search
Back to results

Efficacy of NeoThermo-Radio-chemotherapy for LA Rectal Cancer Before Laparoscopic TME: Prospective Phase II Trial (NEOTREAT)

Primary Purpose

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hyperthermia with concurrent chemo-radiation therapy
Sponsored by
Samsung Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 20 years or older
  • pathologically confirmed rectal cancer
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2
  • Candidate of laparoscopic TME
  • Optimal bone marrow function
  • Locally advanced rectal cancer confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extrapelvic metastasis
  • Previous pelvic irradiation
  • Current status of pregnant or breast feeding
  • Confirmed other malignancy within two years except thyroid cancer

Sites / Locations

  • Samsung Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Thermo-radio-chemotherapy arm

Arm Description

Hyperthermia with concurrent chemo-radiation therapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Curative Resection Rate of Laparoscopic TME
Curative resection rate of laparoscopic TME after CCRT and hyperthermia treament
Pathologic Response of Thermo-radio-chemotherapy
The pathologic response was assessed according to the Dworak's system. The pathologic response grades were as follows: grade 0, no response; grade 1, dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis, vasculopathy, or both (minimal response); grade 2, dominant fibrotic changes with a few easy-to-find tumor cells or groups (moderate response); grade 3, few (difficult to find microscopically) tumor cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucous substance (near complete response); and grade 4, no viable tumor (complete response)
Adverse Event of Laparoscopic TME and Hyperthermia With CCRT
Adverse event according to CTCAE V 4.0 after laparoscopic TME and hyperthermia with CCRT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rate of Open TME
Rate of open TME was measured as ten percent
Pathologic Complete Response of Hyperthermia With CCRT
Pathologic complete response of hyperthermia with CCRT was achieved in 20% of participants

Full Information

First Posted
November 6, 2014
Last Updated
October 13, 2019
Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02290574
Brief Title
Efficacy of NeoThermo-Radio-chemotherapy for LA Rectal Cancer Before Laparoscopic TME: Prospective Phase II Trial
Acronym
NEOTREAT
Official Title
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Thermo-Radio-chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Before Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: Prospective Phase II Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
slow accrual
Study Start Date
November 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators start this prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after concurrent chemo-radiation therapy with hyperthermia in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Detailed Description
The current standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (CCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Recently, laparoscopic surgery is getting substitute open surgery based on the advantages of early recovery, short admission, less pain, less blood loss, and little scar without compromising oncologic outcomes. It is reported that hyperthermia is effective in synthetic (S) phase, Low oxgen pressure, acidic, and low perfusion site which are known as radio-resistant. Because of these characteristics, it considered as the most valuable radiosensitizer in cancer treatment, theoretically. Furthermore, mild hyperthermia (41 to 41.5 ºC) can promote tumor reoxygenation. Based on those background, the investigators start this prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic TME after CCRT with hyperthermia in locally advanced rectal cancer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
14 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Thermo-radio-chemotherapy arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Hyperthermia with concurrent chemo-radiation therapy
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Hyperthermia with concurrent chemo-radiation therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Curative Resection Rate of Laparoscopic TME
Description
Curative resection rate of laparoscopic TME after CCRT and hyperthermia treament
Time Frame
expected average of 6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatement
Title
Pathologic Response of Thermo-radio-chemotherapy
Description
The pathologic response was assessed according to the Dworak's system. The pathologic response grades were as follows: grade 0, no response; grade 1, dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis, vasculopathy, or both (minimal response); grade 2, dominant fibrotic changes with a few easy-to-find tumor cells or groups (moderate response); grade 3, few (difficult to find microscopically) tumor cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucous substance (near complete response); and grade 4, no viable tumor (complete response)
Time Frame
expected average of 6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatement
Title
Adverse Event of Laparoscopic TME and Hyperthermia With CCRT
Description
Adverse event according to CTCAE V 4.0 after laparoscopic TME and hyperthermia with CCRT
Time Frame
expected average of 16 weeks after neoadjuvant treatement
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of Open TME
Description
Rate of open TME was measured as ten percent
Time Frame
expected average of 6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatement
Title
Pathologic Complete Response of Hyperthermia With CCRT
Description
Pathologic complete response of hyperthermia with CCRT was achieved in 20% of participants
Time Frame
expected average of 6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatement

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 20 years or older pathologically confirmed rectal cancer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2 Candidate of laparoscopic TME Optimal bone marrow function Locally advanced rectal cancer confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging Exclusion Criteria: Extrapelvic metastasis Previous pelvic irradiation Current status of pregnant or breast feeding Confirmed other malignancy within two years except thyroid cancer
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hee Chul Park, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Samsung Medical Center
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
135-710
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of NeoThermo-Radio-chemotherapy for LA Rectal Cancer Before Laparoscopic TME: Prospective Phase II Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs