search
Back to results

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Secukinumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Taking Methotrexate

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
secukinumab (AIN457)
placebo
Sponsored by
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis, RA, secukinumab, AIN457, inflammatory joints, American College of Rheumatology, ACR

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • presence of RA classified by ACR 2010 revised criteria for at least 3 months before screening
  • must have been taking MTX for at least 3 months before randomization and must currently be on a stable dose of MTX for at least 4 weeks before randomization.
  • At Baseline: Disease activity criteria defined by >6 tender joints out of 68 and >6 swollen joints out of 66 and with at least 1 of the following at screening: Anti-CCP antibodies positive OR Rheumatoid Factor positive and with at least 1 of the following at screening: hsCRP ≥ 10 mg/L OR ESR ≥ 28

Exclusion criteria:

  • RA patients functional status class IV according to the ACR 1991 revised criteria
  • Previous exposure to secukinumab or any other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17 or IL-17 receptor
  • Previous exposure ever to an anti-TNF-a agent or any other immunomodulatory biologic agent (experimental or approved)
  • Patients taking high potency opioid analgesics (e.g., methadone, hydromorphone, or morphine)
  • Any therapy by intra-articular injections (e.g. corticosteroid, hyaluronan) required for treatment of arthritis within 4 weeks before randomization
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Sites / Locations

  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

secukinumab 10 mg/kg i.v. loading

secukinumab 150 mg s.c. loading

placebo

Arm Description

secukinumab 10mg/kg i.v. loading at Weeks 0, 2 and 4, and placebo s.c. at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, followed by secukinumab 150mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 8

secukinumab 150mg s.c. loading at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, and placebo i.v. at weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by secukinumab 150mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 8

placebo at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 & 12, followed by secukinumab 150mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 16

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20)
A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR20 criteria if the participant had at least 20% improvement in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ACR50 and ACR70
A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR50 or ACR70 criteria if the participant had at least 50% or 70% improvement, respectively, in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Score.
The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. In this trial, only the disability dimension was used. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Within each of the 8 categories, only the item indicating the most severe impairment contributes to the category score. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Using High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (DAS28-CRP)
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a combined index to measure disease activity in RA participants. DAS28-CRP is determined using the following variables: 28-joint counts (tender28 and swollen28), CRP, and the participant's general health (GH) or global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm (0 = and 100 = ). Using the data from these variables, DAS28-CRP is calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4(crp) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014*GH + 0.96. The calculation results in a DAS28-CRP score from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis of your patient. A DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 Response Using ESR (DAS28-ESR)
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a combined index to measure disease activity in RA participants. DAS28 is determined using the following variables: 28-joint counts (tender28 and swollen28), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the participant's general health (GH) or global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm (0 = and 100 = ). Using the data from these variables, DAS28-ESR is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28 * sqrt(swollen28) + 0.70 * ln(ESR) + 0.014 * GH. The calculation results in a DAS28-ESR score from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis of your patient. A DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
EULAR response criteria are based on DAS28 status in combination with DAS28 improvements. The EULAR response criteria are as follows: present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement >1.2 corresponds to 'good response'; present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement between 0.6 to 1.2, or present DAS28 between 3.2 to 5.1 with DAS28 improvement from 0.6 to >1.2, or present DAS28 >5.2 with DAS28 improvement >1.2 correspond to 'moderate response; present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement <0.6, or present DAS28 between 3.2 to 5.1 with DAS28 improvement <0.6, or present DAS28 >5.1 with DAS28 improvement <0.6 to 1.2 correspond to 'no response'.
Change From Baseline in Swollen 66-joint Count
The 66 joints assessed for swelling included the 8 distal interphalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal and 10 metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands, the 10 metatarsophalangeal and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows , 2 shoulders , 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). A negative change in baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Tender 68-joint Count
The 68 joints assessed for tenderness included the 8 distal interphalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal and 10 metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands, the 10 metatarsophalangeal and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows , 2 shoulders , 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Pain
The patient's assessment of pain was performed using 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain) after the question "Please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line the most pain you had from your rheumatoid arthritis over the last 24 hours". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very good) to 100 (very poor), after the question "Considering all the ways rheumatoid arthritis affects you, please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line how well you are doing today". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very good) to 100 (very poor), after the question "Considering all the ways rheumatoid arthritis affects your patient, how would you rate his or her current condition?". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in hsCRP
Blood for this assessment was obtained to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in ESR
Blood for this assessment was obtained to monitor disease activity and response to therapy. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Full Information

First Posted
May 19, 2011
Last Updated
February 12, 2015
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01359943
Brief Title
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Secukinumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Taking Methotrexate
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Secukinumab at 12 Weeks Administered With an Intravenous (i.v.) or Subcutaneous (s.c.) Loading Regimen Compared to Placebo in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With Methotrexate
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study compared the efficacy and assessed the safety of secukinumab given as 3 intravenous (i.v.) loading doses or weekly sub-cutaneous (s.c.) loading doses, compared to placebo, followed by monthly s.c. injections in patients with active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) despite treatment with Methotrexate.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, RA, secukinumab, AIN457, inflammatory joints, American College of Rheumatology, ACR

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
221 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
secukinumab 10 mg/kg i.v. loading
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
secukinumab 10mg/kg i.v. loading at Weeks 0, 2 and 4, and placebo s.c. at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, followed by secukinumab 150mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 8
Arm Title
secukinumab 150 mg s.c. loading
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
secukinumab 150mg s.c. loading at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, and placebo i.v. at weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by secukinumab 150mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 8
Arm Title
placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
placebo at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 & 12, followed by secukinumab 150mg s.c. every 4 weeks starting at Week 16
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
secukinumab (AIN457)
Intervention Description
Secukinumab is a human monoclonal antibody. Monoclonal antibodies are proteins that recognize and bind to unique proteins that your body produces. Secukinumab binds and reduces the activity of a cytokine (a "messenger" protein in the body) called Interleukin 17 (IL-17).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo to AIN457 i.v. and to AIN457 s.c..
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20)
Description
A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR20 criteria if the participant had at least 20% improvement in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ACR50 and ACR70
Description
A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR50 or ACR70 criteria if the participant had at least 50% or 70% improvement, respectively, in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Score.
Description
The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. In this trial, only the disability dimension was used. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Within each of the 8 categories, only the item indicating the most severe impairment contributes to the category score. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 Weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Using High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (DAS28-CRP)
Description
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a combined index to measure disease activity in RA participants. DAS28-CRP is determined using the following variables: 28-joint counts (tender28 and swollen28), CRP, and the participant's general health (GH) or global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm (0 = and 100 = ). Using the data from these variables, DAS28-CRP is calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4(crp) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014*GH + 0.96. The calculation results in a DAS28-CRP score from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis of your patient. A DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 Response Using ESR (DAS28-ESR)
Description
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a combined index to measure disease activity in RA participants. DAS28 is determined using the following variables: 28-joint counts (tender28 and swollen28), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the participant's general health (GH) or global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm (0 = and 100 = ). Using the data from these variables, DAS28-ESR is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28 * sqrt(swollen28) + 0.70 * ln(ESR) + 0.014 * GH. The calculation results in a DAS28-ESR score from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis of your patient. A DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
Description
EULAR response criteria are based on DAS28 status in combination with DAS28 improvements. The EULAR response criteria are as follows: present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement >1.2 corresponds to 'good response'; present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement between 0.6 to 1.2, or present DAS28 between 3.2 to 5.1 with DAS28 improvement from 0.6 to >1.2, or present DAS28 >5.2 with DAS28 improvement >1.2 correspond to 'moderate response; present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement <0.6, or present DAS28 between 3.2 to 5.1 with DAS28 improvement <0.6, or present DAS28 >5.1 with DAS28 improvement <0.6 to 1.2 correspond to 'no response'.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Swollen 66-joint Count
Description
The 66 joints assessed for swelling included the 8 distal interphalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal and 10 metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands, the 10 metatarsophalangeal and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows , 2 shoulders , 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). A negative change in baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Tender 68-joint Count
Description
The 68 joints assessed for tenderness included the 8 distal interphalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal and 10 metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands, the 10 metatarsophalangeal and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows , 2 shoulders , 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Pain
Description
The patient's assessment of pain was performed using 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain) after the question "Please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line the most pain you had from your rheumatoid arthritis over the last 24 hours". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Description
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very good) to 100 (very poor), after the question "Considering all the ways rheumatoid arthritis affects you, please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line how well you are doing today". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Description
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very good) to 100 (very poor), after the question "Considering all the ways rheumatoid arthritis affects your patient, how would you rate his or her current condition?". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in hsCRP
Description
Blood for this assessment was obtained to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in ESR
Description
Blood for this assessment was obtained to monitor disease activity and response to therapy. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: presence of RA classified by ACR 2010 revised criteria for at least 3 months before screening must have been taking MTX for at least 3 months before randomization and must currently be on a stable dose of MTX for at least 4 weeks before randomization. At Baseline: Disease activity criteria defined by >6 tender joints out of 68 and >6 swollen joints out of 66 and with at least 1 of the following at screening: Anti-CCP antibodies positive OR Rheumatoid Factor positive and with at least 1 of the following at screening: hsCRP ≥ 10 mg/L OR ESR ≥ 28 Exclusion criteria: RA patients functional status class IV according to the ACR 1991 revised criteria Previous exposure to secukinumab or any other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17 or IL-17 receptor Previous exposure ever to an anti-TNF-a agent or any other immunomodulatory biologic agent (experimental or approved) Patients taking high potency opioid analgesics (e.g., methadone, hydromorphone, or morphine) Any therapy by intra-articular injections (e.g. corticosteroid, hyaluronan) required for treatment of arthritis within 4 weeks before randomization Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vestavia
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Peoria
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85381
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Upland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91786
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bowling Green
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tupelo
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
38801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68516
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Pleven
ZIP/Postal Code
5800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sevlievo
ZIP/Postal Code
5400
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1505
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1612
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
St. John's
State/Province
Newfoundland and Labrador
ZIP/Postal Code
A1C 5B8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sainte-Foy
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1W 4R4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1023
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Debrecen
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Szeged
ZIP/Postal Code
H-6725
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Valeggio Sul Mincio
State/Province
(vr)
ZIP/Postal Code
37067
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Arenzano
State/Province
GE
ZIP/Postal Code
16011
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Genova
State/Province
GE
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00152
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Siena
State/Province
SI
ZIP/Postal Code
53100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Torino
State/Province
TO
ZIP/Postal Code
10128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-218
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-341
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
04-141
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
San Juan
ZIP/Postal Code
00909
Country
Puerto Rico
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bardejov
State/Province
Slovak Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
085 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Trnava
State/Province
Slovensko
ZIP/Postal Code
91701
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lucenec
ZIP/Postal Code
98401
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Partizánske
ZIP/Postal Code
95801
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Piestany
ZIP/Postal Code
92112
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sabinov
ZIP/Postal Code
08301
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Stara Lubovna
ZIP/Postal Code
06401
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Topolcany
ZIP/Postal Code
95501
Country
Slovakia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26834211
Citation
Tlustochowicz W, Rahman P, Seriolo B, Krammer G, Porter B, Widmer A, Richards HB. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Loading Dose Regimens of Secukinumab in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from a Randomized Phase II Study. J Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;43(3):495-503. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150117. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Secukinumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Taking Methotrexate

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs