search
Back to results

Efficacy of Repetitive Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation on Gait Freezing in PD (rTSMS)

Primary Purpose

Adverse Effect of Drug Therapy Levodopa

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
non invasive repetitive magnetic stimulation (real Transcranial + real trans-spinal )
non invasive repetitive magnetic stimulation (real Transcranial + sham trans-spinal )sham trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
Sponsored by
Assiut University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Adverse Effect of Drug Therapy Levodopa focused on measuring rTMS, Parkinson's disease, therapeutic role, spinal magnetic stimulation, gait disturbance, frozen gait, UPDRS, Quality of life, Visual analogue scale

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men or women of at least 40-80 years of age.
  2. Are reliable and willing to make themselves available for the duration of the study and are willing to follow up.
  3. Medically stable outpatients with a confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic PD according to United Kingdom Brain Bank Criteria
  4. Clear written informed consent from each participant in the trial.
  5. Patients after at least 6 h free of parkinsonian drugs (off-state).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnants, breastfeeding, or willing to be pregnant during the study.
  2. Presence of a clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with the study
  3. Participation in any other type of medical research that may interfere with the interpretation of the study.
  4. Patients with severe motor disability (bed-ridden ) that may interfere with the study procedure.
  5. History of surgical or invasive intervention for Parkinson's disease.
  6. Patients with a history of seizures or epilepsy including history in a first-degree relative or patients on treatment that reduce the seizure threshold.

Sites / Locations

  • Assiut University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

real transcranial magnetic stimulation plus real transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of spinalcord

real transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of spinalcord

Arm Description

the patient will receive real rTMS 2000 pulses for each hand area 20Hz 80% of Motor threshold of the hand, 10 trains, each train 10 seconds over the hand area plus 1000 pulses 10 Hz 80% of the motor threshold of the leg 10 trains, and each train 10 seconds over the mid-dorsal vertebrae for consecuative 10 days (5 days/week)

the patient will receive real rTMS 2000 pulses for each hand area 20Hz 80% of Motor threshold of the hand, 10 trains, each train 10 seconds plus sham stimulation 1000 pulses 10 Hz 80% of the motor threshold of the leg 10 trains, and each train 10 seconds over the mid-dorsal vertebrae for 10 consecutive days (5 sessions/week)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Score on Freezing of gait Questionnaire
Score on Freezing of gait Questionnaire
Time taken for Primed up-and-go
Time taken for Primed up-and-go
Time taken for 10m walk
Time taken for 10m walk

Secondary Outcome Measures

Score on MDS-UPDRS
Score on MDS-UPDRS
Score on PDQ-39
Score on PDQ-39

Full Information

First Posted
December 26, 2021
Last Updated
September 14, 2023
Sponsor
Assiut University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05271513
Brief Title
Efficacy of Repetitive Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation on Gait Freezing in PD
Acronym
rTSMS
Official Title
Efficacy of Repetitive Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation on Gait Abnormalities in Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 1, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 1, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 1, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Assiut University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized trial was to evaluate the efficacy of repeated sessions of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord on gait abnormality, and posture abnormalities in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
Detailed Description
Parkinson's disease is the second most common age-related neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease[1], patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) often present with axial symptoms, including abnormal posture, postural instability, and gait disorder [2]. These axial symptoms are the main factors that reduce the activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL) of PD patients. Gait disorders are among the most prevalent problems in the advanced phase of Parkinson's disease (PD) and are relatively resistant to dopaminergic treatment. Freezing of gait (FoG) affects 7% of patients in early PD and reaches 60% in advanced stages [3]. Patients with PD also suffer from pain significantly more frequently than normal subjects. Low back pain and leg pain are the most commonly experienced pain symptoms in PD patients. One of the reasons is considered to be the decreased threshold of pain due to abnormality of the dopaminergic system in the basal ganglia of PD patients [3.4]. Administration of anti-parkinsonian medication or Deep brain stimulation results in increased pain thresholds. Treatment by medication or DBS is often ineffective for low back pain caused by postural deformity and is also ineffective for radicular or peripheral neuropathic. Because pain is an important factor that reduces the ADL and QOL of patients, the establishment of new and effective therapy is essential [5.6]. A positive effect of epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on locomotive activity has been reported in animal models and small cohorts of PD patients and seems to be promising.[7] Transcutaneous SCS is an emerging method that activates similar target neural structures noninvasively and has recently been explored for the treatment of spasticity after spinal cord injury.[8] Here, the investigators will assess the safety and efficacy of transcutaneous magnetic SCS on freezing of gait (FoG) and other motor symptoms in a cohort of PD patients. The investigators will be going to carry out a double-blinded randomized, case-controlled study on 38 patients who will be randomly chosen and categorize them into 2 groups, 19 patients each. The 1st group will receive real transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over each hand area High frequency 20 HZ, 80% of the motor threshold of hand, 10 sec for each train, 20 train with a total of 2000 pulses for each side plus transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (over mid-dorsal vertebrae (thoracic 6) high frequency 10 HZ, 80% of the motor threshold of leg area10 sec for each train, 10 trains with total 1000 pulses for 10 consecutive days. The second group will receive the same protocol but the spinal stimulation will be sham stimulation as the coil lie perpendicular to the vertebral axis. Then the investigators will be going to compare the results of two groups at the end of sessions, one and two months after the last session to find out the efficacy of repetitive transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord on gait abnormalities and posture abnormalities, relief of pain, UPDRS, and as well as the quality of life in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Adverse Effect of Drug Therapy Levodopa
Keywords
rTMS, Parkinson's disease, therapeutic role, spinal magnetic stimulation, gait disturbance, frozen gait, UPDRS, Quality of life, Visual analogue scale

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
masking enclosed envelop
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
real transcranial magnetic stimulation plus real transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of spinalcord
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
the patient will receive real rTMS 2000 pulses for each hand area 20Hz 80% of Motor threshold of the hand, 10 trains, each train 10 seconds over the hand area plus 1000 pulses 10 Hz 80% of the motor threshold of the leg 10 trains, and each train 10 seconds over the mid-dorsal vertebrae for consecuative 10 days (5 days/week)
Arm Title
real transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of spinalcord
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
the patient will receive real rTMS 2000 pulses for each hand area 20Hz 80% of Motor threshold of the hand, 10 trains, each train 10 seconds plus sham stimulation 1000 pulses 10 Hz 80% of the motor threshold of the leg 10 trains, and each train 10 seconds over the mid-dorsal vertebrae for 10 consecutive days (5 sessions/week)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
non invasive repetitive magnetic stimulation (real Transcranial + real trans-spinal )
Intervention Description
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
non invasive repetitive magnetic stimulation (real Transcranial + sham trans-spinal )sham trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
Intervention Description
sham trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Score on Freezing of gait Questionnaire
Description
Score on Freezing of gait Questionnaire
Time Frame
2 months after the end of sessions
Title
Time taken for Primed up-and-go
Description
Time taken for Primed up-and-go
Time Frame
2 months after the end of sessions
Title
Time taken for 10m walk
Description
Time taken for 10m walk
Time Frame
2 months after the end of sessions
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Score on MDS-UPDRS
Description
Score on MDS-UPDRS
Time Frame
2 months after the end of sessions
Title
Score on PDQ-39
Description
Score on PDQ-39
Time Frame
2 months after the end of sessions

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men or women of at least 40-80 years of age. Are reliable and willing to make themselves available for the duration of the study and are willing to follow up. Medically stable outpatients with a confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic PD according to United Kingdom Brain Bank Criteria Clear written informed consent from each participant in the trial. Patients after at least 6 h free of parkinsonian drugs (off-state). Exclusion Criteria: Pregnants, breastfeeding, or willing to be pregnant during the study. Presence of a clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with the study Participation in any other type of medical research that may interfere with the interpretation of the study. Patients with severe motor disability (bed-ridden ) that may interfere with the study procedure. History of surgical or invasive intervention for Parkinson's disease. Patients with a history of seizures or epilepsy including history in a first-degree relative or patients on treatment that reduce the seizure threshold.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Assiut University
City
Assiut
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21039949
Citation
Fuentes R, Petersson P, Nicolelis MA. Restoration of locomotive function in Parkinson's disease by spinal cord stimulation: mechanistic approach. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Oct;32(7):1100-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07417.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21514890
Citation
Doherty KM, van de Warrenburg BP, Peralta MC, Silveira-Moriyama L, Azulay JP, Gershanik OS, Bloem BR. Postural deformities in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jun;10(6):538-49. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70067-9. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19299613
Citation
Fuentes R, Petersson P, Siesser WB, Caron MG, Nicolelis MA. Spinal cord stimulation restores locomotion in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Science. 2009 Mar 20;323(5921):1578-82. doi: 10.1126/science.1164901.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14627461
Citation
Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, Oria HE. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003 Oct;13(5):684-92. doi: 10.1381/096089203322509237.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28332488
Citation
Poewe W, Seppi K, Tanner CM, Halliday GM, Brundin P, Volkmann J, Schrag AE, Lang AE. Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Mar 23;3:17013. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.13.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22850494
Citation
Agari T, Date I. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of abnormal posture and gait disorder in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(7):470-4. doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.470.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18779422
Citation
Defazio G, Berardelli A, Fabbrini G, Martino D, Fincati E, Fiaschi A, Moretto G, Abbruzzese G, Marchese R, Bonuccelli U, Del Dotto P, Barone P, De Vivo E, Albanese A, Antonini A, Canesi M, Lopiano L, Zibetti M, Nappi G, Martignoni E, Lamberti P, Tinazzi M. Pain as a nonmotor symptom of Parkinson disease: evidence from a case-control study. Arch Neurol. 2008 Sep;65(9):1191-4. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2008.2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15210877
Citation
Djaldetti R, Shifrin A, Rogowski Z, Sprecher E, Melamed E, Yarnitsky D. Quantitative measurement of pain sensation in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2004 Jun 22;62(12):2171-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000130455.38550.9d.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16078219
Citation
Brefel-Courbon C, Payoux P, Thalamas C, Ory F, Quelven I, Chollet F, Montastruc JL, Rascol O. Effect of levodopa on pain threshold in Parkinson's disease: a clinical and positron emission tomography study. Mov Disord. 2005 Dec;20(12):1557-63. doi: 10.1002/mds.20629.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17504881
Citation
Gerdelat-Mas A, Simonetta-Moreau M, Thalamas C, Ory-Magne F, Slaoui T, Rascol O, Brefel-Courbon C. Levodopa raises objective pain threshold in Parkinson's disease: a RIII reflex study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;78(10):1140-2. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.120212. Epub 2007 May 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28497877
Citation
Yadav AP, Nicolelis MAL. Electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2017 Jun;32(6):820-832. doi: 10.1002/mds.27033. Epub 2017 May 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31333064
Citation
Hofstoetter US, Freundl B, Danner SM, Krenn MJ, Mayr W, Binder H, Minassian K. Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Induces Temporary Attenuation of Spasticity in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2020 Feb 1;37(3):481-493. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6588. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30145797
Citation
Postuma RB, Poewe W, Litvan I, Lewis S, Lang AE, Halliday G, Goetz CG, Chan P, Slow E, Seppi K, Schaffer E, Rios-Romenets S, Mi T, Maetzler C, Li Y, Heim B, Bledsoe IO, Berg D. Validation of the MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2018 Oct;33(10):1601-1608. doi: 10.1002/mds.27362. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Repetitive Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation on Gait Freezing in PD

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs