search
Back to results

End-of-life Decision-making in Patients With Sepsis-related Organ Failure (EIDECS)

Primary Purpose

Severe Sepsis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SOPs for decision-making and communication
Sponsored by
Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Germany
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Severe Sepsis focused on measuring sepsis, organ failure, end-of-life decisions, patient-centered communication

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Staff:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all physicians and nursing staff who treat patients with sepsis-related organ failure on participating ICUs who consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decline to participate

Relatives:

  • Relatives of patients with sepsis-related organ failure and EOL-D who consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decline to participate

Sites / Locations

  • Jena University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Other

Arm Label

"Before"

"After"

Arm Description

No Intervention Observation of current practice

SOPs for decision-making and communication Assessment of practice after implementation of SOPs

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Symptoms of burnout by MBI score in ICU caregivers
Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder by IES and HADS scores in relatives at 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Psychological symptoms by IES, HADS or MBI subscales in caregivers or relatives, respectively
Characteristics of patients with and without end-of-life decisions (EOL-D) including time periods (time until EOL-D, time between EOL-D until death or discharge) and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates
Prevalence and characteristics of EOL-D
Prevalence and characteristics of patients' advance directives
characteristics of EOL-D communication with relatives
Prevalence of request for "Ethik Konsil" (counseling by an external ethical review board)
direct costs of treatment of survivors and non-survivors

Full Information

First Posted
November 11, 2010
Last Updated
August 8, 2017
Sponsor
Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Germany
Collaborators
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01247792
Brief Title
End-of-life Decision-making in Patients With Sepsis-related Organ Failure
Acronym
EIDECS
Official Title
A Time-series Intervention Analysis of End-of-life Decision-making in Patients With Sepsis-related Organ Failure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Germany
Collaborators
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The care of patients with sepsis-related organ failure on the intensive care unit (ICU) often includes end-of-life decision (EOL-D) and communication of such decisions to relatives. This increases the psychological burden for caregiver and relatives. The investigators intend to assess the prevalence and impact of EOL-D on ICU care-givers and relatives ("before") and to use this data to develop and implement standard operating procedures (SOPs) for improved decision-making and communication of these decisions ("after"). The hypothesis is that an improved communication strategy will reduce symptoms of burnout in caregivers and symptoms of anxiety and depression in relatives.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND About half of patients with sepsis related organ failure die on the ICU, frequently after end-of-life decisions (EOL-D), i.e. the decision to withdraw or withhold life-supporting therapies or forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lack of SOPs about how to communicate and share EOL-decisionmaking among staff and to communicate EOL-D to relatives may increase burnout and anxiety in staff as well as relatives. Also, there is uncertainty about the role of patients' advance directives in EOL-Decision-making. HYPOTHESES 1. SOPs for interdisciplinary EOL-decisions will alleviate staff burnout; 2. A structured strategy to communicate EOL-decisions to relatives will lead to reduced anxiety and depression in relatives 3 months after the event. AIMS 1. to develop SOPs for EOL-decision-making which improve timeliness of EOL-D and involvement of interdisciplinary care-givers. 2. to develop a strategy how to communicate these EOL-D to relatives including a structured procedure for participants, set-up, times and content. These aims may be adapted according to the findings of the observation period. CONDUCT The study is designed as an interrupted time series analysis ("before/after study") located on the mixed, neurological and medical ICUs of the Jena University Hospital. It is composed of 3 observation periods separated by phases of data analysis and implementation of changes in behavioral practice. After the first phase of observation and data analysis, SOPs including an improved communication strategy with relatives will be developed on the basis of the collected data. SOPs will be developed and implemented on participating ICUs. In the following second observation period data will be collected to assess changed procedures and primary endpoints. A third round of data analysis, interpretation and observation will enable to further adapt SOPs and achieve sustainability ("post-implementation phase"). ESTIMATED ENROLLMENT Enrollment of 180 staff members (physicians and nursing staff) and 90 relatives during each study phase

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Severe Sepsis
Keywords
sepsis, organ failure, end-of-life decisions, patient-centered communication

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
174 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
"Before"
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No Intervention Observation of current practice
Arm Title
"After"
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
SOPs for decision-making and communication Assessment of practice after implementation of SOPs
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
SOPs for decision-making and communication
Intervention Description
Development and implementation of SOPs for timely and interdisciplinary EOL-decisionmaking and a communication strategy with relatives which addresses participants, set-up, time-points, and content
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Symptoms of burnout by MBI score in ICU caregivers
Time Frame
once during observation period (1 year)
Title
Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder by IES and HADS scores in relatives at 90 days
Time Frame
once during observation period (1 year)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Psychological symptoms by IES, HADS or MBI subscales in caregivers or relatives, respectively
Time Frame
once during the observation period (1 year)
Title
Characteristics of patients with and without end-of-life decisions (EOL-D) including time periods (time until EOL-D, time between EOL-D until death or discharge) and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates
Time Frame
until death or discharge from the ICU
Title
Prevalence and characteristics of EOL-D
Time Frame
until death or discharge from the ICU
Title
Prevalence and characteristics of patients' advance directives
Time Frame
until death or discharge from the ICU
Title
characteristics of EOL-D communication with relatives
Time Frame
ICU stay
Title
Prevalence of request for "Ethik Konsil" (counseling by an external ethical review board)
Time Frame
until death or discharge from the ICU
Title
direct costs of treatment of survivors and non-survivors
Time Frame
until death or discharge from the ICU

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Staff: Inclusion Criteria: all physicians and nursing staff who treat patients with sepsis-related organ failure on participating ICUs who consent to participate Exclusion Criteria: Decline to participate Relatives: Relatives of patients with sepsis-related organ failure and EOL-D who consent to participate Exclusion Criteria: Decline to participate
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christiane S Hartog, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jena University Hospital
City
Jena
State/Province
Thuringia
ZIP/Postal Code
07747
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17267907
Citation
Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, Barnoud D, Bleichner G, Bruel C, Choukroun G, Curtis JR, Fieux F, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Georges H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Jourdain M, Loubert G, Reignier J, Saidi F, Souweine B, Vincent F, Barnes NK, Pochard F, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):469-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 12;357(2):203.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17762223
Citation
Embriaco N, Papazian L, Kentish-Barnes N, Pochard F, Azoulay E. Burnout syndrome among critical care healthcare workers. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):482-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282efd28a.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25311265
Citation
Schwarzkopf D, Westermann I, Skupin H, Riedemann NC, Reinhart K, Pfeifer R, Fritzenwanger M, Gunther A, Witte OW, Hartog CS. A novel questionnaire to measure staff perception of end-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit--development and psychometric testing. J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25634628
Citation
Hartog CS, Schwarzkopf D, Riedemann NC, Pfeifer R, Guenther A, Egerland K, Sprung CL, Hoyer H, Gensichen J, Reinhart K. End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a patient-based questionnaire of intensive care unit staff perception and relatives' psychological response. Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):336-45. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560007. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

End-of-life Decision-making in Patients With Sepsis-related Organ Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs