Endoscopic Resection in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (RESECT-RGO)
Primary Purpose
GERD, Gastro Esophageal Reflux
Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for GERD
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient with GERD resistant to medical treatment, or requiring daily long-term medical treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications to the realization of a upper GI endoscopy
- Achalasia or other esophageal motor disorders
- Voluminous hiatal hernia Haemorrhagic, haemostasis or coagulation disorders
Sites / Locations
- LAQUIERE
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Endoscopic treatment
Arm Description
ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION AT DAY 1
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rate of patients no longer requiring medical treatment at 6 months
Suggest that endoscopic treatment would allow the cessation of medical treatment in 50% of cases Rate of patients no longer requiring medical treatment at 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
Improvement in quality of life
Percentage of improvement in quality of life measured by the score obtained in the GERD-HRQL questionnaire evaluating the impact of GERD on quality of life.
Improvement of gastric PH
Improvement of gastric PH metric dosages.
Evaluation for morbidity
Rate of all observed complications in per and post immediate procedure (up to 30 minutes). The delayed morbidity of the procedure for the study will be defined by the rate of complications occurring after the examination and up to 30 days. Specially, the following events will be studied: digestive hemorrhage and digestive perforation
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03357809
First Posted
October 13, 2017
Last Updated
April 3, 2019
Sponsor
Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03357809
Brief Title
Endoscopic Resection in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
Acronym
RESECT-RGO
Official Title
Monocentric Study Evaluating the Efficiency and Safety of Anti-reflux Mucosectomy ARMS for the Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
lake of efficiency and poor tolerance of endoscopic technique
Study Start Date
April 10, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 10, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 10, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Currently patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This long-term PPI treatment would likely increase the risk of pulmonary and digestive infections and would not prevent evolution to adenocarcinoma of Barrett's Esophagus. Surgical fundoplication is generally recommended when symptoms are poorly controlled with PPIs and considered as standard treatment despite celioscopy risk. A variety of endoscopic techniques for the treatment of GERD has been proposed to obtain non-surgical control. These endoscopic techniques aim to bring the tissues closer to the Œsogastric (JOG) junction. But a low response rate has been demonstrated with these techniques.
H. Inoue (inventor of the anti-reflux mucosectomy 20 years ago) and his team postulated that the reflux symptoms would be reduced by creating a relative restriction of gastric cardia. The healing of the mucosectomy zone led to restriction of gastric cardia. This observation suggested that ARMS could represent an effective anti-reflux procedure with the advantage that no prostheses would be left in situ.
Few studies have evaluated this new endoscopic technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of gastric mucosectomy for patients with GERD resistant to medical treatment or requiring long-term maintenance medical treatment.
Detailed Description
This is a monocentric prospective therapeutic study. Patients will be recruited in hepato-gastroenterology department of Saint Joseph Hospital (Marseille). A first clinical, endoscopic and PH impedance evaluation will be made. Mucosectomy will be scheduled depending on the results of the review.
The patients will be followed for 2 years with esophageal and gastric PH-impedance monitoring at 6 months and 24 months. Health related quality of life questionnaires will be completed before ARMS, 6 and 24 months after mucosectomy.
The characteristics of the patients will be compared to evaluate the % of responders and non-responders
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
GERD, Gastro Esophageal Reflux
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
15 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Endoscopic treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION AT DAY 1
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Intervention Description
Mucosectomy performed at day 1. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is at least 3 cm long. The mucosal resection is carried out along the side of the small curvature of the stomach, in order to preserve a valve of the cardia at the level of the large curvature of the stomach.
A coloured solution is injected into the submucosa following markers. The correct submucosal injection is confirmed by the lifting of the mucosal surface. A submucosal dissection is carried out using the dual knife. The mucosectomy is repeatedly performed until the mucosal zone is completely resected. The choice of the resection technique will depend on the anatomy of the patient.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of patients no longer requiring medical treatment at 6 months
Description
Suggest that endoscopic treatment would allow the cessation of medical treatment in 50% of cases Rate of patients no longer requiring medical treatment at 6 months
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Percentage of improvement in quality of life measured by the score obtained in the GERD-HRQL questionnaire evaluating the impact of GERD on quality of life.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Improvement of gastric PH
Description
Improvement of gastric PH metric dosages.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Evaluation for morbidity
Description
Rate of all observed complications in per and post immediate procedure (up to 30 minutes). The delayed morbidity of the procedure for the study will be defined by the rate of complications occurring after the examination and up to 30 days. Specially, the following events will be studied: digestive hemorrhage and digestive perforation
Time Frame
30 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient with GERD resistant to medical treatment, or requiring daily long-term medical treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
Contraindications to the realization of a upper GI endoscopy
Achalasia or other esophageal motor disorders
Voluminous hiatal hernia Haemorrhagic, haemostasis or coagulation disorders
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arthur Laquière, MD
Organizational Affiliation
French Society of Digestive Endoscopy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
LAQUIERE
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13008
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21586712
Citation
Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Eklund S, Langstrom G, Lind T, Lundell L; LOTUS Trial Collaborators. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1969-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.626.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24151377
Citation
Cicala M, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, Ribolsi M. Proton pump inhibitor resistance, the real challenge in gastro-esophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 21;19(39):6529-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i39.6529.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23840119
Citation
Kellokumpu I, Voutilainen M, Haglund C, Farkkila M, Roberts PJ, Kautiainen H. Quality of life following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: assessing short-term and long-term outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 28;19(24):3810-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3810.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9265066
Citation
Marret H, Pierre F, Chapron C, Perrotin F, Body G, Lansac J. [Complications of laparoscopy caused by trocars. Preliminary study from the national registry of the French Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(4):405-12. French.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24018760
Citation
Rickenbacher N, Kotter T, Kochen MM, Scherer M, Blozik E. Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):143-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3140-z. Epub 2013 Sep 10. Erratum In: Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):2002.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16542276
Citation
Mahmood Z, Byrne PJ, McMahon BP, Murphy EM, Arfin Q, Ravi N, Weir DG, Reynolds JV. Comparison of transesophageal endoscopic plication (TEP) with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in the treatment of uncomplicated reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):431-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00534.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24976710
Citation
Triadafilopoulos G. Stretta: a valuable endoscopic treatment modality for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7730-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7730.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11275880
Citation
Feretis C, Benakis P, Dimopoulos C, Dailianas A, Filalithis P, Stamou KM, Manouras A, Apostolidis N. Endoscopic implantation of Plexiglas (PMMA) microspheres for the treatment of GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Apr;53(4):423-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.113912.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15647177
Citation
Cicala M, Gabbrielli A, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, Ribolsi M, Caviglia R, Costamagna G. Effect of endoscopic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (Gatekeeper reflux repair system) on intraoesophageal dynamic characteristics of acid reflux. Gut. 2005 Feb;54(2):183-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.040501.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15855987
Citation
Wong RF, Davis TV, Peterson KA. Complications involving the mediastinum after injection of Enteryx for GERD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 May;61(6):753-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02645-8. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
14595322
Citation
Chuttani R, Sud R, Sachdev G, Puri R, Kozarek R, Haber G, Pleskow D, Zaman M, Lembo A. A novel endoscopic full-thickness plicator for the treatment of GERD: A pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Nov;58(5):770-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02027-3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18443855
Citation
Cadiere GB, Buset M, Muls V, Rajan A, Rosch T, Eckardt AJ, Weerts J, Bastens B, Costamagna G, Marchese M, Louis H, Mana F, Sermon F, Gawlicka AK, Daniel MA, Deviere J. Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1676-88. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9594-9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12872107
Citation
Satodate H, Inoue H, Yoshida T, Usui S, Iwashita M, Fukami N, Shiokawa A, Kudo SE. Circumferential EMR of carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus: case report. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Aug;58(2):288-92. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.361. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25330784
Citation
Inoue H, Ito H, Ikeda H, Sato C, Sato H, Phalanusitthepha C, Hayee B, Eleftheriadis N, Kudo SE. Anti-reflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the absence of hiatus hernia: a pilot study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27(4):346-351.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
8784314
Citation
Velanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR, Tapia FV, Harkabus MA. Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Sep;183(3):217-24.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
35237316
Citation
Laquiere A, Trottier-Tellier F, Urena-Campos R, Lienne P, Lecomte L, Katsogiannou M, Penaranda G, Boustiere C. Evaluation of Antireflux Mucosectomy for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Medium-Term Results of a Pilot Study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 21;2022:1606944. doi: 10.1155/2022/1606944. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Endoscopic Resection in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs