanine amino transferase [ALT] and/or aspartate aminotransferase [AST] > 1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN]), renal, pancreatic or biliary disease, blood coagulation disorders, anemia or platelet count of < 100 × 10^9/L.
  • Pregnant or lactating women, or premenopausal women not using an acceptable form of birth control, are ineligible for inclusion. Contraception will be maintained during treatment and until the end of relevant systemic exposure. Additional pregnancy testing will be performed at the end of relevant systemic exposure. The patients will be required to use contraception from initial treatment administration until 24 months after the last dose of study drug.
  • In each case of delayed menstrual period (over one month between menstruations) confirmation of absence of pregnancy is strongly recommended.
  • Positive serology for following infection: Syphilis, HIV, Hepatitis B, or C.
  • Contraindication to MRI assessed by the investigator.
  • Intolerance or allergy to local anaesthesia.
  • Any history of Cancer or immunodeficiency disease.
  • Previous transplantation.

Sites / Locations

  • Campus Bio-Medico University of RomeRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active Arm

Sham Procedure

Arm Description

Two procedures: Bone marrow harvesting from the posterior superior iliac crest region Single injections of a dose of 15 million of autologous BM-MSC for each disc affected by IDD (up to 3 discs) via imaging control

Two sham procedures: Simulated bone marrow harvesting without insertion into the posterior iliac crest region Simulated injection under only local anaesthesia without disc injection and without placebo injection.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain Change
Changes in pain will be evaluated on Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) between baseline and month 24. VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable.
Functional disability index evaluation
Functional disability changes will be assessed on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) at month 24 compared with baseline. ODI scale ranges from 0 to 50 and allows evaluation of disability (0 - 20 percent: minimal disability; 20 - 40 percent: moderate disability; 40 - 60 percent: severe disability; 60 - 80 percent: crippled; 80 - 100 percent: bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disability evolution
Disability evolution includes Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores. SF-36 scores consist of eight 0-100 scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning and mental health) where a lower score corresponds to more disability and a higher score corresponds to less disability.
Quality of life evolution
Quality of life evolution includes global assessment by the patient and the physician. The global assessment by the patient and the physician involves evaluation of: - Overall pain intensity in the lumbar spine (1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = extreme); - patient's global assessment of disease activity (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor); - physician's global assessment of disease activity (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor).
Drug consumption of rescue painkillers medication
The decrease/increase in the use of rescue medication will be recorded throughout the study duration by a diary file. A reduction in dose or frequency of administration of painkillers is an indirect marker of the benefits of MSC therapy.
Measurement of pain
Assessed by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). VAS pain scale ranges from 0 to 100: where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable. In brief, the patients will fill VAS tests indicating the amount of pain experienced at rest and in motion.
Employment and work status assessment
For this the investigators will assign each of the patients to one of 4 categories designated as "employable" which included those who were unemployed due to pain, employed but on sick leave, laid off, or working. The other categories include retired, disabled, and elderly at least 60 years of age, eligible for social security.
Structural assessment
Evolution of affected disc(s) by quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) density measurements in T2 and T1 spin/echo and T1 rho weighted images used as an indication of disc fluid and glycosaminoglycans (GAG) content. The "quality" of the patient's lumbar disc/discs will be monitored non invasively using T2 weighted MRI sagittal images and, in T1 spin/echo MRI. Lumbar disc grading will be performed in the sagittal T2 weighted images by two physicians independently who were experienced in MRI of the spine. They will review each intervertebral disc from L1-2 to L5-S1 by the modified Pfirrmann criteria. The modified Pfirrmann grading system assesses degenerated intervertebral discs by MRI for the asymmetry in disc structure, distinction of the nucleus and the annulus, signal intensity of intervertebral discs and height of intervertebral discs and assigns grade 1 to 8 for disc degeneration.
Evaluation of costs
The investigators will compare the medical and non-medical costs between the two groups of patient. For this purpose, resource use in each arm will be collected in physical units in the eCRF (electronic case report form) at the clinical centre as follows: Acute care medical hospitalisations related to IDD Acute care surgical hospitalisations related to IDD Rehabilitation hospitalisations related to IDD Analgesics Work disruption
Body Mass Index evaluation
Evaluation of changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) through the measurement of weight (kg) and height (m) of each subject enrolled in the study.
Haematological evaluation: safety parameter
The investigators will assess the percentage of patients who will develop haematological disorders. For this reason, participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to determine haematological parameters (haematocrit, haemoglobin, RBC, WBC) to monitor the physiological status of the patient.
Coagulation status: safety parameter
The investigators will assess the incidence of disorders related to coagulation. For this reason, participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to determine coagulation parameters (INR, PTT) to monitor the coagulation status and hemostasis risks of each subject.
Metabolic functions: safety parameter
The investigators will evaluate the incidence of metabolic alteration in patients recruited. For this reason, participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to determine biochemical parameters (Electrolytes, Creatinine, ALT, AST, AP, Bilirubin) to monitor the metabolic function of liver and kidney.
Inflammation: safety parameter
Blood sampling will be used to determine the concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP). Participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to monitor inflammatory response in each subject.
Urinalysis
Participants will undergo to urinalysis which consists in routine urine tests for the semiquantitative assessment of urinary characteristics to monitor the physiological status of the subjects.
Spine examination
Participants will undergo to spine examination for the identification of relevant clinical signs. The clinicians will evaluate: abnormalities in gait (pattern of walking); spinal range of motion (eg, bend forward); posture and spinal alignment (such as scoliosis or kyphosis).
Specific Adverse Events Evaluation
Participants will be interviewed by the investigator to fill a study-specific Adverse Events checklist for recording of symptoms and complaints.

Full Information

First Posted
July 27, 2021
Last Updated
October 1, 2021
Sponsor
Campus Bio-Medico University
Collaborators
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Italy
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05066334
Brief Title
Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Autologous BM-MSC in Subjects With Chronic LBP Due to Multilevel Lumbar IDD
Acronym
DREAM
Official Title
Intervertebral Disc Regeneration Mediated by Autologous Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Intradiscal Injection: a Phase IIB Randomized Clinical Trial - DREAM Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 22, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 9, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Campus Bio-Medico University
Collaborators
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Italy

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
DREAM is a phase II B efficacy monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled double blinded trial, comparing intra-discal autologous adult bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) therapy and sham treated controls in subjects with chronic (> 6 months) Low Back Pain (LBP) due to lumbar multilevel (max. 3 levels) intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) unresponsive to conventional therapy. Duration of the recruitment period has been estimated to be 12 months. The efficacy of intradiscal injection of autologous BM-MSC in reducing chronic LBP due to multilevel lumbar IDD will be evaluated after 24 months in terms of pain relief (VAS), functionality (ODI) and quality of life (SF36).
Detailed Description
Low back pain (LBP) is the global leading cause of disability, and furthermore rates sixth in terms of overall disease burden, in both developed and developing countries. LPB is a condition of all ages, from children to elderly, affecting 60-70 percent of the global population during life, and ~700 million people each year. LBP prevalence increases with age, and with populations ageing worldwide, the societal and economic burden associated with LBP will increase substantially over coming years. Current LBP therapies are aimed at pain reduction, and do not provide restorative treatment. Such conservative strategies (e.g. painkillers and musculoskeletal rearrangement by manual and physiotherapy) rarely address the actual cause of LBP. In a healthy spine, intervertebral discs (IVDs) separate the vertebrae to provide complex spinal flexibility while supporting large spinal loads. Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is widely recognized as a major contributor to LBP, responsible for at least 40 percent of LBP cases. A key characteristic of IVD degeneration is loss of matrix integrity, thereby causing biomechanical functional failure. Today, no therapy can restore IVD function or provide long-term relief from symptomatic IDD. New treatment strategies concentrate on treating IDD at an early stage. Stem cell research offers exciting possibilities, and advanced cell-based therapies are considered highly promising strategies in treating IVD degeneration and LBP. Encouraging results suggest that cell-based, regenerative therapies may provide the world first effective therapy for this common and debilitating disease. The objective of DREAM is to generate efficacy and tolerability profiles of a single injection of 15 million of cells/ml of autologous BM-MSC for each disc affected by IDD (up to 3 discs) versus sham procedure. The potential of BM-MSC to lead to a disease-modifying therapeutic option for the treatment of this chronic and debilitating disease will be assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) after 6 months, 1 and 2 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Chronic Low-back Pain
Keywords
Low Back Pain, Spine, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Bone Marrow

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients will be randomized in 2 arms of 26 patients and followed up for 24 months.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The randomization will be centralized and stratified on the investigation center. Treatment allocation will be performed 24 hour-a-day online by a central randomization web-service. The patient identification must be unique within all randomizations performed. For double-blind trial the randomization result will be a treatment code. Blinding or masking will be carried out at all stages of packaging and conditioning for shipping following the treatment allocation. Injections used for all groups will be clear and indistinguishable from each other.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
52 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Two procedures: Bone marrow harvesting from the posterior superior iliac crest region Single injections of a dose of 15 million of autologous BM-MSC for each disc affected by IDD (up to 3 discs) via imaging control
Arm Title
Sham Procedure
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Two sham procedures: Simulated bone marrow harvesting without insertion into the posterior iliac crest region Simulated injection under only local anaesthesia without disc injection and without placebo injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Autologous BM-MSC
Other Intervention Name(s)
Treated
Intervention Description
intradiscal injection of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sham
Other Intervention Name(s)
Untreated
Intervention Description
local anaesthesia, no disc injection, no placebo injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Change
Description
Changes in pain will be evaluated on Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) between baseline and month 24. VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
From Baseline to Month 24
Title
Functional disability index evaluation
Description
Functional disability changes will be assessed on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) at month 24 compared with baseline. ODI scale ranges from 0 to 50 and allows evaluation of disability (0 - 20 percent: minimal disability; 20 - 40 percent: moderate disability; 40 - 60 percent: severe disability; 60 - 80 percent: crippled; 80 - 100 percent: bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms).
Time Frame
From Baseline to Month 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disability evolution
Description
Disability evolution includes Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores. SF-36 scores consist of eight 0-100 scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning and mental health) where a lower score corresponds to more disability and a higher score corresponds to less disability.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Quality of life evolution
Description
Quality of life evolution includes global assessment by the patient and the physician. The global assessment by the patient and the physician involves evaluation of: - Overall pain intensity in the lumbar spine (1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = extreme); - patient's global assessment of disease activity (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor); - physician's global assessment of disease activity (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor).
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Drug consumption of rescue painkillers medication
Description
The decrease/increase in the use of rescue medication will be recorded throughout the study duration by a diary file. A reduction in dose or frequency of administration of painkillers is an indirect marker of the benefits of MSC therapy.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Measurement of pain
Description
Assessed by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). VAS pain scale ranges from 0 to 100: where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable. In brief, the patients will fill VAS tests indicating the amount of pain experienced at rest and in motion.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Employment and work status assessment
Description
For this the investigators will assign each of the patients to one of 4 categories designated as "employable" which included those who were unemployed due to pain, employed but on sick leave, laid off, or working. The other categories include retired, disabled, and elderly at least 60 years of age, eligible for social security.
Time Frame
Baseline and 24 months
Title
Structural assessment
Description
Evolution of affected disc(s) by quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) density measurements in T2 and T1 spin/echo and T1 rho weighted images used as an indication of disc fluid and glycosaminoglycans (GAG) content. The "quality" of the patient's lumbar disc/discs will be monitored non invasively using T2 weighted MRI sagittal images and, in T1 spin/echo MRI. Lumbar disc grading will be performed in the sagittal T2 weighted images by two physicians independently who were experienced in MRI of the spine. They will review each intervertebral disc from L1-2 to L5-S1 by the modified Pfirrmann criteria. The modified Pfirrmann grading system assesses degenerated intervertebral discs by MRI for the asymmetry in disc structure, distinction of the nucleus and the annulus, signal intensity of intervertebral discs and height of intervertebral discs and assigns grade 1 to 8 for disc degeneration.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Evaluation of costs
Description
The investigators will compare the medical and non-medical costs between the two groups of patient. For this purpose, resource use in each arm will be collected in physical units in the eCRF (electronic case report form) at the clinical centre as follows: Acute care medical hospitalisations related to IDD Acute care surgical hospitalisations related to IDD Rehabilitation hospitalisations related to IDD Analgesics Work disruption
Time Frame
12 and 24 months
Title
Body Mass Index evaluation
Description
Evaluation of changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) through the measurement of weight (kg) and height (m) of each subject enrolled in the study.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Haematological evaluation: safety parameter
Description
The investigators will assess the percentage of patients who will develop haematological disorders. For this reason, participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to determine haematological parameters (haematocrit, haemoglobin, RBC, WBC) to monitor the physiological status of the patient.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Coagulation status: safety parameter
Description
The investigators will assess the incidence of disorders related to coagulation. For this reason, participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to determine coagulation parameters (INR, PTT) to monitor the coagulation status and hemostasis risks of each subject.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Metabolic functions: safety parameter
Description
The investigators will evaluate the incidence of metabolic alteration in patients recruited. For this reason, participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to determine biochemical parameters (Electrolytes, Creatinine, ALT, AST, AP, Bilirubin) to monitor the metabolic function of liver and kidney.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Inflammation: safety parameter
Description
Blood sampling will be used to determine the concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP). Participants will undergo blood sampling for routine laboratory testing to monitor inflammatory response in each subject.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Urinalysis
Description
Participants will undergo to urinalysis which consists in routine urine tests for the semiquantitative assessment of urinary characteristics to monitor the physiological status of the subjects.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Spine examination
Description
Participants will undergo to spine examination for the identification of relevant clinical signs. The clinicians will evaluate: abnormalities in gait (pattern of walking); spinal range of motion (eg, bend forward); posture and spinal alignment (such as scoliosis or kyphosis).
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Specific Adverse Events Evaluation
Description
Participants will be interviewed by the investigator to fill a study-specific Adverse Events checklist for recording of symptoms and complaints.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Signed informed consent. Symptomatic chronic LBP due to moderate IDD (modified Pfirrmann score 3-4, Griffith score 3-7) at max.3 levels of the lumbar spine unresponsive to conservative treatment, physical and medical for at least 6 months. Physical treatment includes physiotherapy. Medical treatments includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), paracetamol, opioids and myorelaxant. Annulus fibrosus intact, demonstrated by MRI. Pain baseline > 40 mm on VAS (0- 100). NSAID washout of at least 2 days before screening. Painkillers washout of at least 24 hours before screening. For females of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test must be documented at Screening. Men and women should use effective contraception during treatment and for at least 24 months after BM-MSC discontinuation. As a precautionary measure, breast-feeding should be discontinued during treatment with BM-MSC and should not be restarted after discontinuation of BM-MSC. Exclusion Criteria: Congenital or acquired diseases leading to spine deformations that may upset cell application (scoliosis, isthmus lesion, sacralization and hemisacralization, degenerative spondylolisthesis). Spinal segmental instability assessed by dynamic X-Ray. Symptomatic facet joints syndrome on MRI (facet joints hyperintensity and hypertrophy evaluated at coronal T2 weighted MRI). Prior to the screening visit, has received: Oral corticosteroid therapy within the previous 3 months, OR Intramuscular, intravenous or epidural corticosteroid therapy within the previous 3 months Presence of a 4th level with symptomatic IDD (modified Pfirrmann score 3-4, Griffith score 3-7) in the lumbar spine. Spinal canal stenosis (Schizas score > B). History of spinal infection. Lumbar disc herniation and sciatica. Endplate abnormality such as Schmorl's Nodes. Previous discal puncture or previous spine surgery. IDD with Modic II and III changes on MRI images. Patients not eligible to the intravertebral disc surgery. Patients who have the risk to undergo a surgery in the next 6 months. Patients with local infusion device/devices for corticosteroids. Obesity with body mass index (BMI in Kg/size in m^2) greater than 35 (obesity grade II). Participation in another clinical trial or treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to inclusion in the study. Abnormal blood tests: hepatic (alanine amino transferase [ALT] and/or aspartate aminotransferase [AST] > 1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN]), renal, pancreatic or biliary disease, blood coagulation disorders, anemia or platelet count of < 100 × 10^9/L. Pregnant or lactating women, or premenopausal women not using an acceptable form of birth control, are ineligible for inclusion. Contraception will be maintained during treatment and until the end of relevant systemic exposure. Additional pregnancy testing will be performed at the end of relevant systemic exposure. The patients will be required to use contraception from initial treatment administration until 24 months after the last dose of study drug. In each case of delayed menstrual period (over one month between menstruations) confirmation of absence of pregnancy is strongly recommended. Positive serology for following infection: Syphilis, HIV, Hepatitis B, or C. Contraindication to MRI assessed by the investigator. Intolerance or allergy to local anaesthesia. Any history of Cancer or immunodeficiency disease. Previous transplantation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gianluca Vadalà, MD, PhD
Phone
+39 06 22541918
Email
g.vadala@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gianluca Vadalà, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00128
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Autologous BM-MSC in Subjects With Chronic LBP Due to Multilevel Lumbar IDD

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs