search
Back to results

Efficiency of a Composite Personalised Care on Functional Outcome in Early Psychosis (PSYCARE)

Primary Purpose

Psychosis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive training
Personalized neuroprotective strategies : Vitamin B12, folinic acid, Omega 3, NAC
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Sponsored by
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Psychosis

Eligibility Criteria

15 Years - 30 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Adolescent and young adults, both sexes, aged 15 to 30 years, From Community or academic clinics, Characterised as UHR or FEP according to the first four items of the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS) (first subscale for psychosis) [8] during the last 12 months, Informed and written signed consent, Participant with regular health insurance Exclusion Criteria: Severe and unstabilised medical conditions, Insufficient level in reading and/or French language, Current participation in another intervention trial, Enforced hospitalization , Intellectual Deficiency (i.e. Intelligence Quotient<70), and / or sensorimotor deficits incompatible with the cognitive training, Former treated episode of psychosis, chronic schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or Bipolar disorder, Current severe depression (i.e. MADRS > 34), Receiving therapeutic levels of antipsychotics for more than 12 months, Current medication with benzodiazepine >30 mg per day equivalent diazepam Current daily use of substance of abuse (higher than an average equivalent of daily number of 5 cannabis cigarettes). Current severe substance use disorder except for nicotine (SUD, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders version V (DSMV criteria) during the last 6 months and/or former severe SUD or dependence DSMIV during more than 5 years. Current cognitive remediation programme, Pregnant women, parturients, and lactating women, Individuals deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, Individuals of legal age who are the subject of a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent

Sites / Locations

  • CHRU Brest
  • Centre Esquirol - CHU CAEN
  • CHU Clermont Ferrand
  • Centre Hospitalier La Chartreuse
  • Hôpital Fontan
  • Hôpital La Colombière - CHU Montpellier
  • Eldorado - Maison des Adolescents de Meurthe et Moselle
  • CH Orsay
  • GHU Paris Neurosciences Psychiatrie
  • Nineteen GHU
  • CHU Poitiers
  • C.H. Guillaume Regnier
  • CHU Purpan

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Treatment as usual (TAU)

TAU + cognitive training

TAU + personalized neuroprotective strategies

TAU + personalized neuroprotective strategies + cognitive training

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Global functioning
Global functioning will be assessed using the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), a well-validated tool for the measurement of social functioning previously used in early psychosis. PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale (minimum value 1; maximum value: 100). The scale evaluates four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self-care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours during a determined reference period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Persistence of efficacy on global functioning
Score on the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale (minimum value 1; maximum value: 100). The scale evaluates four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self-care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours during a determined reference period
Persistence of efficacy on global functioning
Scores at Global Functioning Scale-Social and Role [120], measured at V2 and V3. This scale provides a 1 to 10 score separately for social role and for functioning.
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (1)
Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS) CAARMS evaluates seven dimensions of symptomatology. It provides operational criteria to categorise subjects as 'at-risk' or as psychotic (psychosis threshold) on the basis of the first subscale (10 min), 'positive symptoms' encompassing four sub-scales (Unusual Thought Content, Non-Bizarre Ideas, Perceptual Abnormalities, Disorganised Speech)
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (2)
- SOFAS (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale or EFSP. SOFAS specifically estimates social functioning on a scale between 0 and 100.
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (3)
- MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg depression scale). MADRS is a 10 -item scale that evaluates different aspects of depressive symptomatology. It provides a good estimation of the severity of depression and is sensitive to change.
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (4)
- Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). BPRS is a scale that evaluates general psychiatric symptomatology.
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (5)
PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) PANSS is a 30-item scale widely used in schizophrenia research to assess positive and negative psychotic dimensions as well as general symptomatology
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (6)
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. CGI estimates the current severity, of illness on a 7-point scale, as well as evolution and therapeutic index in reference to the clinicians past experiences of similar patients (3 items).
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (7)
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. CGI estimates the current severity, of illness on a 7-point scale, as well as evolution and therapeutic index in reference to the clinicians past experiences of similar patients (3 items).
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care on linguistic and discourse markers
The recording of the interview will allow to extract reliable linguistic metrics that will be processed semi-automatically.
Efficiency of composite personalised care on neurological soft signs (1)
Neurological Soft Signs rating scale (NSS) assesses five factors: motor coordination, motor integration, sensory integration, quality of lateralization and involuntary movements or posture; as well as extrapyramidal symptoms (Simpson Angus Scale) and lateralization (Edinburgh questionnaire).
Efficiency of composite personalised care on neurological soft signs (2)
Electronic Neurological Soft Signs (eNNS) This device incorporates a new, tablet-based and clinically suitable app (behavioral tasks), including tasks designed to probe balance of excitation/inhibition (multi-finger tapping task), body scheme tasks where finger posture recognition is measured and visuomotor sequence learning under variable cognitive load (using visual attentional distractors).
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive complaints
Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS) is a 21-item Likert-type scale that allows a quantitative approach of cognitive complaint.
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Verbal learning and memory)
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Flexibility)
TMT A/B (Reitan, 1959)
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Social cognition)
Consensus autour de la COgnition Sociale (CLACOS) (PerSo)
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Selective attention)
D2-R test
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Verbal long-term memory)
Hopskins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) delayed recall
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Visuospatial learning and memory)
Brief Visuospatial Memory test
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Planning abilities)
Shopping test (Martin 1972)
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Speed processing)
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (code)
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Inhibition control)
Stroop (Incompatibility)
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Visuospatial long-term memory)
Brief Visuospatial Memory test (BVMT) delayed recall
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Working Memory)
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (Digit span)
Efficiency of composite personalised care on motivation
Behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral activation system (BAS)
Embodiment ability in virtual reality environment
Embodiment ability in virtual reality environment will be assessed using a simulation of two districts of a lively city via the Vive Pro virtual reality kit
Effect of Composite Personalised Care on Health-related quality-of-life (1)
Short Form -12 items quality of life questionnaire (SF-12) SF-12 is a multipurpose self-report measure of both physical and mental health status
Effect of Composite Personalised Care on Health-related quality-of-life (2)
European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) EQ-5D-5L investigates 5 dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. These 5 dimensions are rated on 5 levels ranging from no problems to extreme problems.
Effect of Composite Personalised Care on medication adherence
Medication adherence (MARS) is a short assessement (5 items) of the adherence to medication
Acceptability of the program for the e-Health application
amount of time spent on the application
Patient's satisfaction with the e-health application
satisfaction score measured by the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
Level and changes of biological markers (metabolism of monocarbon compounds)
dosage of folates, B12 vitamin, homocysteine
Level and changes of biological markers (lipid membranes)
lipid composition of the red blood cells membrane, including the major lipid classes, such as phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylserine (PS), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), PE plasmalogen and their molecular species)
Longitudinal epigenetic and seric changes associated with outcome (1)
Levels of RNA (messenger RNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA) will be assessed using next generation sequencing methods.
Longitudinal epigenetic and seric changes associated with outcome (2)
Levels of RNA (messenger RNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA) will be assessed using next generation sequencing methods.
Cost-effectiveness of Composite Personalised Care
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) will assess the efficiency of CPC vs. TAU (overall and by component). They will be expressed in cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained and in cost per PSP point gained.
Budgetary impact analysis of the generalization of Composite Personalised Care
Total costs and health benefits associated with generalizing CPC will be assessed and compared to TAU over a 5-year period.

Full Information

First Posted
March 16, 2023
Last Updated
April 26, 2023
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05796401
Brief Title
Efficiency of a Composite Personalised Care on Functional Outcome in Early Psychosis
Acronym
PSYCARE
Official Title
PsyCARE Trial - "Efficiency of a Composite Personalised Care on Functional Outcome in Early Psychosis : A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial "
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
June 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
July 15, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 15, 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier St Anne

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Chronic psychosis, including schizophrenia is now viewed as a progressive disorder where cognitive deficits predate the clinical onset. Early intervention programs improve the general outcome with staged care strategies, supporting the view that the period before and around the first episode of psychosis is a window of opportunity for improving its functional recovery. Pioneering epigenetic analyses indicate that psychosis onset involves oxidative stress and inflammation suggesting that neuroprotective strategies could limit or even prevent the onset of or the transition into a chronic disorder. Several biological factors associated with the emergence of psychosis can all be rectified by using safe and easily accepted supplements including alterations folate deficiency/hyperhomocysteinemia; redox imbalance and deficit in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The prevalence of these anomalies (20-30%) justifies a systematic detection and could guide personalised add-on strategy. Cognitive remediation improves quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients with chronic psychosis. It would even be more efficacious in the early phase of psychosis by tackling the negative impact of psychosis on education achievement and employment. However, cognitive dysfunctions are often overlooked in patients at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis and patient with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) and cognitive remediation is not always accessible. New technologies can provide us with youth-friendly, non-stigmatising tools, such as applications with cognitive strategies, motivational tools and functioning guidance personalised according to the need of each individual. Patients can have access to it, wherever they live. Early psychosis can be associated with inflammation, metabolic deficiency, as well as early structural brain anomalies that reflect brain plasticity abilities and could influence the prognosis and response to cognitive training. The study hypothesis is that promoting neuroplasticity by cognitive training and personalised virtual psychoeducation guidance could attenuate or reverse early cognitive deficits and improve the overall functional outcome in young patients UHR or FEP and that this effect is modulated by individual brain plasticity abilities. The overall objective of PsyCARE_trial is to improve early intervention in psychosis by providing a composite personalised care (CPC) that will enable personalised cognitive training and psychoeducation guidance, adapted to individuals' needs, cognitive abilities and biological background.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psychosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Model Description
Phase III, Prospective Randomised Open, Blinded End-point (PROBE) controlled trial stratified according to the developmental burden and centre, with 2x2 factorial designs (equivalent to a 4-arms clinical trial) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
500 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
TAU + cognitive training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
TAU + personalized neuroprotective strategies
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
TAU + personalized neuroprotective strategies + cognitive training
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive training
Intervention Description
Cognitive reinforcement using digital applications (PSYCARE application) during 12 weeks +/- virtual reality based cognitive remediation application : 24 sessions over 12 weeks (only for patients who have a higher cognitive deficits (TMTB score >110s))
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Personalized neuroprotective strategies : Vitamin B12, folinic acid, Omega 3, NAC
Intervention Description
Personalised neuroprotective medication adapted to the individual's biological profile : Vitamin B12 : 500 micrograms per day Folinic acid : 50 mg per day Omega 3 : 1380 mg EicosaPentaenoic Acid (EPA) + 1140 mg DocosaHexaenoic Acid (DHA) per day N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) : 2400 mg per day duration of supplementation(s) : 12 weeks
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Treatment as usual (TAU)
Intervention Description
Treatment as usual (TAU), including a standardised psycho-education program with a group cognitive behavioural therapy (e.g. I_Care - You Care) and, in FEP only, second generation antipsychotic from a restricted list (following the recommendations www.orygen.org.au)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Global functioning
Description
Global functioning will be assessed using the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), a well-validated tool for the measurement of social functioning previously used in early psychosis. PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale (minimum value 1; maximum value: 100). The scale evaluates four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self-care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours during a determined reference period
Time Frame
3 to 4 months after the beginning of intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Persistence of efficacy on global functioning
Description
Score on the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale (minimum value 1; maximum value: 100). The scale evaluates four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self-care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours during a determined reference period
Time Frame
6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Persistence of efficacy on global functioning
Description
Scores at Global Functioning Scale-Social and Role [120], measured at V2 and V3. This scale provides a 1 to 10 score separately for social role and for functioning.
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (1)
Description
Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS) CAARMS evaluates seven dimensions of symptomatology. It provides operational criteria to categorise subjects as 'at-risk' or as psychotic (psychosis threshold) on the basis of the first subscale (10 min), 'positive symptoms' encompassing four sub-scales (Unusual Thought Content, Non-Bizarre Ideas, Perceptual Abnormalities, Disorganised Speech)
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (2)
Description
- SOFAS (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale or EFSP. SOFAS specifically estimates social functioning on a scale between 0 and 100.
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (3)
Description
- MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg depression scale). MADRS is a 10 -item scale that evaluates different aspects of depressive symptomatology. It provides a good estimation of the severity of depression and is sensitive to change.
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (4)
Description
- Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). BPRS is a scale that evaluates general psychiatric symptomatology.
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (5)
Description
PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) PANSS is a 30-item scale widely used in schizophrenia research to assess positive and negative psychotic dimensions as well as general symptomatology
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (6)
Description
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. CGI estimates the current severity, of illness on a 7-point scale, as well as evolution and therapeutic index in reference to the clinicians past experiences of similar patients (3 items).
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care (CPC) on clinical outcome (7)
Description
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. CGI estimates the current severity, of illness on a 7-point scale, as well as evolution and therapeutic index in reference to the clinicians past experiences of similar patients (3 items).
Time Frame
at baseline, then 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of Composite Personalised Care on linguistic and discourse markers
Description
The recording of the interview will allow to extract reliable linguistic metrics that will be processed semi-automatically.
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on neurological soft signs (1)
Description
Neurological Soft Signs rating scale (NSS) assesses five factors: motor coordination, motor integration, sensory integration, quality of lateralization and involuntary movements or posture; as well as extrapyramidal symptoms (Simpson Angus Scale) and lateralization (Edinburgh questionnaire).
Time Frame
at baseline and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on neurological soft signs (2)
Description
Electronic Neurological Soft Signs (eNNS) This device incorporates a new, tablet-based and clinically suitable app (behavioral tasks), including tasks designed to probe balance of excitation/inhibition (multi-finger tapping task), body scheme tasks where finger posture recognition is measured and visuomotor sequence learning under variable cognitive load (using visual attentional distractors).
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive complaints
Description
Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS) is a 21-item Likert-type scale that allows a quantitative approach of cognitive complaint.
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Verbal learning and memory)
Description
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Flexibility)
Description
TMT A/B (Reitan, 1959)
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Social cognition)
Description
Consensus autour de la COgnition Sociale (CLACOS) (PerSo)
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Selective attention)
Description
D2-R test
Time Frame
3 to 4 Month and 6 to 8 Month after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Verbal long-term memory)
Description
Hopskins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) delayed recall
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Visuospatial learning and memory)
Description
Brief Visuospatial Memory test
Time Frame
3 to 4 Month and 6 to 8 Month after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Planning abilities)
Description
Shopping test (Martin 1972)
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Speed processing)
Description
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (code)
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Inhibition control)
Description
Stroop (Incompatibility)
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Visuospatial long-term memory)
Description
Brief Visuospatial Memory test (BVMT) delayed recall
Time Frame
3 to 4 Month and 6 to 8 Month after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on cognitive functions (Working Memory)
Description
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (Digit span)
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Efficiency of composite personalised care on motivation
Description
Behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral activation system (BAS)
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Embodiment ability in virtual reality environment
Description
Embodiment ability in virtual reality environment will be assessed using a simulation of two districts of a lively city via the Vive Pro virtual reality kit
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Effect of Composite Personalised Care on Health-related quality-of-life (1)
Description
Short Form -12 items quality of life questionnaire (SF-12) SF-12 is a multipurpose self-report measure of both physical and mental health status
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Effect of Composite Personalised Care on Health-related quality-of-life (2)
Description
European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) EQ-5D-5L investigates 5 dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. These 5 dimensions are rated on 5 levels ranging from no problems to extreme problems.
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Effect of Composite Personalised Care on medication adherence
Description
Medication adherence (MARS) is a short assessement (5 items) of the adherence to medication
Time Frame
at baseline, 3 to 4 months and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Acceptability of the program for the e-Health application
Description
amount of time spent on the application
Time Frame
3 to 4 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Patient's satisfaction with the e-health application
Description
satisfaction score measured by the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS)
Time Frame
3 to 4 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Level and changes of biological markers (metabolism of monocarbon compounds)
Description
dosage of folates, B12 vitamin, homocysteine
Time Frame
at baseline and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Level and changes of biological markers (lipid membranes)
Description
lipid composition of the red blood cells membrane, including the major lipid classes, such as phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylserine (PS), sphingomyelin (SM), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), PE plasmalogen and their molecular species)
Time Frame
at baseline and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Longitudinal epigenetic and seric changes associated with outcome (1)
Description
Levels of RNA (messenger RNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA) will be assessed using next generation sequencing methods.
Time Frame
at baseline and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Longitudinal epigenetic and seric changes associated with outcome (2)
Description
Levels of RNA (messenger RNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA) will be assessed using next generation sequencing methods.
Time Frame
at baseline and 6 to 8 months after the beginning of intervention
Title
Cost-effectiveness of Composite Personalised Care
Description
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) will assess the efficiency of CPC vs. TAU (overall and by component). They will be expressed in cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained and in cost per PSP point gained.
Time Frame
at the end of the follow-up, up to 4 years
Title
Budgetary impact analysis of the generalization of Composite Personalised Care
Description
Total costs and health benefits associated with generalizing CPC will be assessed and compared to TAU over a 5-year period.
Time Frame
at the end of the follow-up, up to 4 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adolescent and young adults, both sexes, aged 15 to 30 years, From Community or academic clinics, Characterised as UHR or FEP according to the first four items of the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State (CAARMS) (first subscale for psychosis) [8] during the last 12 months, Informed and written signed consent, Participant with regular health insurance Exclusion Criteria: Severe and unstabilised medical conditions, Insufficient level in reading and/or French language, Current participation in another intervention trial, Enforced hospitalization , Intellectual Deficiency (i.e. Intelligence Quotient<70), and / or sensorimotor deficits incompatible with the cognitive training, Former treated episode of psychosis, chronic schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or Bipolar disorder, Current severe depression (i.e. MADRS > 34), Receiving therapeutic levels of antipsychotics for more than 12 months, Current medication with benzodiazepine >30 mg per day equivalent diazepam Current daily use of substance of abuse (higher than an average equivalent of daily number of 5 cannabis cigarettes). Current severe substance use disorder except for nicotine (SUD, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders version V (DSMV criteria) during the last 6 months and/or former severe SUD or dependence DSMIV during more than 5 years. Current cognitive remediation programme, Pregnant women, parturients, and lactating women, Individuals deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, Individuals of legal age who are the subject of a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marie-Odile KREBS
Phone
+33 1 45 65 74 97
Email
marie-odile.krebs@inserm.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Khaoussou SYLLA
Phone
+331.45.65.73.35
Email
K.SYLLA@ghu-paris.fr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHRU Brest
City
Brest
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christophe LEMEY
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christophe LEMEY
Facility Name
Centre Esquirol - CHU CAEN
City
Caen
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sonia DOLLFUS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sonia DOLLFUS
Facility Name
CHU Clermont Ferrand
City
Clermont-Ferrand
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Isabelle JALENQUES
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Isabelle JALENQUES
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier La Chartreuse
City
Dijon
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Fontan
City
Lille
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Renaud JARDRI
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Renaud JARDRI
Facility Name
Hôpital La Colombière - CHU Montpellier
City
Montpellier
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diane PURPER OUAKIL
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diane PURPER OUAKIL
Facility Name
Eldorado - Maison des Adolescents de Meurthe et Moselle
City
Nancy
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vincent LAPREVOTE
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vincent LAPREVOTE
Facility Name
CH Orsay
City
Orsay
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie BOURGIN
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie BOURGIN
Facility Name
GHU Paris Neurosciences Psychiatrie
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marie-Odile KREBS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marie-Odile KREBS
Facility Name
Nineteen GHU
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gilles MARTINEZ
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gilles MARTINEZ
Facility Name
CHU Poitiers
City
Poitiers
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nematollah JAAFARI
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nematollah JAAFARI
Facility Name
C.H. Guillaume Regnier
City
Rennes
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Purpan
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Philippe RAYNAUD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Philippe RAYNAUD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Efficiency of a Composite Personalised Care on Functional Outcome in Early Psychosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs