Endocervical Evaluation With the Curette Versus Cytobrush for the Diagnosis of Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix
Primary Purpose
Cervical Dysplasia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Curette v/s endocervical brush
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Cervical Dysplasia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- French-speaking
- 21 years or older
- Attending our colposcopy clinic
- Need for endocervical evaluation
- Full autonomy or capacity to understand the procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Absence of uterus
- History of DES exposure in utero
Sites / Locations
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Specimen adequacy
Cytological and histological interpretation of the endocervical brush specimens will then be performed, while for the endocervical currete specimens only histological interpretation will be done. The adequacy of the specimens will be based on the quantity of endocervical cells present (< or ≥ 20 endocervical cells), the quantity of histological material (< or ≥ 3 epithelial stripes) and the quality of histological material (absence or presence of lamina propia).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patient discomfort
To evaluate the degree of patient discomfort, patients will be requested to complete a questionnaire once the exam has been completed. The main acceptance variables will be degree of helplessness, pain (on visual analog scales), willingness to undergo the test again, and overall satisfaction. Once the exam has been completed, the doctor performing the sampling will answer a questionnaire indicating his/her perception of the exam (patient's pain, technical difficulty performing the exam, doctors acceptability of the exam).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01435590
First Posted
September 13, 2011
Last Updated
May 27, 2015
Sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01435590
Brief Title
Endocervical Evaluation With the Curette Versus Cytobrush for the Diagnosis of Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Geneva
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
OBJECTIVE: to compare endocervical brushing with endocervical curettage with respect to diagnostic and patient discomfort.
METHOD: women referred to colposcopy because of abnormal Papanicolaou tests will be randomized to endocervical sampling with either a metal curette (endocervical curettage -ECC) or and endocervical brush. All samples will be submitted for histological study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Dysplasia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
180 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Curette v/s endocervical brush
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Specimen adequacy
Description
Cytological and histological interpretation of the endocervical brush specimens will then be performed, while for the endocervical currete specimens only histological interpretation will be done. The adequacy of the specimens will be based on the quantity of endocervical cells present (< or ≥ 20 endocervical cells), the quantity of histological material (< or ≥ 3 epithelial stripes) and the quality of histological material (absence or presence of lamina propia).
Time Frame
09/2011 - 05/2012 (1 year)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient discomfort
Description
To evaluate the degree of patient discomfort, patients will be requested to complete a questionnaire once the exam has been completed. The main acceptance variables will be degree of helplessness, pain (on visual analog scales), willingness to undergo the test again, and overall satisfaction. Once the exam has been completed, the doctor performing the sampling will answer a questionnaire indicating his/her perception of the exam (patient's pain, technical difficulty performing the exam, doctors acceptability of the exam).
Time Frame
09/2011 to 05/2012 (8 months)
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
French-speaking
21 years or older
Attending our colposcopy clinic
Need for endocervical evaluation
Full autonomy or capacity to understand the procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy
Absence of uterus
History of DES exposure in utero
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29107949
Citation
Undurraga M, Catarino R, Navarria I, Ibrahim Y, Puget E, Royannez Drevard I, Pache JC, Tille JC, Petignat P. User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 6;12(11):e0186812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186812. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Endocervical Evaluation With the Curette Versus Cytobrush for the Diagnosis of Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs