search
Back to results

Eldecalcitol for GLucocorticoid Induced OsteopoRosIs Versus Alfacalcidol (e-GLORIA)

Primary Purpose

Osteoporosis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Eldecalcitol
Alfacalcidol
Sponsored by
e-GLORIA trial Protocol Review Committee
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoporosis focused on measuring glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Patients who are currently taking or plan to take oral glucocorticoid medication for 3 months or longer and thus require treatment as per the 'Guidelines on the management and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis of the Japanese Society for Bone and mineral Research (2004),' and who meet at least one of the conditions below. No restriction is imposed on the underlying disease treated with the oral glucocorticoid medication.

    (i) Have any existing insufficiency fracture (ii) %YAM <80 (iii) Oral glucocorticoid daily dose >= 5 mg prednisolone equivalent

  • (2) Aged between 20 and 85 years (both inclusive) at consent
  • (3) Patients who are able to walk without assistance
  • (4) Provided consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) BMD (L1-4 or T-Hip) T score < -3.5
  • (2) Have 3 or more vertebral fractures between L1 and L4.
  • (3) Have 1 or more SQ grade 3 vertebral fractures, or 3 or more SQ grade 2 vertebral fractures.
  • (4) Have received a bisphosphonate preparation for 2 weeks or longer within 6 months before the start of study treatment.
  • (5) Have received a bisphosphonate preparation for 2 years or longer within 3 years before the start of study treatment.
  • (6) Have received a parathyroid hormone preparation before the start of study treatment.
  • (7) Have received one or more doses of an anti-RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand) antibody.
  • (8) Have received one or more doses of an anti-sclerostin antibody or cathepsin K inhibitor.
  • (9) Have received any other investigational product (including placebo) within 16 weeks before the start of study treatment in the present study.
  • (10) Have received any of the following drugs that can affect bone metabolism within 8 weeks before the start of study treatment, with the exception of calcium preparations: (i) Bisphosphonates (ii) Active vitamin D preparations (including those for topical use) (iii) Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (iv) Calcitonin preparations (v) Vitamin K2 preparations (vi) Ipriflavone preparations (vii) Reproductive hormone products (except those for vaginal use such as vaginal tablets and creams) (viii) Other drugs that can affect bone metabolism
  • (11) Pregnant woman or woman who desires to become pregnant
  • (12) Have corrected serum calcium >= 10.4 mg/dL or < 8.0 mg/dL at enrollment.
  • (13) Have corrected urinary calcium > 0.4 mg/dL GF at enrollment.
  • (14) Have a past or current history of urinary calculus.
  • (15) Have eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at enrollment.
  • (16) Have severe liver disease such as cirrhosis or severe heart disease such as severe cardiac failure.
  • (17) Have active malignancy or received treatment for malignancy, including adjuvant therapy, within the past 3 years.
  • (18) Have a history of hypersensitivity to eldecalcitol, alfacalcidol, or other vitamin D preparations.
  • (19) Other persons judged by the investigator (or subinvestigator) to be inappropriate to participate in this study.

Sites / Locations

  • Nara Hospital Kinki University Faculty of MedicineRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Eldecalcitol group

Alfacalcidol group

Arm Description

Eldecalcitol 0.75 microgram once daily orally

Alfacalcidol 1 microgram once daily orally

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent change in lumbar spine (L1-4) bone mineral density
Incidence of vertebral fractures
A vertebral fracture will be classified as a new fracture (i.e., change from grade 0 to grade 1, 2, or 3) or worsening of a prevalent fracture (i.e., change from grade 1 to grade 2 or 3, or change from grade 2 to grade 3) using a semi-quantitative [SQ] method according to the "Vertebral Fracture Assessment Criteria, 2012 revised version."

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (both traumatic and non-traumatic; All sites)
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (both traumatic and non-traumatic; 3 Major sites)
The 3 Major sites are defined as the forearm, humerus, and femur.
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (both traumatic and non-traumatic; 6 Major sites)
The 6 Major sites are defined as the femur, lower leg, humerus, forearm, clavicle, and pelvis.
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (traumatic; All sites)
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (traumatic; 3 Major sites)
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (traumatic; 6 Major sites)
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (non-traumatic; All sites)
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (non-traumatic; 3 Major sites)
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (non-traumatic; 6 Major sites)
Incidence of vertebral fractures (new vertebral fractures)
Incidence of vertebral fractures (worsening of prevalent vertebral fractures)
Incidence of vertebral fractures (clinical vertebral fractures)
Incidence of vertebral fracture (new or worsening of prevalent fractures) by glucocorticoid dose
Incidence of clinical vertebral fractures by glucocorticoid dose
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by glucocorticoid dose
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by glucocorticoid dose
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by glucocorticoid dose
Incidence of vertebral fractures (new or worsening) by bone mineral density
Incidence of clinical vertebral fractures by bone mineral density
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by bone mineral density
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by bone mineral density
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by bone mineral density
Incidence of vertebral fractures (new or worsening) by number of prevalent fractures
Incidence of clinical vertebral fractures by number of prevalent fractures
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by number of prevalent fractures
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by number of prevalent fractures
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by number of prevalent fractures
Incidence of new vertebral fractures by severity
Semiquantitative (SQ) method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Incidence of new clinical vertebral fractures by severity
SQ method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Incidence of new non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by severity
SQ method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Incidence of new non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by severity
SQ method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Incidence of new non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by severity
Incidence of osteoporotic fractures
An osteoporotic fracture is defined as a fracture of the following sites: vertebral body, ribs, pelvis, humerus, clavicle, scapula, sternum, proximal femur, other portions of the femur, tibia, fibula, and forearm.
Incidence of FRAX-defined major osteoporotic fractures
The 4 Major sites are defined as clinical fractures of the spine, forearm, hip, and shoulder.
Percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density
Percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density
Percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Percent change in TRACP-5b bone metabolism marker
Percent change in TRACP-5b bone metabolism marker
Percent change in PINP bone metabolism marker
Percent change in PINP bone metabolism marker
Frequency of falls
Change in muscle strength (back muscle strength)
Change in muscle strength (back muscle strength)
Change in muscle strength (back muscle strength)
Change in muscle strength (grip strength)
Change in muscle strength (grip strength)
Change in muscle strength (grip strength)
Change in height
Change in height
Change in height

Full Information

First Posted
October 28, 2013
Last Updated
August 5, 2014
Sponsor
e-GLORIA trial Protocol Review Committee
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01974167
Brief Title
Eldecalcitol for GLucocorticoid Induced OsteopoRosIs Versus Alfacalcidol
Acronym
e-GLORIA
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
e-GLORIA trial Protocol Review Committee

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol monotherapy compared with alfacalcidol monotherapy in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, using a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, comparative design.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoporosis
Keywords
glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Eldecalcitol group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Eldecalcitol 0.75 microgram once daily orally
Arm Title
Alfacalcidol group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Alfacalcidol 1 microgram once daily orally
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Eldecalcitol
Intervention Description
Eldecalcitol 0.75 microgram once daily orally
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Alfacalcidol
Intervention Description
Alfacalcidol 1 microgram once daily orally
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent change in lumbar spine (L1-4) bone mineral density
Time Frame
12 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Incidence of vertebral fractures
Description
A vertebral fracture will be classified as a new fracture (i.e., change from grade 0 to grade 1, 2, or 3) or worsening of a prevalent fracture (i.e., change from grade 1 to grade 2 or 3, or change from grade 2 to grade 3) using a semi-quantitative [SQ] method according to the "Vertebral Fracture Assessment Criteria, 2012 revised version."
Time Frame
36 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (both traumatic and non-traumatic; All sites)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (both traumatic and non-traumatic; 3 Major sites)
Description
The 3 Major sites are defined as the forearm, humerus, and femur.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (both traumatic and non-traumatic; 6 Major sites)
Description
The 6 Major sites are defined as the femur, lower leg, humerus, forearm, clavicle, and pelvis.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (traumatic; All sites)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (traumatic; 3 Major sites)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (traumatic; 6 Major sites)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (non-traumatic; All sites)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (non-traumatic; 3 Major sites)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (non-traumatic; 6 Major sites)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of vertebral fractures (new vertebral fractures)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of vertebral fractures (worsening of prevalent vertebral fractures)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of vertebral fractures (clinical vertebral fractures)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of vertebral fracture (new or worsening of prevalent fractures) by glucocorticoid dose
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of clinical vertebral fractures by glucocorticoid dose
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by glucocorticoid dose
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by glucocorticoid dose
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by glucocorticoid dose
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of vertebral fractures (new or worsening) by bone mineral density
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of clinical vertebral fractures by bone mineral density
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by bone mineral density
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by bone mineral density
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by bone mineral density
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of vertebral fractures (new or worsening) by number of prevalent fractures
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of clinical vertebral fractures by number of prevalent fractures
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by number of prevalent fractures
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by number of prevalent fractures
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by number of prevalent fractures
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of new vertebral fractures by severity
Description
Semiquantitative (SQ) method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of new clinical vertebral fractures by severity
Description
SQ method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of new non-vertebral fractures (all sites) by severity
Description
SQ method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of new non-vertebral fractures (3 Major sites) by severity
Description
SQ method is used for grading of vertebral fractures.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of new non-vertebral fractures (6 Major sites) by severity
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of osteoporotic fractures
Description
An osteoporotic fracture is defined as a fracture of the following sites: vertebral body, ribs, pelvis, humerus, clavicle, scapula, sternum, proximal femur, other portions of the femur, tibia, fibula, and forearm.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Incidence of FRAX-defined major osteoporotic fractures
Description
The 4 Major sites are defined as clinical fractures of the spine, forearm, hip, and shoulder.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density
Time Frame
6 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density
Time Frame
24 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density
Time Frame
36 months after the start of study drug administration (or at the time of withdrawal from the study)
Title
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Time Frame
6 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Time Frame
12 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Time Frame
24 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in proximal femur (total-hip) bone mineral density
Time Frame
36 months after the start of study drug administration (or at the time of withdrawal from the study)
Title
Percent change in TRACP-5b bone metabolism marker
Time Frame
6 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Percent change in TRACP-5b bone metabolism marker
Time Frame
12 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Percent change in PINP bone metabolism marker
Time Frame
6 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Percent change in PINP bone metabolism marker
Time Frame
12 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Frequency of falls
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Change in muscle strength (back muscle strength)
Time Frame
12 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in muscle strength (back muscle strength)
Time Frame
24 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in muscle strength (back muscle strength)
Time Frame
36 months after the start of study drug administration (or at the time of withdrawal from the study)
Title
Change in muscle strength (grip strength)
Time Frame
12 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in muscle strength (grip strength)
Time Frame
24 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in muscle strength (grip strength)
Time Frame
36 months after the start of study drug administration (or at the time of withdrawal from the study)
Title
Change in height
Time Frame
12 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in height
Time Frame
24 months after the start of study drug administration
Title
Change in height
Time Frame
36 months after the start of study drug administration (or at the time of withdrawal from the study)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: (1) Patients who are currently taking or plan to take oral glucocorticoid medication for 3 months or longer and thus require treatment as per the 'Guidelines on the management and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis of the Japanese Society for Bone and mineral Research (2004),' and who meet at least one of the conditions below. No restriction is imposed on the underlying disease treated with the oral glucocorticoid medication. (i) Have any existing insufficiency fracture (ii) %YAM <80 (iii) Oral glucocorticoid daily dose >= 5 mg prednisolone equivalent (2) Aged between 20 and 85 years (both inclusive) at consent (3) Patients who are able to walk without assistance (4) Provided consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: (1) BMD (L1-4 or T-Hip) T score < -3.5 (2) Have 3 or more vertebral fractures between L1 and L4. (3) Have 1 or more SQ grade 3 vertebral fractures, or 3 or more SQ grade 2 vertebral fractures. (4) Have received a bisphosphonate preparation for 2 weeks or longer within 6 months before the start of study treatment. (5) Have received a bisphosphonate preparation for 2 years or longer within 3 years before the start of study treatment. (6) Have received a parathyroid hormone preparation before the start of study treatment. (7) Have received one or more doses of an anti-RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand) antibody. (8) Have received one or more doses of an anti-sclerostin antibody or cathepsin K inhibitor. (9) Have received any other investigational product (including placebo) within 16 weeks before the start of study treatment in the present study. (10) Have received any of the following drugs that can affect bone metabolism within 8 weeks before the start of study treatment, with the exception of calcium preparations: (i) Bisphosphonates (ii) Active vitamin D preparations (including those for topical use) (iii) Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (iv) Calcitonin preparations (v) Vitamin K2 preparations (vi) Ipriflavone preparations (vii) Reproductive hormone products (except those for vaginal use such as vaginal tablets and creams) (viii) Other drugs that can affect bone metabolism (11) Pregnant woman or woman who desires to become pregnant (12) Have corrected serum calcium >= 10.4 mg/dL or < 8.0 mg/dL at enrollment. (13) Have corrected urinary calcium > 0.4 mg/dL GF at enrollment. (14) Have a past or current history of urinary calculus. (15) Have eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at enrollment. (16) Have severe liver disease such as cirrhosis or severe heart disease such as severe cardiac failure. (17) Have active malignancy or received treatment for malignancy, including adjuvant therapy, within the past 3 years. (18) Have a history of hypersensitivity to eldecalcitol, alfacalcidol, or other vitamin D preparations. (19) Other persons judged by the investigator (or subinvestigator) to be inappropriate to participate in this study.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
e-GLORIA trial Office
Phone
+81-6229-8937
Email
e-gloria@mebix.co.jp
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Toshio Matsumoto
Organizational Affiliation
University of Tokushima
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nara Hospital Kinki University Faculty of Medicine
City
Ikoma
State/Province
Nara
ZIP/Postal Code
630-0293
Country
Japan
Individual Site Status
Recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Eldecalcitol for GLucocorticoid Induced OsteopoRosIs Versus Alfacalcidol

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs