search
Back to results

Efficacy of Language Games as Therapy for Post Stroke Aphasia (AphasiaGame)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Aphasia

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
language game therapy
standard therapy
Sponsored by
University of Birmingham
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who have suffered a stroke a minimum of 2 months prior to commencement of the intervention. They will present with expressive aphasia, with relatively preserved language comprehension. They will have been fully fluent in English before the stroke.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe perceptual or cognitive deficits. History of other neurological, psychiatric or neurodegenerative disease impairing language or communicative ability. Severe visual agnosia. Severe limb apraxia. Severe dysarthria. Drug or alcohol abuse.

Sites / Locations

  • Moor Green Out-Patient Brain Injury ServiceRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

game therapy then standard therapy

standard therapy then game therapy

Arm Description

participants will take part in language game therapy followed by standard aphasia therapy

participants will have standard aphasia therapy first then will take part in language game therapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn et al 2004)
Measures of language performance taken as designated in the various sub-tests, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after game therapy and after standard therapy. These will measure the general efficacy of the intervention.
Communication Outcomes After Stroke Scale (Long et al, 2008)
Measures of participants' subjective views of communicative abilities taken as designated by the test, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after game therapy and after standard therapy. These will measure the impact of therapy on general functional communication.
Picture naming of words targeted in game therapy
Confrontational picture naming of 180 words targeted in game therapy- points awarded for correct naming, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after game therapy and after standard therapy. These will measure therapy effects for the items that are specifically treated based on single word production.
Picture description of words targeted in game therapy
Measures of improvement in connected speech using method from Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Comparison of improvement following game therapy and following standard therapy. These will measure the ability of participants to use targeted words, but in a functional communication context -- i.e. producing phrases and sentences to describe a scene.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Picture naming of words targeted in game therapy to ascertain effects of different facilitatory techniques - multiple baseline measure
Confrontational picture naming of 180 words targeted in game therapy- points awarded for correct naming, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after each type of language game.
Picture description of words targeted in game therapy to ascertain effects of different facilitatory techniques - multiple baseline measure
Measures of improvement in connected speech using method from Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Comparison of improvement following each type of language game.

Full Information

First Posted
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 2, 2021
Sponsor
University of Birmingham
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02458222
Brief Title
Efficacy of Language Games as Therapy for Post Stroke Aphasia
Acronym
AphasiaGame
Official Title
Efficacy of Language Games as Therapy for Post Stroke Aphasia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Birmingham

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Aphasia is a language impairment experienced by about one third of stroke patients. This often devastating condition is treated by speech and language therapists (SLTs). There is evidence that language games delivered at the right intensity are an efficacious means of improving communication for people with post stroke aphasia. However, it is unclear which mechanism of language facilitation used in a game works best. This study will provide evidence for the "active ingredient" of a game, together with measures of efficacy, feasibility and enjoyment compared to standard aphasia therapy.
Detailed Description
Aphasia is a language impairment experienced by about one third of stroke patients. This often devastating condition is treated by speech and language therapists (SLTs). There is evidence that language games delivered at the right intensity are an efficacious means of improving communication for people with post stroke aphasia. However, it is unclear which mechanism of language facilitation used in a game works best. This study will provide evidence for the "active ingredient" of a game, together with measures of efficacy, feasibility and enjoyment compared to standard aphasia therapy. Participants with moderate-severe difficulties will play picture naming games, involving self-cuing using gesture and circumlocution. Those with mild difficulties will play story-telling games, using similar self-cuing techniques. Change in language performance will be measured and compared to that achieved by the same participants following an episode of standard aphasia therapy from their local SLT (i.e. normal care). This study will build on a growing evidence base for the efficacy of therapeutic language games in post stroke aphasia. In today's resource-constrained National Health Service, SLTs are continually searching for cost-effective, innovative ways of delivering therapy. Language games based on sound neuro-scientific principles have the potential to deliver improvements in functional communication by means of an enjoyable and motivating activity, and moreover can be done cost effectively. Improvements have been demonstrated from the acute through to the chronic stage of stroke. A number of factors are said to contribute to the outcomes achieved: intensity of training, behavioural relevance and focussed use of capacities. This study intends to explore in more depth some of the specific behaviours that can occur spontaneously or than can be prompted to facilitate language. The aim is to uncover the "active ingredient", and thereby ensure that participants can benefit maximally from therapeutic language games. This study will contribute to the search for cost effective treatment for post-stroke aphasia, which offers ease and flexibility of delivery, is enjoyable and motivating for patients, and works.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Aphasia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
game therapy then standard therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
participants will take part in language game therapy followed by standard aphasia therapy
Arm Title
standard therapy then game therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
participants will have standard aphasia therapy first then will take part in language game therapy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
language game therapy
Intervention Description
participants will take part in game therapy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
standard therapy
Intervention Description
usual clinical care
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn et al 2004)
Description
Measures of language performance taken as designated in the various sub-tests, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after game therapy and after standard therapy. These will measure the general efficacy of the intervention.
Time Frame
Assessment carried out prior to commencement of language game therapy, and immediately after language game therapy, 10 week interval. Assessment also carried out prior to and immediately after standard therapy, approx 12 week interval.
Title
Communication Outcomes After Stroke Scale (Long et al, 2008)
Description
Measures of participants' subjective views of communicative abilities taken as designated by the test, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after game therapy and after standard therapy. These will measure the impact of therapy on general functional communication.
Time Frame
Assessment carried out prior to commencement of language game therapy, and immediately after language game therapy, 10 week interval. Assessment also carried out prior to and immediately after standard therapy, approx 12 week interval.
Title
Picture naming of words targeted in game therapy
Description
Confrontational picture naming of 180 words targeted in game therapy- points awarded for correct naming, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after game therapy and after standard therapy. These will measure therapy effects for the items that are specifically treated based on single word production.
Time Frame
Assessment carried out prior to commencement of language game therapy, and immediately after language game therapy, 10 week interval. Assessment also carried out prior to and immediately after standard therapy, approx 12 week interval.
Title
Picture description of words targeted in game therapy
Description
Measures of improvement in connected speech using method from Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Comparison of improvement following game therapy and following standard therapy. These will measure the ability of participants to use targeted words, but in a functional communication context -- i.e. producing phrases and sentences to describe a scene.
Time Frame
Assessment carried out prior to commencement of language game therapy, and immediately after language game therapy, 10 week interval. Assessment also carried out prior to and immediately after standard therapy, approx 12 week interval.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Picture naming of words targeted in game therapy to ascertain effects of different facilitatory techniques - multiple baseline measure
Description
Confrontational picture naming of 180 words targeted in game therapy- points awarded for correct naming, and comparisons of improvement in those measures after each type of language game.
Time Frame
Assessment carried out immediately after game 1 and game 2, at 4 weeks and 7 weeks.
Title
Picture description of words targeted in game therapy to ascertain effects of different facilitatory techniques - multiple baseline measure
Description
Measures of improvement in connected speech using method from Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Comparison of improvement following each type of language game.
Time Frame
Assessment carried out immediately after game 1 and game 2, at 4 weeks and 7 weeks.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults who have suffered a stroke a minimum of 2 months prior to commencement of the intervention. They will present with expressive aphasia, with relatively preserved language comprehension. They will have been fully fluent in English before the stroke. Exclusion Criteria: Severe perceptual or cognitive deficits. History of other neurological, psychiatric or neurodegenerative disease impairing language or communicative ability. Severe visual agnosia. Severe limb apraxia. Severe dysarthria. Drug or alcohol abuse.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Andrew Olson, PhD
Phone
+44 121 414 3328
Email
olsonac@bham.ac.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sean Jennings, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Birmingham
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Moor Green Out-Patient Brain Injury Service
City
Birmingham
State/Province
West Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
B13 8JL
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Louise Lander, MSc
Phone
44 121 466 6070
Email
Louise.Lander@BHAMCLouise.Lander@BHAMCommunity.nhs.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Olson, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cristina Romani, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Language Games as Therapy for Post Stroke Aphasia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs