search
Back to results

Efficacy Study of Two Formulations of Erythropoietin

Primary Purpose

Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Formulations of Epoetin in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Epoetin Alfa-BioManguinhos
Epoetin Alfa-BioSimilar
Sponsored by
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Formulations of Epoetin in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis focused on measuring Erythropoietin, Chronic renal failure, Hemodialysis, Anemia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We included adult patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis for more than three months at the Dialysis Unit of the Department of Nephrology, HCPA and the Center for Dialysis and Transplant (CDT), characterized as as patients on chronic regular dialysis procedure. Patients already in use of EPO for at least three months, only those taking the drug by subcutaneous and agreed to participate in the study.

Patients using different doses of EPO were included, but these were distributed across the treatment groups by randomization stratum dose of EPO, to ensure even distribution of patients in both groups.

It was considered that patients with HIV or AIDS who were in treatment for the disease with proper clinical management would be eligible for the study (as exemplified by patients with HIV or AIDS approved for inclusion on the waiting list for cadaveric kidney transplantation) .

Patients with a history of cancer or already treated in the oncological standpoint, and no signs of disease activity could be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had other causes of anemia defined for maintenance, for example, patients with liver cirrhosis, with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, patients with chronic Gastro Intestinal, Genital or Urinary bleeding or other sites were excluded. Similarly patients with AIDS without treatment, hemolytic anemia, pancytopenia, thalassemia, sickle cell anemia, myelodysplasia, multiple myeloma or other cancers or inflammatory arthritis. There was also no inclusion of patients with intolerance or allergy to iron parenterally, patients without adherence to dialysis or with chronic inadequate dialysis blood flow of vascular access persistently below 250 mL / min, kt / v, as a measure of efficiency of hemodialysis, persistently <1.2) or frequent hospitalizations considered as possible causes of inadequate response to erythropoietin.

We excluded patients with mental illness or condition that prevents the free consent and signature of informed consent, as well as previous reports of serious adverse effects to the drugs studied.

Criteria for withdrawal from the clinical trial: a view of the high morbidity of hemodialysis patients, expressed by frequent hospital clinics, it was found that patients in the study would not be withdrawn from the study due to hospitalization, provided that: the hospital did not involve surgery (except vascular access surgery or hospitalization in the intensive care unit or equivalent, or that represent otherwise, a loss of patient follow-up or co-interventions in the treatment of anemia of these).

Were withdrawn from the study patients who required blood transfusion because they have severe anemia or intervention unrelated to the usual treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Epoetin Bio-Manguinhos

    EPO-BioSimilar

    Arm Description

    Subcutaneous administration of EPO-BioSimilar

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Hemoglobin Level in blood
    The evaluation of the efficacy between different formulations of recombinant EPO: the one produced by Bio-Manguinhos and produced by private industry was observed in response to EPO as measured by levels of hemoglobin (Hb) results. The mean Hb of the two groups were compared, as well as the variation observed in both groups over time follow-up (six months).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Safety
    Assessing the safety of the formulation produced by Bio-Manguinhos was performed by comparing the rate of adverse events related to the use of recombinant EPO in the two study groups

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 17, 2010
    Last Updated
    February 24, 2017
    Sponsor
    Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
    Collaborators
    Rio Grande do Sul State Health Department - SES/RS, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01184495
    Brief Title
    Efficacy Study of Two Formulations of Erythropoietin
    Official Title
    Comparison of the Efficacy of Erythropoietin Produced in the Institute of Technology in Immunobiology of the Oswald Cruz Foundation (BioMaguinhos/FioCruz/MS) and Erythropoietin Industrialized in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    April 2008 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2008 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    January 2009 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
    Collaborators
    Rio Grande do Sul State Health Department - SES/RS, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    A double-blind, randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy of two formulations of erythropoietin in patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Formulations of Epoetin in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
    Keywords
    Erythropoietin, Chronic renal failure, Hemodialysis, Anemia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    74 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Epoetin Bio-Manguinhos
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    EPO-BioSimilar
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Subcutaneous administration of EPO-BioSimilar
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Epoetin Alfa-BioManguinhos
    Intervention Description
    Subcutaneous administration of EPO-BioManguinhos
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Epoetin Alfa-BioSimilar
    Intervention Description
    Subcutaneous administration of EPO-BioSimilar
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Hemoglobin Level in blood
    Description
    The evaluation of the efficacy between different formulations of recombinant EPO: the one produced by Bio-Manguinhos and produced by private industry was observed in response to EPO as measured by levels of hemoglobin (Hb) results. The mean Hb of the two groups were compared, as well as the variation observed in both groups over time follow-up (six months).
    Time Frame
    Monthly assessment of the levels of hemoglobin in blood at baseline and monthly for six months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Safety
    Description
    Assessing the safety of the formulation produced by Bio-Manguinhos was performed by comparing the rate of adverse events related to the use of recombinant EPO in the two study groups
    Time Frame
    Monthly assessment of adverse events

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: We included adult patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis for more than three months at the Dialysis Unit of the Department of Nephrology, HCPA and the Center for Dialysis and Transplant (CDT), characterized as as patients on chronic regular dialysis procedure. Patients already in use of EPO for at least three months, only those taking the drug by subcutaneous and agreed to participate in the study. Patients using different doses of EPO were included, but these were distributed across the treatment groups by randomization stratum dose of EPO, to ensure even distribution of patients in both groups. It was considered that patients with HIV or AIDS who were in treatment for the disease with proper clinical management would be eligible for the study (as exemplified by patients with HIV or AIDS approved for inclusion on the waiting list for cadaveric kidney transplantation) . Patients with a history of cancer or already treated in the oncological standpoint, and no signs of disease activity could be included. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who had other causes of anemia defined for maintenance, for example, patients with liver cirrhosis, with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, patients with chronic Gastro Intestinal, Genital or Urinary bleeding or other sites were excluded. Similarly patients with AIDS without treatment, hemolytic anemia, pancytopenia, thalassemia, sickle cell anemia, myelodysplasia, multiple myeloma or other cancers or inflammatory arthritis. There was also no inclusion of patients with intolerance or allergy to iron parenterally, patients without adherence to dialysis or with chronic inadequate dialysis blood flow of vascular access persistently below 250 mL / min, kt / v, as a measure of efficiency of hemodialysis, persistently <1.2) or frequent hospitalizations considered as possible causes of inadequate response to erythropoietin. We excluded patients with mental illness or condition that prevents the free consent and signature of informed consent, as well as previous reports of serious adverse effects to the drugs studied. Criteria for withdrawal from the clinical trial: a view of the high morbidity of hemodialysis patients, expressed by frequent hospital clinics, it was found that patients in the study would not be withdrawn from the study due to hospitalization, provided that: the hospital did not involve surgery (except vascular access surgery or hospitalization in the intensive care unit or equivalent, or that represent otherwise, a loss of patient follow-up or co-interventions in the treatment of anemia of these). Were withdrawn from the study patients who required blood transfusion because they have severe anemia or intervention unrelated to the usual treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Paulo Dornelles Picon
    Organizational Affiliation
    Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    25141114
    Citation
    Picon PD, Pribbernow SC, Prompt CA, Schacher SC, Antunes VV, Mentz BP, Oliveira FL, Souza CM, Schacher FC. Randomized double-blind clinical trial of a new human epoetin versus a commercially available formula for anemia control in patients on hemodialysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Aug;69(8):547-53. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(08)08.
    Results Reference
    derived
    Links:
    URL
    http://www.fiocruz.br/bio
    Description
    Institute BioManguinhos/FioCruz/Ministry of Health Brazil

    Learn more about this trial

    Efficacy Study of Two Formulations of Erythropoietin

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs